Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

Terrestrial radio’s biggest problem is retaining advertising revenues as
more ad dollars are siphoned by the internet. In 2007 total ad dollars for
radio fell to where they were in 2003. That point to an industry going
backwards, not forward, Cramer said.
The average market cap of terrestrial radio companies has declined by a
staggering 80% over the last five years. But the bottom isn’t even in yet,
as far as Cramer can tell
Either way, the bottom line remains the same. Cramer expects the terrestrial
radio companies to go down harder than almost anything else and he would not
own any of them under any condition right now.

Here's the video - http://www.cnbc.com/id/23558686/from/ET/

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

On Mar 20, 6:33 pm, "Scooter" wrote:
Terrestrial radio's biggest problem is retaining advertising revenues as
more ad dollars are siphoned by the internet. In 2007 total ad dollars for
radio fell to where they were in 2003. That point to an industry going
backwards, not forward, Cramer said.
The average market cap of terrestrial radio companies has declined by a
staggering 80% over the last five years. But the bottom isn't even in yet,
as far as Cramer can tell
Either way, the bottom line remains the same. Cramer expects the terrestrial
radio companies to go down harder than almost anything else and he would not
own any of them under any condition right now.

Here's the video - http://www.cnbc.com/id/23558686/from/ET/

Scooter,

Did you know by mentioning "Jim Cramer" and Cramer
three times you generated these Google Sponsored Links :

Jim Cramer Stock Bot
Tracks Cramer's 'Mad Money'
picks and commentary. You love it.
TopStockGuru.com

Jim cramer
Get Cramer's Stock Picks Daily
Mad Money, RealMoney & Stop Trading
Cramers-Mad-Money.com

Jim Cramer's Picks
All of Cramers Buys, Sells and Stay
Away from His TV Show Plus Archive.
earnings-splits-ipo.com

Google Says : See your message here...

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

In article
,
RHF wrote:

Scooter,

Did you know by mentioning "Jim Cramer" and Cramer
three times you generated these Google Sponsored Links :

SNIP

So you are more than a Troll and actually a curse on the news group.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

"Scooter" wrote in message
.. .
Terrestrial radio’s biggest problem is retaining advertising revenues as
more ad dollars are siphoned by the internet. In 2007 total ad dollars for
radio fell to where they were in 2003. That point to an industry going
backwards, not forward, Cramer said.
The average market cap of terrestrial radio companies has declined by a
staggering 80% over the last five years. But the bottom isn’t even in yet,
as far as Cramer can tell
Either way, the bottom line remains the same. Cramer expects the
terrestrial
radio companies to go down harder than almost anything else and he would
not
own any of them under any condition right now.

Of course, Cramer is barely right half the time. His advice is more
entertaining screaming and diatribe than useful.

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

"Rfburns" wrote in message
...
On Mar 20, 10:05 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Scooter" wrote in message

.. .

Terrestrial radio's biggest problem is retaining advertising revenues
as
more ad dollars are siphoned by the internet. In 2007 total ad dollars
for
radio fell to where they were in 2003. That point to an industry going
backwards, not forward, Cramer said.
The average market cap of terrestrial radio companies has declined by a
staggering 80% over the last five years. But the bottom isn't even in
yet,
as far as Cramer can tell
Either way, the bottom line remains the same. Cramer expects the
terrestrial
radio companies to go down harder than almost anything else and he
would
not
own any of them under any condition right now.

Of course, Cramer is barely right half the time. His advice is more
entertaining screaming and diatribe than useful.

Once again - Eduardo, you're an expert on everything. Amazing!

There are plenty of sites that track Cramer's "advice" to show that it is
mediocre at best.

PONG : Telamon - [Was Jim Cramer Why Radio is Dead.]
 

On Mar 20, 8:02*pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article
,

*RHF wrote:
- - Scooter,
- -
- - Did you know by mentioning "Jim Cramer" and Cramer
- - three times you generated these Google Sponsored Links :
-
- SNIP

* * * * * Un-Snip * * * * *
Subject: Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...0a41c6440cd13a
Newsgroups : alt.radio.broadcasting, rec.radio.shortwave,
alt.commercial-hit-radio, alt.radio, alt.radio.broadcasting.open

-
- So you are more than a Troll and actually a curse on the news group.
-
- --
- Telamon -chief-resident-in-charge-of- Alt.Idiots etc...
- Ventura, California
-

Hello Telamon - Here You Go Again Poluting Another
Rec.Radio Shortwave Newsgroup Thread with Your
Personal Attacks on Me "RHF" :

Teli - Please Learn To Be A Positive Contributor Here and Not
Just Another "Trill" In-Search-Of a "Troll" To Get Some Attention.

Telamon - It is Better to Light a Candle
- Then to Curse the Darkness ~ RHF

To Paraphase :
Telamon - It is Better to Post something Positive Yourself
- Then to Curse another Poster ~ RHF

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

AHA.....NOW is the time to load up on their stock !!!

Scooter wrote:
Terrestrial radio�s biggest problem is retaining advertising revenues as
more ad dollars are siphoned by the internet. In 2007 total ad dollars for
radio fell to where they were in 2003. That point to an industry going
backwards, not forward, Cramer said.
The average market cap of terrestrial radio companies has declined by a
staggering 80% over the last five years. But the bottom isn�t even in yet,
as far as Cramer can tell
Either way, the bottom line remains the same. Cramer expects the terrestrial
radio companies to go down harder than almost anything else and he would not
own any of them under any condition right now.

Here's the video - http://www.cnbc.com/id/23558686/from/ET/

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

On Mar 20, 11:05 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Scooter" wrote in message

.. .

Terrestrial radio's biggest problem is retaining advertising revenues as
more ad dollars are siphoned by the internet. In 2007 total ad dollars for
radio fell to where they were in 2003. That point to an industry going
backwards, not forward, Cramer said.
The average market cap of terrestrial radio companies has declined by a
staggering 80% over the last five years. But the bottom isn't even in yet,
as far as Cramer can tell
Either way, the bottom line remains the same. Cramer expects the
terrestrial
radio companies to go down harder than almost anything else and he would
not
own any of them under any condition right now.

Of course, Cramer is barely right half the time. His advice is more
entertaining screaming and diatribe than useful.

Hey NAMBLA dude, where have you been hiding?

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

David Frackelton Gleason, still posing as 'Eduardo' wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Mar 20, 11:05 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Scooter" wrote in message

.. .

Terrestrial radio's biggest problem is retaining advertising revenues
as
more ad dollars are siphoned by the internet. In 2007 total ad dollars
for
radio fell to where they were in 2003. That point to an industry going
backwards, not forward, Cramer said.
The average market cap of terrestrial radio companies has declined by a
staggering 80% over the last five years. But the bottom isn't even in
yet,
as far as Cramer can tell
Either way, the bottom line remains the same. Cramer expects the
terrestrial
radio companies to go down harder than almost anything else and he
would
not
own any of them under any condition right now.

Of course, Cramer is barely right half the time. His advice is more
entertaining screaming and diatribe than useful.

Hey NAMBLA dude, where have you been hiding?

A rather simple inspection of the message headers will show that the "dude"
in question is an imposter.

But, what the hell, you seem to believe it so I do have a reasonable idea of
your perceptive abilities and IQ.

Your "IQ" is just something else you made up, right, Gleason?

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

David Eduardo wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Mar 20, 11:05 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Scooter" wrote in message

.. .

Terrestrial radio's biggest problem is retaining advertising revenues
as
more ad dollars are siphoned by the internet. In 2007 total ad dollars
for
radio fell to where they were in 2003. That point to an industry going
backwards, not forward, Cramer said.
The average market cap of terrestrial radio companies has declined by a
staggering 80% over the last five years. But the bottom isn't even in
yet,
as far as Cramer can tell
Either way, the bottom line remains the same. Cramer expects the
terrestrial
radio companies to go down harder than almost anything else and he
would
not
own any of them under any condition right now.

Of course, Cramer is barely right half the time. His advice is more
entertaining screaming and diatribe than useful.

Hey NAMBLA dude, where have you been hiding?

A rather simple inspection of the message headers will show that the "dude"
in question is an imposter.

You are an imposter yourself, are you not, 'Eduardo'? After all, you've been
posing as an Hispanic since around the year 2000, have you not?

You really need to apologize to the Hispanic community.



But, what the hell, you seem to believe it so I do have a reasonable idea of
your perceptive abilities and IQ.

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

David Frackelton Gleason, posing as 'Eduardo', the faux Hispanic, wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Mar 20, 11:05 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Scooter" wrote in message

.. .

Terrestrial radio's biggest problem is retaining advertising revenues
as
more ad dollars are siphoned by the internet. In 2007 total ad dollars
for
radio fell to where they were in 2003. That point to an industry going
backwards, not forward, Cramer said.
The average market cap of terrestrial radio companies has declined by a
staggering 80% over the last five years. But the bottom isn't even in
yet,
as far as Cramer can tell
Either way, the bottom line remains the same. Cramer expects the
terrestrial
radio companies to go down harder than almost anything else and he
would
not
own any of them under any condition right now.

Of course, Cramer is barely right half the time. His advice is more
entertaining screaming and diatribe than useful.

Hey NAMBLA dude, where have you been hiding?

A rather simple inspection of the message headers will show that the "dude"
in question is an imposter.

Aren't you associated with SAMBLA? (South American Man Boy Love Association)

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

On Mar 21, 5:42*pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message

...





On Mar 20, 11:05 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Scooter" wrote in message

...

Terrestrial radio's biggest problem is retaining advertising revenues
as
more ad dollars are siphoned by the internet. In 2007 total ad dollars
for
radio fell to where they were in 2003. That point to an industry going
backwards, not forward, Cramer said.
The average market cap of terrestrial radio companies has declined by a
staggering 80% over the last five years. But the bottom isn't even in
yet,
as far as Cramer can tell
Either way, the bottom line remains the same. Cramer expects the
terrestrial
radio companies to go down harder than almost anything else and he
would
not
own any of them under any condition right now.

Of course, Cramer is barely right half the time. His advice is more
entertaining screaming and diatribe than useful.

Hey NAMBLA dude, where have you been hiding?

A rather simple inspection of the message headers will show that the "dude"
in question is an imposter.

Or that you intentionally posted via a different ip address so that
you could later, if necessary, avail yourself of this very excuse. An
old hat technique.


But, what the hell, you seem to believe it so I do have a reasonable idea of
your perceptive abilities and IQ.- Hide quoted text -


Still probably greater than your six year old lover's. How's little
Billy doing today, anyway?

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


Your "IQ" is just something else you made up, right, Gleason?



Started your weekend drinking binge, I see.

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

In article
,
RHF wrote:

On Mar 20, 8:02*pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article
,

*RHF wrote:
- - Scooter,
- -
- - Did you know by mentioning "Jim Cramer" and Cramer
- - three times you generated these Google Sponsored Links :
-
- SNIP

RESNIP RHF crap

So I noticed you did not answer the question are you a curse on the news
group or just a spamming trolling idiot? Which is it?

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

In article
,
Rfburns wrote:

On Mar 21, 1:23 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Rfburns" wrote in message

...



On Mar 20, 10:05 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Scooter" wrote in message

...

Terrestrial radio's biggest problem is retaining advertising revenues
as
more ad dollars are siphoned by the internet. In 2007 total ad dollars
for
radio fell to where they were in 2003. That point to an industry going
backwards, not forward, Cramer said.
The average market cap of terrestrial radio companies has declined by a
staggering 80% over the last five years. But the bottom isn't even in
yet,
as far as Cramer can tell
Either way, the bottom line remains the same. Cramer expects the
terrestrial
radio companies to go down harder than almost anything else and he
would
not
own any of them under any condition right now.

Of course, Cramer is barely right half the time. His advice is more
entertaining screaming and diatribe than useful.

Once again - Eduardo, you're an expert on everything. Amazing!

There are plenty of sites that track Cramer's "advice" to show that it is
mediocre at best.

amazing!

He has the psychic ability to tell you what you can hear on your radio.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

In article ,
"MNMikew" wrote:

"Scooter" wrote in message
.. .
Terrestrial radio's biggest problem is retaining advertising revenues as
more ad dollars are siphoned by the internet. In 2007 total ad dollars for
radio fell to where they were in 2003. That point to an industry going
backwards, not forward, Cramer said.
The average market cap of terrestrial radio companies has declined by a
staggering 80% over the last five years. But the bottom isn't even in yet,
as far as Cramer can tell
Either way, the bottom line remains the same. Cramer expects the
terrestrial
radio companies to go down harder than almost anything else and he would
not
own any of them under any condition right now.

Here's the video - http://www.cnbc.com/id/23558686/from/ET/

Cramer is the biggest dumbass in the financial world!

And you are the biggest dumb ass posting to this news group.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

David Eduardo wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message
...

Your "IQ" is just something else you made up, right, Gleason?



Started your weekend drinking binge, I see.




Which raises the question....why would you waste your time?

You dismiss him as irrelevant. You dismiss him as alcoholic.

And yet...you're the one who engages him.


Hmmmmm...



Kinda raises another question. Doesn't it.


Given your stated disdain for DXers, it is quite the curiosity that
you spend so much time arguing with them.

Like Steve...you dismiss them as irrelevant. You blame them for the
deterioration of their relationship with broadcasters...and yet you
regularly engage them.



Hmmmmmm...



A person in your position would seem to have better uses for his
time. Unless, like another poster here, who faded away about the time of
your appearance, your bickering here is fodder for some discussions
outside of the group.

Which then raises more significant questions.

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...

Which raises the question....why would you waste your time?

You dismiss him as irrelevant. You dismiss him as alcoholic.

And yet...you're the one who engages him.

If you had been on a high school or college debate team, you would
understand.

Given your stated disdain for DXers, it is quite the curiosity that you
spend so much time arguing with them.

I have a disdain for DXers who have a disdain for broadcasters. Big
difference.

Like Steve...you dismiss them as irrelevant. You blame them for the
deterioration of their relationship with broadcasters...and yet you
regularly engage them.

.... because it is fun.

A person in your position would seem to have better uses for his time.

I find this a rather entertaining diversion from that very same position.

Unless, like another poster here, who faded away about the time of your
appearance, your bickering here is fodder for some discussions outside of
the group.

How nice to be able to foment conversation.

Which then raises more significant questions.

Nothing on a news group is truly significant. It's backyard gossip over a
(fire) wall.

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:


"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...

Which raises the question....why would you waste your time?

You dismiss him as irrelevant. You dismiss him as alcoholic.

And yet...you're the one who engages him.

If you had been on a high school or college debate team, you would
understand.

SNIP

Most people shun debaters. You would think you would have learned that
by now.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:


"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...

Which raises the question....why would you waste your time?

You dismiss him as irrelevant. You dismiss him as alcoholic.

And yet...you're the one who engages him.

If you had been on a high school or college debate team, you would
understand.

SNIP

Most people shun debaters. You would think you would have learned that
by now.

This is documented where? In your rigid inflexible mind?

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
Which raises the question....why would you waste your time?

You dismiss him as irrelevant. You dismiss him as alcoholic.

And yet...you're the one who engages him.

If you had been on a high school or college debate team, you would
understand.


So, this just sport for you. You're not arguing to purpose, you're
simply arguing. Got it.

I was in the Writer's Club, actually.


Given your stated disdain for DXers, it is quite the curiosity that you
spend so much time arguing with them.

I have a disdain for DXers who have a disdain for broadcasters. Big
difference.


What you conveniently ignore, is that fans don't turn on the
object of their fanaticism....they have to be run off.

Broadcasters were long disdainful of DXers before DXers were
turned off.

So, you have disdain for Dxers who have disdain for you because
you had disdain for them.

Yes, it's a big difference of no difference. The very persons for
whom you have disdain are the ones you spend so much time aguing with.

Yes, I see the distinction.




Like Steve...you dismiss them as irrelevant. You blame them for the
deterioration of their relationship with broadcasters...and yet you
regularly engage them.

... because it is fun.

A person in your position would seem to have better uses for his time.

I find this a rather entertaining diversion from that very same position.

Unless, like another poster here, who faded away about the time of your
appearance, your bickering here is fodder for some discussions outside of
the group.

How nice to be able to foment conversation.

As usual, you miss my point.


Which then raises more significant questions.

Nothing on a news group is truly significant. It's backyard gossip over a
(fire) wall.



Uh huh...which, again, raises questions.

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
Which raises the question....why would you waste your time?

You dismiss him as irrelevant. You dismiss him as alcoholic.

And yet...you're the one who engages him.

If you had been on a high school or college debate team, you would
understand.


So, this just sport for you. You're not arguing to purpose, you're
simply arguing. Got it.

No, you do not get it. Debate, going back to the Greeks, was as much about
the enjoyment of the discussion as the content being discussed. There are
two parts... holding a point of view and enjoying the challenge of defending
it.

I have a disdain for DXers who have a disdain for broadcasters. Big
difference.


What you conveniently ignore, is that fans don't turn on the object
of their fanaticism....they have to be run off.

This "hatred" has to origins...

One is based in the decline of AM whereby most "DX hours" programming is
networked and there is little variety to hear among domestics.

The second is based on AM looking for a saviour, and placing some faith in
HD Radio to improve its declining fortunes.

The first makes late-night DX boring. The second makes it impossible. Both
are reasonable business decisions by AM stations, but DXers see them as
attacks.

Broadcasters were long disdainful of DXers before DXers were turned
off.

I would not say that. Interest in DX reports waned as the importance of
non-local coverage waned, while at the same time most non-Metro stations
used outside contract engineers who were not paid to answer reception
reports. Today, nearly nobody at a station will know what DX even is.


Unless, like another poster here, who faded away about the time of your
appearance, your bickering here is fodder for some discussions outside
of the group.

How nice to be able to foment conversation.

As usual, you miss my point.

You have no point.

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
Which raises the question....why would you waste your time?

You dismiss him as irrelevant. You dismiss him as alcoholic.

And yet...you're the one who engages him.
If you had been on a high school or college debate team, you would
understand.

So, this just sport for you. You're not arguing to purpose, you're
simply arguing. Got it.

No, you do not get it. Debate, going back to the Greeks, was as much about
the enjoyment of the discussion as the content being discussed. There are
two parts... holding a point of view and enjoying the challenge of defending
it.



Yes, I do get it. It's sport. You don't actually discuss. You don't
actually discuss, because you don't actually listen. You don't actually
respond to someone else's comment.

You declare. You don't discuss.


I have a disdain for DXers who have a disdain for broadcasters. Big
difference.

What you conveniently ignore, is that fans don't turn on the object
of their fanaticism....they have to be run off.

This "hatred" has to origins...

One is based in the decline of AM whereby most "DX hours" programming is
networked and there is little variety to hear among domestics.

The second is based on AM looking for a saviour, and placing some faith in
HD Radio to improve its declining fortunes.

The first makes late-night DX boring. The second makes it impossible. Both
are reasonable business decisions by AM stations, but DXers see them as
attacks.
Broadcasters were long disdainful of DXers before DXers were turned
off.

I would not say that.


And you would be in direct contradiction with yourself. You've stated
repeatedly how the disinterest in DX reports predates even the days of
CKLW.

Broadcasters had disdain for DXers long before DXers had disdain for
Broadcasters.



Unless, like another poster here, who faded away about the time of your
appearance, your bickering here is fodder for some discussions outside
of the group.
How nice to be able to foment conversation.
As usual, you miss my point.

You have no point.


Wow. That's some debate style.

You must have been a student of Bryant.

Or Algore.


Have a good evening, David.

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

dxAce wrote:

Drifter wrote:

dxAce wrote:
David Frackelton Gleason, posing as 'Eduardo', the faux Hispanic, wrote:

Hey NAMBLA dude, where have you been hiding?
A rather simple inspection of the message headers will show that the "dude"
in question is an imposter.
Aren't you associated with SAMBLA? (South American Man Boy Love Association)

(cross posting snip)
Thanks Steve, coffee on the screen here again.

I spit a wee bit of Guinness earlier!

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Shanti Om

OMG! I'd rather waste the coffee than the Guinness...

and thanks Steve, i tend to get a bit misty sometimes.

Drifter...

--
"Regulatory capitalism is when companies invest in lawyers, lobbyists,
and politicians, instead of plant, people, and customer service."
- former FCC Chairman William Kennard (A real FCC Chairman,
unlike the current Corporate Spokesperson in the job!)

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

Drifter wrote:

dxAce wrote:

Drifter wrote:

dxAce wrote:
David Frackelton Gleason, posing as 'Eduardo', the faux Hispanic, wrote:

Hey NAMBLA dude, where have you been hiding?
A rather simple inspection of the message headers will show that the "dude"
in question is an imposter.
Aren't you associated with SAMBLA? (South American Man Boy Love Association)

(cross posting snip)
Thanks Steve, coffee on the screen here again.

I spit a wee bit of Guinness earlier!

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Shanti Om

OMG! I'd rather waste the coffee than the Guinness...

and thanks Steve, i tend to get a bit misty sometimes.

I as well. I put my flag up a bit ago in memory of your friends. I hope others might
remember them as well as they go about their day.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Shanti Om

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Frackelton Gleason, Univisions retard boy who poses as 'Eduardo',
the faux
Hispanic, wrote:

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...

Which raises the question....why would you waste your time?

You dismiss him as irrelevant. You dismiss him as alcoholic.

And yet...you're the one who engages him.

If you had been on a high school or college debate team, you would
understand.

LMFAO. Gleason, you never graduated from high school, nor college!

Yeah, I know you are envious that I had a business of my own at age 17 that
was a lot more exciting and productive than falling asleep from boredom in
high school... and later I had the luxury of studying what I wanted, not a
required curriculum, in college.

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


I would not say that. Interest in DX reports waned as the importance of
non-local coverage waned, while at the same time most non-Metro stations
used outside contract engineers who were not paid to answer reception
reports. Today, nearly nobody at a station will know what DX even is.

Hell, even you don't know what DX is. Never did, never will. 'Eduardo',
you
couldn't DX your way out of a wet paper sack!

Of course, that has no truth to it al all. I was a good enough DXer to be
one of the founding members of the IRCA and a member of it's board in its
first year, as well as a member of the NRC from about 1958 to just a couple
of years ago.

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

David Frackelton Gleason, Univisions retard boy who poses as 'Eduardo', the faux
Hispanic, wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...

Which raises the question....why would you waste your time?

You dismiss him as irrelevant. You dismiss him as alcoholic.

And yet...you're the one who engages him.

If you had been on a high school or college debate team, you would
understand.

LMFAO. Gleason, you never graduated from high school, nor college!

Yeah, I know you are envious that I had a business of my own at age 17 that
was a lot more exciting and productive than falling asleep from boredom in
high school... and later I had the luxury of studying what I wanted, not a
required curriculum, in college.

Bull****!

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


I would not say that. Interest in DX reports waned as the importance of
non-local coverage waned, while at the same time most non-Metro stations
used outside contract engineers who were not paid to answer reception
reports. Today, nearly nobody at a station will know what DX even is.

Hell, even you don't know what DX is. Never did, never will. 'Eduardo',
you
couldn't DX your way out of a wet paper sack!

Of course, that has no truth to it al all. I was a good enough DXer to be
one of the founding members of the IRCA and a member of it's board in its
first year, as well as a member of the NRC from about 1958 to just a couple
of years ago.

They kick your faux ass out?

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

Drifter wrote:

dxAce wrote:

Drifter wrote:

dxAce wrote:
David Frackelton Gleason, posing as 'Eduardo', the faux Hispanic, wrote:

Hey NAMBLA dude, where have you been hiding?
A rather simple inspection of the message headers will show that the "dude"
in question is an imposter.
Aren't you associated with SAMBLA? (South American Man Boy Love Association)

(cross posting snip)
Thanks Steve, coffee on the screen here again.

I spit a wee bit of Guinness earlier!

OMG! I'd rather waste the coffee than the Guinness...

Very tasty!

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Shanti Om

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


I would not say that. Interest in DX reports waned as the importance
of
non-local coverage waned, while at the same time most non-Metro
stations
used outside contract engineers who were not paid to answer reception
reports. Today, nearly nobody at a station will know what DX even is.

Hell, even you don't know what DX is. Never did, never will. 'Eduardo',
you
couldn't DX your way out of a wet paper sack!

Of course, that has no truth to it al all. I was a good enough DXer to be
one of the founding members of the IRCA and a member of it's board in its
first year, as well as a member of the NRC from about 1958 to just a
couple
of years ago.

They kick your faux ass out?

No, I did not renew... a few ornery DXers who are against radio as a
business made it annoying, particularly when one has to pay to be a member.

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Frackelton Gleason, Univisions retard boy who poses as 'Eduardo',
the faux
Hispanic, wrote:

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...

Which raises the question....why would you waste your time?

You dismiss him as irrelevant. You dismiss him as alcoholic.

And yet...you're the one who engages him.

If you had been on a high school or college debate team, you would
understand.

LMFAO. Gleason, you never graduated from high school, nor college!

Yeah, I know you are envious that I had a business of my own at age 17 that
was a lot more exciting and productive than falling asleep from boredom in
high school...

I'm not envious of anything you fabricate, 'Eduardo'.

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


I would not say that. Interest in DX reports waned as the importance
of
non-local coverage waned, while at the same time most non-Metro
stations
used outside contract engineers who were not paid to answer reception
reports. Today, nearly nobody at a station will know what DX even is.

Hell, even you don't know what DX is. Never did, never will. 'Eduardo',
you
couldn't DX your way out of a wet paper sack!

Of course, that has no truth to it al all. I was a good enough DXer to be
one of the founding members of the IRCA and a member of it's board in its
first year, as well as a member of the NRC from about 1958 to just a
couple
of years ago.

They kick your faux ass out?

No, I did not renew... a few ornery DXers who are against radio as a
business made it annoying, particularly when one has to pay to be a member.

Broke, oh faux one? So very sad. You should have graduated high school.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Shanti Om

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

dxAce wrote:

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


I would not say that. Interest in DX reports waned as the importance
of
non-local coverage waned, while at the same time most non-Metro
stations
used outside contract engineers who were not paid to answer reception
reports. Today, nearly nobody at a station will know what DX even is.

Hell, even you don't know what DX is. Never did, never will. 'Eduardo',
you
couldn't DX your way out of a wet paper sack!

Of course, that has no truth to it al all. I was a good enough DXer to be
one of the founding members of the IRCA and a member of it's board in its
first year, as well as a member of the NRC from about 1958 to just a
couple
of years ago.

They kick your faux ass out?

No, I did not renew... a few ornery DXers who are against radio as a
business made it annoying, particularly when one has to pay to be a member.

Broke, oh faux one? So very sad. You should have graduated high school.

Your mommy, whom, according to you, graduated from Wellesley College, would have
been proud.

Instead, you are a lying, pathological idiot.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Shanti Om

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:


"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...

Which raises the question....why would you waste your time?

You dismiss him as irrelevant. You dismiss him as alcoholic.

And yet...you're the one who engages him.

If you had been on a high school or college debate team, you would
understand.

SNIP

Most people shun debaters. You would think you would have learned that
by now.

This is documented where? In your rigid inflexible mind?

No, that would be most people. Debating is just the parsing of words to
win an argument, which each side puts out their best words to that
effect regardless of the truth of the matter. It exists just to make a
mindless win for lawyers and politicians whether they are right or
wrong. Most people don't care because it is useless information. The
truth of the matter will help and the BS will just lead you astray.

That's why most people hate you. You are just a BS spewer.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:


"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
Which raises the question....why would you waste your time?

You dismiss him as irrelevant. You dismiss him as alcoholic.

And yet...you're the one who engages him.

If you had been on a high school or college debate team, you would
understand.


So, this just sport for you. You're not arguing to purpose, you're
simply arguing. Got it.

No, you do not get it. Debate, going back to the Greeks, was as much about
the enjoyment of the discussion as the content being discussed.

SNIP

To bad for anyone reading your posts that it is all just BS.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

In article ,
D Peter Maus wrote:

David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
Which raises the question....why would you waste your time?

You dismiss him as irrelevant. You dismiss him as alcoholic.

And yet...you're the one who engages him.
If you had been on a high school or college debate team, you would
understand.

So, this just sport for you. You're not arguing to purpose, you're
simply arguing. Got it.

No, you do not get it. Debate, going back to the Greeks, was as much about
the enjoyment of the discussion as the content being discussed. There are
two parts... holding a point of view and enjoying the challenge of
defending
it.



Yes, I do get it. It's sport. You don't actually discuss. You don't
actually discuss, because you don't actually listen. You don't actually
respond to someone else's comment.

You declare. You don't discuss.

SNIP

He just posts crap for the hell of it. He thinks it is fun to trash the
news group.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


I would not say that. Interest in DX reports waned as the importance
of
non-local coverage waned, while at the same time most non-Metro
stations
used outside contract engineers who were not paid to answer reception
reports. Today, nearly nobody at a station will know what DX even is.

Hell, even you don't know what DX is. Never did, never will. 'Eduardo',
you
couldn't DX your way out of a wet paper sack!

Of course, that has no truth to it al all. I was a good enough DXer to be
one of the founding members of the IRCA and a member of it's board in its
first year, as well as a member of the NRC from about 1958 to just a
couple
of years ago.

They kick your faux ass out?

No, I did not renew... a few ornery DXers who are against radio as a
business made it annoying, particularly when one has to pay to be a member.

They told you not to Renew.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

In article ,
dxAce wrote:

David Frackelton Gleason, Univisions retard boy who poses as 'Eduardo', the
faux
Hispanic, wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...

Which raises the question....why would you waste your time?

You dismiss him as irrelevant. You dismiss him as alcoholic.

And yet...you're the one who engages him.

If you had been on a high school or college debate team, you would
understand.

LMFAO. Gleason, you never graduated from high school, nor college!

Yeah, I know you are envious that I had a business of my own at age 17 that
was a lot more exciting and productive than falling asleep from boredom in
high school... and later I had the luxury of studying what I wanted, not a
required curriculum, in college.

Bull****!

Precisely.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Jim Cramer Why Radio is dead.
 

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


Broke, oh faux one? So very sad. You should have graduated high school.


Graduating from high school would not have helped me at all and has never
been a factor in business. It's all about successful work experience.