FA: Realistic DX-150A - Collector quality
Sorry for the blatant shilling, but it's possible someone here may be
interested in this. Yes, it's mine. http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...MESE:IT&ih=009 Jeff |
FA: Realistic DX-150A - Collector quality
On Sep 24, 8:29 am, David wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 06:29:32 -0400, "Unrevealed Source" wrote: Sorry for the blatant shilling, but it's possible someone here may be interested in this. Yes, it's mine. http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...=190155553202&... Jeff Isn't there a matching speaker? Don't be picky, please...rip something off a dead Drake. |
FA: Realistic DX-150A - Collector quality
"Steven" wrote in message oups.com... On Sep 24, 8:29 am, David wrote: On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 06:29:32 -0400, "Unrevealed Source" wrote: Sorry for the blatant shilling, but it's possible someone here may be interested in this. Yes, it's mine. http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...=190155553202&... Jeff Isn't there a matching speaker? Don't be picky, please...rip something off a dead Drake. How you gonna use part of a deceased duck for a speaker???? |
FA: Realistic DX-150A - Collector quality
On Sep 24, 6:29 am, "Unrevealed Source"
wrote: Sorry for the blatant shilling, but it's possible someone here may be interested in this. Yes, it's mine. http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...=190155553202&... Jeff They are a fun to use radio if you enjoy bandspread tuning. There are more similarities than differences between the 150, 150A, 150B and 160. However, in reference to the auction comments I would say the 150b had a slight edge because of the relatively improved selectivity from a mechanical filter and the 160 because of extended coverage. Best of luck with the auction. |
FA: Realistic DX-150A - Collector quality
On Sep 24, 7:42 am, "Brenda Ann" wrote:
"Steven" wrote in message oups.com... On Sep 24, 8:29 am, David wrote: On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 06:29:32 -0400, "Unrevealed Source" wrote: Sorry for the blatant shilling, but it's possible someone here may be interested in this. Yes, it's mine. http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...=190155553202&... Jeff Isn't there a matching speaker? Don't be picky, please...rip something off a dead Drake. How you gonna use part of a deceased duck for a speaker???? It's easier to spell than "Hammarlund" |
FA: Realistic DX-150A - Collector quality
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 06:29:32 -0400, "Unrevealed Source"
wrote: Sorry for the blatant shilling, but it's possible someone here may be interested in this. Yes, it's mine. http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...MESE:IT&ih=009 Jeff Isn't there a matching speaker? |
FA: Realistic DX-150A - Collector quality
On Sep 24, 2:23 pm, Clara Peller wrote:
Brenda Ann wrote: Isn't there a matching speaker? Don't be picky, please...rip something off a dead Drake. How you gonna use part of a deceased duck for a speaker???? He obviously took it to heart when I said "Parts is parts". How could I if I thought you died years ago...there's REALLY nobody back there now! |
FA: Realistic DX-150A - Collector quality
On Sep 24, 2:23 pm, Clara Peller wrote:
Brenda Ann wrote: Isn't there a matching speaker? Don't be picky, please...rip something off a dead Drake. How you gonna use part of a deceased duck for a speaker???? He obviously took it to heart when I said "Parts is parts". I think you died years ago so there's really nobody back there. |
FA: Realistic DX-150A - Collector quality
They are a fun to use radio if you enjoy bandspread tuning. There are more similarities than differences between the 150, 150A, 150B and 160. However, in reference to the auction comments I would say the 150b had a slight edge because of the relatively improved selectivity from a mechanical filter and the 160 because of extended coverage. If I had a choice, I'd pick the any of the 150-series units over the 160. The sound quality of the 160s are just awful-The filter is just too aggressive, with no way to switch it out for casual listening. -Scott |
FA: Realistic DX-150A - Collector quality
Scott W. Harvey wrote:
They are a fun to use radio if you enjoy bandspread tuning. There are more similarities than differences between the 150, 150A, 150B and 160. However, in reference to the auction comments I would say the 150b had a slight edge because of the relatively improved selectivity from a mechanical filter and the 160 because of extended coverage. If I had a choice, I'd pick the any of the 150-series units over the 160. The sound quality of the 160s are just awful-The filter is just too aggressive, with no way to switch it out for casual listening. -Scott There are two caps on the 160 you can replace that will widen up the audio nicely, without widening the IF bandwidth. Makes all the difference. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:52 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com