David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
Which raises the question....why would you waste your time?

You dismiss him as irrelevant. You dismiss him as alcoholic.

And yet...you're the one who engages him.

If you had been on a high school or college debate team, you would
understand.


So, this just sport for you. You're not arguing to purpose, you're
simply arguing. Got it.

I was in the Writer's Club, actually.


Given your stated disdain for DXers, it is quite the curiosity that you
spend so much time arguing with them.

I have a disdain for DXers who have a disdain for broadcasters. Big
difference.


What you conveniently ignore, is that fans don't turn on the
object of their fanaticism....they have to be run off.

Broadcasters were long disdainful of DXers before DXers were
turned off.

So, you have disdain for Dxers who have disdain for you because
you had disdain for them.

Yes, it's a big difference of no difference. The very persons for
whom you have disdain are the ones you spend so much time aguing with.

Yes, I see the distinction.




Like Steve...you dismiss them as irrelevant. You blame them for the
deterioration of their relationship with broadcasters...and yet you
regularly engage them.

... because it is fun.

A person in your position would seem to have better uses for his time.

I find this a rather entertaining diversion from that very same position.

Unless, like another poster here, who faded away about the time of your
appearance, your bickering here is fodder for some discussions outside of
the group.

How nice to be able to foment conversation.

As usual, you miss my point.


Which then raises more significant questions.

Nothing on a news group is truly significant. It's backyard gossip over a
(fire) wall.



Uh huh...which, again, raises questions.