( OT ) 5 passengers, 4 parachutes . ..
 

On Feb 28, 12:04 pm, David wrote:
An airplane was about to crash; there were 5 passengers on board but
only 4 parachutes.

The first passenger, said, "I'm Kobe Bryant, The best NBA basketball
player, the Lakers need me, I can't afford to die." So, he took the
first pack and left the plane.

The second passenger, Hillary Clinton, said, "I am the wife of the
former President of the United States, and I am also a U.S. Senator."
She got up took the second parachute and jumped out of the plane.

The third passenger, George W. Bush, said, "I'm President of the
United States, and I have a great responsibility being the leader of
the Free World.

In addition, I'm the cleverest President in American history, so
America's people won't let me die". He put on the pack next to him and
jumped out of the plane.

The fourth passenger, The Pope, says to the fifth passenger, a 10 year-
old school boy, "I am old and frail and I don't have many years left,
as a Christian, I will sacrifice my life and let you have the last
parachute.

The boy said, "It's Ok, there's a parachute left for you. America's
cleverest President jumped out with my School Bag ."

LOL, and how easily imagined true ;)

( OT ) 5 passengers, 4 parachutes . ..
 

wrote:

On Feb 28, 12:04 pm, David wrote:
An airplane was about to crash; there were 5 passengers on board but
only 4 parachutes.

The first passenger, said, "I'm Kobe Bryant, The best NBA basketball
player, the Lakers need me, I can't afford to die." So, he took the
first pack and left the plane.

The second passenger, Hillary Clinton, said, "I am the wife of the
former President of the United States, and I am also a U.S. Senator."
She got up took the second parachute and jumped out of the plane.

The third passenger, George W. Bush, said, "I'm President of the
United States, and I have a great responsibility being the leader of
the Free World.

In addition, I'm the cleverest President in American history, so
America's people won't let me die". He put on the pack next to him and
jumped out of the plane.

The fourth passenger, The Pope, says to the fifth passenger, a 10 year-
old school boy, "I am old and frail and I don't have many years left,
as a Christian, I will sacrifice my life and let you have the last
parachute.

The boy said, "It's Ok, there's a parachute left for you. America's
cleverest President jumped out with my School Bag ."

LOL, and how easily imagined true ;)

You probably have more trouble putting on your Depends than the President would
have putting on a parachute. He was after all at one time a qualified pilot. And
you, just another retard on the short bus.

( OT ) 5 passengers, 4 parachutes . ..
 

dxAce wrote:


You probably have more trouble putting on your Depends than the President would
have putting on a parachute. He was after all at one time a qualified pilot. And
you, just another retard on the short bus.


We spent hundreds of thousands of dollars training that ****head and he
goes AWOL. Real admirable, ****wad.

( OT ) 5 passengers, 4 parachutes . ..
 

dave wrote:
We spent hundreds of thousands of dollars training that ****head and he
goes AWOL. Real admirable, ****wad.

That's a pretty nasty accusation that's been disproven years ago. Prove it
or admit you're a liar.

--
If only there was a Republican running for President of the United States.

( OT ) 5 passengers, 4 parachutes . ..
 

clifto wrote:

dave wrote:
We spent hundreds of thousands of dollars training that ****head and he
goes AWOL. Real admirable, ****wad.

That's a pretty nasty accusation that's been disproven years ago.

Indeed.

Prove it
or admit you're a liar.

Yes, ol' Rickets is a liar.

( OT ) 5 passengers, 4 parachutes . ..
 

dxAce wrote:
clifto wrote:
dave wrote:
We spent hundreds of thousands of dollars training that ****head and he
goes AWOL. Real admirable, ****wad.

That's a pretty nasty accusation that's been disproven years ago.

Indeed.

Prove it
or admit you're a liar.

Yes, ol' Rickets is a liar.

Pretty shallow lie, too. Even the hard-core lefties admit that that lie was
so transparent that even Dan Rather couldn't pull it off.

--
If only there was a Republican running for President of the United States.

( OT ) 5 passengers, 4 parachutes . ..
 

dxAce wrote:

wrote:


The boy said, "It's Ok, there's a parachute left for you. America's
cleverest President jumped out with my School Bag ."
LOL, and how easily imagined true ;)

You probably have more trouble putting on your Depends than the President would
have putting on a parachute. He was after all at one time a qualified pilot. And
you, just another retard on the short bus.


Not only a pilot, but an F102 pilot...one of the hardest aircraft to
fly. And his own wing commander proudly stated he was one of the MOST
accomplished F102 pilots in the Guard.

That doesn't come easy.


Tim Worstall writes:

Even in peacetime conditions, F-102 pilots risked their lives on
every flight. Only highly-qualified pilot candidates were accepted for
Delta Dagger training because it was such a challenging aircraft to fly
and left little room for mistakes. According to the Air Force Safety
Center, the lifetime Class A accident rate for the F-102 was 13.69
mishaps per 100,000 flight hours, much higher than the average for
today's combat aircraft. For example, the F-16 has an accident rate of
4.14, the F-15 is at 2.47, the F-117 at 4.07, the S-3 at 2.6, and the
F-18 at 4.9. Even the Marine Corps' AV-8B, regarded as the most
dangerous aircraft in US service today, has a lifetime accident rate of
only 11.44 mishaps per 100,000 flight hours. The F-102 claimed the lives
of many pilots, including a number stationed at Ellington during Bush's
tenure. Of the 875 F-102A production models that entered service, 259
were lost in accidents that killed 70 Air Force and ANG pilots.

G.W.Bush....F-102 Pilot
 

From Aerospaceweb.org on the subject of F-102, and G. W. Bush.


http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question...ry/q0185.shtml

( OT ) 5 passengers, 4 parachutes . ..
 

clifto wrote:
dxAce wrote:
clifto wrote:
dave wrote:
We spent hundreds of thousands of dollars training that ****head and he
goes AWOL. Real admirable, ****wad.
That's a pretty nasty accusation that's been disproven years ago.
Indeed.

Prove it
or admit you're a liar.
Yes, ol' Rickets is a liar.

Pretty shallow lie, too. Even the hard-core lefties admit that that lie was
so transparent that even Dan Rather couldn't pull it off.


Dan Rather?

I didn't say "Deserter" though it would have worked, too.
 

D Peter Maus wrote:



From Aerospaceweb.org on the subject of F-102, and G. W. Bush.


http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question...ry/q0185.shtml

http://www.glcq.com/bush_at_arpc1.htm

http://www.phonyfighterpilot.com/

(OT) : 2008 Election Politics - Clearly We All Know Who Should Be The
 

On Mar 8, 6:43*am, D Peter Maus wrote:
-
- From Aerospaceweb.org on the subject of F-102, and G. W. Bush.
-*http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question...ry/q0185.shtml
-

OK - So those are Two "Criteria" for 'being' President :

1 - Can Fly an Aircraft {George "W" Bush}
- - - = = = O R = = = - - -
2 - Serviced in Vietnam {John 'ff' Kerry}

So here are the three major Presidential Candidates in 2008.

A - Hillary Rodham Clinton = HRH = Her Royal Clintoness
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton
0 = Can't Fly an Aircraft
0 = Never Went to Vietnam.

B - Barack "Hussein" Obama Jr. (BHO)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama
0 = Can't Fly an Aircraft
0 = Never Went to Vietnam.
Oops... I mentioned his Middle Name "Hussein" :
So Now You All can call me a Racist and Anti-Islamic.

C - John Sidney McCain III (JSM)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_McCain
+1 = Can Fly an Aircraft
+1 = Went to Vietnam

Clearly We All Know Who Should Be The
Next US President : Based On This Criteria.

just for the fun of it ~ RHF

(OT) : 2008 Election Politics - Clearly We All Know Who Should...
 

2nd Roswell Crash Found by Archeologist in 1947. www.rense.com

Art Bell and George Noory will be having orgasims with each other over
that lieing article.

I was living in Martisnville,Indiana in 1947.I didn't see any stinking
phoney ufos.
cuhulin

( OT ) 5 passengers, 4 parachutes . ..
 

dave wrote:
clifto wrote:
dxAce wrote:
clifto wrote:
dave wrote:
We spent hundreds of thousands of dollars training that ****head and he
goes AWOL. Real admirable, ****wad.
That's a pretty nasty accusation that's been disproven years ago.
Indeed.

Prove it
or admit you're a liar.
Yes, ol' Rickets is a liar.

Pretty shallow lie, too. Even the hard-core lefties admit that that lie was
so transparent that even Dan Rather couldn't pull it off.


Dan Rather?

http://littlegreenfootballs.com/webl...try=12526&only

--
If only there was a Republican running for President of the United States.

( OT ) 5 passengers, 4 parachutes . ..
 

clifto wrote:
dave wrote:
clifto wrote:
dxAce wrote:
clifto wrote:
dave wrote:
We spent hundreds of thousands of dollars training that ****head and he
goes AWOL. Real admirable, ****wad.
That's a pretty nasty accusation that's been disproven years ago.
Indeed.

Prove it
or admit you're a liar.
Yes, ol' Rickets is a liar.
Pretty shallow lie, too. Even the hard-core lefties admit that that lie was
so transparent that even Dan Rather couldn't pull it off.

Dan Rather?

http://littlegreenfootballs.com/webl...try=12526&only

Rather was set up. This removed "AWOL Bush" as an issue; even
though there's plenty of evidence beside the 60 Minutes fake letter.

( OT ) 5 passengers, 4 parachutes . ..
 

dave wrote:

clifto wrote:
dave wrote:
clifto wrote:
dxAce wrote:
clifto wrote:
dave wrote:
We spent hundreds of thousands of dollars training that ****head and he
goes AWOL. Real admirable, ****wad.
That's a pretty nasty accusation that's been disproven years ago.
Indeed.

Prove it
or admit you're a liar.
Yes, ol' Rickets is a liar.
Pretty shallow lie, too. Even the hard-core lefties admit that that lie was
so transparent that even Dan Rather couldn't pull it off.

Dan Rather?

http://littlegreenfootballs.com/webl...try=12526&only

Rather was set up.

By whom, himself?

This removed "AWOL Bush" as an issue; even
though there's plenty of evidence beside the 60 Minutes fake letter.

Show us the evidence.

( OT ) 5 passengers, 4 parachutes . ..
 

Dan Rather if you ''rather''.I rather NOT.Dan Rather, y'all can read his
stuff over yonder at, www.hd.net

I have to give Dan Rather some kind of credit though, he likes Railroads
and Railroad Trains.I figure he can't be all bad.Dan, sing us that there
Railroad song again like you did a bunch of years ago on the David
Letteman show.
cuhulin, the Railroad

( OT ) 5 passengers, 4 parachutes . ..
 

Come awayyyy with me Lucille,,,, in my merry Oldsmobileeeee,,,,,
cuhulin, the Car

( OT ) 5 passengers, 4 parachutes . ..
 

dxAce wrote:

dave wrote:

clifto wrote:
dave wrote:
clifto wrote:
dxAce wrote:
clifto wrote:
dave wrote:
We spent hundreds of thousands of dollars training that ****head and he
goes AWOL. Real admirable, ****wad.
That's a pretty nasty accusation that's been disproven years ago.
Indeed.

Prove it
or admit you're a liar.
Yes, ol' Rickets is a liar.
Pretty shallow lie, too. Even the hard-core lefties admit that that lie was
so transparent that even Dan Rather couldn't pull it off.

Dan Rather?
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/webl...try=12526&only
Rather was set up.

By whom, himself?

This removed "AWOL Bush" as an issue; even
though there's plenty of evidence beside the 60 Minutes fake letter.

Show us the evidence.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp...nguage=printer

( OT ) 5 passengers, 4 parachutes . ..
 

dave wrote:

dxAce wrote:

dave wrote:

clifto wrote:
dave wrote:
clifto wrote:
dxAce wrote:
clifto wrote:
dave wrote:
We spent hundreds of thousands of dollars training that ****head and he
goes AWOL. Real admirable, ****wad.
That's a pretty nasty accusation that's been disproven years ago.
Indeed.

Prove it
or admit you're a liar.
Yes, ol' Rickets is a liar.
Pretty shallow lie, too. Even the hard-core lefties admit that that lie was
so transparent that even Dan Rather couldn't pull it off.

Dan Rather?
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/webl...try=12526&only
Rather was set up.

By whom, himself?

This removed "AWOL Bush" as an issue; even
though there's plenty of evidence beside the 60 Minutes fake letter.

Show us the evidence.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp...nguage=printer

No evidence there of being AWOL.

Try again, Druggie!

( OT ) 5 passengers, 4 parachutes . ..
 

That's my problem.Them wimmins want to see my ''evidence'' If they can
find my little piece of thimble size ''evidence'' I wish them the Luck
O' the Irish.
cuhulin

( OT ) 5 passengers, 4 parachutes . ..
 

On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 06:52:27 -0700, dave wrote:

Rather was set up. This removed "AWOL Bush" as an issue; even
though there's plenty of evidence beside the 60 Minutes fake letter.

I concur.
The only reason none of the other media don't follow this line is that
all were threatened with loosing access to the Pres and white house media
pool. The republicants management of the media is pretty similar to how
Putin managed the media. The question is, who learned from whom?

( OT ) 5 passengers, 4 parachutes . ..
 

Bernard Peters wrote:

On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 06:52:27 -0700, dave wrote:

Rather was set up. This removed "AWOL Bush" as an issue; even
though there's plenty of evidence beside the 60 Minutes fake letter.

I concur.
The only reason none of the other media don't follow this line is that
all were threatened with loosing access to the Pres and white house media
pool. The republicants management of the media is pretty similar to how
Putin managed the media. The question is, who learned from whom?

OK, you post the 'proof'. See if you can come up with something better than your
retarded brother, David Rickets.

( OT ) 5 passengers, 4 parachutes . ..
 

dxAce wrote:
dave wrote:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp...nguage=printer

No evidence there of being AWOL.

It's basically an opinion piece, with a couple of really ludicrous unrelated
factoids thrown in to lend a patina of seriousness.

--
If only there was a Republican running for President of the United States.

( OT ) 5 passengers, 4 parachutes . ..
 

On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 14:56:42 -0400, dxAce wrote:

Bernard Peters wrote:

On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 06:52:27 -0700, dave wrote:

Rather was set up. This removed "AWOL Bush" as an issue; even
though there's plenty of evidence beside the 60 Minutes fake letter.

I concur.
The only reason none of the other media don't follow this line is that
all were threatened with loosing access to the Pres and white house
media pool. The republicants management of the media is pretty similar
to how Putin managed the media. The question is, who learned from whom?

OK, you post the 'proof'. See if you can come up with something better
than your retarded brother, David Rickets.

The proof was already presented. From multiple prospectives even. The
real issue is that you have chosen to believe the "controlled" media
inspite of the fact of the other evidence and also the lack of evidence
(where was he during this time?).

Concluding, Bush's record poor performance as president and his inability
as a corporate manager is example enough of his inability to make
intelligent decisions that one would have gained if he had server as a
pilot in the AF.

( OT ) 5 passengers, 4 parachutes . ..
 

Bernard Peters wrote:

On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 14:56:42 -0400, dxAce wrote:

Bernard Peters wrote:

On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 06:52:27 -0700, dave wrote:

Rather was set up. This removed "AWOL Bush" as an issue; even
though there's plenty of evidence beside the 60 Minutes fake letter.

I concur.
The only reason none of the other media don't follow this line is that
all were threatened with loosing access to the Pres and white house
media pool. The republicants management of the media is pretty similar
to how Putin managed the media. The question is, who learned from whom?

OK, you post the 'proof'. See if you can come up with something better
than your retarded brother, David Rickets.

The proof was already presented. From multiple prospectives even. The
real issue is that you have chosen to believe the "controlled" media
inspite of the fact of the other evidence and also the lack of evidence
(where was he during this time?).

Concluding, Bush's record poor performance as president and his inability
as a corporate manager is example enough of his inability to make
intelligent decisions that one would have gained if he had server as a
pilot in the AF.

Inability as a corporate manager?

( OT ) 5 passengers, 4 parachutes . ..
 

dxAce wrote:
Bernard Peters wrote:
Concluding, Bush's record poor performance as president and his inability
as a corporate manager is example enough of his inability to make
intelligent decisions that one would have gained if he had server as a
pilot in the AF.

Inability as a corporate manager?

He's making **** up. Notice he also referred to poor performance as prexy.

--
If only there was a Republican running for President of the United States.

( OT ) 5 passengers, 4 parachutes . ..
 

snip
Concluding, Bush's record poor performance as president and his
inability as a corporate manager is example enough of his inability to
make intelligent decisions that one would have gained if he had server
as a pilot in the AF.

Inability as a corporate manager?

His companies and team franchise fail or performed poorly. In general

( OT ) 5 passengers, 4 parachutes . ..
 

Bernard Peters wrote:

snip
Concluding, Bush's record poor performance as president and his
inability as a corporate manager is example enough of his inability to
make intelligent decisions that one would have gained if he had server
as a pilot in the AF.

Inability as a corporate manager?

His companies and team franchise fail or performed poorly. In general

In general, you're a retard boy. Get ready to board the short bus in the
morning!

( OT ) 5 passengers, 4 parachutes . ..
 

On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 17:35:35 -0400, dxAce wrote:

Bernard Peters wrote:

snip
Concluding, Bush's record poor performance as president and his
inability as a corporate manager is example enough of his inability
to make intelligent decisions that one would have gained if he had
server as a pilot in the AF.

Inability as a corporate manager?

His companies and team franchise fail or performed poorly. In general

In general, you're a retard boy. Get ready to board the short bus in the
morning!

exactly the response I should have expected. No brains for an argument.
Definitely not one of the millionaire republicants. Must be one of the
others....

( OT ) 5 passengers, 4 parachutes . ..
 

Bernard Peters wrote:

On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 17:35:35 -0400, dxAce wrote:

Bernard Peters wrote:

snip
Concluding, Bush's record poor performance as president and his
inability as a corporate manager is example enough of his inability
to make intelligent decisions that one would have gained if he had
server as a pilot in the AF.

Inability as a corporate manager?

His companies and team franchise fail or performed poorly. In general

In general, you're a retard boy. Get ready to board the short bus in the
morning!

exactly the response I should have expected. No brains for an argument.
Definitely not one of the millionaire republicants. Must be one of the
others....

Others? Obviously you're just a retard boy who failed as a corporate manager.

LMFAO

dxAce
Michigan
USA

( OT ) 5 passengers, 4 parachutes . ..
 

Bernard Peters wrote:
On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 17:35:35 -0400, dxAce wrote:

Bernard Peters wrote:

snip
Concluding, Bush's record poor performance as president and his
inability as a corporate manager is example enough of his inability
to make intelligent decisions that one would have gained if he had
server as a pilot in the AF.
Inability as a corporate manager?
His companies and team franchise fail or performed poorly. In general
In general, you're a retard boy. Get ready to board the short bus in the
morning!

exactly the response I should have expected. No brains for an argument.



And yet, you, yourself have only presented gratuitous assertions.
Which, by the rules of logic, may be gratuitously denied.


Present some supporting information, and you may find an entirely
different level of discussion.


But by your own language, you have provided precisely the assertions
expected. Suggesting precious little grey matter for an argument,
yourself.


Do have a nice, though, apparently, agitated day.

( OT ) 5 passengers, 4 parachutes . ..
 

D Peter Maus wrote:

Bernard Peters wrote:
On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 17:35:35 -0400, dxAce wrote:

Bernard Peters wrote:

snip
Concluding, Bush's record poor performance as president and his
inability as a corporate manager is example enough of his inability
to make intelligent decisions that one would have gained if he had
server as a pilot in the AF.
Inability as a corporate manager?
His companies and team franchise fail or performed poorly. In general
In general, you're a retard boy. Get ready to board the short bus in the
morning!

exactly the response I should have expected. No brains for an argument.

And yet, you, yourself have only presented gratuitous assertions.
Which, by the rules of logic, may be gratuitously denied.

Present some supporting information, and you may find an entirely
different level of discussion.

But by your own language, you have provided precisely the assertions
expected. Suggesting precious little grey matter for an argument,
yourself.

Do have a nice, though, apparently, agitated day.

Somewhere it's quiet
Somwhere it's warm
It's peaceful and calm
In the eye of the storm

(OT) : 2008 Election Politics - Clearly We All Know Who Should Be
 

" wrote:

On Mar 8, 7:36 pm, RHF wrote:
On Mar 8, 6:43 am,D Peter wrote:
-
- From Aerospaceweb.org on the subject of F-102, and G. W. Bush.
- http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question...ry/q0185.shtml
-

OK - So those are Two "Criteria" for 'being' President :

1 - Can Fly an Aircraft {George "W" Bush}
- - - = = = O R = = = - - -
2 - Serviced in Vietnam {John 'ff' Kerry}

So here are the three major Presidential Candidates in 2008.

A - Hillary Rodham Clinton = HRH = Her Royal Clintonesshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton
0 = Can't Fly an Aircraft
0 = Never Went to Vietnam.

B - Barack "Hussein" Obama Jr. (BHO)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama
0 = Can't Fly an Aircraft
0 = Never Went to Vietnam.
Oops... I mentioned his Middle Name "Hussein" :
So Now You All can call me a Racist and Anti-Islamic.

C - John Sidney McCain III (JSM)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_McCain
+1 = Can Fly an Aircraft
+1 = Went to Vietnam

Clearly We All Know Who Should Be The
Next US President : Based On This Criteria.

just for the fun of it ~ RHF
.

I'm not endorsing or dissing any canidate - but am I to understand
that now the only requirements for being president are being able to
fly an aircraft and having served in Viet Naum.

Naum?

Wow. We either have
really slim pickings for president or we really need to take a look at
what we expect from the person. There's more to it than just being
COMMANDER IN CHEIF.

Cheif?

Good thing we don't have to totally rely on you Liberal retards !

(OT) : 2008 Election Politics - Clearly We All Know Who Should...
 

Armapolaaaaaa,,,,,, my purrty little flowerrrrrrrrrr,,,,,, ow I longggg
to hear you sayyyy,,,, I Love Youuuuuu!,,,,,,,
cuhulin

(OT) : 2008 Election Politics - Clearly We All Know Who Should...
 

Dan Rather once told a Truthism.Soon as he did that, the Communist,
Ministry of Propagana (so-called U.S.''news media'') kicked him out.
cuhulin

(OT) : 2008 Election Politics - Clearly We All Know Who Should...
 

Hesh up.I just now watched that Absent Minded Professor movie on
DirectTV.Now, I have to watch The son of Flubber movie on Radio tb.Dont
blame it on me, it isn't my fault.
cuhulin

(OT) : 2008 Election Politics - Clearly We All Know Who Should Be
 

On Mar 9, 5:44*pm, "
wrote:
On Mar 8, 7:36*pm, RHF wrote:





On Mar 8, 6:43*am,D Peter wrote:
-
- From Aerospaceweb.org on the subject of F-102, and G. W. Bush.
-*http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question...ry/q0185.shtml
-

OK - So those are Two "Criteria" for 'being' President :

1 - Can Fly an Aircraft {George "W" Bush}
*- - - = = = O R = = = - - -
2 - Serviced in Vietnam {John 'ff' Kerry}

So here are the three major Presidential Candidates in 2008.

A - Hillary Rodham Clinton = HRH = Her Royal Clintonesshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton
0 = Can't Fly an Aircraft
0 = Never Went to Vietnam.

B - Barack "Hussein" Obama Jr. (BHO)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama
0 = Can't Fly an Aircraft
0 = Never Went to Vietnam.
Oops... I mentioned his Middle Name "Hussein" :
So Now You All can call me a Racist and Anti-Islamic.

C - John Sidney McCain III (JSM)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_McCain
+1 = Can Fly an Aircraft
+1 = Went to Vietnam

Clearly We All Know Who Should Be The
Next US President : Based On This Criteria.

just for the fun of it ~ RHF
*.

I'm not endorsing or dissing any canidate - but am I to understand
that now the only requirements for being president are being able to
fly an aircraft and having served in Viet Naum. *Wow. *We either have
really slim pickings for president or we really need to take a look at
what we expect from the person. *There's more to it than just being
COMMANDER IN CHEIF.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

BAJ - It was an Exercise in the Absurd :

Based on the Views Express and the
Comments Made by two prior Posters.

a very logical conclusion that was
drawn from illogical assumptions ~ RHF

(OT) : 2008 Election Politics - Clearly We All Know Who Should Be
 

On Mar 9, 6:02*pm, dxAce wrote:
" wrote:
On Mar 8, 7:36 pm, RHF wrote:
On Mar 8, 6:43 am,D Peter wrote:
-
- From Aerospaceweb.org on the subject of F-102, and G. W. Bush.
-http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/history/q0185.shtml
-

OK - So those are Two "Criteria" for 'being' President :

1 - Can Fly an Aircraft {George "W" Bush}
*- - - = = = O R = = = - - -
2 - Serviced in Vietnam {John 'ff' Kerry}

So here are the three major Presidential Candidates in 2008.

A - Hillary Rodham Clinton = HRH = Her Royal Clintonesshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton
0 = Can't Fly an Aircraft
0 = Never Went to Vietnam.

B - Barack "Hussein" Obama Jr. (BHO)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama
0 = Can't Fly an Aircraft
0 = Never Went to Vietnam.
Oops... I mentioned his Middle Name "Hussein" :
So Now You All can call me a Racist and Anti-Islamic.

C - John Sidney McCain III (JSM)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_McCain
+1 = Can Fly an Aircraft
+1 = Went to Vietnam

Clearly We All Know Who Should Be The
Next US President : Based On This Criteria.

just for the fun of it ~ RHF
*.

I'm not endorsing or dissing any canidate - but am I to understand
that now the only requirements for being president
are being able to fly an aircraft

- - and having served in Viet Naum.

- Naum?

DX Ace,

Yeah to the Anti-War types the Viet-Nam War
{Vietnam} -aka- "Nam" went on for way too long
and they suffered from Viet-Nauseam {Ad Nauseam}
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_nauseam

and that's the way it is . . . ~ RHF
http://www.grandtimes.com/cronkite.html
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/americanmast...ronkite_w.html


*Wow. *We either have
really slim pickings for president or we really need to take a look at
what we expect from the person. *There's more to it than just being
COMMANDER IN CHEIF.

Cheif?

Good thing we don't have to totally rely on you Liberal retards !- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

(OT) : 2008 Election Politics - Clearly We All Know Who Should...
 

My little doggy, she cleans my dishes for me.Best little dishwasher in
town!
cuhulin

(OT) : 2008 Election Politics - The "Clintonistas" to Sabotage theBarack Insane* Obama Presidential Campaign Against Republican Nominee John"Smiley" McCain
 

On Mar 10, 6:06*am, Bob Miller wrote:
On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 16:36:34 -0800 (PST), RHF





wrote:
On Mar 8, 6:43*am, D Peter Maus wrote:
-
- From Aerospaceweb.org on the subject of F-102, and G. W. Bush.
-*http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question...ry/q0185.shtml
-

OK - So those are Two "Criteria" for 'being' President :

1 - Can Fly an Aircraft {George "W" Bush}
- - - = = = O R = = = - - -
2 - Serviced in Vietnam {John 'ff' Kerry}

So here are the three major Presidential Candidates in 2008.

A - Hillary Rodham Clinton = HRH = Her Royal Clintoness
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton
0 = Can't Fly an Aircraft
0 = Never Went to Vietnam.

B - Barack "Hussein" Obama Jr. (BHO)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama
0 = Can't Fly an Aircraft
0 = Never Went to Vietnam.
Oops... I mentioned his Middle Name "Hussein" :
So Now You All can call me a Racist and Anti-Islamic.

C - John Sidney McCain III (JSM)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_McCain
+1 = Can Fly an Aircraft
+1 = Went to Vietnam

Clearly We All Know Who Should Be The
Next US President : Based On This Criteria.

just for the fun of it ~ RHF
.

- I would add to that "hugging George Bush." And his veep?
- That so-called Democrat Bush kissed on the cheek.
-
- Obama, save us from all this...
-
- Bob
- k5qwg
-

Bob [K5QWG],

One Political Program on TV that I watched over the Weekend
made-up of a Panel of Talking Heads; had one who was very
Cynical who Inferring that "IF" Hillary R. Clinton should lose the
Democrat Party Nomination in 2008 : HRC and Bill Clinton would
do everything that they could to sabotage the Barack Insane*
Obama Campaign against the Republican Nominee John "Smiley"
McCain. - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_McCain

* Yes you can call him Barack "Insane" Obama or refer to
him as BHO -but- You can use his legal middle name of
"Hussein" -cause- To do so is both Racist and Anti-Islamic.

The Talking Head's 'theory' was that "IF" Barack Insane* Obama
won the US Presidency in 2008 : Then HRC would never have
another chance at the Presidency because BHO would most like
be President for 8 Years; and then the American People would
Seek-a-Change; and would Elect a Republican for the next President
in 2016; at which time HRC would be Age 69 going on 70 and
look like a Tired-Old-Women to most of the Younger Voters**.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Rodham_Clinton
* By 2016 most/many of the Post WW2 Baby-Boomers
will be Dead and the Next Generation of Voters will be
seeking out Political Leaders that are Of-Their-Generation.

Note - The same Taliking Head said that because of John "Smiley"
McCain at Age 72 would be a one-term President and HRC could
have another shot at the Presidency in 2012.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_McCain

in 2008 election politics it may sound crazy, but it is true . . .
it is the democrat party of the u.s.a. -versus- the clintonistas ~
RHF