Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Telamon" wrote in message ... They didn't ask the listeners and they did not listen to the stations that have good regional coverage. All 25 or 30 of them? Most of those stations, perhaps nearly all, do not care about anything except the strongest groundwave coverage areas. One would be enough but the number is a lot more than 25 to 30. No, it is actually not. You are perhaps missing the point that radio markets are not single cities or even counties. Chicago is an 11 county metro, for example. Very few signals cover it all. Only a couple get any significant listening outside the metro, either... despite pretty good coductivity there. So there are really only a handful of staitons by day, on AM, that cover adequately outside their radio market. And at night, there are even fewer due to interference, directionality, and the fact that AM is only listened to lightly at night demonstrates this. The number is basically the 25 former 1-As, plus a handful of the old 1-Bs. No former regionals get any really useful skywave, as the channels are too crowded. And some of the 1-As are chewed up at night by other stations, like KFI and KNX do to the East of the LA market. Do a nice little straight line history and project into the future the total AM listenership in the US and its age level. Within th enext decade, it will be almost entirely over 55, and down to about 6% to 7% of all radio listening. The only straight line I see is the HD driving listeners away evenings. Using statistics to predict the future is foolhardy at best. You don't know the future. The decline of AM listening is mostly a function of age. The band "average age" increases by 1 year every 18 months, nationally, and there are two whole rated generations that for all practical purposes don't use AM at all or only for some special occurrence. I steadfastly predict that Americans will continue to age one year each 12 months, so there will be ongoing ageing of AM listeners until the band is totally unprofitable. This will be hastened by the current "we already read the tea leaves" move of many AM news talk operators to transfer the format to FM and put the AM to some other niche use until it no longer produces anything. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 30, 12:19 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Telamon" wrote in message ... They didn't ask the listeners and they did not listen to the stations that have good regional coverage. All 25 or 30 of them? Most of those stations, perhaps nearly all, do not care about anything except the strongest groundwave coverage areas. One would be enough but the number is a lot more than 25 to 30. No, it is actually not. You are perhaps missing the point that radio markets are not single cities or even counties. Chicago is an 11 county metro, for example. Very few signals cover it all. Only a couple get any significant listening outside the metro, either... despite pretty good coductivity there. So there are really only a handful of staitons by day, on AM, that cover adequately outside their radio market. And at night, there are even fewer due to interference, directionality, and the fact that AM is only listened to lightly at night demonstrates this. The number is basically the 25 former 1-As, plus a handful of the old 1-Bs. No former regionals get any really useful skywave, as the channels are too crowded. And some of the 1-As are chewed up at night by other stations, like KFI and KNX do to the East of the LA market. Do a nice little straight line history and project into the future the total AM listenership in the US and its age level. Within th enext decade, it will be almost entirely over 55, and down to about 6% to 7% of all radio listening. The only straight line I see is the HD driving listeners away evenings. Using statistics to predict the future is foolhardy at best. You don't know the future. The decline of AM listening is mostly a function of age. The band "average age" increases by 1 year every 18 months, nationally, and there are two whole rated generations that for all practical purposes don't use AM at all or only for some special occurrence. I steadfastly predict that Americans will continue to age one year each 12 months, so there will be ongoing ageing of AM listeners until the band is totally unprofitable. This will be hastened by the current "we already read the tea leaves" move of many AM news talk operators to transfer the format to FM and put the AM to some other niche use until it no longer produces anything. Instead of posting this crap, you'd better start altering your web resume some more. Quick! |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... They didn't ask the listeners and they did not listen to the stations that have good regional coverage. All 25 or 30 of them? Most of those stations, perhaps nearly all, do not care about anything except the strongest groundwave coverage areas. One would be enough but the number is a lot more than 25 to 30. No, it is actually not. You are perhaps missing the point that radio markets are not single cities or even counties. Chicago is an 11 county metro, for example. Very few signals cover it all. Only a couple get any significant listening outside the metro, either... despite pretty good coductivity there. So there are really only a handful of staitons by day, on AM, that cover adequately outside their radio market. And at night, there are even fewer due to interference, directionality, and the fact that AM is only listened to lightly at night demonstrates this. The number is basically the 25 former 1-As, plus a handful of the old 1-Bs. No former regionals get any really useful skywave, as the channels are too crowded. And some of the 1-As are chewed up at night by other stations, like KFI and KNX do to the East of the LA market. Snip You are full of crap. KFI and KNX come in just fine here at night. I also regularly listen to KKOH out of Nevada, KOGO San Diego, KGO in San Francisco to name a few. I'm beginning to think you don't live in LA when you post this crap. They all come in well on a portable radio I hold in my hand so drop the jealousy act over my table top radios. You do not seem to know what can be picked up on the West coast at all. You seem to get your information from the Internet instead of actually listening to a radio. You are a real nut job pretender. How can you not know about the reception I get if you live in LA? I can only conclude you are full of crap and that you don't live in LA or anywhere on the West coast. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Telamon" wrote in message ... You are full of crap. KFI and KNX come in just fine here at night. I also regularly listen to KKOH out of Nevada, KOGO San Diego, KGO in San Francisco to name a few. I'm beginning to think you don't live in LA when you post this crap. They all come in well on a portable radio I hold in my hand so drop the jealousy act over my table top radios. Right. I said there were a handful of stations that get any kind of regional coverarage. KFI and KNX are licensed within the market you live in, although you are in an area outside the radio metro, but inside the TV metro (marketing terms like MSA and DMA were set up precisely so advertisers would know where the influence of a market's stations extends to... it's not arbitrary.... it is based on listening) where the signals may be receivable, but few people listen. KOGO is probably receivable as you are near the coast. I have no usable night signal in Glendale, as 600 is very congested inland. 780 and 810 are former 1 B clears. You have proven my case. Many 1 Bs shoot out over the water, but the As and usable B's combined are not even 1% of all the radio stations in the US, and none of them has registered skywave based listening in ratings for many, mnay years... decades perhaps. All we are looking at here is whether the FCC and the broadcast industry did the right thing. A sacrifice of a quantity of listening so small it is statistically not quantifiable looks to many to be a fair price to try to move AM to digital and to try to "reinvent" it. I happen to think AM is too dead to save in the long run, but standing in the way of perhaps its only chance to survive is also not appropriate. You do not seem to know what can be picked up on the West coast at all. You seem to get your information from the Internet instead of actually listening to a radio. I can get Kota Kinabalu many mornings, but that is no indication that anyone else in the US is listening to it. My point... what I have apparently failed to convey to you, is that reception of night skywave signals is not how 99.999% of people want to hear radio. The levels of such reception are so low that they do not register in radio ratings, where every listening incident is captured, including distant stations, in the current system. You are a real nut job pretender. How can you not know about the reception I get if you live in LA? I can only conclude you are full of crap and that you don't live in LA or anywhere on the West coast. The fact is that many LA stations are unusable to me, let alone distant ones. The noise level is so extreme that anything but a huge signal is not worth listening to. You are talking about a theoretical ability to pick up a station and I am talking about what people actually do when they listen to the radio. Our KTNQ, a 50 kw AM, of which a decade ago I was program director, did not have a usable night signal much of the time where I lived in Toluca Lake; it has no consistently usable signal in Orange County, either. And guess what: we got no diary mentions in those areas, either. Listeners don't seek out signals that sound bad. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() The fact is that many LA stations are unusable to me, let alone distant ones. The noise level is so extreme that anything but a huge signal is not worth listening to. .... Just go here and you can listen to your station with crystal clarity: http://www.knx1070.com http://www.kfi640.com http://www.kkoh.com http://www.kogo.com http://www.kgo.com |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 30, 10:16 am, SFTV_troy wrote:
The fact is that many LA stations are unusable to me, let alone distant ones. The noise level is so extreme that anything but a huge signal is not worth listening to. .... Just go here and you can listen to your station with crystal clarity:http://www.knx1070.com http://www.kfi640.comhttp://www.kkoh...://www.kgo.com SFTV - DOH ! - Internet Radio - Ain't Radio * It's Wire-to-Wire -aka- Telegraph / Telephone Free Over-the-Air Radio is Radio [.] SFTV, { DOH ! - Hybrid Digital Radio Fanatic } AM/MW "HD" Radio is 'by-design' Engineered to Interfer with the two Adjacent AM/MW Radio Channels at 10 kHz. http://electronicdesign.com/Files/29.../Figure_02.gif 1 - Sear This Graphic Into Your Minds Eye. 2 - Then Actually Listen To What AM/MW Radio Has Become Due To IBOC {HD} Radio Broadcasting. I Ask Myself : What IBOC ? All I See Is The Blinking Blue Light ! ~ RHF In That Distant Land* Where IBOC Fears To Go : Life Exists and Radio Listeners Live Beyond the 10mv/m Contour. * Twain Harte, CA -USA- |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 30, 1:16 pm, SFTV_troy wrote:
The fact is that many LA stations are unusable to me, let alone distant ones. The noise level is so extreme that anything but a huge signal is not worth listening to. .... Just go here and you can listen to your station with crystal clarity:http://www.knx1070.com http://www.kfi640.comhttp://www.kkoh...://www.kgo.com Except, if your other posts are correct, the internet could disappear at any minute. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 16:23:19 GMT, "David Eduardo"
wrote: Your methods are flawed. Listen to KGO tonight at 10P PDT. There's a huge community happening there. Live and local to the American West. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 30, 11:26 am, David wrote:
On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 16:23:19 GMT, "David Eduardo" wrote: Your methods are flawed. Listen to KGO tonight at 10P PDT. There's a huge community happening there. Live and local to the American West. Well no, on the weekends, don't list to KGO at 10PM. But Monday through Friday, that is a good suggestion. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 30, 1:49 pm, wrote:
On Sep 30, 11:26 am, David wrote: On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 16:23:19 GMT, "David Eduardo" wrote: Your methods are flawed. Listen to KGO tonight at 10P PDT. There's a huge community happening there. Live and local to the American West. Well no, on the weekends, don't list to KGO at 10PM. But Monday through Friday, that is a good suggestion. M...Sushi - OK - Why Not on the Week-Ends ? - iwtk ~ RHF |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
sony icf-sw1 motorboating earphone too | Shortwave | |||
WTB: Elmac PS2 or M-1070 p.s. | Swap | |||
motorboating in cascaded AF amplifier chain, help! | Homebrew | |||
KNX 1070 off air now 0900 Z | Shortwave | |||
Sony ICF-SW1 motorboating | Shortwave |