![]() |
|
"Radio listening declines to record low, says Arbitron"
"dxAce" wrote in message ... David, "Yes, I'm a prancing pedant, posing as 'Eduardo'", wrote: "David" wrote in message ... On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 10:17:13 -0800, "David Eduardo" wrote: "David" wrote in message . .. On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 07:12:10 -0800, "David Eduardo" wrote: I am not Venezuelan, nor have I ever lived there.... you just make things up. Waaah! The point being that Mexicans have no right to come up here and criticise the politics of the locals. They have the right to free speech... you use the Constitution only when it supports your argument, I guess. OK, so you have the right to criticise me, but it's still ridiculously out-of-place. You are a Cylon. Of course I have the right. I am a resident of the United States of America. Only a resident? Did you finally renounce your citizenship? Citizens who live in the US are residents; those who do not (expats) are not residents. Buy a dictionary, eh? |
"Radio listening declines to record low, says Arbitron"
"dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "Bart Bailey" wrote in message ... In et posted on Sat, 17 Nov 2007 10:17:13 -0800, David Eduardo wrote: Begin I commented; "sounds nice, bet you can't wait to get back" That's not particularly correct in "theory." I have good memories of childhood in Cleveland, Ohio, and enjoy recalling them. But I would rather live in Bolivia than there, today. Yeah, Bolivia! You could pretend to own radio stations there too! But then the day would come when you'd get your prancing ass tossed outta there at gunpoint. Where to then? I really find it amusing that you think that something that is to be proud of is negative. I left Ecuador because I had joined with a newspaper to become the voice of opposition to the military government, calling for a return to democracy and free elections. I paid my consequences, but my counterpart at the newspaper "disappeared" and was presumed killed by the military. You... being a misanthrope, a xenophobe and a fool... think that is disgraceful. |
"Radio listening declines to record low, says Arbitron"
David Frackelton Gleason, who fools no one whilst posing as 'Eduardo', wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David, "Yes, I'm a prancing pedant, posing as 'Eduardo'", wrote: "David" wrote in message ... On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 10:17:13 -0800, "David Eduardo" wrote: "David" wrote in message . .. On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 07:12:10 -0800, "David Eduardo" wrote: I am not Venezuelan, nor have I ever lived there.... you just make things up. Waaah! The point being that Mexicans have no right to come up here and criticise the politics of the locals. They have the right to free speech... you use the Constitution only when it supports your argument, I guess. OK, so you have the right to criticise me, but it's still ridiculously out-of-place. You are a Cylon. Of course I have the right. I am a resident of the United States of America. Only a resident? Did you finally renounce your citizenship? Citizens who live in the US are residents No **** Sherlock! ; those who do not (expats) are not residents. Buy a dictionary, eh? Kiss my ass, pedant! |
"Radio listening declines to record low, says Arbitron"
David Frackelton Gleason, still stuck on stupid and locked on dumb, posed as 'Eduardo' and wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "Bart Bailey" wrote in message ... In et posted on Sat, 17 Nov 2007 10:17:13 -0800, David Eduardo wrote: Begin I commented; "sounds nice, bet you can't wait to get back" That's not particularly correct in "theory." I have good memories of childhood in Cleveland, Ohio, and enjoy recalling them. But I would rather live in Bolivia than there, today. Yeah, Bolivia! You could pretend to own radio stations there too! But then the day would come when you'd get your prancing ass tossed outta there at gunpoint. Where to then? I really find it amusing that you think that something that is to be proud of is negative. I left Ecuador because I had joined with a newspaper to become the voice of opposition to the military government, calling for a return to democracy and free elections. I paid my consequences, but my counterpart at the newspaper "disappeared" and was presumed killed by the military. Gee, you've certainly altered that story over time. Why am I not surprised? |
"Radio listening declines to record low, says Arbitron"
"dxAce" wrote in message ... David Frackelton Gleason, still stuck on stupid and locked on dumb, posed as 'Eduardo' and wrote: I really find it amusing that you think that something that is to be proud of is negative. I left Ecuador because I had joined with a newspaper to become the voice of opposition to the military government, calling for a return to democracy and free elections. I paid my consequences, but my counterpart at the newspaper "disappeared" and was presumed killed by the military. Gee, you've certainly altered that story over time. Why am I not surprised? No alteration. I put on a news and talk station, and our opposition to the military government got me booted from the country and I lost all the radio stations. |
"Radio listening declines to record low, says Arbitron"
David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Frackelton Gleason, still stuck on stupid and locked on dumb, posed as 'Eduardo' and wrote: I really find it amusing that you think that something that is to be proud of is negative. I left Ecuador because I had joined with a newspaper to become the voice of opposition to the military government, calling for a return to democracy and free elections. I paid my consequences, but my counterpart at the newspaper "disappeared" and was presumed killed by the military. Gee, you've certainly altered that story over time. Why am I not surprised? No alteration. I put on a news and talk station, and our opposition to the military government got me booted from the country and I lost all the radio stations. You lost nothing, other than something you fabricated. Get over it! |
"Radio listening declines to record low, says Arbitron"
"dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Frackelton Gleason, still stuck on stupid and locked on dumb, posed as 'Eduardo' and wrote: I really find it amusing that you think that something that is to be proud of is negative. I left Ecuador because I had joined with a newspaper to become the voice of opposition to the military government, calling for a return to democracy and free elections. I paid my consequences, but my counterpart at the newspaper "disappeared" and was presumed killed by the military. Gee, you've certainly altered that story over time. Why am I not surprised? No alteration. I put on a news and talk station, and our opposition to the military government got me booted from the country and I lost all the radio stations. You lost nothing, other than something you fabricated. Get over it! Search and find any of these people who received paychecks or soutside service checks I signed: Matilde Lalama Marylou Parra Patricio Moncayo Fabricio Cifuentes Jose Rosenfeld Jose Endara Gabriel Espinosa de los Montersos Eduardo Cruz Castañeda Alberto Ribadeneira Carlos Guarderas Barba Al Horvath Fred Simon Byron Guerra Pedro Chassi Guillermo Jácome Lucho Castellanos Patricio Toro Marcos Díaz (and 50 more I can not remember at the moment) Or contact these station owners who were also members of AER: Eduardo Granja Estrella Edgardo Terán Arcesio A. Arcentales A. Fausto Vallejo Carlos Silva Numa Pompilio Castro Gustavo Terán Gerardo Brborich Eduardo Cevallos Gustavo Herdoiza José Rodríguez Gonzalo Maldonado Quijano Ligia Wilches Armando Romero Rodas Holguer Velástegui |
"Radio listening declines to record low, says Arbitron"
On Nov 17, 6:50 am, David wrote:
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 12:14:02 -0500, dxAce wrote: - - Just like you, retard boy! - As a retard, I resent that. David - And Well You Should ! :o) ~ RHF |
"Radio listening declines to record low, says Arbitron"
"RHF" wrote in message ... On Nov 17, 10:17 am, "David Eduardo" wrote: "David" wrote in message ... On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 07:12:10 -0800, "David Eduardo" wrote: I am not Venezuelan, nor have I ever lived there.... you just make things up. Waaah! The point being that Mexicans have no right to come up here and criticise the politics of the locals. - They have the right to free speech... THEY DO NOT HAVE ANY RIGHTS : THEY ARE NOT AMERICAN CITIZENS : PLUS THEY ARE HERE ILLEGALLY [.] They are within our borders, and enjoy the protection of the Constitution. - you use the Constitution only when it - supports your argument, I guess. THE US CONSTITUTION IS FOR THE CITIZENS OF THE USA [.] ILLEGAL ALIEN [INVADERS] HAVE NO RIGHTS [.] Except for rights specifically given to citizens, like the right to vote, all persons within the borders of the USA have guaranteed rights. Residents, tourists, even illegal immigrants are given these rights and that is what made the US rather unique in the world. |
"Radio listening declines to record low, says Arbitron"
On Nov 17, 10:13 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"RHF" wrote in message ... On Nov 17, 10:17 am, "David Eduardo" wrote: "David" wrote in message . .. On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 07:12:10 -0800, "David Eduardo" wrote: I am not Venezuelan, nor have I ever lived there.... you just make things up. Waaah! The point being that Mexicans have no right to come up here and criticise the politics of the locals. - They have the right to free speech... THEY DO NOT HAVE ANY RIGHTS : THEY ARE NOT AMERICAN CITIZENS : PLUS THEY ARE HERE ILLEGALLY [.] They are within our borders, and enjoy the protection of the Constitution. - you use the Constitution only when it - supports your argument, I guess. THE US CONSTITUTION IS FOR THE CITIZENS OF THE USA [.] ILLEGAL ALIEN [INVADERS] HAVE NO RIGHTS [.] Except for rights specifically given to citizens, like the right to vote, all persons within the borders of the USA have guaranteed rights. Residents, tourists, even illegal immigrants are given these rights and that is what made the US rather unique in the world.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Dream On ! |
"Radio listening declines to record low, says Arbitron"
On Nov 17, 11:04 am, David wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 10:17:13 -0800, "David Eduardo" wrote: "David" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 07:12:10 -0800, "David Eduardo" wrote: I am not Venezuelan, nor have I ever lived there.... you just make things up. Waaah! The point being that Mexicans have no right to come up here and criticise the politics of the locals. They have the right to free speech... you use the Constitution only when it supports your argument, I guess. OK, so you have the right to criticise me, but it's still ridiculously out-of-place. - You are a Cylon. - - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cylon_%28re-imagining%29 For d'Eduardo being a 'Cylon' would be High Praise. http://star-www.st-and.ac.uk/~srk1/dsa/cylon.jpg Even one of the original Cylon "Toosters" {Tin Man} Alas - d'Eduardo is more of a "Tin Man" with a Big Liberal Bleeding Heart. el TINo MANo = http://www.tinmanic.com/images/tinman1.jpg While I Imagine d'Eduardo being like 'Davros' seated at his http://www.sevenzero.net/toyroom/ima...aleks25179.jpg Programming Consol planning "Dalek" like Radio Stations with Mexican/Hispanic/Latino Music Radio Programs to Conquer the Hearts and Minds of the Illegal Alien Radio Listening Market. http://www.davross.clara.co.uk/personal/jpg/davros.jpg |
"Radio listening declines to record low, says Arbitron"
On Nov 17, 1:27 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message ... David, "Yes, I'm a prancing pedant, posing as 'Eduardo'", wrote: "David" wrote in message . .. On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 10:17:13 -0800, "David Eduardo" wrote: "David" wrote in message . .. On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 07:12:10 -0800, "David Eduardo" wrote: I am not Venezuelan, nor have I ever lived there.... you just make things up. Waaah! The point being that Mexicans have no right to come up here and criticise the politics of the locals. They have the right to free speech... you use the Constitution only when it supports your argument, I guess. OK, so you have the right to criticise me, but it's still ridiculously out-of-place. You are a Cylon. Of course I have the right. I am a resident of the United States of America. Only a resident? Did you finally renounce your citizenship? - - Citizens who live in the US are residents; - those who do not (expats) are not residents. - Buy a dictionary, eh? Point # 1 - Illegal Aliens from Mexico Are NOT Citizens [.] Point # 2 - Illegal Aliens Are Not Residents - They Are Invaders [.] |
"Radio listening declines to record low, says Arbitron"
On Nov 17, 12:14 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Bart Bailey" wrote in message ... In et posted on Sat, 17 Nov 2007 10:17:13 -0800, David Eduardo wrote: Begin "David" wrote in message . .. On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 07:12:10 -0800, "David Eduardo" wrote: I am not Venezuelan, nor have I ever lived there.... you just make things up. Waaah! The point being that Mexicans have no right to come up here and criticise the politics of the locals. They have the right to free speech... you use the Constitution only when it supports your argument, I guess. Reminds me of a neighbor I once had that would go on and on about how lovely her Nayarit was until I commented; "sounds nice, bet you can't wait to get back" That's not particularly correct in "theory." I have good memories of childhood in Cleveland, Ohio, and enjoy recalling them. But I would rather live in Bolivia than there, today.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - d'Eduardo - Please Go 'Home' To Bolivia ASAP ! ~ RHF Mi Casa - AIN'T Your House - So Get Out Now ! |
"Radio listening declines to record low, says Arbitron"
On Nov 17, 10:13 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"RHF" wrote in message ... On Nov 17, 10:17 am, "David Eduardo" wrote: "David" wrote in message . .. On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 07:12:10 -0800, "David Eduardo" wrote: I am not Venezuelan, nor have I ever lived there.... you just make things up. Waaah! The point being that Mexicans have no right to come up here and criticise the politics of the locals. - They have the right to free speech... THEY DO NOT HAVE ANY RIGHTS : THEY ARE NOT AMERICAN CITIZENS : PLUS THEY ARE HERE ILLEGALLY [.] - They are within our borders, and enjoy the protection of the Constitution. The Enjoy The Right To Be Deported ASAP ! - you use the Constitution only when it - supports your argument, I guess. THE US CONSTITUTION IS FOR THE CITIZENS OF THE USA [.] ILLEGAL ALIEN [INVADERS] HAVE NO RIGHTS [.] Except for rights specifically given to citizens, like the right to vote, all persons within the borders of the USA have guaranteed rights. Residents, tourists, even illegal immigrants are given these rights and that is what made the US rather unique in the world. d'Eduardo - The US Constitution 'Protects' The Citizens Of The USA From Foreign Illegal Alien Invaders -and- Those Invaders Have NO Rights [.] -Except- The Right To Be Deported ASAP ! ~ RHF |
"Radio listening declines to record low, says Arbitron"
RHF wrote: On Nov 17, 12:14 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: "Bart Bailey" wrote in message ... In et posted on Sat, 17 Nov 2007 10:17:13 -0800, David Eduardo wrote: Begin "David" wrote in message . .. On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 07:12:10 -0800, "David Eduardo" wrote: I am not Venezuelan, nor have I ever lived there.... you just make things up. Waaah! The point being that Mexicans have no right to come up here and criticise the politics of the locals. They have the right to free speech... you use the Constitution only when it supports your argument, I guess. Reminds me of a neighbor I once had that would go on and on about how lovely her Nayarit was until I commented; "sounds nice, bet you can't wait to get back" That's not particularly correct in "theory." I have good memories of childhood in Cleveland, Ohio, and enjoy recalling them. But I would rather live in Bolivia than there, today.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - d'Eduardo - Please Go 'Home' To Bolivia ASAP ! ~ RHF Absolutely. There's probably a village there that's looking for an idiot! |
"Radio listening declines to record low, says Arbitron"
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote: "RHF" wrote in message ... On Nov 17, 10:17 am, "David Eduardo" wrote: "David" wrote in message ... On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 07:12:10 -0800, "David Eduardo" wrote: I am not Venezuelan, nor have I ever lived there.... you just make things up. Waaah! The point being that Mexicans have no right to come up here and criticise the politics of the locals. - They have the right to free speech... THEY DO NOT HAVE ANY RIGHTS : THEY ARE NOT AMERICAN CITIZENS : PLUS THEY ARE HERE ILLEGALLY [.] They are within our borders, and enjoy the protection of the Constitution. No they don't. - you use the Constitution only when it - supports your argument, I guess. THE US CONSTITUTION IS FOR THE CITIZENS OF THE USA [.] ILLEGAL ALIEN [INVADERS] HAVE NO RIGHTS [.] Except for rights specifically given to citizens, like the right to vote, all persons within the borders of the USA have guaranteed rights. Residents, tourists, even illegal immigrants are given these rights and that is what made the US rather unique in the world. The documentation foreigners sign and agreed to grant specific rights to what activities they can participate in and what time frame they can be within our borders just like any other country. It could be a visa to vacation here, a student visa or a work permit for example. These examples permit the foreigner holding them to specific activities in specific time frames. If the rules in the agreement granted are violated they are deported. If they do not have a student visa or work permit they better not be doing either. You must understand that these limited rights are granted by the government and are not the inalienable rights the citizens have. Foreigners that are undocumented have broken the law being here and so as criminals (not following the rules) they are deported. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
"Radio listening declines to record low, says Arbitron"
On Nov 18, 12:19 pm, Telamon
wrote: In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "RHF" wrote in message ... On Nov 17, 10:17 am, "David Eduardo" wrote: "David" wrote in message . .. On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 07:12:10 -0800, "David Eduardo" wrote: I am not Venezuelan, nor have I ever lived there.... you just make things up. Waaah! The point being that Mexicans have no right to come up here and criticise the politics of the locals. - They have the right to free speech... THEY DO NOT HAVE ANY RIGHTS : THEY ARE NOT AMERICAN CITIZENS : PLUS THEY ARE HERE ILLEGALLY [.] They are within our borders, and enjoy the protection of the Constitution. No they don't. - you use the Constitution only when it - supports your argument, I guess. THE US CONSTITUTION IS FOR THE CITIZENS OF THE USA [.] ILLEGAL ALIEN [INVADERS] HAVE NO RIGHTS [.] Except for rights specifically given to citizens, like the right to vote, all persons within the borders of the USA have guaranteed rights. Residents, tourists, even illegal immigrants are given these rights and that is what made the US rather unique in the world. - The documentation foreigners sign and agreed to grant specific rights to - what activities they can participate in and what time frame they can be - within our borders just like any other country. It could be a visa to - vacation here, a student visa or a work permit for example. These - examples permit the foreigner holding them to specific activities in - specific time frames. If the rules in the agreement granted are violated - they are deported. - - If they do not have a student visa or work permit they better not be - doing either. - - You must understand that these limited rights are granted by the - government and are not the inalienable rights the citizens have. - - Foreigners that are undocumented have broken the law being here - and so as criminals (not following the rules) they are deported. - - -- - Telamon - Ventura, California Telamon - Spoken Like A True American Citizen Who Knows His Rights. ~ RHF Question - What So-Called 'Rights' Does An America Illegally in Mexico Have : The Right To Go To Jail and Be Ransomed-Out {Extortion} To Go Back To The USA. Illegal Aliens - Have One Right - To Be Set Home {Deported} [.] |
Question - What So-Called 'Rights' Does An America Illegally InMexico Have . . .
On Nov 18, 2:38 pm, David wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 20:30:43 -0800 (PST), RHF wrote: THE US CONSTITUTION IS FOR THE CITIZENS OF THE USA [.] ILLEGAL ALIEN [INVADERS] HAVE NO RIGHTS [.] I don't think that's entirely true. David - That is because you are not 'thinking' like an American Citizen First and Foremost. Question - What So-Called 'Rights' Does An America Illegally In Mexico Have : The Right To Go To Jail and Be Ransomed-Out {Extortion} To Go Back To The USA. Illegal Aliens - Have Only One Right : To Be Set Home {Deported} ASAP [.] ~ RHF |
Question - What So-Called 'Rights' Does An America Illegally InMexico Have . . .
RHF wrote: On Nov 18, 2:38 pm, David wrote: On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 20:30:43 -0800 (PST), RHF wrote: THE US CONSTITUTION IS FOR THE CITIZENS OF THE USA [.] ILLEGAL ALIEN [INVADERS] HAVE NO RIGHTS [.] I don't think that's entirely true. David - That is because you are not 'thinking' like an American Citizen First and Foremost. Question - What So-Called 'Rights' Does An America Illegally In Mexico Have : The Right To Go To Jail and Be Ransomed-Out {Extortion} To Go Back To The USA. Illegal Aliens - Have Only One Right : To Be Set Home {Deported} ASAP [.] ~ RHF I support the Deport David 'Eduardo' Movement! dxAce Michigan USA |
Question - What So-Called 'Rights' Does An America Illegally In Mexico Have . . .
"RHF" wrote in message ... Question - What So-Called 'Rights' Does An America Illegally In Mexico Have : The Right To Go To Jail and Be Ransomed-Out {Extortion} To Go Back To The USA. Mexico is not the USA. The rights granted in the Mexican constitution prevail in Mexico and Mexican law is based on the Napoleonic Code, where one is guilty until proven innocent. The same applies to Mexican nationals, Mexican Citizens and residents of Mexico as well. Each nation has its own "bill of rights" and in many cases they are far more restrictive. In some nations, non-citizens have few rights. In the US, we guarantee things such as due process to all, irrespective of citizenship or status. |
Question - What So-Called 'Rights' Does An America Illegally In Mexico Have . . .
"dxAce" wrote in message ... RHF wrote: On Nov 18, 2:38 pm, David wrote: On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 20:30:43 -0800 (PST), RHF wrote: THE US CONSTITUTION IS FOR THE CITIZENS OF THE USA [.] ILLEGAL ALIEN [INVADERS] HAVE NO RIGHTS [.] I don't think that's entirely true. David - That is because you are not 'thinking' like an American Citizen First and Foremost. Question - What So-Called 'Rights' Does An America Illegally In Mexico Have : The Right To Go To Jail and Be Ransomed-Out {Extortion} To Go Back To The USA. Illegal Aliens - Have Only One Right : To Be Set Home {Deported} ASAP [.] ~ RHF I support the Deport David 'Eduardo' Movement! I'm sure we can arrange a reciprocal agreement, where you must live out your life in Canada in the Hispanic area in Toronto. |
Question - What So-Called 'Rights' Does An America Illegally InMexico Have . . .
David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... RHF wrote: On Nov 18, 2:38 pm, David wrote: On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 20:30:43 -0800 (PST), RHF wrote: THE US CONSTITUTION IS FOR THE CITIZENS OF THE USA [.] ILLEGAL ALIEN [INVADERS] HAVE NO RIGHTS [.] I don't think that's entirely true. David - That is because you are not 'thinking' like an American Citizen First and Foremost. Question - What So-Called 'Rights' Does An America Illegally In Mexico Have : The Right To Go To Jail and Be Ransomed-Out {Extortion} To Go Back To The USA. Illegal Aliens - Have Only One Right : To Be Set Home {Deported} ASAP [.] ~ RHF I support the Deport David 'Eduardo' Movement! I'm sure we can arrange a reciprocal agreement, where you must live out your life in Canada in the Hispanic area in Toronto. You can't arrange ****, boy. You might fake it, but you can't arrange it. |
Question - What So-Called 'Rights' Does An America Illegally InMexico Have . . .
On Nov 18, 5:28 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"RHF" wrote in message ... Question - What So-Called 'Rights' Does An America Illegally In Mexico Have : The Right To Go To Jail and Be Ransomed-Out {Extortion} To Go Back To The USA. Mexico is not the USA. The rights granted in the Mexican constitution prevail in Mexico and Mexican law is based on the Napoleonic Code, where one is guilty until proven innocent. The same applies to Mexican nationals, Mexican Citizens and residents of Mexico as well. - - Each nation has its own "bill of rights" and in many cases - they are far more restrictive. In some nations, non-citizens - have few rights. - - In the US, we guarantee things such as due process to all, - irrespective of citizenship or status. d'Eduardo, There Is Due Process. -and-then- There Is Due Process ! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Due_Process * Federal Law for Illegal Alien Mexican Invaders - - - Under Due Process Should Be - - - Treat the Illegal Alien Mexican Invaders According to the Law -IF- They Can Not Prove That They Are Legally in the USA within 24 Hours to a Three Judge US Immigration Tribunal -results in- Summary Deportion with 48 Hours. -Note- We The People of the USA are Not Depriving the Illegal Alien Mexican Invaders of Life, Liberty, or Property. * We Are Giving Them A 'Life' In Their Home Land Mexico. * We Are 'Liberating' Them To Mexico. * As An Illegal Alien Mexican Invader They Have No Right To Property In The USA + Plus We Are Placeing Them Back On The Property Of Mexico Where They Do Have A Right To Be As Cirtizens Of Mexico. -TBL- Now That Is A Way Over Due Process ! Again - Illegal Alien Mexican Invaders have only one Right Under-the-Law : The Right To A Due Process Deportation ASAP ! give them their due and process then homeward bound ~ RHF |
Question - What So-Called 'Rights' Does An America Illegally InMexico Have . . .
RHF wrote: On Nov 18, 5:28 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: "RHF" wrote in message ... Question - What So-Called 'Rights' Does An America Illegally In Mexico Have : The Right To Go To Jail and Be Ransomed-Out {Extortion} To Go Back To The USA. Mexico is not the USA. The rights granted in the Mexican constitution prevail in Mexico and Mexican law is based on the Napoleonic Code, where one is guilty until proven innocent. The same applies to Mexican nationals, Mexican Citizens and residents of Mexico as well. - - Each nation has its own "bill of rights" and in many cases - they are far more restrictive. In some nations, non-citizens - have few rights. - - In the US, we guarantee things such as due process to all, - irrespective of citizenship or status. d'Eduardo, There Is Due Process. -and-then- There Is Due Process ! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Due_Process * Federal Law for Illegal Alien Mexican Invaders - - - Under Due Process Should Be - - - Treat the Illegal Alien Mexican Invaders According to the Law -IF- They Can Not Prove That They Are Legally in the USA within 24 Hours to a Three Judge US Immigration Tribunal -results in- Summary Deportion with 48 Hours. -Note- We The People of the USA are Not Depriving the Illegal Alien Mexican Invaders of Life, Liberty, or Property. * We Are Giving Them A 'Life' In Their Home Land Mexico. * We Are 'Liberating' Them To Mexico. * As An Illegal Alien Mexican Invader They Have No Right To Property In The USA + Plus We Are Placeing Them Back On The Property Of Mexico Where They Do Have A Right To Be As Cirtizens Of Mexico. -TBL- Now That Is A Way Over Due Process ! Again - Illegal Alien Mexican Invaders have only one Right Under-the-Law : The Right To A Due Process Deportation ASAP ! give them their due and process then homeward bound ~ RHF Support the Deport David 'Eduardo' Movement! |
"Radio listening declines to record low, says Arbitron"
Telamon wrote:
In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "RHF" wrote in message ... On Nov 17, 10:17 am, "David Eduardo" wrote: "David" wrote in message ... On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 07:12:10 -0800, "David Eduardo" wrote: I am not Venezuelan, nor have I ever lived there.... you just make things up. Waaah! The point being that Mexicans have no right to come up here and criticise the politics of the locals. - They have the right to free speech... THEY DO NOT HAVE ANY RIGHTS : THEY ARE NOT AMERICAN CITIZENS : PLUS THEY ARE HERE ILLEGALLY [.] They are within our borders, and enjoy the protection of the Constitution. No they don't. - you use the Constitution only when it - supports your argument, I guess. THE US CONSTITUTION IS FOR THE CITIZENS OF THE USA [.] ILLEGAL ALIEN [INVADERS] HAVE NO RIGHTS [.] Except for rights specifically given to citizens, like the right to vote, all persons within the borders of the USA have guaranteed rights. Residents, tourists, even illegal immigrants are given these rights and that is what made the US rather unique in the world. The documentation foreigners sign and agreed to grant specific rights to what activities they can participate in and what time frame they can be within our borders just like any other country. It could be a visa to vacation here, a student visa or a work permit for example. These examples permit the foreigner holding them to specific activities in specific time frames. If the rules in the agreement granted are violated they are deported. If they do not have a student visa or work permit they better not be doing either. You must understand that these limited rights are granted by the government and are not the inalienable rights the citizens have. Foreigners that are undocumented have broken the law being here and so as criminals (not following the rules) they are deported. They must be assumed to be citizens until proved otherwise, due process and all that gobbledegook. |
Question - What Rights Should An Illegal Alien Mexican Invader Havein the USA . . .
On Nov 21, 10:53 pm, rickets wrote:
Telamon wrote: In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "RHF" wrote in message ... On Nov 17, 10:17 am, "David Eduardo" wrote: "David" wrote in message m... On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 07:12:10 -0800, "David Eduardo" wrote: I am not Venezuelan, nor have I ever lived there.... you just make things up. Waaah! The point being that Mexicans have no right to come up here and criticise the politics of the locals. - They have the right to free speech... THEY DO NOT HAVE ANY RIGHTS : THEY ARE NOT AMERICAN CITIZENS : PLUS THEY ARE HERE ILLEGALLY [.] They are within our borders, and enjoy the protection of the Constitution. No they don't. - you use the Constitution only when it - supports your argument, I guess. THE US CONSTITUTION IS FOR THE CITIZENS OF THE USA [.] ILLEGAL ALIEN [INVADERS] HAVE NO RIGHTS [.] Except for rights specifically given to citizens, like the right to vote, all persons within the borders of the USA have guaranteed rights. Residents, tourists, even illegal immigrants are given these rights and that is what made the US rather unique in the world. The documentation foreigners sign and agreed to grant specific rights to what activities they can participate in and what time frame they can be within our borders just like any other country. It could be a visa to vacation here, a student visa or a work permit for example. These examples permit the foreigner holding them to specific activities in specific time frames. If the rules in the agreement granted are violated they are deported. If they do not have a student visa or work permit they better not be doing either. You must understand that these limited rights are granted by the government and are not the inalienable rights the citizens have. Foreigners that are undocumented have broken the law being here and so as criminals (not following the rules) they are deported. - They must be assumed to be citizens until proved otherwise, - due process and all that gobbledegook. David, Not According to the Laws of Mexico the actual Country that the Illegal Alien Meican Invaders are in-fact Citizens of . . . Question - What Rights Should An Illegal Alien Mexican Invader Have in the USA . . . # 1 - The Right to be Arrested by Any US Citizen for Failing to have Legal Document to Prove They are in the USA Legally. * Federal $100 Dollar Bounty on Each One Brought Directly To a US Federal INS Office - Not Considered Assault or Kidnapping under Federal Law. # 2 - The Right to be Judged by an INS Tribunal with 24 Hours. # 3 - The Right to be Deported back to Mexico within 48 Hours. Illegal Aliens - Have One Right - To Be Set Home {Deported} [.] so say i ~ RHF |
(OT) : Driver's Licenses for Illegal Alien Mexican Invaders - I SayNo !
On Nov 22, 12:47 pm, Telamon
wrote: In article , rickets wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "RHF" wrote in message ... On Nov 17, 10:17 am, "David Eduardo" wrote: "David" wrote in message m... On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 07:12:10 -0800, "David Eduardo" wrote: I am not Venezuelan, nor have I ever lived there.... you just make things up. Waaah! The point being that Mexicans have no right to come up here and criticise the politics of the locals. - They have the right to free speech... THEY DO NOT HAVE ANY RIGHTS : THEY ARE NOT AMERICAN CITIZENS : PLUS THEY ARE HERE ILLEGALLY [.] They are within our borders, and enjoy the protection of the Constitution. No they don't. - you use the Constitution only when it - supports your argument, I guess. THE US CONSTITUTION IS FOR THE CITIZENS OF THE USA [.] ILLEGAL ALIEN [INVADERS] HAVE NO RIGHTS [.] Except for rights specifically given to citizens, like the right to vote, all persons within the borders of the USA have guaranteed rights. Residents, tourists, even illegal immigrants are given these rights and that is what made the US rather unique in the world. The documentation foreigners sign and agreed to grant specific rights to what activities they can participate in and what time frame they can be within our borders just like any other country. It could be a visa to vacation here, a student visa or a work permit for example. These examples permit the foreigner holding them to specific activities in specific time frames. If the rules in the agreement granted are violated they are deported. If they do not have a student visa or work permit they better not be doing either. You must understand that these limited rights are granted by the government and are not the inalienable rights the citizens have. Foreigners that are undocumented have broken the law being here and so as criminals (not following the rules) they are deported. - - They must be assumed to be citizens until proved otherwise, due process - - and all that gobbledegook. - - Absolutely not. That's why people are so ****ed off over the driver - license issue. We all carry identification in the case of exercising a - privilege regulated by the government and an officer of the government - has cause to ask for that identification when some kind of incident - brings it to his attention. You are supposed to be licensed, have the - registration of the vehicle you are driving to prove it yours and - insurance in case of an accident. People that are otherwise not - documented as immigrants should not be able to get a license for a - privilege we enjoy as responsible citizens. - - -- - Telamon - Ventura, California Telamon - Ditto That ! (OT) : Driver's Licenses for Illegal Alien Mexican Invaders - I Say No ! Any Illegal Alien Mexican Invader should be required to Post a $250,000 Surety Bond or $250,000 Cash for the Term of the Driver's License; before the they can apply for a State Issued Driver's License. NOTE - We Pay for Proof of Insurance and the Cost of Liability : Shouldn't They ? {Now That Is True Equality Under-the-Law For All} Any "Un-Licensed" Illegal Alien Mexican Invader caught Driving a Car/Trunk should by Law be Held for 24 Hours; plus that Car/Trunk Impounded for 10 Days. Any "Un-Licensed" Illegal Alien Mexican Invader Driving a Car/Trunk that is 'involved' in an Auto Accident -or- DUI/Drugs -or- Commission of a Felony Crime; should by Law be Held for 72 Hours; plus that Car/Trunk Impounded for 30 Days. NOTE - If that Car/Truck belongs to a US Business and has Commercial Plates on it : Then the Car/Truck is Forfeited and Sold plus a $5000 Fine Paid by the Business for Hiring an Illegal Alien Mexican Invader and Paying them to Drive a Vehicle on US Streets and Roads in Violation of Numerous State and Federal Laws. HIRE AMERICANS TO DO AMERICAN JOBS - FIRST ! * Car/Truck Driving is a Good Paying Job for Most Americans. The Message of Our Laws Should Be Hire Americans First [.] Better Yet - Make Non-US-Citizen Driver's Licenses a Federal responsibility -and- take the States out of the Driver's License 'business' for Illegals. States shoul be 'limited' to Issuing Driver's Licenses to US Citizens Only. so say i ~ RHF |
(OT) : Driver's Licenses for Illegal Alien Mexican Invaders - I Say No !
A burst of .223 between the eyes would be better, same for the slime
that employ them.... On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 13:52:51 -0800 (PST), RHF wrote: On Nov 22, 12:47 pm, Telamon wrote: In article , rickets wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "RHF" wrote in message ... On Nov 17, 10:17 am, "David Eduardo" wrote: "David" wrote in message m... On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 07:12:10 -0800, "David Eduardo" wrote: I am not Venezuelan, nor have I ever lived there.... you just make things up. Waaah! The point being that Mexicans have no right to come up here and criticise the politics of the locals. - They have the right to free speech... THEY DO NOT HAVE ANY RIGHTS : THEY ARE NOT AMERICAN CITIZENS : PLUS THEY ARE HERE ILLEGALLY [.] They are within our borders, and enjoy the protection of the Constitution. No they don't. - you use the Constitution only when it - supports your argument, I guess. THE US CONSTITUTION IS FOR THE CITIZENS OF THE USA [.] ILLEGAL ALIEN [INVADERS] HAVE NO RIGHTS [.] Except for rights specifically given to citizens, like the right to vote, all persons within the borders of the USA have guaranteed rights. Residents, tourists, even illegal immigrants are given these rights and that is what made the US rather unique in the world. The documentation foreigners sign and agreed to grant specific rights to what activities they can participate in and what time frame they can be within our borders just like any other country. It could be a visa to vacation here, a student visa or a work permit for example. These examples permit the foreigner holding them to specific activities in specific time frames. If the rules in the agreement granted are violated they are deported. If they do not have a student visa or work permit they better not be doing either. You must understand that these limited rights are granted by the government and are not the inalienable rights the citizens have. Foreigners that are undocumented have broken the law being here and so as criminals (not following the rules) they are deported. - - They must be assumed to be citizens until proved otherwise, due process - - and all that gobbledegook. - - Absolutely not. That's why people are so ****ed off over the driver - license issue. We all carry identification in the case of exercising a - privilege regulated by the government and an officer of the government - has cause to ask for that identification when some kind of incident - brings it to his attention. You are supposed to be licensed, have the - registration of the vehicle you are driving to prove it yours and - insurance in case of an accident. People that are otherwise not - documented as immigrants should not be able to get a license for a - privilege we enjoy as responsible citizens. - |
Question - What Rights Should An Illegal Alien Mexican Invader Have in the USA . . .
The right to be buried on the Rio Grande when they attempt to
come into the USA. On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 11:19:29 -0800 (PST), RHF wrote: On Nov 21, 10:53 pm, rickets wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "RHF" wrote in message ... On Nov 17, 10:17 am, "David Eduardo" wrote: "David" wrote in message m... On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 07:12:10 -0800, "David Eduardo" wrote: I am not Venezuelan, nor have I ever lived there.... you just make things up. Waaah! The point being that Mexicans have no right to come up here and criticise the politics of the locals. - They have the right to free speech... THEY DO NOT HAVE ANY RIGHTS : THEY ARE NOT AMERICAN CITIZENS : PLUS THEY ARE HERE ILLEGALLY [.] They are within our borders, and enjoy the protection of the Constitution. No they don't. - you use the Constitution only when it - supports your argument, I guess. THE US CONSTITUTION IS FOR THE CITIZENS OF THE USA [.] ILLEGAL ALIEN [INVADERS] HAVE NO RIGHTS [.] Except for rights specifically given to citizens, like the right to vote, all persons within the borders of the USA have guaranteed rights. Residents, tourists, even illegal immigrants are given these rights and that is what made the US rather unique in the world. The documentation foreigners sign and agreed to grant specific rights to what activities they can participate in and what time frame they can be within our borders just like any other country. It could be a visa to vacation here, a student visa or a work permit for example. These examples permit the foreigner holding them to specific activities in specific time frames. If the rules in the agreement granted are violated they are deported. If they do not have a student visa or work permit they better not be doing either. You must understand that these limited rights are granted by the government and are not the inalienable rights the citizens have. Foreigners that are undocumented have broken the law being here and so as criminals (not following the rules) they are deported. - They must be assumed to be citizens until proved otherwise, - due process and all that gobbledegook. David, Not According to the Laws of Mexico the actual Country that the Illegal Alien Meican Invaders are in-fact Citizens of . . . Question - What Rights Should An Illegal Alien Mexican Invader Have in the USA . . . # 1 - The Right to be Arrested by Any US Citizen for Failing to have Legal Document to Prove They are in the USA Legally. * Federal $100 Dollar Bounty on Each One Brought Directly To a US Federal INS Office - Not Considered Assault or Kidnapping under Federal Law. # 2 - The Right to be Judged by an INS Tribunal with 24 Hours. # 3 - The Right to be Deported back to Mexico within 48 Hours. Illegal Aliens - Have One Right - To Be Set Home {Deported} [.] so say i ~ RHF . |
Question - What Rights Should An Illegal Alien Mexican InvaderHave in the USA . . .
On Nov 23, 5:58 am, cbx wrote:
- - The right to be buried on the Rio Grande when they attempt to - come into the USA. - CBX - Violence Is Not The Answer [.] ~ RHF No - The Illegal Alien Mexican Invaders have 'The Right' To Be Buried In Mexico {Their HomeLand} When God Calls Them Home at the Natural End of Their Time. ~ RHF |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:38 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com