|
RHF = Idiocy & Brain Damage
Mike wrote:
On Jan 16, 12:20�pm, (Michael Black) wrote: bpnjensen ) writes: On Jan 16, 2:31=A0am, BCBlazysusan wrote: On Jan 15, 10:50=A0pm, RHF wrote: On Jan 15, 6:50=A0pm, wrote: On Jan 15, 12:56 pm, wrote: Poor Roy, he must h= ave been exposed to massive amounts of microwave energy or RF energy. He simply cannot make a post without those redundant cut n' paste links he deems important to life on this planet. What a goddamn dork!!! +++++++++++++++++++++++ -=A0Keep in mind the guy was a government bureaucrat for 30 years. Bureaucrat -nah- I was simply a low level US Civil Servant doing a Job. -ps- It was 32+ Years - That explains why he acts the way he does. Could Be . . . - The arrogance and compulsive {with a} need to be in charge Very True. - (evidenced here by his self appointed moderator role) and Clearly I am failing at that task : Based on this and other Posts about me; and not about Shortwave Radio. - his smug "I'm the smartest guy in the room" attitude. Dang - You Got That Right -but- Then Again I do sign many of my Posts "pomkia" - POMKIA =3D Plain Old Mister Know It All . - In short, he's a caricature of himself - pompous, arrogant, self - righteous, hypocritical http://www.octanecreative.com/knowitall/jpgs/mr_kia.jpg - (chronically scolding others for off topic posting while he is - one of the worst offenders) and obnoxious Dang - You Got That Right ! - the consummate {petty} bureaucrat. Again - I was just a low level US Civil Servant. - =A0Roy's 30 years as a government parasite The Truth {Reality} is that the vast majority of US Civile Servants are Good Decent Hard Working People who Earn their Salary. - making the lives of people who paid his salary miserable - prepared him well for his current role as - resident pain in the ass. Well at least I appear to have succeeded with you. :o) ! ~ RHF =A0. RHF, Don't let em' get you down. FWIW I have your back. I really need to start posting posting more. I really miss Steve/Bryants 'conversations'....lol.....those were classics IMO back in the day. Many great people IMO in here just a few bad apples. Ole' DXlover waving a hand at you. :-)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Ditto too, and RHF, you're OK in my book - I may not always agree with your politics (but sometimes do), but there is no shame at all in your postings about radios, antennas and equipment, or how to use them. The feebs who have criticized? �I doubt if they know a kilowatt from a kilocycle. Some bozo who constantly yammers on, posting when he usually has little to say, posting links rather than real comments, posting in a completely unreadable style, constantly changing subject headers, playing "moderator" when his skill is so horrific that it only makes things worse, and being a big source of the animosity here, well that defines the state of the newsgroup. �"RHF" isn't the only one, but he certainly enables the other junk posters. Wade through the off topic posts, the political bickering and admonishments, and there isn't much here. �Far better for the yammerers to be silent for a time than to constantly spew. �And yes, you will see three or four posters, including the bozo "RHF", in the thick of all that drivel. There was a time when if someone asked a simple question, they'd be told to look it up themselves. �But nowadays, this newsgroup is full of people who do that work for the lazy, merely posting links. �And when people do that, who's to know whether they know anything or not? There is no value in posting such links, because the original poster should be doing that work themselves. �But instead, we get all these link posters, and nobody around to really address the question that may not be properly asked. The only reason this bozo RHF is getting accolades is because the newsgroup has decayed so much that many have left, and a new wave that doesn't know better has moved in. �SOmeone who can't keep his mouth shut is bound to dominate a newsgroup, and that's what people are reacting to. �Look between the lines, and there is little of substance there, and the only reason he becomes a "valuable source" is because the good posters of the old days have faded away, so there's nothing better than a bozo posting links. A newsgroup is not healthy if only a handful dominate. �Drive off a wide range of readers, and the newsgroup declines, because as long as people are reading a newsgroup, they may reply when they actually have something to add, so some obscure topic gets a real answer instead of another stupid link. �Or that person who only replies a few times a year may have some obscure bit of knowledge that few know, so if they tune out, there goes the knowledge. It's telling that the bozo RHF never looks things up in this newsgroup, he's constantly linking to other sources of information. This is what the newsgroup used to be like, before the bozos and the village idiots took over: From: (Michael Black) Subject: Double conversion Vs Triple conversion Date: 2000/02/17 Message-ID: X-Deja-AN: 587020050 References: Organization: Communications Accessibles Montreal, Quebec Canada Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave In article , dan wrote: All: I am considering buying a new World Band reciever; (- this may be my lifes work ) Does anyone know, in laymans terms, what �the advantages of a triple conversion receiver Vs double conversion receiver are; �and, if one is listening Just to world band, �is there a really good choice of triple conversion receiver; all things (antenna, location) being equal.. Really difficult to hear stations are the most interesting to try to receive; Indonesia, New Zealand on a bad night, WBCQ on Saturdays.. etc. - Dan How many conversions a receiver has is not a direct indication of performance. The whole point of superheterodyne receivers is to get the incoming signal to a frequency where amplification and selectivity can easily be accomplished. The superhet is something like 80 years old, which is barely younger than radio itself. When it was invented, the state of the technology could only mean that the superhet would convert to a lower frequency. It was easier to get amplification there, and since it was a fixed frequency as opposed to variabl4e frequency if amplification took place on the signal frequency, you wouldn't need constant readjustment. Selectivity may have been a mere byproduct; �I know I've seen early schematics of superhets where provides no selectivity, only amplification. Of course, with time, selectivity became an important reason for the superhet. But once the superhet was invented, it became clear that there was a problem. �In the conversion to another frequency, the IF (Intermediate Freuqency), you'd also get an image frequency. �Basically, that meant that anywhere you tuned the receiver, you would pick up two signals, the one you want and one that was a side effect of the conversion. With the relatively low frequencies used for the IFs in the early days, the only way to get rid of the unwanted image frequency was to put more selectivity on the signal frequency, which in some ways the superhet was supposed to eliminate. �Usually there was no problem in the �AM broadcast band, and even in the low shortwave bands, because relatively simple front end selectivity could give enough rejection of the image frequency. �But a lot of cheap receivers from the old days bombed on the highest band, the one that ended at 30Mhz, because there was way too little selectivity in the front end to get rid of the image frequency. Of course, the more expensive receivers did put more selectivity in the front end, and suffered far less. �The HRO series were manufacturered up into the sixties (or was it the late fifties?), and they still had a 455KHz IF. �But they had two RF stages and associated tuned circuits to get rid of the image frequency. With time, somebody thought of the idea of double conversion. �Convert the incoming signal to a frequency high enough that it would place the image frequency far enough away that the front end would reject it sufficiently, and then a second conversion to a frequency where the real amplification and selectivity could take place. �Of course, if the design wasn't done right, it could be horrible since you now had two sets of image frequencies to get rid of, and of course you added a second oscillator inside the receiver to generate spurious signals. Triple conversion was just an extension of that, though in some cases it was used to add special features. One of the problems of double, or triple, conversion is that in that era it put a fair amount of amplification before the ultimate selectivity of the receiver. �So the tuned circuits before the final IF would take out the image frequency, but a strong signal not that far from the desired signal would pass without attenuation, and if it was strong enough it could overload one of the stages. With time, technology allowed for a different implementation of the superhet. �You could have good selectivity at a high frequency, and of course tubes and later transistors got good enough that they could amplify with no problem at high frequencies. So there was a move back to single conversion receivers, with the IF in the 9MHz range, or thereabouts. �The IF was far enough away that only the strongest signals on the image frequency could get by relatively simple front end selectivity. �And the selectivity could be put right after the mixer, meaning that all the rest of the receiver saw only the bandwidth of a single "channel". The mixer was still vulnerable to overload, though there were improvements in that area around the same time, but at least it was reduced to only one mixer. �And in many cases the high IF allowed for no amplification before the mixer, again helping the receiver's overload resistance. Of course, there were problems. �Having the IF in the middle of the range the receiver was trying to tune was a problem. �And those crystal filters could be expensive. With time, mainly when ICs allowed for cheap synthesizers so the local oscillator could operate at a high frequency and still be stable, the first IF moved up above the 30MHz. �The whole shortwave band could then be tuned without a gap, and there were other good reasons for moving the IF there. The problem was that a filter at 45MHz or so could be terribly expensive, and it might even be difficult to get narrow selectivity in that range. So receivers moved back to double conversion. �The filter at the first IF would be little wider than the widest selectivity desired, so the rest of the receiver would have to deal with a relatively small slice of spectrum. �And the IF was high enough that virtually anything in the way of front end selectivity would reject the image frequency, allowing for quite a bit of flexibility in the front end design. �Of course, the overload resistance of the mixer became an issue as the selectivity decreased in the front end; �it had always been a problem, but image rejection had been a more immediate need for that front end selectivity. And of course, triple conversion also returned. �But it was for things like passband tuning, rather than to deal with limited technology. The point to all this is that conversion is a trade-off. Triple conversion will give you pass band tuning, but if not done carefully will give you spurious responses. �But that triple conversion is giving you a feature, better to be assesed on the basis of that feature, rather than as an absolute. �If you wanted to pay the high price, a single conversion receiver with a bank of filters of various bandwidths operating at 45MHz or so would probably be best, since you don't have to worry about the problems of multiple conversion. �But people want multiple bandwidths and lower cost, so you end up with double conversion receivers. �Likewise, they want poassband tuning, so they end up with triple conversion. But you can't compare two receivers by looking at how many conversions, and say this one is better than that one because it has double (or triple conversion). �You have to look at the overall design, and the specs. As for scanners, that someone brought up in this thread, the need for multiple conversions is a reflection of the wide frequency;coverage that many of them provide, and the multiple conversions could be seen in the same light as multiple conversions in receivers of yesteryears. �They need it to get rid of the image frequencies. The technology hasn't caught up enough with the needed range. � � Michael OK. This post requires temporary de-cloaking! Will you please consider distributing to the group whatever you're obviously on? You start off complaining about RHF and people posting links, then you cite a silly post from DiverDan about selecting a cheap portable as being what this group should aspire to, and ramble into the most esoteric post I think I've ever read on receiver design. Wow. That's impressive. Can you say "tangential"? After leaving this zoo for over 2.5 years (except for a few minor incursions) I think I can say with certainty that though people like Steve Lare (DXAce) and Roy Fisk (RHF) are often difficult to deal with, they are clearly the most valuable contributors in RRS. Lare's contributions to DXLD and BDXC are valuable resources in the international DX community and his links to EiBi updates invaluable in this post-ILG world. RHF's tireless efforts to disseminate antenna info through his Yahoo group is a MONUMENTAL service to the community. I don't like their politics, but they help keep this hobby alive in difficult times. Yeah, they probably shouldn't post when drunk, but none of the rest of us are really perfect, either. Anyone who really believes these people are hurting the hobby by providing useful links is someone the hobby would probably be better off without. Who knows? Maybe, if I stay away long enough, I'll gain the perspective to understand what Telamon's contribution to the hobby really is. Right now, I haven't got the faintest concept of why anyone would read his posts.... ;-) Re-cloaking, MWBRYANT Why not just post a link to the Google results page, instead of posting each individual site? Why not follow rules for punctuation? Those of us with licenses know the rules require that communications be as clear as possible, in the interest of keeping monkey chatter to a minimum. (Now, Google "monkey chatter" for everyone.) I can go back 5 years and find the same RHF posts. |
RHF = Idiocy & Brain Damage
The best one was when Burr said he smacked a woman for cussin out
Vietnam Veterans.Thank you, Mr.Burr. cuhulin |
RHF = Idiocy & Brain Damage
David wrote:
Why not just post a link to the Google results page, instead of posting each individual site? Why not follow rules for punctuation? *Those of us with licenses know the rules require that communications be as clear as possible, in the interest of keeping monkey chatter to a minimum. (Now, Google "monkey chatter" for everyone.) I can go back 5 years and find the same RHF posts. What's so wrong with posting individual URLs? If you aren't interested in the info, why bother clicking on it? Newbies, the ones that might benefit the most from such actions, may not understand how to properly conduct a wide-ranging search. Sometimes the search engines bury you in URLs unrelated to what you're looking for. Castigating RHF and DXAce simply because they post links seems to be focusing negativity on the MOST USEFUL things those guys do in here. You'd think that you, more than most, would be encouraging these guys to spend more time posting links instead of ridiculing YOU daily. Punctuation? I teach public speaking and I find that most people that even try to have perfect grammar are suffering from delusions regarding their own self-grandeur. Understandability is the key and I don't have any problem understanding what RHF is trying to say. He may not be the best speller in the world, but his efforts at disseminating antenna info hardly are suffering from any non-standard spelling or punctuation. There are many contributors in here with good punctuation and spelling, but nothing of any real value to read. If you go back five years, you'll see that RHF was posting DIFFERENT links back then. To be honest, I think the quality of his links has improved significantly. To be honest, going back three years doesn't show a whole lot of evolution transpiring in your posts. Talk about "monkey chatter".... To be honest, RRS is infinitely better than it was in the mid-90s. The racists and neo-Nazis that use to make about half the posts in here have disappeared. If you don't like RRS, there are now plenty of other places (with moderation!) where you can get info. Do you really believe, David, that your own posts convey as much valuable info as do at least some of the posts of Steve and Roy? I'm truly sorry that you've been picked on as much as you have, but your posts are NOT the reason I've been reading this RRS without posting. MWBRYANT |
RHF = Idiocy & Brain Damage
Mike wrote:
David wrote: Why not just post a link to the Google results page, instead of posting each individual site? Why not follow rules for punctuation? Those of us with licenses know the rules require that communications be as clear as possible, in the interest of keeping monkey chatter to a minimum. (Now, Google "monkey chatter" for everyone.) I can go back 5 years and find the same RHF posts. What's so wrong with posting individual URLs? If you aren't interested in the info, why bother clicking on it? Newbies, the ones that might benefit the most from such actions, may not understand how to properly conduct a wide-ranging search. Sometimes the search engines bury you in URLs unrelated to what you're looking for. Castigating RHF and DXAce simply because they post links seems to be focusing negativity on the MOST USEFUL things those guys do in here. You'd think that you, more than most, would be encouraging these guys to spend more time posting links instead of ridiculing YOU daily. Punctuation? I teach public speaking and I find that most people that even try to have perfect grammar are suffering from delusions regarding their own self-grandeur. Understandability is the key and I don't have any problem understanding what RHF is trying to say. He may not be the best speller in the world, but his efforts at disseminating antenna info hardly are suffering from any non-standard spelling or punctuation. There are many contributors in here with good punctuation and spelling, but nothing of any real value to read. If you go back five years, you'll see that RHF was posting DIFFERENT links back then. To be honest, I think the quality of his links has improved significantly. To be honest, going back three years doesn't show a whole lot of evolution transpiring in your posts. Talk about "monkey chatter".... To be honest, RRS is infinitely better than it was in the mid-90s. The racists and neo-Nazis that use to make about half the posts in here have disappeared. If you don't like RRS, there are now plenty of other places (with moderation!) where you can get info. Do you really believe, David, that your own posts convey as much valuable info as do at least some of the posts of Steve and Roy? I'm truly sorry that you've been picked on as much as you have, but your posts are NOT the reason I've been reading this RRS without posting. MWBRYANT I know I'm way less rude than DX Asshole. I know that proper punctuation facilitates easier communications, especially for the visually impaired. I know that throwing up a bunch of information, some of it contradicting other of it, is not as helpful as when someone speaks from personal experience. I am not the subject. RHF has been turned into a filter. I don't bother w/ Ace as he is too drunk to type more than a few words at a time. Any effort I made to stave off fascism was done in the interests of preventing the demise of the freedom required for this hobby to flourish. HF radios are illegal in many places. My only regret is that we patriots failed and that the USA is a goddam police state. |
RHF = Idiocy & Brain Damage
I got through public school good enough, from 1946 through 1958.I
started first grade in public school when I was five years old.My favorite subjects (was my first grade class teacher lady, I had a crush on her, and my seventh grade class science teacher lady, Mrs.Bell) were Science and History. cuhulin |
RHF = Idiocy & Brain Damage
RHF is always kind and considerate too.He is a Good Guy!
cuhulin |
RHF = Idiocy & Brain Damage
David wrote: Mike wrote: David wrote: Why not just post a link to the Google results page, instead of posting each individual site? Why not follow rules for punctuation? Those of us with licenses know the rules require that communications be as clear as possible, in the interest of keeping monkey chatter to a minimum. (Now, Google "monkey chatter" for everyone.) I can go back 5 years and find the same RHF posts. What's so wrong with posting individual URLs? If you aren't interested in the info, why bother clicking on it? Newbies, the ones that might benefit the most from such actions, may not understand how to properly conduct a wide-ranging search. Sometimes the search engines bury you in URLs unrelated to what you're looking for. Castigating RHF and DXAce simply because they post links seems to be focusing negativity on the MOST USEFUL things those guys do in here. You'd think that you, more than most, would be encouraging these guys to spend more time posting links instead of ridiculing YOU daily. Punctuation? I teach public speaking and I find that most people that even try to have perfect grammar are suffering from delusions regarding their own self-grandeur. Understandability is the key and I don't have any problem understanding what RHF is trying to say. He may not be the best speller in the world, but his efforts at disseminating antenna info hardly are suffering from any non-standard spelling or punctuation. There are many contributors in here with good punctuation and spelling, but nothing of any real value to read. If you go back five years, you'll see that RHF was posting DIFFERENT links back then. To be honest, I think the quality of his links has improved significantly. To be honest, going back three years doesn't show a whole lot of evolution transpiring in your posts. Talk about "monkey chatter".... To be honest, RRS is infinitely better than it was in the mid-90s. The racists and neo-Nazis that use to make about half the posts in here have disappeared. If you don't like RRS, there are now plenty of other places (with moderation!) where you can get info. Do you really believe, David, that your own posts convey as much valuable info as do at least some of the posts of Steve and Roy? I'm truly sorry that you've been picked on as much as you have, but your posts are NOT the reason I've been reading this RRS without posting. MWBRYANT I know I'm way less rude than DX Asshole. I know that proper punctuation facilitates easier communications, especially for the visually impaired. I know that throwing up a bunch of information, some of it contradicting other of it, is not as helpful as when someone speaks from personal experience. I am not the subject. RHF has been turned into a filter. I don't bother w/ Ace as he is too drunk to type more than a few words at a time. Any effort I made to stave off fascism was done in the interests of preventing the demise of the freedom required for this hobby to flourish. HF radios are illegal in many places. My only regret is that we patriots failed and that the USA is a goddam police state. Rickets, you wouldn't know a 'patriot' even if said 'patriot' crawled up your ass and decided to spend the winter. You're nothing more than a debutante, malcontent, faux little SOB who cares little or nothing about SW radio. Now go listen to your satellite 'radio', and leave the real stuff to the big boys. |
RHF = Idiocy & Brain Damage
dxAce wrote:
David wrote: Mike wrote: David wrote: Why not just post a link to the Google results page, instead of posting each individual site? Why not follow rules for punctuation? Those of us with licenses know the rules require that communications be as clear as possible, in the interest of keeping monkey chatter to a minimum. (Now, Google "monkey chatter" for everyone.) I can go back 5 years and find the same RHF posts. What's so wrong with posting individual URLs? If you aren't interested in the info, why bother clicking on it? Newbies, the ones that might benefit the most from such actions, may not understand how to properly conduct a wide-ranging search. Sometimes the search engines bury you in URLs unrelated to what you're looking for. Castigating RHF and DXAce simply because they post links seems to be focusing negativity on the MOST USEFUL things those guys do in here. You'd think that you, more than most, would be encouraging these guys to spend more time posting links instead of ridiculing YOU daily. Punctuation? I teach public speaking and I find that most people that even try to have perfect grammar are suffering from delusions regarding their own self-grandeur. Understandability is the key and I don't have any problem understanding what RHF is trying to say. He may not be the best speller in the world, but his efforts at disseminating antenna info hardly are suffering from any non-standard spelling or punctuation. There are many contributors in here with good punctuation and spelling, but nothing of any real value to read. If you go back five years, you'll see that RHF was posting DIFFERENT links back then. To be honest, I think the quality of his links has improved significantly. To be honest, going back three years doesn't show a whole lot of evolution transpiring in your posts. Talk about "monkey chatter".... To be honest, RRS is infinitely better than it was in the mid-90s. The racists and neo-Nazis that use to make about half the posts in here have disappeared. If you don't like RRS, there are now plenty of other places (with moderation!) where you can get info. Do you really believe, David, that your own posts convey as much valuable info as do at least some of the posts of Steve and Roy? I'm truly sorry that you've been picked on as much as you have, but your posts are NOT the reason I've been reading this RRS without posting. MWBRYANT I know I'm way less rude than DX Asshole. I know that proper punctuation facilitates easier communications, especially for the visually impaired. I know that throwing up a bunch of information, some of it contradicting other of it, is not as helpful as when someone speaks from personal experience. I am not the subject. RHF has been turned into a filter. I don't bother w/ Ace as he is too drunk to type more than a few words at a time. Any effort I made to stave off fascism was done in the interests of preventing the demise of the freedom required for this hobby to flourish. HF radios are illegal in many places. My only regret is that we patriots failed and that the USA is a goddam police state. Rickets, you wouldn't know a 'patriot' even if said 'patriot' crawled up your ass and decided to spend the winter. You're nothing more than a debutante, malcontent, faux little SOB who cares little or nothing about SW radio. Now go listen to your satellite 'radio', and leave the real stuff to the big boys. I'm listening to web radio at the moment. Satellite is passe`. Your reference to the "big boys" reveals that you are a frightened blustering ****, who must compensate by acting tough and macho. People like you are the reason for the collapse of modern civilization. So ****ing insecure, so afraid to be characterized as sensitive, you swagger right off the cliff. Nobody in his right mind would live in Michigan. |
RHF = Idiocy & Brain Damage
David wrote: dxAce wrote: David wrote: Mike wrote: David wrote: Why not just post a link to the Google results page, instead of posting each individual site? Why not follow rules for punctuation? Those of us with licenses know the rules require that communications be as clear as possible, in the interest of keeping monkey chatter to a minimum. (Now, Google "monkey chatter" for everyone.) I can go back 5 years and find the same RHF posts. What's so wrong with posting individual URLs? If you aren't interested in the info, why bother clicking on it? Newbies, the ones that might benefit the most from such actions, may not understand how to properly conduct a wide-ranging search. Sometimes the search engines bury you in URLs unrelated to what you're looking for. Castigating RHF and DXAce simply because they post links seems to be focusing negativity on the MOST USEFUL things those guys do in here. You'd think that you, more than most, would be encouraging these guys to spend more time posting links instead of ridiculing YOU daily. Punctuation? I teach public speaking and I find that most people that even try to have perfect grammar are suffering from delusions regarding their own self-grandeur. Understandability is the key and I don't have any problem understanding what RHF is trying to say. He may not be the best speller in the world, but his efforts at disseminating antenna info hardly are suffering from any non-standard spelling or punctuation. There are many contributors in here with good punctuation and spelling, but nothing of any real value to read. If you go back five years, you'll see that RHF was posting DIFFERENT links back then. To be honest, I think the quality of his links has improved significantly. To be honest, going back three years doesn't show a whole lot of evolution transpiring in your posts. Talk about "monkey chatter".... To be honest, RRS is infinitely better than it was in the mid-90s. The racists and neo-Nazis that use to make about half the posts in here have disappeared. If you don't like RRS, there are now plenty of other places (with moderation!) where you can get info. Do you really believe, David, that your own posts convey as much valuable info as do at least some of the posts of Steve and Roy? I'm truly sorry that you've been picked on as much as you have, but your posts are NOT the reason I've been reading this RRS without posting. MWBRYANT I know I'm way less rude than DX Asshole. I know that proper punctuation facilitates easier communications, especially for the visually impaired. I know that throwing up a bunch of information, some of it contradicting other of it, is not as helpful as when someone speaks from personal experience. I am not the subject. RHF has been turned into a filter. I don't bother w/ Ace as he is too drunk to type more than a few words at a time. Any effort I made to stave off fascism was done in the interests of preventing the demise of the freedom required for this hobby to flourish. HF radios are illegal in many places. My only regret is that we patriots failed and that the USA is a goddam police state. Rickets, you wouldn't know a 'patriot' even if said 'patriot' crawled up your ass and decided to spend the winter. You're nothing more than a debutante, malcontent, faux little SOB who cares little or nothing about SW radio. Now go listen to your satellite 'radio', and leave the real stuff to the big boys. I'm listening to web radio at the moment. Satellite is passe`. Your reference to the "big boys" reveals that you are a frightened blustering ****, who must compensate by acting tough and macho. People like you are the reason for the collapse of modern civilization. So ****ing insecure, so afraid to be characterized as sensitive, you swagger right off the cliff. You're projecting, Rickets. Nobody in his right mind would live in Michigan. Nobody, or just a drug addled idiot such as yourself? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:29 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com