Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
This link shows how I have "grounded" the setup
http://www.geocities.com/qrp_baluns/LMZ-50-Ground.GIF vangellis |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , vangellis
writes This link shows how I have "grounded" the setup http://www.geocities.com/qrp_baluns/LMZ-50-Ground.GIF vangellis It's interesting that they have one version which is described as a 10:1 impedance matching voltage transformer, for 50 ohm coax, and the other described as a 9:1 voltage balun transformer, for 75 ohm coax. It could be that they are essentially the same inside (why would they want to make two different types?), but with different connectors. Neither are actually acting as baluns (although they be using balun transformers inside the can). Some time ago, there was report published of tests which compared the received signals levels with - and without - this type of transformer. From memory, it showed that, on most frequencies, there was a very noticeable increase of signal level into the receiver. Only on a minority of frequencies was there some (acceptable) reduction of level. I've had a quick Google, but haven't yet found this report. -- Ian |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 28, 1:16*pm, Ian Jackson
wrote: In message , vangellis writesThis link shows how I have "grounded" the setup http://www.geocities.com/qrp_baluns/LMZ-50-Ground.GIF vangellis It's interesting that they have one version which is described as a 10:1 impedance matching voltage transformer, for 50 ohm coax, and the other described as a 9:1 voltage balun transformer, for 75 ohm coax. It could be that they are essentially the same inside (why would they want to make two different types?), but with different connectors. Neither are actually acting as baluns (although they be using balun transformers inside the can). - Some time ago, there was report published of tests - which compared the received signals levels with - and without - this type of transformer. - *From memory, it showed that, on most frequencies, - there was a very noticeable increase of signal level - into the receiver. Only on a minority of frequencies was - there some (acceptable) reduction of level. - I've had a quick Google, but haven't yet found this report. - -- - Ian IAN, Read this Post : SWL Longwire + Low Noise Antenna Connection + Grounding Is Key To Good Reception Three Messages to Read -by- John Doty http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...bc6a2bf8acc12d Follow the Links/URLs provided in the Message. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
, RHF writes On Mar 28, 1:16*pm, Ian Jackson wrote: In message , vangellis writesThis link shows how I have "grounded" the setup http://www.geocities.com/qrp_baluns/LMZ-50-Ground.GIF vangellis It's interesting that they have one version which is described as a 10:1 impedance matching voltage transformer, for 50 ohm coax, and the other described as a 9:1 voltage balun transformer, for 75 ohm coax. It could be that they are essentially the same inside (why would they want to make two different types?), but with different connectors. Neither are actually acting as baluns (although they be using balun transformers inside the can). - Some time ago, there was report published of tests - which compared the received signals levels with - and without - this type of transformer. - *From memory, it showed that, on most frequencies, - there was a very noticeable increase of signal level - into the receiver. Only on a minority of frequencies was - there some (acceptable) reduction of level. - I've had a quick Google, but haven't yet found this report. - -- - Ian IAN, Read this Post : SWL Longwire + Low Noise Antenna Connection + Grounding Is Key To Good Reception Three Messages to Read -by- John Doty http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...bc6a2bf8acc12d Follow the Links/URLs provided in the Message. . ~ RHF . Thanks. There's certainly a lot of good reading there, and in the links in your other posts today. The info particularly in http://web.archive.org/web/200306090...wa/badx/antenn as/SWL_longwire.html is exactly the sort of thing I was thinking about. However, there's one thing which I note (just a quick look) on several of the websites, and that is the transformer is repeatedly referred to as a 'balun'. It isn't. I suspect that it's because they are using the same transformer as the type used in a balun but, in this application, a balun it ain't! -- Ian |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Ian Jackson wrote: In message , RHF writes On Mar 28, 1:16 pm, Ian Jackson wrote: In message , vangellis writesThis link shows how I have "grounded" the setup http://www.geocities.com/qrp_baluns/LMZ-50-Ground.GIF vangellis It's interesting that they have one version which is described as a 10:1 impedance matching voltage transformer, for 50 ohm coax, and the other described as a 9:1 voltage balun transformer, for 75 ohm coax. It could be that they are essentially the same inside (why would they want to make two different types?), but with different connectors. Neither are actually acting as baluns (although they be using balun transformers inside the can). - Some time ago, there was report published of tests - which compared the received signals levels with - and without - this type of transformer. - From memory, it showed that, on most frequencies, - there was a very noticeable increase of signal level - into the receiver. Only on a minority of frequencies was - there some (acceptable) reduction of level. - I've had a quick Google, but haven't yet found this report. - -- - Ian IAN, Read this Post : SWL Longwire + Low Noise Antenna Connection + Grounding Is Key To Good Reception Three Messages to Read -by- John Doty http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...bc6a2bf8acc12d Follow the Links/URLs provided in the Message. . ~ RHF . Thanks. There's certainly a lot of good reading there, and in the links in your other posts today. The info particularly in http://web.archive.org/web/200306090...wa/badx/antenn as/SWL_longwire.html is exactly the sort of thing I was thinking about. However, there's one thing which I note (just a quick look) on several of the websites, and that is the transformer is repeatedly referred to as a 'balun'. It isn't. I suspect that it's because they are using the same transformer as the type used in a balun but, in this application, a balun it ain't! transformer/balun. The only ones who care are anal folk like 'Eduardo'. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() dxAce wrote: Ian Jackson wrote: In message , RHF writes On Mar 28, 1:16 pm, Ian Jackson wrote: In message , vangellis writesThis link shows how I have "grounded" the setup http://www.geocities.com/qrp_baluns/LMZ-50-Ground.GIF vangellis It's interesting that they have one version which is described as a 10:1 impedance matching voltage transformer, for 50 ohm coax, and the other described as a 9:1 voltage balun transformer, for 75 ohm coax. It could be that they are essentially the same inside (why would they want to make two different types?), but with different connectors. Neither are actually acting as baluns (although they be using balun transformers inside the can). - Some time ago, there was report published of tests - which compared the received signals levels with - and without - this type of transformer. - From memory, it showed that, on most frequencies, - there was a very noticeable increase of signal level - into the receiver. Only on a minority of frequencies was - there some (acceptable) reduction of level. - I've had a quick Google, but haven't yet found this report. - -- - Ian IAN, Read this Post : SWL Longwire + Low Noise Antenna Connection + Grounding Is Key To Good Reception Three Messages to Read -by- John Doty http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...bc6a2bf8acc12d Follow the Links/URLs provided in the Message. . ~ RHF . Thanks. There's certainly a lot of good reading there, and in the links in your other posts today. The info particularly in http://web.archive.org/web/200306090...wa/badx/antenn as/SWL_longwire.html is exactly the sort of thing I was thinking about. However, there's one thing which I note (just a quick look) on several of the websites, and that is the transformer is repeatedly referred to as a 'balun'. It isn't. I suspect that it's because they are using the same transformer as the type used in a balun but, in this application, a balun it ain't! transformer/balun. The only ones who care are anal folk like 'Eduardo'. And, as always, don't do business with the Huntington Investment Company. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 29, 5:37*am, Ian Jackson
wrote: In message , RHF writes On Mar 28, 1:16*pm, Ian Jackson wrote: In message , vangellis writesThis link shows how I have "grounded" the setup http://www.geocities.com/qrp_baluns/LMZ-50-Ground.GIF vangellis It's interesting that they have one version which is described as a 10:1 impedance matching voltage transformer, for 50 ohm coax, and the other described as a 9:1 voltage balun transformer, for 75 ohm coax. It could be that they are essentially the same inside (why would they want to make two different types?), but with different connectors. Neither are actually acting as baluns (although they be using balun transformers inside the can). - Some time ago, there was report published of tests - which compared the received signals levels with - and without - this type of transformer. - *From memory, it showed that, on most frequencies, - there was a very noticeable increase of signal level - into the receiver. Only on a minority of frequencies was - there some (acceptable) reduction of level. - I've had a quick Google, but haven't yet found this report. - -- - Ian IAN, Read this Post : SWL Longwire + Low Noise Antenna Connection + Grounding Is Key To Good Reception Three Messages to Read -by- John Doty http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...bc6a2bf8acc12d Follow the Links/URLs provided in the Message. . ~ RHF . Thanks. There's certainly a lot of good reading there, and in the links in your other posts today. The info particularly in http://web.archive.org/web/200306090.../naswa/badx/an... as/SWL_longwire.html is exactly the sort of thing I was thinking about. - - However, there's one thing which I note (just a quick look) - on several of the websites, and that is the transformer is - repeatedly referred to as a 'balun'. - - It isn't. I suspect that it's because they are using the - same transformer as the type used in a balun but, - in this application, a balun it ain't! - -- - Ian - Ian Jackson -read- The Magnetic Long-Wire Antenna Balun - A Balun It Ain't ! - But It Works ![]() http://groups.google.com./group/rec....334b2122c8ddbf iane ~ RHF |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
, RHF wrote: On Mar 29, 5:37*am, Ian Jackson wrote: In message , RHF writes On Mar 28, 1:16*pm, Ian Jackson wrote: In message , vangellis writesThis link shows how I have "grounded" the setup http://www.geocities.com/qrp_baluns/LMZ-50-Ground.GIF vangellis It's interesting that they have one version which is described as a 10:1 impedance matching voltage transformer, for 50 ohm coax, and the other described as a 9:1 voltage balun transformer, for 75 ohm coax. It could be that they are essentially the same inside (why would they want to make two different types?), but with different connectors. Neither are actually acting as baluns (although they be using balun transformers inside the can). - Some time ago, there was report published of tests - which compared the received signals levels with - and without - this type of transformer. - *From memory, it showed that, on most frequencies, - there was a very noticeable increase of signal level - into the receiver. Only on a minority of frequencies was - there some (acceptable) reduction of level. - I've had a quick Google, but haven't yet found this report. - -- - Ian IAN, Read this Post : SWL Longwire + Low Noise Antenna Connection + Grounding Is Key To Good Reception Three Messages to Read -by- John Doty http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...bc6a2bf8acc12d Follow the Links/URLs provided in the Message. . Thanks. There's certainly a lot of good reading there, and in the links in your other posts today. The info particularly in http://web.archive.org/web/200306090.../naswa/badx/an... as/SWL_longwire.html is exactly the sort of thing I was thinking about. - - However, there's one thing which I note (just a quick look) - on several of the websites, and that is the transformer is - repeatedly referred to as a 'balun'. - - It isn't. I suspect that it's because they are using the - same transformer as the type used in a balun but, - in this application, a balun it ain't! Ian Jackson -read- The Magnetic Long-Wire Antenna Balun - A Balun It Ain't ! - But It Works ![]() http://groups.google.com./group/rec....334b2122c8ddbf This isn't hard to understand. This is a two part term, which refers to the type of transformer. "BAL" refers to balanced and "UN" refers to unbalanced so the possibilities are BALBAL, UNUN, or BALUN. A long wire is unbalanced and a coax is unbalanced so the transformer type you would use is a UNUN. If you had a dipole, which is balanced connected to a coax you would use a BALUN. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 29, 12:40*pm, Telamon
wrote: In article , *RHF wrote: On Mar 29, 5:37*am, Ian Jackson wrote: In message , RHF writes On Mar 28, 1:16*pm, Ian Jackson wrote: In message , vangellis writesThis link shows how I have "grounded" the setup http://www.geocities.com/qrp_baluns/LMZ-50-Ground.GIF vangellis It's interesting that they have one version which is described as a 10:1 impedance matching voltage transformer, for 50 ohm coax, and the other described as a 9:1 voltage balun transformer, for 75 ohm coax. It could be that they are essentially the same inside (why would they want to make two different types?), but with different connectors. Neither are actually acting as baluns (although they be using balun transformers inside the can). - Some time ago, there was report published of tests - which compared the received signals levels with - and without - this type of transformer. - *From memory, it showed that, on most frequencies, - there was a very noticeable increase of signal level - into the receiver. Only on a minority of frequencies was - there some (acceptable) reduction of level. - I've had a quick Google, but haven't yet found this report. - -- - Ian IAN, Read this Post : SWL Longwire + Low Noise Antenna Connection + Grounding Is Key To Good Reception Three Messages to Read -by- John Doty http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...bc6a2bf8acc12d Follow the Links/URLs provided in the Message. . Thanks. There's certainly a lot of good reading there, and in the links in your other posts today. The info particularly in http://web.archive.org/web/200306090.../naswa/badx/an.... as/SWL_longwire.html is exactly the sort of thing I was thinking about. - - However, there's one thing which I note (just a quick look) - on several of the websites, and that is the transformer is - repeatedly referred to as a 'balun'. - - It isn't. I suspect that it's because they are using the - same transformer as the type used in a balun but, - in this application, a balun it ain't! - - Ian Jackson -read- The Magnetic Long-Wire Antenna Balun - - - A Balun It Ain't ! - But It Works ![]() - - - - http://groups.google.com./group/rec....334b2122c8ddbf - - This isn't hard to understand. This is a two part term, which refers to - the type of transformer. "BAL" refers to balanced and "UN" refers to - unbalanced so the possibilities are BALBAL, UNUN, or BALUN. - - A long wire is unbalanced and a coax is unbalanced so the transformer - type you would use is a UNUN. If you had a dipole, which is balanced - connected to a coax you would use a BALUN. - - -- - Telamon - Ventura, California - Telamon - Good Explanation. - We Agree ! ![]() |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 28, 12:06*pm, "vangellis" wrote:
Subject-Line was : balun question? http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...42f1fea85e6cf1 - - This link shows how I have "grounded" the setup - http://www.geocities.com/qrp_baluns/LMZ-50-Ground.GIF - - vangellis - Vangellis, The "Correct Way" to Install a Longwire Antenna and Balun by Wellbrook - Using the Far-End Feed-Point Concept http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Shortw.../message/11773 The "Correct Way" to Install a Longwire Antenna and Balun by Wellbrook = http://www.wellbrook.uk.com/longwire.html We have all most likely done it the wrong way more than once . . . A key-point that Wellbrook makes is the Five Metre "Noise Zone" that exists around a House and getting the Wire Antenna Element away {out} from this area. http://www.wellbrook.uk.com/longwire.html Note - The above "Correct Way" installation will ensure that the Wire Antenna Element is 'outside' the local Noise Zone which extends up to Five Metres (16 Feet) around the House. Also the noise pickup is lower with the feeder close to the ground -or- buried under the ground a few inches. -Why- The Antenna and the Balun are within the Local Noise Zone RFI & EMF {Interference Area} that surrounds most buildings up to distance of Five Metres (16 Feet). Read - WHY - The Far-End-Fed Shortwave Listener's (SWLs) Inverted "L" Antenna http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...cfc6b9cb2447c0 all i ask for is five metres beyond the noise - iane ~ RHF {pomkia} |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
4:1 balun question | Antenna | |||
4:1 balun question | Antenna | |||
Balun question... | Scanner | |||
4:1 balun question | Antenna |