RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Shortwave (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/)
-   -   Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead. (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/131670-jim-cramer-why-radio-dead.html)

David Eduardo[_4_] March 23rd 08 02:28 AM

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

"Telamon" wrote in message
...

Yeah, but what is the point of generating this Web page and Usenet
fabrication? What does he have to gain by doing this? There has to be a
payoff somewhere.


There is no fabrication. dxAss claims to have proven lies, and all he can
come up with is questioning if I went to Mexico in March or April of 1963...
as I said, no fabrication.

The only payoff is the amusement of seeing how far this could go.



[email protected] March 23rd 08 02:29 AM

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 
On Mar 22, 10:04 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message

...

On 22 Mrz., 17:24, "David Eduardo" wrote:


Sitting in a class waiting for the dolts to "get it" is very frustrating.
In
the end, it was not worth it.


Perhaps instead of simply sitting there you should have applied
yourself. This is what the better students do.


I did not even have to apply myself to get A's. I could even do one class'
homework in another. It was just boring. And these were private, college
preparatory schools, not public ones.


Had you been a good student, your focus would not have been on grades
but on ideas. If you were bored in school, it's a reflection on you
and no one else.

David Eduardo[_4_] March 23rd 08 02:34 AM

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

wrote in message
...
On 22 Mrz., 21:45, "David Eduardo" wrote:
It's the study and learning that earns the diploma that's important.
If you ever earn one yourself, you'll understand that.


I learned that part by 7th or 8th grade. There was really nothing new to
be
learned by being in school that I could not achieve by reading,
experience
and hiring highly qualified staff that I could learn from.


Had you really learned it, you'd have succeeded and graduated with a
degree.


You are missing the entire point. There was no challenge, no further useful
learning to be achieved. There were real life experiences to be done,
however. And, after about 10 years, I realized how fortunate I was to be
able to go to a university and cherry pick the courses that truly benefited
me and which I never would have taken had I gone to college out of HS.



David Eduardo[_4_] March 23rd 08 02:36 AM

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

You know damn well who I called, oh fraudulent one!

Stop your little pretending game.


No, I do not know and you don't either since you will not give any names.
There is no "Mr Bryant" that I know, so that one is a dud. Obviously, when
this round is over, we will see that the liar all along is you.



[email protected] March 23rd 08 02:37 AM

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 
On 22 Mrz., 22:00, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message

...

On 22 Mrz., 17:22, "David Eduardo" wrote:


Many of the best people in radio are not big on forma education,


And this may be one of the reasons radio is in the pickle it's in.


Radio is not in a pickle. It is simply, like light bulbs, a mature, slow
growth business now. And will be for many years to come. Of course, the
company I am with increased its revenue 13% in Q4 of 2007, so I am in a high
growth, pickle-less sector of radio.


Really? Then where does all of this desperation come from?

but you
find them to be excellent autodidacts.


Oh, not really. This is just something lots of people pretend after
they flunk out of school.


Except for the fact that I did not flunk out. I quit school (Colegio
Americano de Quito) the week my station went on the air.


I'm sure the same is true of everyone else who failed to graduate.

Since radio broadcasting is not a field where there is much to be learned
in
college, intelligence and work experience is often better than specific
training.


There may not be much room for learning in radio broadcasting, but
there's plenty of room for it in life. Trust me on this one.


You have a very restricted mindset when you believe that learning can only
take place within the walls of academia.


And you have a restricted mindset when you believe that learning
cannot happen even within those walls.

There is nothing stopping me from
reading Cervantes in the original or Joyce or picking up calculus if I want
to buy a couple of books.


This is what people always say after they've flunked. It is so old
hat. Be bitter, if you must, but at least be original.

David Eduardo[_4_] March 23rd 08 02:38 AM

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

data almost 100% of the time.

It's like a sitcom, in fact.


Like the lies you've fabricated?


No, since I have not fabricated any. It is, in truth, more like the
nonexistent people you have "contacted" but whose names you do not know.



[email protected] March 23rd 08 02:38 AM

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 
On 22 Mrz., 22:04, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message

...

On 22 Mrz., 17:24, "David Eduardo" wrote:


Sitting in a class waiting for the dolts to "get it" is very frustrating.
In
the end, it was not worth it.


Perhaps instead of simply sitting there you should have applied
yourself. This is what the better students do.


I did not even have to apply myself to get A's. I could even do one class'
homework in another.


And yet, you failed to graduate.

It was just boring. And these were private, college
preparatory schools, not public ones.


If it was boring, that's a reflection on you, not on the material or
the school.

dxAce March 23rd 08 02:39 AM

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

You know damn well who I called, oh fraudulent one!

Stop your little pretending game.


No, I do not know and you don't either since you will not give any names.
There is no "Mr Bryant" that I know, so that one is a dud. Obviously, when
this round is over, we will see that the liar all along is you.


Nope, it's you, 'Eduardo'!



[email protected] March 23rd 08 02:40 AM

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 
On 22 Mrz., 22:09, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message

...

On 22 Mrz., 19:57, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Telamon" wrote in message


... only because they had no alternative. I did. It was a lot more
challenging, rewarding and profitable to own and run a #1 radio station
than
to take woodshop or algebra.


Perhaps if you'd really understood woodshop or algebra you'd
appreciate them more.


I had algebra in 7th grade. I taught myself more advanced math in Ecuador to
be able to design transmitters, diplexers and directional antennas. It was
no big deal.


You didn't learn your lessons well. No one who understands mathematics
fails to appreciate its beauty and its power. They certainly won't
describe it as "no big deal".

There is no reason to be bored in HS if there is something else you can
do
that is of more value.


There is no reason to be bored in HS, period. But if you fail high
school, you move on to whatever else is there.


Again, I was doing absolutely fine grade wise. But it was boring and rote.


Again, that is entirely a reflection on you, and only you.


David Eduardo[_4_] March 23rd 08 02:41 AM

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:


My best option was building a radio station.


You built nothing.


Call Carlos Guarderas Barba, who sold me the license and some of the
equipment.

The truth is that you posted a "source" in the person of "Mr Bryant" and
said you have contacted "people who matter."

Yet you have failed to identify who the mysterious Bryant is, have not named
the people who matter and are coming close to concluding this fun little
chat be being totally transparent in your lies and dishonesty.




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com