http://www.lazygranch.com/sound/shortwave/2750khz.ogg
SF Bay area approx 9GMT 3/22/2008
2750Khz AM 9.5kHz filter

In article
,
wrote:

http://www.lazygranch.com/sound/shortwave/2750khz.ogg
SF Bay area approx 9GMT 3/22/2008
2750Khz AM 9.5kHz filter

What is the file format?

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

On Mar 22, 3:10 pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article
,

wrote:
http://www.lazygranch.com/sound/shortwave/2750khz.ogg
SF Bay area approx 9GMT 3/22/2008
2750Khz AM 9.5kHz filter

What is the file format?

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Ogg. It plays in winamp, irfanview, videolan.

On Mar 22, 2:55 pm, wrote:
http://www.lazygranch.com/sound/shortwave/2750khz.ogg
SF Bay area approx 9GMT 3/22/2008
2750Khz AM 9.5kHz filter

A few days ago they were doing what I call "ding dong whoop." Then 2
second beep, 4 seconds off. I didn't record those events.

wrote:
http://www.lazygranch.com/sound/shortwave/2750khz.ogg
SF Bay area approx 9GMT 3/22/2008
2750Khz AM 9.5kHz filter

Trying to advocate the use of Ogg Vorbis are we?
Just kidding.

--
Mats

In article
,
wrote:

On Mar 22, 3:10 pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article
,

wrote:
http://www.lazygranch.com/sound/shortwave/2750khz.ogg
SF Bay area approx 9GMT 3/22/2008
2750Khz AM 9.5kHz filter

What is the file format?


Ogg. It plays in winamp, irfanview, videolan.

I down loaded the free videolan player. Nice app.

I think someone is testing a transmitter. It just sounds to me to be a
series of tones low to high and at one point a tone ramp.

If I'm awake at 2 AM I'll give it a listen.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

On Mar 22, 6:08 pm, msg wrote:
wrote:
http://www.lazygranch.com/sound/shortwave/2750khz.ogg
SF Bay area approx 9GMT 3/22/2008
2750Khz AM 9.5kHz filter

Hmm, your original post never arrived at Supernews.

Interesting; sounds like some sort of channel
calibration/equalization/training. What were your
receiver settings (mode, filter widths, processing)?

When I first began listening, my impression was of
out-of-band interference from a paging transmitter
or trunking public service repeater slowed _way_ down.

Michael

I already stated the receiver was in AM mode using the 9.5Khz
bandwidth. No processing.

On Mar 22, 4:02 pm, Mats Peterson wrote:
wrote:
http://www.lazygranch.com/sound/shortwave/2750khz.ogg
SF Bay area approx 9GMT 3/22/2008
2750Khz AM 9.5kHz filter

Trying to advocate the use of Ogg Vorbis are we?
Just kidding.

--
Mats

I've been uploading audio in ogg for years.
http://www.lazygranch.com/red_audio.htm
http://www.lazygranch.com/janet_audio.htm

While not much of an advantage for mono, ogg is very useful for stereo
scanner recording. That is, you record two scanners in real time. MP3
will share the audio between channels, while ogg behaves as if each
channel is discrete.

I try to use open source standards where possible, i.e. LAME or Ogg
versus mp3. FLAC versus whatever crap Apple is pushing lately.

wrote:


http://www.lazygranch.com/sound/shortwave/2750khz.ogg
SF Bay area approx 9GMT 3/22/2008
2750Khz AM 9.5kHz filter

Hmm, your original post never arrived at Supernews.

Interesting; sounds like some sort of channel
calibration/equalization/training. What were your
receiver settings (mode, filter widths, processing)?

When I first began listening, my impression was of
out-of-band interference from a paging transmitter
or trunking public service repeater slowed _way_ down.

Michael

wrote:

On Mar 22, 6:08 pm, msg wrote:

wrote:

http://www.lazygranch.com/sound/shortwave/2750khz.ogg
SF Bay area approx 9GMT 3/22/2008
2750Khz AM 9.5kHz filter

Hmm, your original post never arrived at Supernews.

Interesting; sounds like some sort of channel
calibration/equalization/training. What were your
receiver settings (mode, filter widths, processing)?

When I first began listening, my impression was of
out-of-band interference from a paging transmitter
or trunking public service repeater slowed _way_ down.

Michael


I already stated the receiver was in AM mode using the 9.5Khz
bandwidth. No processing.

Yes, but I don't have your original post

Michael