Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steve" wrote in message ... On Jan 7, 11:42 am, "David Eduardo" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message ... Yes, but this doesn't imply that those with brokerage accounts necessarily tell the truth 100% of the time. Even if you're only trying to throw up a smoke screen here, you'll have to be more subtle than this. Investment accounts are subject to 1099 reporting. Any brokerage account 1099 will show distribution of dividends, long and short term capital gains and any other taxable transaction, with the data being transmitted to the IRS electronically. I even have an account that I closed but which ended up with about $30 left sine some kind of dividend was in processing when I closed the account and I get an annual 1099 for a couple of cents of dividends and occasional capital gains of a dollar or two. I have to put that on my tax return, too. I can't see how anyone could hide income or capital gains from a brokerage account since the IRS gets all the data automatically on every such account. The IRS computers can instantly note a mis-match of income reported at the source and income declared on a return. Heck, even the interest on checking and savings accounts gets reported to the IRS. I don't see how your remarks above are relevant. You aren't trying to hide anything from the IRS, so far as I know. You're simply lying to the readers of this group about how much money you have. You don't have to have much money to find advantages in a living trust. Even if a family's only wealth is in home equity, it is appropriate. Have you ever thought about taking up a hobby, like stamp collecting? My hobby and profession are the same, radio. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David Eduardo wrote: "Steve" wrote in message ... On Jan 7, 11:42 am, "David Eduardo" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message ... Yes, but this doesn't imply that those with brokerage accounts necessarily tell the truth 100% of the time. Even if you're only trying to throw up a smoke screen here, you'll have to be more subtle than this. Investment accounts are subject to 1099 reporting. Any brokerage account 1099 will show distribution of dividends, long and short term capital gains and any other taxable transaction, with the data being transmitted to the IRS electronically. I even have an account that I closed but which ended up with about $30 left sine some kind of dividend was in processing when I closed the account and I get an annual 1099 for a couple of cents of dividends and occasional capital gains of a dollar or two. I have to put that on my tax return, too. I can't see how anyone could hide income or capital gains from a brokerage account since the IRS gets all the data automatically on every such account. The IRS computers can instantly note a mis-match of income reported at the source and income declared on a return. Heck, even the interest on checking and savings accounts gets reported to the IRS. I don't see how your remarks above are relevant. You aren't trying to hide anything from the IRS, so far as I know. You're simply lying to the readers of this group about how much money you have. You don't have to have much money to find advantages in a living trust. Even if a family's only wealth is in home equity, it is appropriate. Have you ever thought about taking up a hobby, like stamp collecting? My hobby and profession are the same, radio. I just gotta take a moment here to LMFAO! |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 7, 2:37*pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message ... On Jan 7, 11:42 am, "David Eduardo" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message ... Yes, but this doesn't imply that those with brokerage accounts necessarily tell the truth 100% of the time. Even if you're only trying to throw up a smoke screen here, you'll have to be more subtle than this. Investment accounts are subject to 1099 reporting. Any brokerage account 1099 will show distribution of dividends, long and short term capital gains and any other taxable transaction, with the data being transmitted to the IRS electronically. I even have an account that I closed but which ended up with about $30 left sine some kind of dividend was in processing when I closed the account and I get an annual 1099 for a couple of cents of dividends and occasional capital gains of a dollar or two. I have to put that on my tax return, too. I can't see how anyone could hide income or capital gains from a brokerage account since the IRS gets all the data automatically on every such account. The IRS computers can instantly note a mis-match of income reported at the source and income declared on a return. Heck, even the interest on checking and savings accounts gets reported to the IRS. I don't see how your remarks above are relevant. You aren't trying to hide anything from the IRS, so far as I know. You're simply lying to the readers of this group about how much money you have. You don't have to have much money to find advantages in a living trust. Even if a family's only wealth is in home equity, it is appropriate. Have you ever thought about taking up a hobby, like stamp collecting? My hobby and profession are the same, radio.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You mean business, don't you? You appear to be a businessman who has nothing but disdain for radio. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steve" wrote in message ... You mean business, don't you? You appear to be a businessman who has nothing but disdain for radio. Radio, except for government run facilities, is a business. Even private sector non-commercial stations, like HCJB, are businesses with budgets and systems intended to make them run efficiently. Most broadcasters know that they can not have a successful business without listeners. So I have considerable respect for the listener and spend most of my time finding out at the street level what they want from radio stations in their market. MW and FM stations' markets are, today, the metropolitan area where they operate, not someplace far away... so for such cases, "listener" is synonymous with "local listener." Having lived and worked many decades ago in a nation where, at one time, domestic SW was the only "local" radio for a significant part of the population, I can still remember when SW might have fit a commercial station's business model. Today, in most places, it does not. Any disdain I feel is for those who think that yesterday's radio is relevant today. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David Eduardo wrote: "Steve" wrote in message ... You mean business, don't you? You appear to be a businessman who has nothing but disdain for radio. Radio, except for government run facilities, is a business. Even private sector non-commercial stations, like HCJB, are businesses with budgets and systems intended to make them run efficiently. Most broadcasters know that they can not have a successful business without listeners. So I have considerable respect for the listener and spend most of my time finding out at the street level what they want from radio stations in their market. MW and FM stations' markets are, today, the metropolitan area where they operate, not someplace far away... so for such cases, "listener" is synonymous with "local listener." Having lived and worked many decades ago in a nation where, at one time, domestic SW was the only "local" radio for a significant part of the population, I can still remember when SW might have fit a commercial station's business model. Today, in most places, it does not. Any disdain I feel is for those who think that yesterday's radio is relevant today. Ain't that the nation that tossed your lying ass out? |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "Steve" wrote in message ... You mean business, don't you? You appear to be a businessman who has nothing but disdain for radio. Radio, except for government run facilities, is a business. Even private sector non-commercial stations, like HCJB, are businesses with budgets and systems intended to make them run efficiently. Most broadcasters know that they can not have a successful business without listeners. So I have considerable respect for the listener and spend most of my time finding out at the street level what they want from radio stations in their market. MW and FM stations' markets are, today, the metropolitan area where they operate, not someplace far away... so for such cases, "listener" is synonymous with "local listener." Having lived and worked many decades ago in a nation where, at one time, domestic SW was the only "local" radio for a significant part of the population, I can still remember when SW might have fit a commercial station's business model. Today, in most places, it does not. Any disdain I feel is for those who think that yesterday's radio is relevant today. Ain't that the nation that tossed your lying ass out? When you have risked your life and property to defend democracy, let me know. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "Steve" wrote in message ... You mean business, don't you? You appear to be a businessman who has nothing but disdain for radio. Radio, except for government run facilities, is a business. Even private sector non-commercial stations, like HCJB, are businesses with budgets and systems intended to make them run efficiently. Most broadcasters know that they can not have a successful business without listeners. So I have considerable respect for the listener and spend most of my time finding out at the street level what they want from radio stations in their market. MW and FM stations' markets are, today, the metropolitan area where they operate, not someplace far away... so for such cases, "listener" is synonymous with "local listener." Having lived and worked many decades ago in a nation where, at one time, domestic SW was the only "local" radio for a significant part of the population, I can still remember when SW might have fit a commercial station's business model. Today, in most places, it does not. Any disdain I feel is for those who think that yesterday's radio is relevant today. Ain't that the nation that tossed your lying ass out? When you have risked your life and property to defend democracy, let me know. Damn! You sure are hilarious! |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "Steve" wrote in message ... You mean business, don't you? You appear to be a businessman who has nothing but disdain for radio. Radio, except for government run facilities, is a business. Even private sector non-commercial stations, like HCJB, are businesses with budgets and systems intended to make them run efficiently. Most broadcasters know that they can not have a successful business without listeners. So I have considerable respect for the listener and spend most of my time finding out at the street level what they want from radio stations in their market. MW and FM stations' markets are, today, the metropolitan area where they operate, not someplace far away... so for such cases, "listener" is synonymous with "local listener." Having lived and worked many decades ago in a nation where, at one time, domestic SW was the only "local" radio for a significant part of the population, I can still remember when SW might have fit a commercial station's business model. Today, in most places, it does not. Any disdain I feel is for those who think that yesterday's radio is relevant today. Ain't that the nation that tossed your lying ass out? When you have risked your life and property to defend democracy, let me know. Please, enlighten us once again with your tales! |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "dxAce" wrote in message ... Please, enlighten us once again with your tales! Please enlighten us once again about how you bought 10,000 rounds of Russian ammo. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
dxAce wrote:
David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "Steve" wrote in message ... You mean business, don't you? You appear to be a businessman who has nothing but disdain for radio. Radio, except for government run facilities, is a business. Even private sector non-commercial stations, like HCJB, are businesses with budgets and systems intended to make them run efficiently. Most broadcasters know that they can not have a successful business without listeners. So I have considerable respect for the listener and spend most of my time finding out at the street level what they want from radio stations in their market. MW and FM stations' markets are, today, the metropolitan area where they operate, not someplace far away... so for such cases, "listener" is synonymous with "local listener." Having lived and worked many decades ago in a nation where, at one time, domestic SW was the only "local" radio for a significant part of the population, I can still remember when SW might have fit a commercial station's business model. Today, in most places, it does not. Any disdain I feel is for those who think that yesterday's radio is relevant today. Ain't that the nation that tossed your lying ass out? When you have risked your life and property to defend democracy, let me know. Please, enlighten us once again with your tales! Yeah, even I want to hear about how you defend democracy by leaving the conflict. The heroes I know, who risked life and property to defend democracy took up arms and brought the fight to those who would challenge democracy. There is no risk in leaving the fight behind. And as I said some time ago, the only thing I've ever heard you renounce is your citizenship. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
HD radios made with crappy tuners ! | Shortwave | |||
Survey Finds Great Growth in Christian Radio Broadcasting | Broadcasting | |||
Satellite radio growth projections stir concern | Broadcasting | |||
Looking for a crappy antenna. | Antenna |