"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"IBOCcrock" wrote in message
...

Hey Eduardo - you are worth a $1.85 !

Actually, the company I work for went private at a very nice share
price.
Those with options got big checks, too.

Even the faux Hispanics, such as yourself? Wow, you can go buy yourself
some fun
in Tijuana now, can't you?

No, I bought Suncor at $19 with it.

What you buy, two or three shares?

Add 4 zeros.

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"IBOCcrock" wrote in message
...

Hey Eduardo - you are worth a $1.85 !

Actually, the company I work for went private at a very nice share
price.
Those with options got big checks, too.

Even the faux Hispanics, such as yourself? Wow, you can go buy yourself
some fun
in Tijuana now, can't you?

No, I bought Suncor at $19 with it.

What you buy, two or three shares?

Add 4 zeros.

Uh-huh. And whose name is it in? Certainly not yours. Just like those radio
stations in SA.

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"IBOCcrock" wrote in message
...

Hey Eduardo - you are worth a $1.85 !

Actually, the company I work for went private at a very nice share
price.
Those with options got big checks, too.

Even the faux Hispanics, such as yourself? Wow, you can go buy
yourself
some fun
in Tijuana now, can't you?

No, I bought Suncor at $19 with it.

What you buy, two or three shares?

Add 4 zeros.

Uh-huh. And whose name is it in? Certainly not yours. Just like those
radio
stations in SA.

As with most people, it is in the name of a living trust.

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"IBOCcrock" wrote in message
...

Hey Eduardo - you are worth a $1.85 !

Actually, the company I work for went private at a very nice share
price.
Those with options got big checks, too.

Even the faux Hispanics, such as yourself? Wow, you can go buy
yourself
some fun
in Tijuana now, can't you?

No, I bought Suncor at $19 with it.

What you buy, two or three shares?

Add 4 zeros.

Uh-huh. And whose name is it in? Certainly not yours. Just like those
radio
stations in SA.

As with most people, it is in the name of a living trust.

Like everything you've done your entire life...
....in someone else's name!

I'm LMFAO, Mr. Gay-Lick!

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


Uh-huh. And whose name is it in? Certainly not yours. Just like those
radio
stations in SA.

As with most people, it is in the name of a living trust.

Like everything you've done your entire life...
...in someone else's name!

Obviously you do not know anything about issues of liability and avoiding
probate.

For investments, a sensible person would at least maintain investments in a
brokerage account where the shares are in a street name so they can be
traded instantly. Such an account would be under a living trust to avoid
probate and for certain tax advantages.

A business should always be in some form of a corporation to protect the
owner(s) from liability issues. The assets of the corporation would be held
under a corporate name, but the assets of the individual owners or investors
are protected from the debts or liabilities of the business activity.

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


Uh-huh. And whose name is it in? Certainly not yours. Just like those
radio
stations in SA.

As with most people, it is in the name of a living trust.

Like everything you've done your entire life...
...in someone else's name!

Obviously you do not know anything about issues of liability and avoiding
probate.

But, I do know about pathological liars, such as yourself.



For investments, a sensible person would at least maintain investments in a
brokerage account where the shares are in a street name so they can be
traded instantly. Such an account would be under a living trust to avoid
probate and for certain tax advantages.

A business should always be in some form of a corporation to protect the
owner(s) from liability issues. The assets of the corporation would be held
under a corporate name, but the assets of the individual owners or investors
are protected from the debts or liabilities of the business activity.

Thing is, you've never actually owned much of anything.

Always been in 'someone else's name', etc.

Nothing that was ever traceable to you, which is very interesting.

I'm certain the IRS will be just as amused as I am.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

dxAce wrote:

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


Uh-huh. And whose name is it in? Certainly not yours. Just like those
radio
stations in SA.

As with most people, it is in the name of a living trust.

Like everything you've done your entire life...
...in someone else's name!

Obviously you do not know anything about issues of liability and avoiding
probate.

But, I do know about pathological liars, such as yourself.



For investments, a sensible person would at least maintain investments in a
brokerage account where the shares are in a street name so they can be
traded instantly. Such an account would be under a living trust to avoid
probate and for certain tax advantages.

A business should always be in some form of a corporation to protect the
owner(s) from liability issues. The assets of the corporation would be held
under a corporate name, but the assets of the individual owners or investors
are protected from the debts or liabilities of the business activity.

Thing is, you've never actually owned much of anything.

Always been in 'someone else's name', etc.

Nothing that was ever traceable to you, which is very interesting.

I'm certain the IRS will be just as amused as I am.

Hey, I love kickin' gay-lick ass!

Now, if I were you, you might consider hauling your little hind-lick faux ass
outta here and make a new start somewhere else in 2008.

Something for your faux Hispanic cock sucking brain to think about, eh?

And, as always, leave the SWBC DX to the big boys.

dxAce wrote:

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


Uh-huh. And whose name is it in? Certainly not yours. Just like those
radio
stations in SA.

As with most people, it is in the name of a living trust.

Like everything you've done your entire life...
...in someone else's name!

Obviously you do not know anything about issues of liability and avoiding
probate.

But, I do know about pathological liars, such as yourself.



For investments, a sensible person would at least maintain investments in a
brokerage account where the shares are in a street name so they can be
traded instantly. Such an account would be under a living trust to avoid
probate and for certain tax advantages.

A business should always be in some form of a corporation to protect the
owner(s) from liability issues. The assets of the corporation would be held
under a corporate name, but the assets of the individual owners or investors
are protected from the debts or liabilities of the business activity.

Thing is, you've never actually owned much of anything.

Always been in 'someone else's name', etc.

Nothing that was ever traceable to you, which is very interesting.

I'm certain the IRS will be just as amused as I am.

I'll be calling them first thing tomorrow.

Nothing faux about that, eh boy?

On Jan 6, 6:30*pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message

...



Uh-huh. And whose name is it in? Certainly not yours. Just like those
radio
stations in SA.

As with most people, it is in the name of a living trust.

Like everything you've done your entire life...
...in someone else's name!

Obviously you do not know anything about issues of liability and avoiding
probate.

For investments, a sensible person would at least maintain investments in a
brokerage account where the shares are in a street name so they can be
traded instantly. Such an account would be under a living trust to avoid
probate and for certain tax advantages.

A business should always be in some form of a corporation to protect the
owner(s) from liability issues. The assets of the corporation would be held
under a corporate name, but the assets of the individual owners or investors
are protected from the debts or liabilities of the business activity.

Yes, but this doesn't imply that those with brokerage accounts
necessarily tell the truth 100% of the time. Even if you're only
trying to throw up a smoke screen here, you'll have to be more subtle
than this.

"Steve" wrote in message
...


Yes, but this doesn't imply that those with brokerage accounts
necessarily tell the truth 100% of the time. Even if you're only
trying to throw up a smoke screen here, you'll have to be more subtle
than this.

Investment accounts are subject to 1099 reporting. Any brokerage account
1099 will show distribution of dividends, long and short term capital gains
and any other taxable transaction, with the data being transmitted to the
IRS electronically. I even have an account that I closed but which ended up
with about $30 left sine some kind of dividend was in processing when I
closed the account and I get an annual 1099 for a couple of cents of
dividends and occasional capital gains of a dollar or two. I have to put
that on my tax return, too.

I can't see how anyone could hide income or capital gains from a brokerage
account since the IRS gets all the data automatically on every such account.
The IRS computers can instantly note a mis-match of income reported at the
source and income declared on a return. Heck, even the interest on checking
and savings accounts gets reported to the IRS.