On Oct 19, 2:58 pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article .com,
Ross Archer wrote:



On Oct 13, 6:39 pm, wrote:
www.devilfinder.com Scandals of Al Gore

Be sure to scroll down and click on the softwar.net site at the
devilfinder thingy.
(Nobel peace prize my arse! Nowadays only Morons and Idiots win the
Nobel prize,,,,, Gore,Arafat,Jimmah Carter, etc)

Solar Flares and Volcanos (do some research on Solar Flares and
Volcanos) (Mars is warming up too) contribute far more to global warming
than humans ever have, and there is the Van Oort Cloud too.On a scale of
0 to whatever, humans have contrbuted almost Zero to global warming.Rest
assured though, when this spate of global warming is done with, there
will be global cooling.Back in the 1950s and 1960s those scientist were
harping about an ice age is over the horizon.
cuhulin

The thing is, the global cooling part was never generally accepted and
was speculative.

Snip

Let me put your mind at ease. The human contribution to atmospheric CO2
is in the 1% to 2% range compared to natural processes that add and
subtract. No brainer don't you think?

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

National and international science academies and professional
societies have assessed the current scientific opinion on climate
change, in particular recent global warming. These assessments have
largely followed or endorsed the IPCC position that "An increasing
body of observations gives a collective picture of a warming world and
other changes in the climate system... There is new and stronger
evidence that most of the warming observed over the last 50 years is
attributable to human activities".[1]

This page documents scientific opinion as given by synthesis reports,
scientific bodies of national or international standing, and surveys
of opinion among climate scientists. It does not document the views of
individual scientists or self-selected lists of individuals such as
petitions.

MOST OF THE WARMING OBSERVED OVER THE LAST 50 YEARS IS ATTRIBUTABLE TO
HUMAN ACTIVITIES.

I'm glad you know so much better than actual scientists.

In article . com,
Ross Archer wrote:

On Oct 19, 2:58 pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article .com,
Ross Archer wrote:



On Oct 13, 6:39 pm, wrote:
www.devilfinder.com Scandals of Al Gore

Be sure to scroll down and click on the softwar.net site at the
devilfinder thingy.
(Nobel peace prize my arse! Nowadays only Morons and Idiots win the
Nobel prize,,,,, Gore,Arafat,Jimmah Carter, etc)

Solar Flares and Volcanos (do some research on Solar Flares and
Volcanos) (Mars is warming up too) contribute far more to global warming
than humans ever have, and there is the Van Oort Cloud too.On a scale of
0 to whatever, humans have contrbuted almost Zero to global warming.Rest
assured though, when this spate of global warming is done with, there
will be global cooling.Back in the 1950s and 1960s those scientist were
harping about an ice age is over the horizon.
cuhulin

The thing is, the global cooling part was never generally accepted and
was speculative.

Snip

Let me put your mind at ease. The human contribution to atmospheric CO2
is in the 1% to 2% range compared to natural processes that add and
subtract. No brainer don't you think?

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

National and international science academies and professional
societies have assessed the current scientific opinion on climate
change, in particular recent global warming. These assessments have
largely followed or endorsed the IPCC position that "An increasing
body of observations gives a collective picture of a warming world and
other changes in the climate system... There is new and stronger
evidence that most of the warming observed over the last 50 years is
attributable to human activities".[1]

This page documents scientific opinion as given by synthesis reports,
scientific bodies of national or international standing, and surveys
of opinion among climate scientists. It does not document the views of
individual scientists or self-selected lists of individuals such as
petitions.

MOST OF THE WARMING OBSERVED OVER THE LAST 50 YEARS IS ATTRIBUTABLE TO
HUMAN ACTIVITIES.

I'm glad you know so much better than actual scientists.

Pay attention please. The only scientific body making the incredibly
weak claim is the one at the UN. That body is more political than
scientific.

Now wake up if you are able.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 18:24:05 GMT, Telamon
wrote:

Pay attention please. The only scientific body making the incredibly
weak claim is the one at the UN. That body is more political than
scientific.

Now wake up if you are able.

And the AAAS. Are they political as well?

"The scientific evidence is clear: global climate
change caused by human activities
is occurring now, and it is a growing
threat to society. Accumulating data from
across the globe reveal a wide array of
effects: rapidly melting glaciers, destabilization
of major ice sheets, increases in
extreme weather, rising sea level, shifts
in species ranges, and more. The pace of
change and the evidence of harm have
increased markedly over the last five
years. The time to control greenhouse
gas emissions is now.
The atmospheric concentration of
carbon dioxide, a critical greenhouse
gas, is higher than it has been for at
least 650,000 years. The average temperature
of the Earth is heading for
levels not experienced for millions of
years. Scientific predictions of the
impacts of increasing atmospheric concentrations
of greenhouse gases from
fossil fuels and deforestation match
observed changes. As expected, intensification
of droughts, heat waves, floods,
wildfires, and severe storms is occurring,
with a mounting toll on vulnerable
ecosystems and societies. These events
are early warning signs of even more
devastating damage to come, some of
which will be irreversible.
Delaying action to address climate
change will increase the environmental
and societal consequences as well as
the costs. The longer we wait to tackle
climate change, the harder and more
expensive the task will be.
History provides many examples of
society confronting grave threats by
mobilizing knowledge and promoting
innovation. We need an aggressive
research, development and deployment
effort to transform the existing and
future energy systems of the world away
from technologies that emit greenhouse
gases. Developing clean energy technologies
will provide economic opportunities
and ensure future energy
supplies.
In addition to rapidly reducing greenhouse
gas emissions, it is essential that
we develop strategies to adapt to
ongoing changes and make communities
more resilient to future changes.
The growing torrent of information presents
a clear message: we are already
experiencing global climate change. It is
time to muster the political will for concerted
action. Stronger leadership at all
levels is needed. The time is now. We
must rise to the challenge. We owe this
to future generations."
-American Association for the Advancement of Science

Ice Ages come and go.At some time in the future, there WILL be another
Ice Age coming along.Will that be blamed on Human beings too?
cuhulin

In article ,
David wrote:

On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 18:24:05 GMT, Telamon
wrote:

Pay attention please. The only scientific body making the incredibly
weak claim is the one at the UN. That body is more political than
scientific.

Now wake up if you are able.

And the AAAS. Are they political as well?

Yes.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:52:00 -0700, Telamon
wrote:

In article ,
David wrote:

On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 18:24:05 GMT, Telamon
wrote:

Pay attention please. The only scientific body making the incredibly
weak claim is the one at the UN. That body is more political than
scientific.

Now wake up if you are able.

And the AAAS. Are they political as well?

Yes.

Are you?

On Oct 21, 11:24 am, Telamon
wrote:
In article . com,
Ross Archer wrote:



On Oct 19, 2:58 pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article .com,
Ross Archer wrote:

On Oct 13, 6:39 pm, wrote:
www.devilfinder.com Scandals of Al Gore

Be sure to scroll down and click on the softwar.net site at the
devilfinder thingy.
(Nobel peace prize my arse! Nowadays only Morons and Idiots win the
Nobel prize,,,,, Gore,Arafat,Jimmah Carter, etc)

Solar Flares and Volcanos (do some research on Solar Flares and
Volcanos) (Mars is warming up too) contribute far more to global warming
than humans ever have, and there is the Van Oort Cloud too.On a scale of
0 to whatever, humans have contrbuted almost Zero to global warming.Rest
assured though, when this spate of global warming is done with, there
will be global cooling.Back in the 1950s and 1960s those scientist were
harping about an ice age is over the horizon.
cuhulin

The thing is, the global cooling part was never generally accepted and
was speculative.

Snip

Let me put your mind at ease. The human contribution to atmospheric CO2
is in the 1% to 2% range compared to natural processes that add and
subtract. No brainer don't you think?

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

National and international science academies and professional
societies have assessed the current scientific opinion on climate
change, in particular recent global warming. These assessments have
largely followed or endorsed the IPCC position that "An increasing
body of observations gives a collective picture of a warming world and
other changes in the climate system... There is new and stronger
evidence that most of the warming observed over the last 50 years is
attributable to human activities".[1]

This page documents scientific opinion as given by synthesis reports,
scientific bodies of national or international standing, and surveys
of opinion among climate scientists. It does not document the views of
individual scientists or self-selected lists of individuals such as
petitions.

MOST OF THE WARMING OBSERVED OVER THE LAST 50 YEARS IS ATTRIBUTABLE TO
HUMAN ACTIVITIES.

I'm glad you know so much better than actual scientists.

Pay attention please. The only scientific body making the incredibly
weak claim is the one at the UN. That body is more political than
scientific.

Now wake up if you are able.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California
That's not true. I posted MANY independent sources, which you refuse
to read because you enjoy your ignorance.
Remain ignorant. I am through with such a willfully ignorant
bubblehead.


You are willfully ignorant. I am done with you.

On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:19:31 -0700, Ross Archer
wrote:


That's not true. I posted MANY independent sources, which you refuse
to read because you enjoy your ignorance.
Remain ignorant. I am through with such a willfully ignorant
bubblehead.


You are willfully ignorant. I am done with you.

C'mon, the guy volunteered for his lobotomy, give him SOME credit.

In article ,
David wrote:

On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:19:31 -0700, Ross Archer
wrote:


That's not true. I posted MANY independent sources, which you refuse
to read because you enjoy your ignorance.
Remain ignorant. I am through with such a willfully ignorant
bubblehead.


You are willfully ignorant. I am done with you.

C'mon, the guy volunteered for his lobotomy, give him SOME credit.

Don't confuse me with yourself who opted for the chemical lobotomy.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:15:16 -0700, Telamon
wrote:

In article ,
David wrote:

On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:19:31 -0700, Ross Archer
wrote:


That's not true. I posted MANY independent sources, which you refuse
to read because you enjoy your ignorance.
Remain ignorant. I am through with such a willfully ignorant
bubblehead.


You are willfully ignorant. I am done with you.

C'mon, the guy volunteered for his lobotomy, give him SOME credit.

Don't confuse me with yourself who opted for the chemical lobotomy.

Huh? I don't drink.