|
AM Ratings after 7pm - How many are listening?
I looked on arbitron.com, but they don't share that info with the
public. Anybody know? |
AM Ratings after 7pm - How many are listening?
On Oct 2, 6:57?am, wrote:
I looked on arbitron.com, but they don't share that info with the public. Anybody know? Why do you want to know - say "Hi" to Struble for me! PocketRadio / 700WLW / SayNoToIBOC |
AM Ratings after 7pm - How many are listening?
wrote in message ups.com... On Oct 2, 6:57?am, wrote: I looked on arbitron.com, but they don't share that info with the public. Anybody know? Why do you want to know - say "Hi" to Struble for me! Only subscribers get this data. It is not licensed only for sales and programming purposes. Struble does not work for Arbitron. |
AM Ratings after 7pm - How many are listening?
On Oct 2, 6:57 am, wrote:
I looked on arbitron.com, but they don't share that info with the public. Anybody know? There are very few listening now. Since HD AM broadcasts began last month, there's just not much there to listen to. However, there are a lot of people listening via the internet. |
AM Ratings after 7pm - How many are listening?
|
AM Ratings after 7pm - How many are listening?
On Oct 2, 9:54?am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message ups.com... On Oct 2, 6:57?am, wrote: I looked on arbitron.com, but they don't share that info with the public. Anybody know? Why do you want to know - say "Hi" to Struble for me! Only subscribers get this data. It is not licensed only for sales and programming purposes. Struble does not work for Arbitron. "News/Talk/Sports:Radio's Last Bastion" "Music FMs of any flavor are utterly screwed... Right now -- while FMs are losing the music audience to new media -- satellite radio is offering more News/Talk/Sports programming than we can fit on AM radio..." http://ftp.media.radcity.net/ZMST/daily/IS031005.htm Struble works for the FCC. |
AM Ratings after 7pm - How many are listening?
On Oct 2, 7:42 pm, wrote:
On Oct 2, 9:54?am, "David Eduardo" wrote: wrote in message oups.com... On Oct 2, 6:57?am, wrote: I looked on arbitron.com, but they don't share that info with the public. Anybody know? Why do you want to know - say "Hi" to Struble for me! Only subscribers get this data. It is not licensed only for sales and programming purposes. Struble does not work for Arbitron. "News/Talk/Sports:Radio's Last Bastion" "Music FMs of any flavor are utterly screwed... Right now -- while FMs are losing the music audience to new media -- satellite radio is offering more News/Talk/Sports programming than we can fit on AM radio..." - http://ftp.media.radcity.net/ZMST/daily/IS031005.htm Struble works for the FCC. PR, After Reading the Link/URL and Thinking About It -IF- Most of the AM/MW Radio Stations that I like to http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...d4b1b90e57ec26 Listen-To when to had a simulcast on the FM Radio Band http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulcast -or- Transitioned to the FM Band : I could most likely hear then all better both Day and Night up here beyond the 10mv/m Contour in Twain Harte, CA. KSFO 560 kHz KMJ 580 kHz KSTE 650 kHz KCBS 740 kHz KGO 810 kHz KMPH 840 kHz KVIN 920 kHz KNEW 910 kHz KQKE 960 kHz KSRO 1350 kHz KFBK 1530 kHz Even more reason to convert the old Analog TV Channels http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very_high_frequency 5 and 6 over to an Expanded FM Radio Band {76-88 MHz} http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FM_radio http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FM_broadcast_band http://www.cs.iit.edu/~wan/lecture2.pdf ~ RHF |
AM Ratings after 7pm - How many are listening?
On Oct 3, 4:47 am, RHF wrote:
Even more reason to convert the old Analog TV http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very_high_frequency 5 and 6 over to an Expanded FM Radio Band What the hell are you talking about? Channels 5 and 6 are *already occupied* by ATSC DTV channels. I routinely watch channel 6 out of Philadelphia, and you are NOT going to take it away from me. TV is more important than some fm station. (Besides the TV was there *first* and has a right to stay there.) It's bad enough we lost UHF channels 51 and up. Now you want the FCC to take away channels 5-6 too? **** that idea. |
AM Ratings after 7pm - How many are listening?
On Oct 3, 4:40 am, wrote:
On Oct 3, 4:47 am, RHF wrote: Even more reason to convert the old Analog TVhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very_high_frequency 5 and 6 over to an Expanded FM Radio Band What the hell are you talking about? Channels 5 and 6 are *already occupied* by ATSC DTV channels. I routinely watch channel 6 out of Philadelphia, and you are NOT going to take it away from me. TV is more important than some fm station. (Besides the TV was there *first* and has a right to stay there.) It's bad enough we lost UHF channels 51 and up. Now you want the FCC to take away channels 5-6 too? **** that idea. SFTV - Open Mouth Insert Foot. ~ RHF |
AM Ratings after 7pm - How many are listening?
On Oct 3, 7:40 am, wrote:
On Oct 3, 4:47 am, RHF wrote: Even more reason to convert the old Analog TVhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very_high_frequency 5 and 6 over to an Expanded FM Radio Band What the hell are you talking about? Channels 5 and 6 are *already occupied* by ATSC DTV channels. I routinely watch channel 6 out of Philadelphia, and you are NOT going to take it away from me. TV is more important than some fm station. (Besides the TV was there *first* and has a right to stay there.) It's bad enough we lost UHF channels 51 and up. Now you want the FCC to take away channels 5-6 too? **** that idea. Hmmm. Sounds like you don't like the idea of someone going in and messing up that particular piece of spectrum, huh? Well, now you know how WE feel. Take it and suck on it! |
AM Ratings after 7pm - How many are listening?
On Oct 3, 4:40 am, wrote:
On Oct 3, 4:47 am, RHF wrote: Even more reason to convert the old Analog TVhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very_high_frequency 5 and 6 over to an Expanded FM Radio Band What the hell are you talking about? Channels 5 and 6 are *already occupied* by ATSC DTV channels. I routinely watch channel 6 out of Philadelphia, and you are NOT going to take it away from me. TV is more important than some fm station. (Besides the TV was there *first* and has a right to stay there.) - It's bad enough we lost UHF channels 51 and up. - Now you want the FCC to take away channels 5-6 too? - **** that idea. * Having Intercourse with an Idea -is- a Real Mind F*ck ! SFTV - Ever Heard of the Greater Good ? ~ RHF - Converting the old Analog TV Channels 5 and 6 over to an Expanded FM Radio Band {76-88 MHz} and having all the 'new' FM Broadcasters start out as 50% Analog/ 50% Digital would insure the transition to FM Digital Radio and help to clear-out the AM/MW Radio Band for a new Band Plan : Fewer Radio Stations; Wider Channel Spacing; More Uniform Power Output. A small loss for TV a Greater Good for FM Digital Radio Broadcasting and the Future of Over-the-Air Radio. SFTV -aka- "Hybrid Digital" Man We Need Your Support ! |
AM Ratings after 7pm - How many are listening?
Steve wrote: On Oct 3, 7:40 am, wrote: On Oct 3, 4:47 am, RHF wrote: Even more reason to convert the old Analog TVhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very_high_frequency 5 and 6 over to an Expanded FM Radio Band It's bad enough we lost UHF channels 51 and up. Now you want the FCC to take away channels 5-6 too? **** that idea. Hmmm. Sounds like you don't like the idea of someone going in and messing up that particular piece of spectrum, huh? Not the same. The FCC's decision to convert from analog-to-digital on the AM band does Not make the bandwidth any smaller. It's still the same size as always (530-1710). But deleting channels 5-6 *does* shrink the bandwidth for television (and also puts several stations across the nation out-of-business). |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:24 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com