Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ken wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 13:09:45 -0700, SFTV_troy wrote: Frankly I'm a bit surprised at the reaction. There's currently a transition from analog to digital broadcasting (both in American and the European Union), and there will be some growing pains, but it's only temporary. In the LONG TERM, the digital radio will provide better sound than the current analog (like upgrading FM Stereo to 300 kbps Surround). No, they are going to increase quantity (more radio channels), not sound quality. See how they done in UK. I agree with you. Mostly. I think that most U.S. stations like Top 40 or Rock will try to squeeze as many programs as possible into their 200 kilohertz channel, but I think other stations like Classical will go for higher-quality 300 kbps Surround sound, because their listeners demand the best-possible. BTW, the HD Radio uses HE-AAC and can achieve FM quality as low as 64 kbps. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
172.208.21.59, feeling worse each day | CB | |||
NG is getting worse ! | CB | |||
Just when you thought it couldn't get any worse... | Policy | |||
Looks like my CB NewsGroup is getting WORSE ! | CB | |||
Twithed getting worse.... | CB |