DRM -Ain't- IBOC
 

In article . com,
SFTV_troy wrote:

David Eduardo wrote:
"SFTV_troy" wrote in message

There is no technical difference. Both HD radio and DRM operate on
the same principles:
- 2 separate signals
- 1 analog
- 1 digital
- the digital is simulcast "next to" the original analog signal


No, DRM is 100% digital. To run analog simultaneously you need a separate
frequency. Some testing is being done, like that in Mexico, by placing the
DRM signal on the adjacent AM channel... a station on 1060 is going to have
DRM on 1070.

And I repeat:

HD radio works the same way. The digital signal sits *next to* the
station at 1070.

If you took a buss how many people would sit down next to you?

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

DRM -Ain't- IBOC
 

On Oct 11, 8:16 pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article . com,





SFTV_troy wrote:
David Eduardo wrote:
"SFTV_troy" wrote in message

There is no technical difference. Both HD radio and DRM operate on
the same principles:
- 2 separate signals
- 1 analog
- 1 digital
- the digital is simulcast "next to" the original analog signal

No, DRM is 100% digital. To run analog simultaneously you need a separate
frequency. Some testing is being done, like that in Mexico, by placing the
DRM signal on the adjacent AM channel... a station on 1060 is going to have
DRM on 1070.

And I repeat:

HD radio works the same way. The digital signal sits *next to* the
station at 1070.

If you took a buss how many people would sit down next to you?

The owner of the store selling the fuses. If they are littelfuses, he
might get away with it.

DRM -Ain't- IBOC
 

On Oct 11, 8:16 pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article . com,





SFTV_troy wrote:
David Eduardo wrote:
"SFTV_troy" wrote in message

There is no technical difference. Both HD radio and DRM operate on
the same principles:
- 2 separate signals
- 1 analog
- 1 digital
- the digital is simulcast "next to" the original analog signal

No, DRM is 100% digital. To run analog simultaneously you need a separate
frequency. Some testing is being done, like that in Mexico, by placing the
DRM signal on the adjacent AM channel... a station on 1060 is going to have
DRM on 1070.

And I repeat:

HD radio works the same way. The digital signal sits *next to* the
station at 1070.

If you took a buss how many people would sit down next to you?

The owner of the store selling the fuses. If they are littelfuses, he
might get away with it.

DRM -Ain't- IBOC
 

On Oct 11, 8:44 pm, Steven wrote:
On Oct 11, 8:16 pm, Telamon





wrote:
In article . com,

SFTV_troy wrote:
David Eduardo wrote:
"SFTV_troy" wrote in message

There is no technical difference. Both HD radio and DRM operate on
the same principles:
- 2 separate signals
- 1 analog
- 1 digital
- the digital is simulcast "next to" the original analog signal

No, DRM is 100% digital. To run analog simultaneously you need a separate
frequency. Some testing is being done, like that in Mexico, by placing the
DRM signal on the adjacent AM channel... a station on 1060 is going to have
DRM on 1070.

And I repeat:

HD radio works the same way. The digital signal sits *next to* the
station at 1070.

If you took a buss how many people would sit down next to you?

The owner of the store selling the fuses. If they are littelfuses, he
might get away with it.

AH! STEREO FUSES!

DRM -Ain't- IBOC
 

On Oct 11, 11:53 am, RHF wrote:
On Oct 11, 5:48 am, SFTV_troy wrote:





RHF wrote:
On Oct 9, 10:13 am, SFTV_troy wrote:
Hein ten Horn wrote:
wrote:

Okay. By that reasoning, because HD Radio sits "next to" the AM
signal, then it is not IBOC either. It is a simulcast format.
Do you agree with that statement?

As a whole? No.

- There is no technical difference.
- Both HD radio and DRM operate on the same principles:
- 2 separate signals
- 1 analog
- 1 digital
- the digital is simulcast "next to" the original analog signal

iBquity's IBOC Broadcast System is 'Intrinsic'
DRM's Simulcast Broadcast Scheme is NOT 'Intrinsic'

- That distinction is more about FAITH, than reality.

- There's no real difference between DRM's version
- (sitting next-to the AM signal) and HD's version
- (also sitting next-to the AM signal).


- SFTV,
-
- BLATANTLY TECNICALLY WRONG !
- ARE YOU SURE YOU ARE AN "EE" ?
-
- us lesser beings would like proof ~ RHF
- .

SFTV,

IBOC AM/MW "HD" Radio - Hybrid Mode
http://www.dallas.net/~jvpoll/rfi/AM...BOC_Mask10.gif
- Lower Digital Sidebands {Co-SideBand}
* Analog Host Signal (Mono) {Nested}
+ Upper Digital Sidebands {Co-SideBand}
-Note- The IBOC Signa supports the current AM Mono Signal as well as
the Digital {IBOC} Signal. Provides for 40kbps Data Rate, for Full
Stereo plus a Low Speed Data Path. Audio 36kbps, Song Title and Artist
4kbps .
http://www.rthk.org.hk/about/digital...#slide0143.htm

DRM -Ain't- IBOC
 

RHF wrote:
On Oct 12, 8:52 am, SFTV_troy wrote:
RHF wrote:
On Oct 11, 5:48 am, SFTV_troy

- There's no real difference between DRM's version
- (sitting next-to the AM signal) and HD's version
- (also sitting next-to the AM signal).

IBOC AM/MW "HD" Radio - Hybrid Mode
http://www.dallas.net/~jvpoll/rfi/AM...BOC_Mask10.gif
- Lower Digital Sidebands {Co-SideBand}
* Analog Host Signal (Mono) {Nested}
+ Upper Digital Sidebands {Co-SideBand}

- Thanks for proving my point. HD sits *next to* the AM signal (+/-

- 10 kHz). Same as DRM sits *next to* the AM signal (+/- 10 kHz).



DRM = Simulcast without Specification {Sans-Mask}
x x x Does Not Equal x x x
IBOC = Intrinsic {Mask} : Nested Analog + Two Digital Co-Sidebands



I still don't see the difference. Both standards are using sidebands,
adjacent to the analog AM signal.

DRM -Ain't- IBOC
 

RHF wrote:
On Oct 12, 8:52 am, SFTV_troy wrote:
RHF wrote:
On Oct 11, 5:48 am, SFTV_troy

- There's no real difference between DRM's version
- (sitting next-to the AM signal) and HD's version
- (also sitting next-to the AM signal).

IBOC AM/MW "HD" Radio - Hybrid Mode
http://www.dallas.net/~jvpoll/rfi/AM...BOC_Mask10.gif
- Lower Digital Sidebands {Co-SideBand}
* Analog Host Signal (Mono) {Nested}
+ Upper Digital Sidebands {Co-SideBand}

- Thanks for proving my point. HD sits *next to* the AM signal (+/-

- 10 kHz). Same as DRM sits *next to* the AM signal (+/- 10 kHz).



DRM = Simulcast without Specification {Sans-Mask}
x x x Does Not Equal x x x
IBOC = Intrinsic {Mask} : Nested Analog + Two Digital Co-Sidebands



I still don't see the difference. Both standards are using sidebands,
adjacent to the analog AM signal.

DRM -Ain't- IBOC
 

"SFTV_troy" wrote in message
ps.com...

RHF wrote:
On Oct 12, 8:52 am, SFTV_troy wrote:
RHF wrote:
On Oct 11, 5:48 am, SFTV_troy

- There's no real difference between DRM's version
- (sitting next-to the AM signal) and HD's version
- (also sitting next-to the AM signal).

IBOC AM/MW "HD" Radio - Hybrid Mode
http://www.dallas.net/~jvpoll/rfi/AM...BOC_Mask10.gif
- Lower Digital Sidebands {Co-SideBand}
* Analog Host Signal (Mono) {Nested}
+ Upper Digital Sidebands {Co-SideBand}

- Thanks for proving my point. HD sits *next to* the AM signal (+/-

- 10 kHz). Same as DRM sits *next to* the AM signal (+/- 10 kHz).



DRM = Simulcast without Specification {Sans-Mask}
x x x Does Not Equal x x x
IBOC = Intrinsic {Mask} : Nested Analog + Two Digital Co-Sidebands



I still don't see the difference. Both standards are using sidebands,
adjacent to the analog AM signal.

DRM is not using a sideband; to do analog and digital requires a separate
transmitter for each on a separate carrier frequency. HD is a combined
analog and digital signal on the same carrier frequency. DRM is digital
only... if you want analog, you have to have a separate channel, close to or
not to the DRM one.

DRM -Ain't- IBOC
 

On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 10:05:11 -0700, "David Eduardo"
wrote:


"SFTV_troy" wrote in message
ups.com...

RHF wrote:
On Oct 12, 8:52 am, SFTV_troy wrote:
RHF wrote:
On Oct 11, 5:48 am, SFTV_troy

- There's no real difference between DRM's version
- (sitting next-to the AM signal) and HD's version
- (also sitting next-to the AM signal).

IBOC AM/MW "HD" Radio - Hybrid Mode
http://www.dallas.net/~jvpoll/rfi/AM...BOC_Mask10.gif
- Lower Digital Sidebands {Co-SideBand}
* Analog Host Signal (Mono) {Nested}
+ Upper Digital Sidebands {Co-SideBand}

- Thanks for proving my point. HD sits *next to* the AM signal (+/-

- 10 kHz). Same as DRM sits *next to* the AM signal (+/- 10 kHz).



DRM = Simulcast without Specification {Sans-Mask}
x x x Does Not Equal x x x
IBOC = Intrinsic {Mask} : Nested Analog + Two Digital Co-Sidebands



I still don't see the difference. Both standards are using sidebands,
adjacent to the analog AM signal.

DRM is not using a sideband; to do analog and digital requires a separate
transmitter for each on a separate carrier frequency. HD is a combined
analog and digital signal on the same carrier frequency. DRM is digital
only... if you want analog, you have to have a separate channel, close to or
not to the DRM one.


Exactly. DRM is a separate signal that can go wherever the operator
chooses. He may elect to place it next to his AM transmitter or the
regulator may force him to place it there so any interference will be
to his own service. Whatever, the signal will appear at only one point
in the spectrum. It is not a sideband of the AM.

HD, on the other hand is an actual sideband of the AM carrier. There
are two digital channels available, the primary and the secondary.
Each of them occupies 5kHz either side of the AM carrier, the primary
from 10 to 15kHz, and the secondary from 5 to 10kHz. The HD signal is
irrevocably combined with its host AM service.

d

--
Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com

DRM -Ain't- IBOC
 

David Eduardo wrote:

"SFTV_troy" wrote in message
ps.com...

RHF wrote:
On Oct 12, 8:52 am, SFTV_troy wrote:
RHF wrote:
On Oct 11, 5:48 am, SFTV_troy

- There's no real difference between DRM's version
- (sitting next-to the AM signal) and HD's version
- (also sitting next-to the AM signal).

IBOC AM/MW "HD" Radio - Hybrid Mode
http://www.dallas.net/~jvpoll/rfi/AM...BOC_Mask10.gif
- Lower Digital Sidebands {Co-SideBand}
* Analog Host Signal (Mono) {Nested}
+ Upper Digital Sidebands {Co-SideBand}

- Thanks for proving my point. HD sits *next to* the AM signal (+/-

- 10 kHz). Same as DRM sits *next to* the AM signal (+/- 10 kHz).



DRM = Simulcast without Specification {Sans-Mask}
x x x Does Not Equal x x x
IBOC = Intrinsic {Mask} : Nested Analog + Two Digital Co-Sidebands



I still don't see the difference. Both standards are using sidebands,
adjacent to the analog AM signal.

DRM is not using a sideband; to do analog and digital requires a separate
transmitter for each on a separate carrier frequency. HD is a combined
analog and digital signal on the same carrier frequency. DRM is digital
only... if you want analog, you have to have a separate channel, close to or
not to the DRM one.

Both = QRM

dxAce
Michigan
USA