why?
 

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

Don't forget that he began posing as 'Eduardo' in late 1999 or early 2000!

Actually, I was using it on CIS in the 80's.

why?
 

David Frackelton Gleason, still having the audacity to pose as 'Eduardo', wrote:

"IBOCcrock" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Sep 26, 11:59 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

ups.com...

On Sep 26, 11:11 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:

So far as I'm concerned it doesn't matter at all. But I wonder if this
at least partially explains the enormous chip on your shoulder and
your persistent need to somehow 'prove yourself''.

Why would building a #1 station in a market with 40 signals at age 18
require proving myself... again? And actually, I went back to school
nearly
a decade later and did quite nicely, while at the same time programming a
group of radio stations.

The problem is that you just supposedly receieved a GED, which a poor-
man's high-school diploma.


And was a 4.0 GPA student at a fairly decent university.

Which one? Much like Michael Bryant, you're not to be trusted, and we'd like to
check.

why?
 

"Steve" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Sep 26, 2:39 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:

And you graduated? With what...a degree in journalism?


No, I did not. When I went back to school, I wanted to study what I thought
useful and relevant, not a proscribed specialization or major with course
requirements. I took everything from sociology and cultural anthropology to
statistics, math and literature. I only took one broadcast course, in fact.
I quit the university when a headhunter convinced me that running a radio
group was going to be more productive than getting a degree the employer did
not care one hoot about, anyway.

why?
 

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Frackelton Gleason, still having the audacity to pose as 'Eduardo',
wrote:

"IBOCcrock" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Sep 26, 11:59 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

ups.com...

On Sep 26, 11:11 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:

So far as I'm concerned it doesn't matter at all. But I wonder if
this
at least partially explains the enormous chip on your shoulder and
your persistent need to somehow 'prove yourself''.

Why would building a #1 station in a market with 40 signals at age 18
require proving myself... again? And actually, I went back to school
nearly
a decade later and did quite nicely, while at the same time
programming a
group of radio stations.

The problem is that you just supposedly receieved a GED, which a poor-
man's high-school diploma.


And was a 4.0 GPA student at a fairly decent university.

Which one? Much like Michael Bryant, you're not to be trusted, and we'd
like to
check.

ASU, school of business.

why?
 

On Sep 26, 3:02 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

ups.com...

On Sep 26, 2:39 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:

And you graduated? With what...a degree in journalism?

No, I did not. When I went back to school, I wanted to study what I thought
useful and relevant, not a proscribed specialization or major with course
requirements. I took everything from sociology and cultural anthropology to
statistics, math and literature. I only took one broadcast course, in fact.
I quit the university when a headhunter convinced me that running a radio
group was going to be more productive than getting a degree the employer did
not care one hoot about, anyway.

That's fine. I don't care about your career path, but you must realize
that no one is going to be impressed by the GPA of a person who never
crossed the finish line. That's like boasting that you once led the
Boston Marathon...for the first five seconds.

why?
 

"Steve" wrote in message
s.com...
On Sep 26, 3:02 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

ups.com...

On Sep 26, 2:39 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:

And you graduated? With what...a degree in journalism?

No, I did not. When I went back to school, I wanted to study what I
thought
useful and relevant, not a proscribed specialization or major with course
requirements. I took everything from sociology and cultural anthropology
to
statistics, math and literature. I only took one broadcast course, in
fact.
I quit the university when a headhunter convinced me that running a radio
group was going to be more productive than getting a degree the employer
did
not care one hoot about, anyway.

That's fine. I don't care about your career path, but you must realize
that no one is going to be impressed by the GPA of a person who never
crossed the finish line. That's like boasting that you once led the
Boston Marathon...for the first five seconds.


Not the same. I am in a field where the ability to perform is measured, not
the ability to complete classes. There are no degrees required in most
positions, in fact. Except for entry level positions, educational background
is pretty much ignored.

why?
 

Winter time of 1972/1973,,,, I went to Raymond Junior College
(www.devilfinder.com look it up) on the G.I.Bill night times, welding
classes, after I finished up with driving my bread truck route for
Sunbeam Bakery.(y'all know why Little Miss Sunbeam can't get pregnant?
No holes!) I can weld anything but the crack of Dawn, and Dawn was a
good old gal.
cuhulin

why?
 

On Sep 26, 3:12 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

s.com...





On Sep 26, 3:02 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

roups.com...

On Sep 26, 2:39 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:

And you graduated? With what...a degree in journalism?

No, I did not. When I went back to school, I wanted to study what I
thought
useful and relevant, not a proscribed specialization or major with course
requirements. I took everything from sociology and cultural anthropology
to
statistics, math and literature. I only took one broadcast course, in
fact.
I quit the university when a headhunter convinced me that running a radio
group was going to be more productive than getting a degree the employer
did
not care one hoot about, anyway.

That's fine. I don't care about your career path, but you must realize
that no one is going to be impressed by the GPA of a person who never
crossed the finish line. That's like boasting that you once led the
Boston Marathon...for the first five seconds.

Not the same. I am in a field where the ability to perform is measured, not
the ability to complete classes.

If you look around, I think you'll find that this is true in most
areas of business.

There are no degrees required in most
positions, in fact. Except for entry level positions, educational background
is pretty much ignored

That's fine, and consistent with everything I said. The point is that,
since education matters so little in your field, it's odd to see you
crowing about your college GPA while conveniently failing to volunteer
that you never graduated.

why?
 

"Steve" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Sep 26, 3:12 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:

That's fine, and consistent with everything I said. The point is that,
since education matters so little in your field, it's odd to see you
crowing about your college GPA while conveniently failing to volunteer
that you never graduated.


I have even spoken at industry seminars about the inapplicability of
communications and broadcast courses of study, since they miss so much of
the social sciences and the technical disciplines like math and statistics
as well as the business courses needed in the business. I am proud to have
created my own broadcast curriculum, even if would never have gotten me a
degree.

why?
 

David Eduardo wrote:

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...

The loss of love of Broadcasting by DXers is something that is, itself,
a very late development. Most DXers didn't lose the love of broadcasting,
until they were openly discounted, disrepected, and held in open contempt
by broadcasters.

The broadcasters, particularly engineers, I have spoken with, find that
DXers started becoming less pro-radio as AM quit being a music medium and
lots of stations didniche formats like religion, ethnic, etc., or went talk
with networked content on 600 affiliates.

Something broadcasters, themselves, have been doing for far more than
the handful of years that DXers have been responding with disdain to.

Disagree. I think broadcasters have a greate deal of interest in local
listeners, and spend more than ever to determine their likes and dislikes
and overall preferences.

Broadcasters have been spitting in the face of DXers for at least 30
years that I can recall. Sometimes, one on one. Sometimes, as Mark Byford
did at BBCWS, in mass media presentations, and in direct messages on his
own radio stations.

I know lots of broadcasters who caution talk hosts or programmers to ignore
out of market listening of any kind, since the business model has moved away
from taking such listeners into account as driven by advertisers.

Imagine the gall of a shortwave broadcaster telling his listeners, en
masse, that his programming was intended for 'decision makers and opinion
formers' and would be made preferentially available to them, while
eliminating service to hundreds of millions of listeners at a stroke,
because they simply weren't elite enough.

And there are new SW broadcasters every week? SW is a good indication that
the audience has moved on to better technologies.

We're not talking about local radio, here. We're talking about a
shortwave broadcaster. DX by design. With more than 120 million listeners
worldwide. Told in no uncertain terms that they were of no importance, and
not worth being served.

And ever-declining. I looked at radio ratings in Ecuador in the late 60's
when there were many, many SW stations. Never saw one, local or national or
international even mentioned. The motive for SW, getting remote listeners,
is better served (except in controlled nations) by the web and other options
such as local broadcast of national or even foreign shows.

You think that may have something to do with loss of passion for
broadcasting? It sure turned my radio dial in a hurry.

No, in the SW case, it is a loss of listener need for SW and its
comparitively lower quality.

I've worked at radio stations where the engineers were not permitted to
respond to listener reception reports because, and this is a quote by the
GM, "They're not worth the postage." This was in 1977.

That sounds reasonable. More than the postage, it is the wasted time. As
more and more stations became competitive in each market, doing useless
things was closely monitored. 1977 was the year that nationally FM surpassed
half of all listening.

He's by far not exclusive in my work experience.

Something you've demonstrated for some months here, yourself.

Actually, in LA our DoE is a ham. The company let him put a 10 meter relay
on our roof, in fact. And we answer valid reports. But for every one of
those, we get a bunch that are fabrications... based on streaming listening
or "I heard your station plesase QSL" and no RP.

You think that may have something to do with DXer disdain?

Self inflicted, I think.

DXers have been enthusiasts for broadcasting until only a few years ago.
They've stood by those who echo your sentiments for more than 20 years
while being openly and personally dissed by Broadcasting.

Again, for a reason. Read AM (DX News, etc) publications and see the
constant ragging about synidcated overnight shows, etc.

How dare you display the temerity to imply that the problem is with
DXers. Look within your own ranks. Why the hell would ANYONE remain loyal
to an industry which speaks of them the way Broadcasting speaks of
Dx...the way YOU speak of DX.

As a DXer, I am dismayed by the attitudes... when you have DXers in their
public message boards calling companies "Cheap Channel" and "Idiotvision" it
does not take much to write the whole community off.

Fans don't leave without cause, David. Enthusiasm doesn't die. It's
murdered.

DXers are not fans, today. And what used to be viewed as amusing is now
viewed as annoying.

The first slap in the face came from broadcaster themselves. Look in
your own house before you dare point a finger at your listeners.

With more stations came tighter budgeting... and a lot of engineers with
multiple stations to deal with... and these engineers are of a generation
that does not know what DX is, and don't care.

And Broadcasting has been holding that smoking gun for decades. YOU have
pulled the trigger here, more times than I can count...in this thread
alone.

How dare you.

You arrogant son of a bitch.

We have been collectively pushed to the point of dismay by DXers...
particularly the amount of totally fake reception reports that come in.

I've met DX'ers, and Eduardo, you're no DX'er.

You're not Hispanic either.

why?
 

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Frackelton Gleason, still having the audacity to pose as 'Eduardo',
wrote:

"IBOCcrock" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Sep 26, 11:59 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

ups.com...

On Sep 26, 11:11 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:

So far as I'm concerned it doesn't matter at all. But I wonder if
this
at least partially explains the enormous chip on your shoulder and
your persistent need to somehow 'prove yourself''.

Why would building a #1 station in a market with 40 signals at age 18
require proving myself... again? And actually, I went back to school
nearly
a decade later and did quite nicely, while at the same time
programming a
group of radio stations.

The problem is that you just supposedly receieved a GED, which a poor-
man's high-school diploma.


And was a 4.0 GPA student at a fairly decent university.

Which one? Much like Michael Bryant, you're not to be trusted, and we'd
like to
check.

ASU, school of business.

What years, and just what is 'ASU'?

why?
 

Steve wrote:

On Sep 26, 3:12 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

s.com...





On Sep 26, 3:02 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

roups.com...

On Sep 26, 2:39 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:

And you graduated? With what...a degree in journalism?

No, I did not. When I went back to school, I wanted to study what I
thought
useful and relevant, not a proscribed specialization or major with course
requirements. I took everything from sociology and cultural anthropology
to
statistics, math and literature. I only took one broadcast course, in
fact.
I quit the university when a headhunter convinced me that running a radio
group was going to be more productive than getting a degree the employer
did
not care one hoot about, anyway.

That's fine. I don't care about your career path, but you must realize
that no one is going to be impressed by the GPA of a person who never
crossed the finish line. That's like boasting that you once led the
Boston Marathon...for the first five seconds.

Not the same. I am in a field where the ability to perform is measured, not
the ability to complete classes.

If you look around, I think you'll find that this is true in most
areas of business.

There are no degrees required in most
positions, in fact. Except for entry level positions, educational background
is pretty much ignored

That's fine, and consistent with everything I said. The point is that,
since education matters so little in your field, it's odd to see you
crowing about your college GPA while conveniently failing to volunteer
that you never graduated.

That's our Edweenie! He'll be fraudulent until his dying day.

why?
 

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

ASU, school of business.

What years,

'72-'74

and just what is 'ASU'?

Sun Devils.... etc.

why?
 

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

ASU, school of business.

What years,

'72-'74

How many credits at 'ASU'?

You've claimed in the past to have 140 college credits, and to have gone to
'college' in both Ecuador and Puerto Rico.

why?
 

On Sep 26, 3:44 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

oups.com...

On Sep 26, 3:12 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:

That's fine, and consistent with everything I said. The point is that,
since education matters so little in your field, it's odd to see you
crowing about your college GPA while conveniently failing to volunteer
that you never graduated.

I have even spoken at industry seminars about the inapplicability of
communications and broadcast courses of study, since they miss so much of
the social sciences and the technical disciplines like math and statistics
as well as the business courses needed in the business. I am proud to have
created my own broadcast curriculum, even if would never have gotten me a
degree.

That's great...and consistent with everything I said. Since a formal
education is so unimportant in your field, I'm sure you will no longer
be tempted to boast about your GPA while failing to mention that you
never graduated. Of course, that you boast about it at all suggests
that it is, in your view, of some importance. And your failure to
mention that you never graduated is, again, like someone's boasting
that they once led the Boston Marathon while neglecting to mention
that they led only for the first five seconds. You aren't doing
yourself any favors today.

why?
 

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

ASU, school of business.

What years,

'72-'74

How many credits at 'ASU'?

I think it is about 110... have no exact idea (including transfer credits)

You've claimed in the past to have 140 college credits, and to have gone
to
'college' in both Ecuador and Puerto Rico.


I have about 30 loose credits from PR and college credit training. I also
have totally non-transferable credits from two universities in Ecuador. The
point is that the total number is irrelevant, as they can not be combined
for a degree and I have no interest in a degree...

why?
 

"Steve" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Sep 26, 3:44 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

oups.com...

On Sep 26, 3:12 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:

That's fine, and consistent with everything I said. The point is that,
since education matters so little in your field, it's odd to see you
crowing about your college GPA while conveniently failing to volunteer
that you never graduated.

I have even spoken at industry seminars about the inapplicability of
communications and broadcast courses of study, since they miss so much of
the social sciences and the technical disciplines like math and
statistics
as well as the business courses needed in the business. I am proud to
have
created my own broadcast curriculum, even if would never have gotten me a
degree.

That's great...and consistent with everything I said. Since a formal
education is so unimportant in your field, I'm sure you will no longer
be tempted to boast about your GPA while failing to mention that you
never graduated. Of course, that you boast about it at all suggests
that it is, in your view, of some importance.

Education, whether via work experience, seminars, home study, or in a
classrom is important. But at the end of the day, the value of a degree
declines the further one is into a career where evaluations are made based
on career, not academic success.

And your failure to
mention that you never graduated is, again, like someone's boasting
that they once led the Boston Marathon while neglecting to mention
that they led only for the first five seconds. You aren't doing
yourself any favors today.


I never said I did graduate. I said I attended college; someone who
graduated would mention the degree and the major.

why?
 

On Sep 26, 4:13 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

ups.com...





On Sep 26, 3:44 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

groups.com...

On Sep 26, 3:12 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:

That's fine, and consistent with everything I said. The point is that,
since education matters so little in your field, it's odd to see you
crowing about your college GPA while conveniently failing to volunteer
that you never graduated.

I have even spoken at industry seminars about the inapplicability of
communications and broadcast courses of study, since they miss so much of
the social sciences and the technical disciplines like math and
statistics
as well as the business courses needed in the business. I am proud to
have
created my own broadcast curriculum, even if would never have gotten me a
degree.

That's great...and consistent with everything I said. Since a formal
education is so unimportant in your field, I'm sure you will no longer
be tempted to boast about your GPA while failing to mention that you
never graduated. Of course, that you boast about it at all suggests
that it is, in your view, of some importance.

Education, whether via work experience, seminars, home study, or in a
classrom is important. But at the end of the day, the value of a degree
declines the further one is into a career where evaluations are made based
on career, not academic success.

Ah but in that case, since you are well beyond your school days, your
GPA boasts make little sense. Either that or your formal education is
more of an issue than you let on.


And your failure to
mention that you never graduated is, again, like someone's boasting
that they once led the Boston Marathon while neglecting to mention
that they led only for the first five seconds. You aren't doing
yourself any favors today.

I never said I did graduate. I said I attended college; someone who
graduated would mention the degree and the major.

Correct. Yours was a sin of omission, not commission, but dishonest
all the same--and still further evidence that you do not, after all,
view formal education as of little importance for someone senior in
your profession.

why?
 

David Frackelton Gleason, still attempting to keep 'Eduardo' alive, wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

Don't forget that he began posing as 'Eduardo' in late 1999 or early 2000!

Actually, I was using it on CIS in the 80's.

CIS? Come on Mr. Acronym... stop BS'ing everyone. You didn't dream up the
'Eduardo' shtick until mucho later!

why?
 

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Frackelton Gleason, still attempting to keep 'Eduardo' alive, wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

Don't forget that he began posing as 'Eduardo' in late 1999 or early
2000!

Actually, I was using it on CIS in the 80's.

CIS? Come on Mr. Acronym... stop BS'ing everyone. You didn't dream up the
'Eduardo' shtick until mucho later!

Sorry. As habitual as your weekend binging, you are wrong.... again.

why?
 

On Sep 27, 9:20 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message

...



David Frackelton Gleason, still attempting to keep 'Eduardo' alive, wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

Don't forget that he began posing as 'Eduardo' in late 1999 or early
2000!

Actually, I was using it on CIS in the 80's.

CIS? Come on Mr. Acronym... stop BS'ing everyone. You didn't dream up the
'Eduardo' shtick until mucho later!

Sorry. As habitual as your weekend binging, you are wrong.... again.

It's not DxAce's fault that you never graduate from high school. Nor
did he force you to misrepresent your academic credentials. You did
that.

why?
 

"Steve" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Sep 27, 9:20 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message

...



David Frackelton Gleason, still attempting to keep 'Eduardo' alive,
wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

Don't forget that he began posing as 'Eduardo' in late 1999 or early
2000!

Actually, I was using it on CIS in the 80's.

CIS? Come on Mr. Acronym... stop BS'ing everyone. You didn't dream up
the
'Eduardo' shtick until mucho later!

Sorry. As habitual as your weekend binging, you are wrong.... again.

It's not DxAce's fault that you never graduate from high school.

I'm quite proud of that fact; I was able to leave school and create an
innovative and very successful radio station while a teenager. Given the
quality of US education, I did not miss anything, either.

Nor
did he force you to misrepresent your academic credentials. You did
that.

Huh?

You are a real whack job when something that is so crystal clear that a copy
of it is posted on the web is seen by you to be a misrepresentation.

why?
 

On Sep 27, 11:57 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

ups.com...

You misrepresented your college education. You, of course, know this.

Never did.

I understand you also once led the Boston Marathon (for five seconds).

why?
 

David Eduardo wrote:

"Steve" wrote in message
ups.com...

You misrepresented your college education. You, of course, know this.

Never did.

Liar!

why?
 

I don't know which crazy newsgroup I want to go to next.McHale's Navy is
on Radio tb now.That's as good as any.
cuhulin

why?
 

Wheres ''education'' dudette at? When I go pee and then get back to
doggy's couch,,, I have to be extry special carefull.What I do is, I use
my right hand to shove her out of the way so my 280 pounds of blubber
gut won't sit down on her.
cuhulin

why?
 

On Sep 27, 11:57 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

ups.com...

You misrepresented your college education. You, of course, know this.

Never did.

Always do.

why?
 

David Frackelton Gleason, still screwing up whilst posing as 'Eduardo', the faux
Hispanic, wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

ASU, school of business.

What years,

'72-'74

You'd better check your bio! It says you started ASU in 1973.

The problem you pathological liars most often have is that of keeping your story
straight.

why?
 

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Frackelton Gleason, still screwing up whilst posing as 'Eduardo',
the faux
Hispanic, wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

ASU, school of business.

What years,

'72-'74

You'd better check your bio! It says you started ASU in 1973.

The problem you pathological liars most often have is that of keeping your
story
straight.

What's the difference? The September to June term ENDED in 1973; you are
playing the same game folks in radio did when we played "spot the
difference" between AP and UPI wire copy. Two reporters, same story,
slightly different ways of seeing it... both factual, though.

why?
 

David Frackelton Gleason, trying hard to keep his story straight as 'Eduardo',
wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Frackelton Gleason, still screwing up whilst posing as 'Eduardo',
the faux
Hispanic, wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

ASU, school of business.

What years,

'72-'74

You'd better check your bio! It says you started ASU in 1973.

The problem you pathological liars most often have is that of keeping your
story
straight.

What's the difference? The September to June term ENDED in 1973; you are
playing the same game folks in radio did when we played "spot the
difference" between AP and UPI wire copy. Two reporters, same story,
slightly different ways of seeing it... both factual, though.

LMFAO

why?
 

On Sep 29, 12:49 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message

...







David Frackelton Gleason, still screwing up whilst posing as 'Eduardo',
the faux
Hispanic, wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

ASU, school of business.

What years,

'72-'74

You'd better check your bio! It says you started ASU in 1973.

The problem you pathological liars most often have is that of keeping your
story
straight.

What's the difference?

Between telling the truth and deception? If you haven't figured that
out yet, you probably aren't going to.

The September to June term ENDED in 1973; you are
playing the same game folks in radio did when we played "spot the
difference" between AP and UPI wire copy. Two reporters, same story,
slightly different ways of seeing it... both factual, though.

What's factual is that you attempted to deceive the readers of this
group about your academic history. I don't give a rat's ass whether
you attended ASU for one semester or ten years, but lying about your
academic accomplishments (or the lack thereof) is pathetic. A man your
age should have learned that by now, but I suppose some people never
do.

why?
 

On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 12:54:09 -0400, dxAce
wrote:



David Frackelton Gleason, trying hard to keep his story straight as 'Eduardo',
wrote:

get a clue retard

"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"
adams

woger you are a Congress all in your own head

http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/

and get ou the newly recovered KB9RQZ.blogspot.com as well

G

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

why?
 

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


What's the difference? The September to June term ENDED in 1973; you are
playing the same game folks in radio did when we played "spot the
difference" between AP and UPI wire copy. Two reporters, same story,
slightly different ways of seeing it... both factual, though.

LMFAO

You find humor in the strangest things.

why?
 

"Steve" wrote in message
ups.com...

What's factual is that you attempted to deceive the readers of this
group about your academic history. I don't give a rat's ass whether
you attended ASU for one semester or ten years, but lying about your
academic accomplishments (or the lack thereof) is pathetic.

You are making, just like DXass, assumptions on your own. In other words,
misinterpreting facts, and creating the equivalent of black helicopter
conspiracies. Makes me wonder what percentage of dxAsses loggings are fake,
done with other peoples reports or from internet data.

why?
 

David Frackelton Gleason, posing as 'Eduardo', gave it his best shot and wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


What's the difference? The September to June term ENDED in 1973; you are
playing the same game folks in radio did when we played "spot the
difference" between AP and UPI wire copy. Two reporters, same story,
slightly different ways of seeing it... both factual, though.

LMFAO

You find humor in the strangest things.

Yes, you are indeed a strange thing!

why?
 

David Eduardo wrote:

"Steve" wrote in message
ups.com...

What's factual is that you attempted to deceive the readers of this
group about your academic history. I don't give a rat's ass whether
you attended ASU for one semester or ten years, but lying about your
academic accomplishments (or the lack thereof) is pathetic.

You are making, just like DXass, assumptions on your own. In other words,
misinterpreting facts, and creating the equivalent of black helicopter
conspiracies. Makes me wonder what percentage of dxAsses loggings are fake,
done with other peoples reports or from internet data.

0