Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I guess I have bored everyone to tears by this point, but I finally
got an answer to a question that has bothered me for years:"Why did the FCC chose the levels specified in "Class A" and "Class B" digital devices?". After several fruitless attempts at getting a straight answer from the FCC, I lucked out. I met an retired engineer and he cited a "CBEMA Study 2" that specified the lowest useful field was 48dBuV/M. 48dBuV/M is pretty damn weak. I now understand why devices that clearly met "Class B" requirements, I know because I did the tests, was still a horrible RFI source. Given the near uselessness of Class B, and the clear uselessness of Class A, ratings, the only option weak signal DXers have is to apply as much filtering as we can afford. If I manage to find a online version of what "CBEMA study 2" I will post the link. I did find one reference in an article written by Michel Mardigiuan. http://www.ieee.org/organizations/pu...emcs/summer99/ comment.htm Most of the references that I can find that mention "CBEMA" have more to do with power mains quality then RFI/EMI issues. Terry |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
AM recption notes. | Shortwave | |||
some notes on the forging | Policy | |||
Sirrus Notes | Shortwave | |||
Sirrus Notes | Shortwave | |||
Some notes on using a PCR1000 on SW | Shortwave |