dxAce wrote:

David Eduardo wrote:

"Steve" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Oct 3, 5:45 pm, dxAce wrote:

Edweenie, it would seem as though 55 is your favourite number.

It would also seem to be the age at which you adopted the 'Eduardo'
shtick.

dxAce
Michigan

It's probably also the number of academic degrees he claims to have
I don't claim to have any....

But, you did claim to have enough credits for two degrees, then denying that you
stated such and then flip flopping yet again.

Pathological!




Didn't someone else make such a claim a couple of years ago?

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"Steve" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Oct 3, 5:45 pm, dxAce wrote:

Edweenie, it would seem as though 55 is your favourite number.

It would also seem to be the age at which you adopted the 'Eduardo'
shtick.

dxAce
Michigan


It's probably also the number of academic degrees he claims to have

I don't claim to have any....

But, you did claim to have enough credits for two degrees, then denying
that you
stated such and then flip flopping yet again.

My point is that the credits are not from the same accreditation boards, and
are not combinable...

Uh-huh.

D Peter Maus wrote:

dxAce wrote:

David Eduardo wrote:

"Steve" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Oct 3, 5:45 pm, dxAce wrote:

Edweenie, it would seem as though 55 is your favourite number.

It would also seem to be the age at which you adopted the 'Eduardo'
shtick.

dxAce
Michigan

It's probably also the number of academic degrees he claims to have
I don't claim to have any....

But, you did claim to have enough credits for two degrees, then denying that you
stated such and then flip flopping yet again.

Pathological!



Didn't someone else make such a claim a couple of years ago?

Something like that... ; )

On Oct 3, 6:59 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message

...







David Eduardo wrote:

"Steve" wrote in message
groups.com...
On Oct 3, 5:45 pm, dxAce wrote:

Edweenie, it would seem as though 55 is your favourite number.

It would also seem to be the age at which you adopted the 'Eduardo'
shtick.

dxAce
Michigan

It's probably also the number of academic degrees he claims to have

I don't claim to have any....

But, you did claim to have enough credits for two degrees, then denying
that you
stated such and then flip flopping yet again.

My point is that the credits are not from the same accreditation boards, and
are not combinable...-

And that is very likely for a good reason. Accreditation boards exist
for a purpose, you know.

"Steve" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Oct 3, 6:59 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message

...







David Eduardo wrote:

"Steve" wrote in message
groups.com...
On Oct 3, 5:45 pm, dxAce wrote:

Edweenie, it would seem as though 55 is your favourite number.

It would also seem to be the age at which you adopted the 'Eduardo'
shtick.

dxAce
Michigan

It's probably also the number of academic degrees he claims to have

I don't claim to have any....

But, you did claim to have enough credits for two degrees, then denying
that you
stated such and then flip flopping yet again.

My point is that the credits are not from the same accreditation boards,
and
are not combinable...-

And that is very likely for a good reason. Accreditation boards exist
for a purpose, you know.


Yeah, but credits valid in one may not be transferrable to another.

On Oct 3, 2:54 am, SFTV_troy wrote:
David Eduardo wrote:

The standard daypart is 7 to Midnight.

Using the 6th largest city, Houston, as an example, between 7 PM
and midnight...as a percentage of all persons, whether using radio or
not, it is 0.6%. In 18-34 year olds, the share is 0.4% of all
persons in that age group, whether listening or not.

Thank you. That's what I wanted. For comparison, television pulls
over 60% of all persons during 7 to midnight.

- 0.6% listening to AM during primetime
- over 30% watching broadcast TV (fox, cw, ...)
- over 60% watching all tv (including cable)

Is it any wonder the AM stations feel the need to improve the quality
of the sound (digital upgrade), in hopes of bringing in more listeners.

I listen to the radio if I'm doing something else. The new shows are
out, so I'm watching them right now, to see if any are going to be
worth adding to the list.

Is it any wonder the AM stations feel the need to improve the quality
of the sound (digital upgrade), in hopes of bringing in more listeners.

I listen to the radio if I'm doing something else. The new shows are
out, so I'm watching them right now, to see if any are going to be
worth adding to the list.

Putting GOOD late night programming on would be a hell of a good
start. Fart Smell did well at first because he was the only thing on
late night besides howling religious maniacs and high rotation music.
Then he began to be someone to make fun of.

On Oct 3, 1:34 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...





On Oct 3, 5:54?am, SFTV_troy wrote:
David Eduardo wrote:

The standard daypart is 7 to Midnight.

Using the 6th largest city, Houston, as an example, between 7 PM
and midnight...as a percentage of all persons, whether using radio or
not, it is 0.6%. In 18-34 year olds, the share is 0.4% of all
persons in that age group, whether listening or not.

Thank you. That's what I wanted. For comparison, television pulls
over 60% of all persons during 7 to midnight.

- 0.6% listening to AM during primetime
- over 30% watching broadcast TV (fox, cw, ...)
- over 60% watching all tv (including cable)

Is it any wonder the AM stations feel the need to improve the quality
of the sound (digital upgrade), in hopes of bringing in more listeners.

Listeners do not care about audio quality, but program quality - it
is the music formatted FMs that are screwed from attacks from iPods,
cell phone music streaming, and personalized music services such as
Pandora, Slacker, and Last.FM - news/talk/sports/ AMs are highly
rated. You have it ass-backwards.

Then why have news talk stations all over the US moved totally to FM or are
transitioning with simulcasts? The answer is that they get a big increase in
25-54 listeners when on FM, as the under-55 crowd likes the programming, but
hates the sound quality. When they get it on FM, they listen.

And AM news talkers have about 60% or more of their audience in the 55 and
older demos, which is not an age group with much, if any, sales appeal.

Heck, just this week a 50 kw sports AM in Detroit moved to FM... because
they want to appeal more to younger-than-55 demographic groups.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

d"Eduado,

Think about the Political 'import' of what you are saying.

* News/Talk Radio on AM/MW Conservatized
the Over-50 Demographic Groups.

* News/Talk Radio on FM could Conservatized
the Over-25 Demographic Groups.

Clearly the Democrats will Ban Conservative New/Talk
on the FM Radio Band { Except for Liberal NPR & PRI }

the times they are a changing . . .
- i heard that on the radio ~ RHF

On Oct 3, 3:59 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message

...







David Eduardo wrote:

"Steve" wrote in message
groups.com...
On Oct 3, 5:45 pm, dxAce wrote:

Edweenie, it would seem as though 55 is your favourite number.

It would also seem to be the age at which you adopted the 'Eduardo'
shtick.

dxAce
Michigan

It's probably also the number of academic degrees he claims to have

I don't claim to have any....

But, you did claim to have enough credits for two degrees, then denying
that you
stated such and then flip flopping yet again.

- My point is that the credits are not from the same
- accreditation boards, and are not combinable...

d'Eduardo - Once Again Your Numbers Lie. ~ RHF

Maybe they are not 'credits' at but "Shares" !

And -if- they are 'credits' are they Sellable Credits ?

On Oct 4, 5:28 am, dxAce wrote:
David Frackelton Gleason, still not 'accredited' as 'Eduardo'. wrote:





"Steve" wrote in message
roups.com...
On Oct 3, 6:59 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message

...

David Eduardo wrote:

"Steve" wrote in message
groups.com...
On Oct 3, 5:45 pm, dxAce wrote:

Edweenie, it would seem as though 55 is your favourite number.

It would also seem to be the age at which you adopted the 'Eduardo'
shtick.

dxAce
Michigan

It's probably also the number of academic degrees he claims to have

I don't claim to have any....

But, you did claim to have enough credits for two degrees, then denying
that you
stated such and then flip flopping yet again.

My point is that the credits are not from the same accreditation boards,
and
are not combinable...-

And that is very likely for a good reason. Accreditation boards exist
for a purpose, you know.

Yeah, but credits valid in one may not be transferrable to another.

So what's your excuse about that amateur radio license?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Eduardo is just a high-school dropout - my company wouldn't touch him,
because he counldn't be bid on any proposals.