How the FCC could improve AM nighttime
 

On Oct 3, 8:08 am, Steve wrote:
On Oct 3, 8:53 am, "Richard Crowley" wrote:

THIS DISCUSSION IS OFF-TOPIC FOR REC.AUDIO.TECH
(AND REC.AUDIO.CAR, FOR THAT MATTER)
PLEASE DROP REC.AUDIO.TECH FROM THIS DISCUSSION

Please drop rec.radio.shortwave as well.




I don't see how a discussion about AM radio could be offtopic in a
Radio Tech group or a Car Audio group.

How the FCC could improve AM nighttime
 

"SFTV_troy" wrote ...
I don't see how a discussion about AM radio could be
offtopic in a Radio Tech group or a Car Audio group.

Then you apparently don't understand the difference
between "radio" and "audio". Even more reason why
you should cease cross-posting.

You exhibit the kind of behavior that gives Google Groups
a bad reputation. People are starting to automatically
filter out all postings from Google Groups as *noise*.
Don't spoil it for everyone.

How the FCC could improve AM nighttime
 

In article . com,
SFTV_troy wrote:

On Oct 3, 8:08 am, Steve wrote:
On Oct 3, 8:53 am, "Richard Crowley" wrote:

THIS DISCUSSION IS OFF-TOPIC FOR REC.AUDIO.TECH
(AND REC.AUDIO.CAR, FOR THAT MATTER)
PLEASE DROP REC.AUDIO.TECH FROM THIS DISCUSSION

Please drop rec.radio.shortwave as well.




I don't see how a discussion about AM radio could be offtopic in a
Radio Tech group or a Car Audio group.

You could make any on topic discussion off topic. Clueless posts are
always off topic anywhere on Usenet.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California