On Nov 22, 5:14�pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Brenda Ann" wrote in message

...



"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...

� FM failed. Twice. The public didn't care. There was virtually no
uptake.

� Look at it now.

FM didn't require people to throw out their old radios and buy new ones.

It didn't? How did you listen to FM on an AM radio. Similarly, HD does not
require anyone buy a new radio unless they want to... the analog signals
continue to be broadcast. Of course, you had the choice of simply not buying
an �FM radio, which is what 99% of the people did for the first 25 years of
FM broadcasting.



Color TV didn't require people to throw out their B/W sets and buy an
expensive new color set. Color TV didn't interfere with existing B/W
television services and was still viewable on existing B/W sets.

Just as current radios will continue to receive analog signals.

Too bad, no one is buying HD radios, after two years.

On Nov 21, 10:52Â*pm, D Peter Maus wrote:
IBOCcrock wrote:
On Nov 21, 2:07�pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"IBOCcrock" wrote in message

...

On Nov 21, 2:00 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in
....
� �About 90% of the population still listens to the radio. �Even those
with access to, and regular use of, other technologies.
Actually, it is over 95%. Roughly the same as it was in 1965.
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2015 2020
Ah, you called Miss Cleo. Ask what Google stock will be at, will you?

In the mid-60's, pundits said FM would never make it and radio would die due
to TV. Those predictions are as accurate as yours. The satellite numbers are
totally bogus, as sat radio has hit a brick wall on new subscriptions and
the churn rate is huge after the free trial offers expire.

Poor argument - the 1960's didn't have cell phone/streaming, Satellite
Radio, the Internet, Internet Radio, etc...no nearly the same
situation Bud!

Â* Â*What's not acknowledged is that FM failed. Twice.

Â* Â*Before it didn't. FCC mandates were in part responsible.

Â* Â*Don't underestimate the power of commitment.

Â* Â*There's been a huge investment in this technology. There's been an
FCC mandate that all new modulation schemes be digital. Â*And there's
been a half a billion dollars spent in promotion. The point is not that
HD's success is assured, but rather that HD's demise is not assured
either. This is not going away anytime soon. It may go away, but it's
far from over.

Â* Â*And the forces that have sway are in a good position to make it a
full-on madated conversion.

Â* Â*If you really want to fight this, you'll not be successful by
reporting it's premature demise.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

"6/1/07 - FCC Releases Detailed Digital Audio Broadcast Rules"

"At some point in the future, when the Commission determines there is
sufficient market penetration of digital receivers, iBiquity asserts
that the public interest will be best served by reversing this
presumption to favor digital operations....We decline to adopt
iBiquity’s presumption policy because it is too early in the DAB
conversion process for us to consider such a mechanism. We find that
such a policy, if adopted now, may have unknown and unintended
consequences for a new technology that has yet to be accepted by the
public or widely adopted by the broadcast industry."

http://www.diymedia.net/archive/0607.htm

“4/4/07 - FCC: Market to Decide Fate of HD Radio�

"Though it appears that the FCC has stopped short of a full-on,
enthusiastic endorsement of the technology, it has removed all
marketplace barriers to its proliferation. I don't believe this is
because the FCC thinks it's the best DAB technology available, but it
is the horse that the broadcast industry has its money on. We'll now
see whether that bet is a good investment or not, and we'll be forced
to learn the hard way whether the technology's shortfalls are as
egregious as feared."

http://www.diymedia.net/archive/0407.htm

As I stated, it is up to the marketplace to determine the fate of HD
Radio - with total consumer apathy and zero uptake of HD radios in two
years, HD/IBOC will never happen - I win!

On Nov 22, 12:55Â*pm, IBOCcrock wrote:
On Nov 22, 11:38Â*am,D Peter wrote:





IBOCcrock wrote:
On Nov 21, 10:52 pm,D Peter wrote:
IBOCcrock wrote:
On Nov 21, 2:07�pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"IBOCcrock" wrote in message
...
On Nov 21, 2:00 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in
...
� �About 90% of the population still listens to the radio. �Even those
with access to, and regular use of, other technologies.
Actually, it is over 95%. Roughly the same as it was in 1965.
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2015 2020
Ah, you called Miss Cleo. Ask what Google stock will be at, will you?
In the mid-60's, pundits said FM would never make it and radio would die due
to TV. Those predictions are as accurate as yours. The satellite numbers are
totally bogus, as sat radio has hit a brick wall on new subscriptions and
the churn rate is huge after the free trial offers expire.
Poor argument - the 1960's didn't have cell phone/streaming, Satellite
Radio, the Internet, Internet Radio, etc...no nearly the same
situation Bud!
Â* Â*What's not acknowledged is that FM failed. Twice.

Â* Â*Before it didn't. FCC mandates were in part responsible.

Â* Â*Don't underestimate the power of commitment.

Â* Â*There's been a huge investment in this technology. There's been an
FCC mandate that all new modulation schemes be digital. Â*And there's
been a half a billion dollars spent in promotion. The point is not that
HD's success is assured, but rather that HD's demise is not assured
either. This is not going away anytime soon. It may go away, but it's
far from over.

Â* Â*And the forces that have sway are in a good position to make it a
full-on madated conversion.

Â* Â*If you really want to fight this, you'll not be successful by
reporting it's premature demise.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You keep repeating the same rhetoric over and over again.

Â* Â*I keep repeating the same points because you keep ignoring the most
important parts of the argument....1) regardless of the market uptake of
this technology, the investors, the FCC and the stations involved are
committed to it. They may not be able to make it successful, but they
will not let it go easily. Even if IBOC goes no further than AM stereo,
they're simply NOT going to let it go. Not after all the money that's
been spent.

Â* Â*If IBOC is to die, it will die slowly, and over a long period of time.

Stations

will tire of the internal costs associated with running HD/IBOC, and
with no ROI ever possible from total consumer apathy, stations will
tire of paying the on-going fees to iBiquty. Stations refuse to invest
in it, Gen Y thinks the concept is lauable, old consumers don't want
it, and retailers can't sell it.

Â* Â*All of which is true. But the boat is in the water. They're not going
to just abandon ship. Not after all the costs of launch. Â*Radio,
iBiquity, and yes, FCC, will hang onto this for as long as they think
they can turn it around. Remember, AM stereo was a dud, too. With
international uptake. And it took 20 years to die.

Â* Â*FM failed. Twice. The public didn't care. There was virtually no uptake.

Â* Â*Look at it now.

Â* Â*Color TV took 15 years to catch on.

Â* Â*Look at it now.

Â* Â*We're only at the very beginning of the process marketing IBOC
technology. If it's not working, but there are enough people driving
this who think that it can be made successful, they'll keep flaying the
horse until there's nothing left before they give up. And then blame
DXers for the failure.

Â* Â*Even if it cannot be made successful, IBOC will take years to die.
iBiquity has laid out a 5 to 8 year plan...near to a decade, just to
break even. Even if they hit the target, that's only the break even
point. From there, it will take years to build real growth. Or, if not
successful, it will take years for stations, and investors to give up on
the money they've thrown at this issue and finally give up and go away.

Â* Â*FM failed twice. And once it caught on, took nearly two decades to
become what it is. 40 years is a long time to keep swinging....and yet
FM, backed with a lot of creative thinking, and two FCC mandates became
successful 4 decades after launch.

Â* Â*And the only one driving FM for the first 10 years was Edwin
Armstrong. There was no public interest. No industry interest. And no
FCC support.

Â* Â*IBOC has corporate involvement, industry support, and the FCC's
mandate that all new modulation schemes be digital.

Â* Â*It's not going to simply go away.

The FCC learned from the AM Stereo

debacle and will not mandate a shutoff of analog radio.

Â* Â*Don't count on that, either. They didn't learn anything from AM
Stereo. Â*HDTV was supposed to be a market choice, too. Totally voluntary
uptake. And no talk of turning off the NTSC broadcast until and unless
85% of each market had moved to digital TV. And this was to be done
market by market, allowing market forces to make the decisions.

Â* Â*Well, that didn't work. Public interest was low. And new digital
services wanted the spectrum. And they were willing to pay huge dollars
for it.

Â* Â*So, there was an FCC mandate. And now digital TV uptake is strong. I
just added an ATSC tuner to my own system. I now have digital
over-the-air TV. 30 channels of it. (without an HDTV--btw.) NTSC TV is
going away in a little over a year, and the uptake of digital TV
technology is brisk. Resulting in a faster conversion, improved
technology, and much lower prices.

Â* Â*IBOC offers the opportunity for more stations, conditional
access...read that 'subscription radio,'... FCC benefits with more
licensing and process fees...stations see an end to dictatorial
advertisers...they're highly motivated to make IBOC work. No matter what
it takes. And what it may take is an FCC mandate.

Â* Â*Again, HDTV was to be market driven. FCC specifically said there
woudl be no HDTV mandate. Now, there's a mandate. Don't think it can't
happen with Radio. There are too many salivating to get it done for that
not to be an option.

Â* Â*IBOC. It certainly doesn't look good now. You and I agree there. The
public is not interested. Costs of implementation are a sore point for
broadcasters. iBiquity fees are absurd. We agree here.

Â* Â*And nobody is liking where this is going. Not the public. Not the
industry. We agree here, as well.

Â* Â*But there are too many historic examples of new technology
implemetation...even implementation badly executed...that have been
turned around by changing the rules.

Â* Â*FM benefitted from two FCC mandates. HDTV was mandated into life.

Â* Â*History has shown us that FCC can and will mandate what they believe
needs to be mandated. Even if reversing previous decisions to do it.

Â* Â*And as far as Â*the spectrum issue is concerned...digital broadcasting
frees up more local spectra. More stations, more FCC revenues. They've
got a financial interest in this too.

Â* Â*And the MW broadcast band is being eyed for low bitrate digital
services. There is spectrum pressure in favor of IBOC, just as there is
Â* HDTV.

Â* Â*An FCC mandate is not out of the question.

Â* Â*So, take a step back and look at the bigger picture. IBOC isn't
working. You're right about that. We agree. This is a boondoggle. And
it's an expensive boondoggle.

Â* Â*But that's only the picture right now.

Â* Â*There is too much history to suggest that with this much support in
the industry, with this much money spent, with this much motivation on
the part of broadcasters AND FCC....there is just too much historic
evidence to make the claim that IBOC will just go away.

Â* Â*It may fail. But it will not just go away. It will peter out, and
peter out and peter out....just like AM Stereo...and it will take more
than a decade to do it.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

"There is too much history to suggest that with this much support in
the industry... blah, blah, blah..."

Come back here - I'm not done with you yet! Most of that "money" ($680
million) is unsold advertising time, which stations were not going to
continue into 2008. Gee, what does that say about terrestrial radio
that they have $680 million in unsold ad time - it's dying! Large
market stations have only spent a few hundred thousand dollars each
upgrading to HD - according to Eduardo, a drop in the bucket; so, you
argument fails here, too! Now, come back here!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Stations have always had unsold air time. That's where they fit in
their public service extras. And if they still have left overs - they
hire an ad agency to sell -- " public service reminders brought to you
by some local business" which helps pick up the unsold air time. The
stations that have the most audience have less unsold air times -- the
stations with the smaller audiences - have more unsold air time. I
don't think that unsold air time can prove that terrestrial radio.
And stations sources of income have broaden from just air time
anyways. They have new revenue streams now to make up for deficits in
other areas.

On Nov 22, 4:14 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Brenda Ann" wrote in message

...



"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...

FM failed. Twice. The public didn't care. There was virtually no
uptake.

Look at it now.

FM didn't require people to throw out their old radios and buy new ones.

It didn't? How did you listen to FM on an AM radio. Similarly, HD does not
require anyone buy a new radio unless they want to... the analog signals
continue to be broadcast. Of course, you had the choice of simply not buying
an FM radio, which is what 99% of the people did for the first 25 years of
FM broadcasting.



Color TV didn't require people to throw out their B/W sets and buy an
expensive new color set. Color TV didn't interfere with existing B/W
television services and was still viewable on existing B/W sets.

Just as current radios will continue to receive analog signals.

So, then are you saying that HD radio, once all stations go to that,
will require everyone to purchase an HD radio - or could one still
listen to the station on a regular radio - with just poorer quality
reception??

IBOCcrock wrote:
On Nov 22, 3:40 pm, D Peter Maus wrote:
IBOCcrock wrote:
On Nov 22, 11:38 am, D Peter Maus wrote:
IBOCcrock wrote:
On Nov 21, 10:52 pm, D Peter Maus wrote:
IBOCcrock wrote:
On Nov 21, 2:07�pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"IBOCcrock" wrote in message
...
On Nov 21, 2:00 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in
...
� �About 90% of the population still listens to the radio. �Even those
with access to, and regular use of, other technologies.
Actually, it is over 95%. Roughly the same as it was in 1965.
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2015 2020
Ah, you called Miss Cleo. Ask what Google stock will be at, will you?
In the mid-60's, pundits said FM would never make it and radio would die due
to TV. Those predictions are as accurate as yours. The satellite numbers are
totally bogus, as sat radio has hit a brick wall on new subscriptions and
the churn rate is huge after the free trial offers expire.
Poor argument - the 1960's didn't have cell phone/streaming, Satellite
Radio, the Internet, Internet Radio, etc...no nearly the same
situation Bud!
What's not acknowledged is that FM failed. Twice.
Before it didn't. FCC mandates were in part responsible.
Don't underestimate the power of commitment.
There's been a huge investment in this technology. There's been an
FCC mandate that all new modulation schemes be digital. And there's
been a half a billion dollars spent in promotion. The point is not that
HD's success is assured, but rather that HD's demise is not assured
either. This is not going away anytime soon. It may go away, but it's
far from over.
And the forces that have sway are in a good position to make it a
full-on madated conversion.
If you really want to fight this, you'll not be successful by
reporting it's premature demise.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
You keep repeating the same rhetoric over and over again.
I keep repeating the same points because you keep ignoring the most
important parts of the argument....1) regardless of the market uptake of
this technology, the investors, the FCC and the stations involved are
committed to it. They may not be able to make it successful, but they
will not let it go easily. Even if IBOC goes no further than AM stereo,
they're simply NOT going to let it go. Not after all the money that's
been spent.
If IBOC is to die, it will die slowly, and over a long period of time.
Stations
will tire of the internal costs associated with running HD/IBOC, and
with no ROI ever possible from total consumer apathy, stations will
tire of paying the on-going fees to iBiquty. Stations refuse to invest
in it, Gen Y thinks the concept is lauable, old consumers don't want
it, and retailers can't sell it.
All of which is true. But the boat is in the water. They're not going
to just abandon ship. Not after all the costs of launch. Radio,
iBiquity, and yes, FCC, will hang onto this for as long as they think
they can turn it around. Remember, AM stereo was a dud, too. With
international uptake. And it took 20 years to die.
FM failed. Twice. The public didn't care. There was virtually no uptake.
Look at it now.
Color TV took 15 years to catch on.
Look at it now.
We're only at the very beginning of the process marketing IBOC
technology. If it's not working, but there are enough people driving
this who think that it can be made successful, they'll keep flaying the
horse until there's nothing left before they give up. And then blame
DXers for the failure.
Even if it cannot be made successful, IBOC will take years to die.
iBiquity has laid out a 5 to 8 year plan...near to a decade, just to
break even. Even if they hit the target, that's only the break even
point. From there, it will take years to build real growth. Or, if not
successful, it will take years for stations, and investors to give up on
the money they've thrown at this issue and finally give up and go away.
FM failed twice. And once it caught on, took nearly two decades to
become what it is. 40 years is a long time to keep swinging....and yet
FM, backed with a lot of creative thinking, and two FCC mandates became
successful 4 decades after launch.
And the only one driving FM for the first 10 years was Edwin
Armstrong. There was no public interest. No industry interest. And no
FCC support.
IBOC has corporate involvement, industry support, and the FCC's
mandate that all new modulation schemes be digital.
It's not going to simply go away.
The FCC learned from the AM Stereo
debacle and will not mandate a shutoff of analog radio.
Don't count on that, either. They didn't learn anything from AM
Stereo. HDTV was supposed to be a market choice, too. Totally voluntary
uptake. And no talk of turning off the NTSC broadcast until and unless
85% of each market had moved to digital TV. And this was to be done
market by market, allowing market forces to make the decisions.
Well, that didn't work. Public interest was low. And new digital
services wanted the spectrum. And they were willing to pay huge dollars
for it.
So, there was an FCC mandate. And now digital TV uptake is strong. I
just added an ATSC tuner to my own system. I now have digital
over-the-air TV. 30 channels of it. (without an HDTV--btw.) NTSC TV is
going away in a little over a year, and the uptake of digital TV
technology is brisk. Resulting in a faster conversion, improved
technology, and much lower prices.
IBOC offers the opportunity for more stations, conditional
access...read that 'subscription radio,'... FCC benefits with more
licensing and process fees...stations see an end to dictatorial
advertisers...they're highly motivated to make IBOC work. No matter what
it takes. And what it may take is an FCC mandate.
Again, HDTV was to be market driven. FCC specifically said there
woudl be no HDTV mandate. Now, there's a mandate. Don't think it can't
happen with Radio. There are too many salivating to get it done for that
not to be an option.
IBOC. It certainly doesn't look good now. You and I agree there. The
public is not interested. Costs of implementation are a sore point for
broadcasters. iBiquity fees are absurd. We agree here.
And nobody is liking where this is going. Not the public. Not the
industry. We agree here, as well.
But there are too many historic examples of new technology
implemetation...even implementation badly executed...that have been
turned around by changing the rules.
FM benefitted from two FCC mandates. HDTV was mandated into life.
History has shown us that FCC can and will mandate what they believe
needs to be mandated. Even if reversing previous decisions to do it.
And as far as the spectrum issue is concerned...digital broadcasting
frees up more local spectra. More stations, more FCC revenues. They've
got a financial interest in this too.
And the MW broadcast band is being eyed for low bitrate digital
services. There is spectrum pressure in favor of IBOC, just as there is
HDTV.
An FCC mandate is not out of the question.
So, take a step back and look at the bigger picture. IBOC isn't
working. You're right about that. We agree. This is a boondoggle. And
it's an expensive boondoggle.
But that's only the picture right now.
There is too much history to suggest that with this much support in
the industry, with this much money spent, with this much motivation on
the part of broadcasters AND FCC....there is just too much historic
evidence to make the claim that IBOC will just go away.
It may fail. But it will not just go away. It will peter out, and
peter out and peter out....just like AM Stereo...and it will take more
than a decade to do it.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
"regardless of the market uptake of this technology, the investors,
the FCC and the stations involved are committed to it... There is too
much history to suggest that with this much support in the industry,
with this much money spent, with this much motivation on the part of
broadcasters AND FCC....there is just too much historic evidence to
make the claim that IBOC will just go away. It may fail. But it will
not just go away. It will peter out, and peter out and peter
out....just like AM Stereo...and it will take more than a decade to do
it."
In response to you, here is the FCC's stance on HD/IBOC:
“4/4/07 - FCC: Market to Decide Fate of HD Radio�
"Other coverage of the FCC's decision notes that iBiquity, the
proprietor of HD Radio, reacted in a manner like they exhal[ed] a sigh
that's been held in for several years. Though it appears that the FCC
has stopped short of a full-on, enthusiastic endorsement of the
technology, it has removed all marketplace barriers to its
proliferation. I don't believe this is because the FCC thinks it's the
best DAB technology available, but it is the horse that the broadcast
industry has its money on. We'll now see whether that bet is a good
investment or not, and we'll be forced to learn the hard way whether
the technology's shortfalls are as egregious as feared. Marketplace
forces are not inexorable, and radio's digital transition will most
likely take a decade or more to really take hold."
http://www.diymedia.net/archive/0407.htm
You obviously need to do more research, before you hysterically blow
unsubstantiated opinions out of your arse. With no consumer interest
after at least two years (really 5 years since HD has been
broadcasting), HD/IBOC will never take-hold. The FCC is not interested
in freeing-up the broadcast bands, as with TV, for auction. Automakers
have no interest in HD/IBOC, just as with the general public - nothing
can force consumers or automakers to buy/install HD radios. Who in
hell cares about listening to radio anymore, except for radio-geeks,
and incidental listening to/from work.
iBiquity will be looking at exit stratagies in the near-futu
"IBiquity sees digital radio signaling changes to come"
"The company has yet to turn a profit and does not expect to do so in
2007 or 2008, Struble said... Mass marketing and consumer adoption is
the last hurdle, Struble said... Representatives of investment firms
that have spots on iBiquity's board of directors could not be reached
for comment, but Struble said they are excited about the progress the
company is making. The focus is not on exit strategies yet, he said."
http://tinyurl.com/3don5y
If you look at my blog, I have acquired far more HD/IBOC knowledge,
over 2 years, than you could ever dream about:
http://hdradiofarce.blogspot.com/
With all due respect, no, you don't.

By your ignorant rants, yes I do!



Actually, you need to read a little more closely. And do some
historical research.

Blogs are fine. But facts are a lot nicer in a discussion.

Do have a nice holiday weekend.

p

"IBOCcrock" wrote in message
...
On Nov 22, 3:33?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"David Eduardo" wrote in message

...



Fe de errata...

This we agree on. And its success is not needed for FM in the short
term,
but it could have had some effect on saving FM from death.

That should be "saving AM" and not FM.

No, it is the music-related FMs that are screwed - news/talk/sports on
the 50KW AMs is alive and well.

No, it is not. When stations like KGO in San Francisco have lost a third or
more of their billing in the last 7 year period, and the audience in 25-54
has never been lower, AM is in crisis. The talk formats are moving ever more
rapidly to FM, with the latest being 50 kw WIBC in Indianapolis, whose
format moves totally to FM in 40 days.

AM -HD will destroy AM with adjacent-
channel interference and poor coverage. Most 60kw AMs are rated #1, or
in the top-5.

Actually, most are not. 50 kw KMIK in Phoenix is dead last. 50 kw KBLA in LA
is second from last.

There are only a handful of 50 kw AMs that are #1, such as KMOX, WCCO, KGO,
KMJ. None are #1 or clese to it in 25-54.

There are 98 50 kw day and night stations. About 10 are #1 or #2. None is #1
or 2 in 25-54. More than half are not even in the top 10 in 25-54, the only
ages that count for sales.

wrote in message
...
On Nov 22, 12:55 pm, IBOCcrock wrote:

Stations have always had unsold air time.

Correct. When stations approach sellout, they move the rates to a higher
grid and charge more. "If you are sold out, you are selling too cheap."

That's where they fit in
their public service extras.

No, when there is unsold time, we play more music, or cluster the spots to
do a music sweep.

And if they still have left overs - they
hire an ad agency to sell -- " public service reminders brought to you
by some local business" which helps pick up the unsold air time.

That is in very, very, very small markets. No rated market station with
audience will let a third party sell their inventory.

The
stations that have the most audience have less unsold air times -- the
stations with the smaller audiences - have more unsold air time. I
don't think that unsold air time can prove that terrestrial radio.
And stations sources of income have broaden from just air time
anyways. They have new revenue streams now to make up for deficits in
other areas.

Further, there are times of the year when demand in higher, and times when
it is lower, just like in TV or print or cable. That is an indication of
market conditions, not a failure of radio..

On Nov 22, 7:25 pm, "
wrote:
On Nov 22, 4:14 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:





"Brenda Ann" wrote in message

m...

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...

FM failed. Twice. The public didn't care. There was virtually no
uptake.

Look at it now.

FM didn't require people to throw out their old radios and buy new ones.

It didn't? How did you listen to FM on an AM radio. Similarly, HD does not
require anyone buy a new radio unless they want to... the analog signals
continue to be broadcast. Of course, you had the choice of simply not buying
an FM radio, which is what 99% of the people did for the first 25 years of
FM broadcasting.

Color TV didn't require people to throw out their B/W sets and buy an
expensive new color set. Color TV didn't interfere with existing B/W
television services and was still viewable on existing B/W sets.

Just as current radios will continue to receive analog signals.

So, then are you saying that HD radio, once all stations go to that,
will require everyone to purchase an HD radio - or could one still
listen to the station on a regular radio - with just poorer quality
reception??- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

BAJ,

You can not listen to the "HD" Radio 'Digital' Signal
on an Anolog Radio.

1 - Buy a HD Radio and Listen for Free.

2 - Buy a Internet Radio and Pay a Month Fee.

3 - Buy a Satellite Radio and Pay a Month Fee.

Your Future Choice : Free -or- Monthly Fee

~ RHF

RHF wrote:

snip

2 - Buy a Internet Radio and Pay a Month Fee.

Many WiFi Internet Radio appliances are already on the market;
these are often used near public "hot spots" or open WiFi
access points and don't require any fee. Many communities
have a stated goal to provide large-area WiFi open access
for VoIP, email and internet radio appliances and mesh
and ad-hoc networks are also becoming more widespread.
In urban areas at least, this will be a competition to
terrestrial radio.

Regards,

Michael

On Nov 22, 5:16Â*pm, IBOCcrock wrote:
On Nov 21, 10:52Â*pm, D Peter Maus wrote:





IBOCcrock wrote:
On Nov 21, 2:07�pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"IBOCcrock" wrote in message

....

On Nov 21, 2:00 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in
...
� �About 90% of the population still listens to the radio. �Even those
with access to, and regular use of, other technologies.
Actually, it is over 95%. Roughly the same as it was in 1965.
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2015 2020
Ah, you called Miss Cleo. Ask what Google stock will be at, will you?

In the mid-60's, pundits said FM would never make it and radio would die due
to TV. Those predictions are as accurate as yours. The satellite numbers are
totally bogus, as sat radio has hit a brick wall on new subscriptions and
the churn rate is huge after the free trial offers expire.

Poor argument - the 1960's didn't have cell phone/streaming, Satellite
Radio, the Internet, Internet Radio, etc...no nearly the same
situation Bud!

Â* Â*What's not acknowledged is that FM failed. Twice.

Â* Â*Before it didn't. FCC mandates were in part responsible.

Â* Â*Don't underestimate the power of commitment.

Â* Â*There's been a huge investment in this technology. There's been an
FCC mandate that all new modulation schemes be digital. Â*And there's
been a half a billion dollars spent in promotion. The point is not that
HD's success is assured, but rather that HD's demise is not assured
either. This is not going away anytime soon. It may go away, but it's
far from over.

Â* Â*And the forces that have sway are in a good position to make it a
full-on madated conversion.

Â* Â*If you really want to fight this, you'll not be successful by
reporting it's premature demise.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

"6/1/07 - FCC Releases Detailed Digital Audio Broadcast Rules"

"At some point in the future, when the Commission determines there is
sufficient market penetration of digital receivers, iBiquity asserts
that the public interest will be best served by reversing this
presumption to favor digital operations....We decline to adopt
iBiquity’s presumption policy because it is too early in the DAB
conversion process for us to consider such a mechanism. We find that
such a policy, if adopted now, may have unknown and unintended
consequences for a new technology that has yet to be accepted by the
public or widely adopted by the broadcast industry."

http://www.diymedia.net/archive/0607.htm

“4/4/07 - FCC: Market to Decide Fate of HD Radio�

"Though it appears that the FCC has stopped short of a full-on,
enthusiastic endorsement of the technology, it has removed all
marketplace barriers to its proliferation. I don't believe this is
because the FCC thinks it's the best DAB technology available, but it
is the horse that the broadcast industry has its money on. We'll now
see whether that bet is a good investment or not, and we'll be forced
to learn the hard way whether the technology's shortfalls are as
egregious as feared."

http://www.diymedia.net/archive/0407.htm
-
- As I stated, it is up to the marketplace to determine the fate
- of HD Radio - with total consumer apathy and zero uptake of
- HD radios in two years, HD/IBOC will never happen
- I win!
-

IBOC Crock -proclaims- I Win !

DOH ! - Your Hate of All-Things-Radio Makes
You An A#1 Loser - now crock on ~ RHF