Is it true that iBiquity isn't going to support AM HD beyondwhere it's at now?
On Mar 1, 11:23�pm, RHF wrote:
On Mar 1, 1:37�pm, Rfburns wrote: Hey Eddie, Is it true that iBiquity isn't going to support AM HD beyond it's current miserable, useless state. �So is what we hear - what we get? jw RF Burns, OK - Let me 'clue' you into the "Terces Nalp" by the US Federal Government {Translation - Secret Plan} : 1 - Expand the new FM "HD" Radio Band down to 76 MHz.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FM_broadcasting 2 - Sell-Off the old Analog AM/MW Radio Band.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AM_broadcasting The-Bottom-Line : Within 10 Years after the Sell-Off of the old Analog AM/MW Radio Band there will be 5,000 to 25,000 Pirate AM/MW Radio Stations broadcasting LIVE on the old Analog AM/MW Radio Band.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pirate_...rate_Radio_USA [ CBers Gone Berzerk on the AM/MW Radio Band ] . . . and AM/MW DXers Will Be Going WILD ! :o) ~ RHF �. "Digital Audio Broadcasting Systems and Their Impact on the Terrestrial Radio Broadcast Service" 15. We will not establish a deadline for radio stations to convert to digital broadcasting. Stations may decide if, and when, they will provide digital service to the public. Several reasons support this decision. First, unlike television licensees, radio stations are under no statutory mandate to convert to a digital format. Second, a hard deadline is unnecessary given that DAB uses an in-band technology that does not require the allocation of additional spectrum. Thus, the spectrum reclamation needs that exist for DTV do not exist here. Moreover, there is no evidence in the record that marketplace forces cannot propel the DAB conversion forward, and effective markets tend to provide better solutions than regulatory schemes. 16. iBiquity argues that in the early stages of the transition, the Commission should favor and protect existing analog signals. It states that this could be accomplished by limiting the power level and bandwidth occupancy of the digital carriers in the hybrid mode. At some point in the future, when the Commission determines there is sufficient market penetration of digital receivers, iBiquity asserts that the public interest will be best served by reversing this presumption to favor digital operations. At that time, broadcasters will no longer need to protect analog operations by limiting the digital signal and stations should have the option to implement all- digital broadcasts. We decline to adopt iBiquity's presumption policy because it is too early in the DAB conversion process for us to consider such a mechanism. We find that such a policy, if adopted now, may have unknown and unintended consequences for a new technology that has yet to be accepted by the public or widely adopted by the broadcast industry. http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-IMPA...-15/i15922.htm |
Is it true that iBiquity isn't going to support AM HD beyondwhere it's at now?
On Mar 1, 9:59Â*pm, IBOCcrock wrote:
On Mar 1, 11:23�pm, RHF wrote: On Mar 1, 1:37�pm, Rfburns wrote: Hey Eddie, Is it true that iBiquity isn't going to support AM HD beyond it's current miserable, useless state. �So is what we hear - what we get? jw RF Burns, OK - Let me 'clue' you into the "Terces Nalp" by the US Federal Government {Translation - Secret Plan} : 1 - Expand the new FM "HD" Radio Band down to 76 MHz.http://en.wikipedia..org/wiki/FM_broadcasting 2 - Sell-Off the old Analog AM/MW Radio Band.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AM_broadcasting The-Bottom-Line : Within 10 Years after the Sell-Off of the old Analog AM/MW Radio Band there will be 5,000 to 25,000 Pirate AM/MW Radio Stations broadcasting LIVE on the old Analog AM/MW Radio Band.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pirate_...pedia.org/wiki... [ CBers Gone Berzerk on the AM/MW Radio Band ] . . . and AM/MW DXers Will Be Going WILD ! :o) ~ RHF �. "Digital Audio Broadcasting Systems and Their Impact on the Terrestrial Radio Broadcast Service" 15. We will not establish a deadline for radio stations to convert to digital broadcasting. Stations may decide if, and when, they will provide digital service to the public. Several reasons support this decision. First, unlike television licensees, radio stations are under no statutory mandate to convert to a digital format. Second, a hard deadline is unnecessary given that DAB uses an in-band technology that does not require the allocation of additional spectrum. Thus, the spectrum reclamation needs that exist for DTV do not exist here. Moreover, there is no evidence in the record that marketplace forces cannot propel the DAB conversion forward, and effective markets tend to provide better solutions than regulatory schemes. 16. iBiquity argues that in the early stages of the transition, the Commission should favor and protect existing analog signals. It states that this could be accomplished by limiting the power level and bandwidth occupancy of the digital carriers in the hybrid mode. At some point in the future, when the Commission determines there is sufficient market penetration of digital receivers, iBiquity asserts that the public interest will be best served by reversing this presumption to favor digital operations. At that time, broadcasters will no longer need to protect analog operations by limiting the digital signal and stations should have the option to implement all- digital broadcasts. We decline to adopt iBiquity's presumption policy because it is too early in the DAB conversion process for us to consider such a mechanism. We find that such a policy, if adopted now, may have unknown and unintended consequences for a new technology that has yet to be accepted by the public or widely adopted by the broadcast industry. http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-IMPA...15/i15922.htm- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - IBOCcrock, What Ever Congress and the FCC Giveth : Congress and the FCC can Taketh Away [.] 15. Translation - If the Public rapidly accepts "HD" Radio : Then No Dead-Line is Required -however- If the Public Does Not : A Dead-Line Will Be Established. 16. Translation - There will be both an Orderly : * Phase-In {Powering-Up} of Digital Mode of AM/FM Radio Broadcasting - - - and - - - * Phase-Out {Powering-Down} of the Analog Mode of AM/FM Radio Broadcasting the 1 % 'erp' solution was just a starting point ~ RHF |
Is it true that iBiquity isn't going to support AM HD beyondwhere it's at now?
On Mar 2, 3:28Â*am, RHF wrote:
On Mar 1, 9:59Â*pm, IBOCcrock wrote: On Mar 1, 11:23�pm, RHF wrote: On Mar 1, 1:37�pm, Rfburns wrote: Hey Eddie, Is it true that iBiquity isn't going to support AM HD beyond it's current miserable, useless state. �So is what we hear - what we get? jw RF Burns, OK - Let me 'clue' you into the "Terces Nalp" by the US Federal Government {Translation - Secret Plan} : 1 - Expand the new FM "HD" Radio Band down to 76 MHz.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FM_broadcasting 2 - Sell-Off the old Analog AM/MW Radio Band.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AM_broadcasting The-Bottom-Line : Within 10 Years after the Sell-Off of the old Analog AM/MW Radio Band there will be 5,000 to 25,000 Pirate AM/MW Radio Stations broadcasting LIVE on the old Analog AM/MW Radio Band.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pirate_...pedia.org/wiki... [ CBers Gone Berzerk on the AM/MW Radio Band ] . . . and AM/MW DXers Will Be Going WILD ! :o) ~ RHF �. "Digital Audio Broadcasting Systems and Their Impact on the Terrestrial Radio Broadcast Service" 15. We will not establish a deadline for radio stations to convert to digital broadcasting. Stations may decide if, and when, they will provide digital service to the public. Several reasons support this decision. First, unlike television licensees, radio stations are under no statutory mandate to convert to a digital format. Second, a hard deadline is unnecessary given that DAB uses an in-band technology that does not require the allocation of additional spectrum. Thus, the spectrum reclamation needs that exist for DTV do not exist here. Moreover, there is no evidence in the record that marketplace forces cannot propel the DAB conversion forward, and effective markets tend to provide better solutions than regulatory schemes. 16. iBiquity argues that in the early stages of the transition, the Commission should favor and protect existing analog signals. It states that this could be accomplished by limiting the power level and bandwidth occupancy of the digital carriers in the hybrid mode. At some point in the future, when the Commission determines there is sufficient market penetration of digital receivers, iBiquity asserts that the public interest will be best served by reversing this presumption to favor digital operations. At that time, broadcasters will no longer need to protect analog operations by limiting the digital signal and stations should have the option to implement all- digital broadcasts. We decline to adopt iBiquity's presumption policy because it is too early in the DAB conversion process for us to consider such a mechanism. We find that such a policy, if adopted now, may have unknown and unintended consequences for a new technology that has yet to be accepted by the public or widely adopted by the broadcast industry. http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-IMPA...15922.htm-Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - IBOCcrock, What Ever Congress and the FCC Giveth : Congress and the FCC can Taketh Away [.] 15. Translation - If the Public rapidly accepts "HD" Radio : Then No Dead-Line is Required -however- If the Public Does Not : A Dead-Line Will Be Established. 16. Translation - There will be both an Orderly : * Phase-In {Powering-Up} of Digital Mode of AM/FM Radio Broadcasting - - - and - - - * Phase-Out {Powering-Down} of the Analog Mode Â*of AM/FM Radio Broadcasting the 1 % 'erp' solution was just a starting point ~ RHF Â*.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - 15. Translation - If the Public rapidly accepts "HD" Radio : Then No Dead-Line is Required -however- If the Public Does Not : A Dead-Line Will Be Established. There is no proof of that - it was tried in the UK, and digital radio still flopped: "Report: Future Of U.K. Digital Radio May Be Bleak" "LONDON -- January 30, 2008: A report from Enders Analysis found that digital audio broadcasting, or DAB, is in trouble due to the high cost of transmission and slow revenue growth, U.K. newspaper the Guardian reports." http://www.radioink.com/HeadlineEntr...&pt=todaysnews If they do, it will be the end of terrestrial radio, if it doesn't go broke first: "Clear Channel's murky future" "Sad because eliminating new hires (including sellers), failing to replace those who leave, stopping all investment in the future, and halting all advertising and research is the equivalent of saying that necessity requires us to strangle the goose that lays the golden eggs, even as the goose is up for sale." http://www.hear2.com/2008/01/clear-channels.html All major radio stocks are down 90%. Consumers wil lnever buy HD radios, even if mandated. No one buys radios anymore, except for us radio=geeks. AM-HD does not work, so a mandate would make no difference. |
Is it true that iBiquity isn't going to support AM HD beyondwhere it's at now?
On Mar 2, 3:28Â*am, RHF wrote:
On Mar 1, 9:59Â*pm, IBOCcrock wrote: On Mar 1, 11:23�pm, RHF wrote: On Mar 1, 1:37�pm, Rfburns wrote: Hey Eddie, Is it true that iBiquity isn't going to support AM HD beyond it's current miserable, useless state. �So is what we hear - what we get? jw RF Burns, OK - Let me 'clue' you into the "Terces Nalp" by the US Federal Government {Translation - Secret Plan} : 1 - Expand the new FM "HD" Radio Band down to 76 MHz.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FM_broadcasting 2 - Sell-Off the old Analog AM/MW Radio Band.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AM_broadcasting The-Bottom-Line : Within 10 Years after the Sell-Off of the old Analog AM/MW Radio Band there will be 5,000 to 25,000 Pirate AM/MW Radio Stations broadcasting LIVE on the old Analog AM/MW Radio Band.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pirate_...pedia.org/wiki... [ CBers Gone Berzerk on the AM/MW Radio Band ] . . . and AM/MW DXers Will Be Going WILD ! :o) ~ RHF �. "Digital Audio Broadcasting Systems and Their Impact on the Terrestrial Radio Broadcast Service" 15. We will not establish a deadline for radio stations to convert to digital broadcasting. Stations may decide if, and when, they will provide digital service to the public. Several reasons support this decision. First, unlike television licensees, radio stations are under no statutory mandate to convert to a digital format. Second, a hard deadline is unnecessary given that DAB uses an in-band technology that does not require the allocation of additional spectrum. Thus, the spectrum reclamation needs that exist for DTV do not exist here. Moreover, there is no evidence in the record that marketplace forces cannot propel the DAB conversion forward, and effective markets tend to provide better solutions than regulatory schemes. 16. iBiquity argues that in the early stages of the transition, the Commission should favor and protect existing analog signals. It states that this could be accomplished by limiting the power level and bandwidth occupancy of the digital carriers in the hybrid mode. At some point in the future, when the Commission determines there is sufficient market penetration of digital receivers, iBiquity asserts that the public interest will be best served by reversing this presumption to favor digital operations. At that time, broadcasters will no longer need to protect analog operations by limiting the digital signal and stations should have the option to implement all- digital broadcasts. We decline to adopt iBiquity's presumption policy because it is too early in the DAB conversion process for us to consider such a mechanism. We find that such a policy, if adopted now, may have unknown and unintended consequences for a new technology that has yet to be accepted by the public or widely adopted by the broadcast industry. http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-IMPA...15922.htm-Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - IBOCcrock, What Ever Congress and the FCC Giveth : Congress and the FCC can Taketh Away [.] 15. Translation - If the Public rapidly accepts "HD" Radio : Then No Dead-Line is Required -however- If the Public Does Not : A Dead-Line Will Be Established. 16. Translation - There will be both an Orderly : * Phase-In {Powering-Up} of Digital Mode of AM/FM Radio Broadcasting - - - and - - - * Phase-Out {Powering-Down} of the Analog Mode Â*of AM/FM Radio Broadcasting the 1 % 'erp' solution was just a starting point ~ RHF Â*.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - 16. "We find that such a policy, if adopted now, may have unknown and unintended consequences for a new technology that has yet to be accepted by the public or widely adopted by the broadcast industry." HD radios will never approach critical mass - the FCC has stated that HD has not been accepted by the public and broadcasters FIRST. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:09 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com