Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second Why? Because it is not yet necessary. dxAce Michigan USA |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "dxAce" wrote in message ... David wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second Why? Because it is not yet necessary. Thought they did away with the leap second some years ago? Or was that the leap minute? Memory just isn't what it used to be (was it ever?). |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
dxAce wrote:
David wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second Why? Because it is not yet necessary. dxAce Michigan USA We're off the same as we were in 1999 and more than we were in 1994. The last correction was plus 300 ms; obviously someone thinks that's an acceptable deviation. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David wrote: dxAce wrote: David wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second Why? Because it is not yet necessary. We're off the same as we were in 1999 and more than we were in 1994. The last correction was plus 300 ms; obviously someone thinks that's an acceptable deviation. Obviously. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
leap second | Shortwave | |||
U.S. Wants To Scrap Leap Seconds Due To GPS Bug | Shortwave | |||
Leap second | Shortwave | |||
Leap Day Logs | Shortwave | |||
Leap Night Logs | Shortwave |