|
US strike on al-Qaida kills children - AGAIN
On May 22, 8:21*pm, Tex wrote:
*American "HEROES" strike again. Gather your made in communist China flags and throw another parade lemmings! By KIM GAMEL, Associated Press Writer 2 hours, 35 minutes ago BAGHDAD - A U.S. helicopter strike north of Baghdad killed eight people in a vehicle, including at least two children, Iraqi officials said Thursday, insisting all the dead were civilians. The U.S. military said six were al-Qaida militants but acknowledged children were killed. AP Television News footage showed the bodies of three children in blood-drenched clothes — the eldest appearing to be in his early teens — along with the bodies of five men, at the hospital in Beiji, where the dead were taken after Wednesday evening's strike. he strike came as the U.S. was trying to ease Iraqi anger over the shooting of a copy of the Quran by an American sniper, who used Islam's holy book for target practice. In Afghanistan on Thursday, a NATO soldier and two demonstrators were killed at a violent protest over the Quran shooting. Whether declared or not.... justified or not..... War Is Hell especially when innocent people get hurt and killed. Remember 9/11... and the innocent people whos lives were cut violently short...including the little girl who never made it to Disney Land, never got to grow up, never got to share the love of a husband and have children of her own, and whos last moments were filled with terrified screams as they approached the tower... God help us all...... |
US strike on al-Qaida kills children - AGAIN
On May 22, 9:30 pm, Cato wrote:
Whether declared or not.... justified or not..... War Is Hell especially when innocent people get hurt and killed. Remember 9/11... and the innocent people whos lives were cut violently short...including the little girl who never made it to Disney Land, never got to grow up, never got to share the love of a husband and have children of her own, and whos last moments were filled with terrified screams as they approached the tower... God help us all...... Jesus ****ing christ you have got to be the most ignorant asshole in the group - and that takes some doing. Can't you open your ****ing mouth without subtracting from the sum total of human knowledge? Is there one of his fellow canucks in the group who can explain to this imbecile that Iraq had nothing to do with 911? If your brains were made of dynamite you wouldn't even muss up your hair if they exploded! Do the planet a favor and kill yourself before you reproduce any more. P.S. And please spare us your family history when posting your dumbass reply that will surely follow. Everyone already knows that you have "relatives in the US blah blah blah blah blah blah blah..." and we still don't give a ****. |
US strike on al-Qaida kills children - AGAIN
Cato wrote:
Remember 9/11... and the innocent people whos lives were cut violently short...including the little girl who never made it to Disney Land, never got to grow up, never got to share the love of a husband and have children of her own, and whos last moments were filled with terrified screams as they approached the tower... God help us all...... There is no God, and we are screwed. Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11. Since you are too stupid to know this you are doomed. |
US strike on al-Qaida kills children - AGAIN
dave wrote: Cato wrote: Remember 9/11... and the innocent people whos lives were cut violently short...including the little girl who never made it to Disney Land, never got to grow up, never got to share the love of a husband and have children of her own, and whos last moments were filled with terrified screams as they approached the tower... God help us all...... There is no God, and we are screwed. Well, you yourself are certainly screwed, or screwed up. Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11. That's debatable in a way. But no matter, Iraq did not live up to numerous agreements it made after the first Gulf War. Since you are too stupid to know this you are doomed. Rickets, you've been dooming and glooming for so long you don't know which end is up. |
US strike on al-Qaida kills children - AGAIN
dxAce wrote:
d Rickets, you've been dooming and glooming for so long you don't know which end is up. And all the while things just keep getting better, don't they Steve? |
DaviD -proclaims- There Is No God, and We Are Screwed.
On May 23, 5:25*am, dave wrote:
Cato wrote: * * * Remember 9/11... and the innocent people whos lives were cut violently short...including the little girl who never made it to Disney Land, never got to grow up, never got to share the love of a husband and have children of her own, and whos last moments were filled with terrified screams as they approached the tower... * * God help us all...... - There is no God, and we are screwed. -*Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11. - Since you are too stupid to know this you are doomed. DaviD -proclaims- There Is No God, and We Are Screwed. dave i will pray for you - pal ~ RHF |
US strike on al-Qaida kills children - AGAIN
dave wrote: Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11. dxAce wrote: That's debatable in a way. But no matter, Iraq did not live up to numerous agreements it made after the first Gulf War. Maybe yes, maybe no...but even if so, certainly those 'agreements' are not worth all the lives on both sides nor 10 Billion a month of our American dollars nor the divisiveness of our country. Since you are too stupid to know this you are doomed. Rickets, you've been dooming and glooming for so long you don't know which end is up. Maybe so...but there certainly is legitimate cause for the doom and gloom now. Un-affordable medical care for many, health care prices going through the roof for those who can 'afford' it, the housing market falling apart, the collapse of the American dollar, $4/gallon gas with no end in sight, recession or depression looming on the horizon. Other than that, everything is fine. Pay no attention to that "Dooming and Glooming". Don't worry, Be happy! ....and everyone have a happy and safe holiday weekend! |
US strike on al-Qaida kills children - AGAIN
On May 22, 10:58*pm, Tex wrote:
On May 22, 9:30 pm, Cato wrote: * Whether declared or not.... justified or not..... War Is Hell especially when innocent people get hurt and killed. * * * Remember 9/11... and the innocent people whos lives were cut violently short...including the little girl who never made it to Disney Land, never got to grow up, never got to share the love of a husband and have children of her own, and whos last moments were filled with terrified screams as they approached the tower... * * God help us all...... Jesus ****ing christ you have got to be the most ignorant asshole in the group - and that takes some doing. Can't you open your ****ing mouth without subtracting from the sum total of human knowledge? Is there one of his *fellow canucks in the group who can explain to this imbecile that Iraq had nothing to do with 911? If your brains were made of dynamite you wouldn't even muss up your hair if they exploded! Do the planet a favor and kill yourself before you reproduce any more. P.S. And please spare us your family history when posting your dumbass reply that will surely follow. Everyone already knows that you have "relatives in the US blah blah blah blah blah blah blah..." and we still don't give a ****. This from an asshole who makes it his profession to insult anyone he disagrees with, thinks he is some kind of god...and mere mortals should lick his feet clean What about all the agreements Iraq broke? Among others.. they were kicking out international nuke inspectors.... not allowing them to go places they wished to inspect...as if they had something big to hide.... what a buch of stupid assholes to do that if they had nothing to hide... The international community warned them and warned them to no avail... You think your country was the only one to invade???? It was the United States, backed by British forces and smaller contingents from Australia, Poland and Denmark. And other countries forces got involved in the occupation and suppression of Iraqi insurgents after.... You have that short a memory Tex? |
US strike on al-Qaida kills children - AGAIN
Cato wrote:
What about all the agreements Iraq broke? Among others.. they were kicking out international nuke inspectors.... not allowing them to go places they wished to inspect...as if they had something big to hide.... what a buch of stupid assholes to do that if they had nothing to hide... The international community warned them and warned them to no avail... You think your country was the only one to invade???? It was the United States, backed by British forces and smaller contingents from Australia, Poland and Denmark. And other countries forces got involved in the occupation and suppression of Iraqi insurgents after.... You have that short a memory Tex? The US was so desperate to get evidence, ANY kind of evidence, they had to resort to plagiarizing ten year old web pages. (complete with spelling mistakes and typos.) You have that short a memory, Cato? Do you remember Colin Powell lying his face off in front of the UN? You have that short a memory, Cato? As for the inspections: ====================================== Iraq has on the whole cooperated rather well so far with UNMOVIC in this field. The most important point to make is that access has been provided to all sites we have wanted to inspect and with one exception it has been prompt. We have further had great help in building up the infrastructure of our office in Baghdad and the field office in Mosul. Arrangements and services for our plane and our helicopters have been good. The environment has been workable. Our inspections have included universities, military bases, presidential sites and private residences. Inspections have also taken place on Fridays, the Muslim day of rest, on Christmas day and New Years day. These inspections have been conducted in the same manner as all other inspections. We seek to be both effective and correct. http://www.un.org/Depts/unmovic/Bx27.htm ========================================== You have that short a memory, Cato? Remember April Glaspie? She told Hussein the States had no interest in the Iraq/Kuwait border dispute. Hussein was set up. ======================================= GLASPIE: I think I understand this. I have lived here for years. I admire your extraordinary efforts to rebuild your country. I know you need funds. We understand that and our opinion is that you should have the opportunity to rebuild your country. But we have no opinion on the Arab-Arab conflicts, like your border disagreement with Kuwait. I was in the American Embassy in Kuwait during the late 60's. The instruction we had during this period was that we should express no opinion on this issue and that the issue is not associated with America. http://chss.montclair.edu/english/furr/glaspie.html ================================================== ==== You have that short a memory, Cato? The whole mess is based on one lie after another. Euros VS Dollars? ========================================= Original Essay January 2003 Although completely unreported by the U.S. media and government, the answer to the Iraq enigma is simple yet shocking -- it is in large part an oil currency war. One of the core reasons for this upcoming war is this administration's goal of preventing further Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) momentum towards the euro as an oil transaction currency standard. However, in order to pre-empt OPEC, they need to gain geo-strategic control of Iraq along with its 2nd largest proven oil reserves. The second coalescing factor that is driving the Iraq war is the quiet acknowledgement by respected oil geologists and possibly this administration is the impending phenomenon known as Global "Peak Oil." This is projected to occur around 2010, with Iraq and Saudi Arabia being the final two nations to reach peak oil production. http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/RRiraqWar.html ================================================== == |
US strike on al-Qaida kills children - AGAIN
m II wrote:
Euros VS Dollars? ========================================= Original Essay January 2003 Although completely unreported by the U.S. media and government, the answer to the Iraq enigma is simple yet shocking -- it is in large part an oil currency war. One of the core reasons for this upcoming war is this administration's goal of preventing further Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) momentum towards the euro as an oil transaction currency standard. Well, it didn't work. Looks like the euro IS becoming the standard for oil transactions (and Brazilian fashion models!). |
US strike on al-Qaida kills children - AGAIN
Cato wrote:
What about all the agreements Iraq broke? Among others.. they were kicking out international nuke inspectors.... not allowing them to go places they wished to inspect...as if they had something big to hide.... what a buch of stupid assholes to do that if they had nothing to hide... The international community warned them and warned them to no avail... That is factually inaccurate propaganda. Iraq complied with almost every ultimatum. Mr. Bush was Hell-bent on war with Iraq; even before he was appointed by the Supreme Court. You don't know a coup d`etat when you see one. |
(OT) US strike on al-Qaida kills children - AGAIN
dave wrote: Cato wrote: What about all the agreements Iraq broke? Among others.. they were kicking out international nuke inspectors.... not allowing them to go places they wished to inspect...as if they had something big to hide.... what a buch of stupid assholes to do that if they had nothing to hide... The international community warned them and warned them to no avail... That is factually inaccurate propaganda. Iraq complied with almost every ultimatum. Mr. Bush was Hell-bent on war with Iraq; even before he was appointed by the Supreme Court. You don't know a coup d`etat when you see one. You don't know Jack, Rickets! |
(OT) US strike on al-Qaida kills children - AGAIN
dxAce wrote:
dave wrote: Cato wrote: What about all the agreements Iraq broke? Among others.. they were kicking out international nuke inspectors.... not allowing them to go places they wished to inspect...as if they had something big to hide.... what a buch of stupid assholes to do that if they had nothing to hide... The international community warned them and warned them to no avail... That is factually inaccurate propaganda. Iraq complied with almost every ultimatum. Mr. Bush was Hell-bent on war with Iraq; even before he was appointed by the Supreme Court. You don't know a coup d`etat when you see one. You don't know Jack, Rickets! http://www.baltimorechronicle.com/mediawise_jan01.html http://www.consortiumnews.com/2001/111201a.html In other words, the elite media’s judgment is in: "Bush won, get over it." Only "Gore partisans" – as both the Washington Post and the New York Times called critics of the official Florida election tallies – would insist on looking at the fine print. The Actual Findings While that was the tone of coverage in these leading news outlets, it’s still a bit jarring to go outside the articles and read the actual results of the statewide review of 175,010 disputed ballots. “Full Review Favors Gore,” the Washington Post said in a box on page 10, showing that under all standards applied to the ballots, Gore came out on top. The New York Times' graphic revealed the same outcome. Earlier, less comprehensive ballot studies by the Miami Herald and USA Today had found that Bush and Gore split the four categories of disputed ballots depending on what standard was applied to assessing the ballots – punched-through chads, hanging chads, etc. Bush won under two standards and Gore under two standards. The new, fuller study found that Gore won regardless of which standard was applied and even when varying county judgments were factored in. Counting fully punched chads and limited marks on optical ballots, Gore won by 115 votes. With any dimple or optical mark, Gore won by 107 votes. With one corner of a chad detached or any optical mark, Gore won by 60 votes. Applying the standards set by each county, Gore won by 171 votes. This core finding of Gore’s Florida victory in the unofficial ballot recount might surprise many readers who skimmed only the headlines and the top paragraphs of the articles. The headlines and leads highlighted hypothetical, partial recounts that supposedly favored Bush. Buried deeper in the stories or referenced in subheads was the fact that the new recount determined that Gore was the winner statewide, even ignoring the “butterfly ballot” and other irregularities that cost him thousands of ballots. |
(OT) US strike on al-Qaida kills children - AGAIN
dave wrote: dxAce wrote: dave wrote: Cato wrote: What about all the agreements Iraq broke? Among others.. they were kicking out international nuke inspectors.... not allowing them to go places they wished to inspect...as if they had something big to hide.... what a buch of stupid assholes to do that if they had nothing to hide... The international community warned them and warned them to no avail... That is factually inaccurate propaganda. Iraq complied with almost every ultimatum. Mr. Bush was Hell-bent on war with Iraq; even before he was appointed by the Supreme Court. You don't know a coup d`etat when you see one. You don't know Jack, Rickets! http://www.baltimorechronicle.com/mediawise_jan01.html http://www.consortiumnews.com/2001/111201a.html In other words, the elite media’s judgment is in: "Bush won, get over it." Only "Gore partisans" – as both the Washington Post and the New York Times called critics of the official Florida election tallies – would insist on looking at the fine print. The Actual Findings While that was the tone of coverage in these leading news outlets, it’s still a bit jarring to go outside the articles and read the actual results of the statewide review of 175,010 disputed ballots. “Full Review Favors Gore,” the Washington Post said in a box on page 10, showing that under all standards applied to the ballots, Gore came out on top. The New York Times' graphic revealed the same outcome. Earlier, less comprehensive ballot studies by the Miami Herald and USA Today had found that Bush and Gore split the four categories of disputed ballots depending on what standard was applied to assessing the ballots – punched-through chads, hanging chads, etc. Bush won under two standards and Gore under two standards. The new, fuller study found that Gore won regardless of which standard was applied and even when varying county judgments were factored in. Counting fully punched chads and limited marks on optical ballots, Gore won by 115 votes. With any dimple or optical mark, Gore won by 107 votes. With one corner of a chad detached or any optical mark, Gore won by 60 votes. Applying the standards set by each county, Gore won by 171 votes. This core finding of Gore’s Florida victory in the unofficial ballot recount might surprise many readers who skimmed only the headlines and the top paragraphs of the articles. The headlines and leads highlighted hypothetical, partial recounts that supposedly favored Bush. Buried deeper in the stories or referenced in subheads was the fact that the new recount determined that Gore was the winner statewide, even ignoring the “butterfly ballot” and other irregularities that cost him thousands of ballots. As I stated earlier: You don't know Jack, Rickets. So you, and your drug addled brain ought to just wander off. |
(OT) US strike on al-Qaida kills children - AGAIN
dxAce wrote:
As I stated earlier: You don't know Jack, Rickets. So you, and your drug addled brain ought to just wander off. As in wander off the subject, Steve. "...this isn't an argument...it's just contradiction." |
(OT) US strike on al-Qaida kills children - AGAIN
dxAce wrote:
As I stated earlier: You don't know Jack, Rickets. So you, and your drug addled brain ought to just wander off. Should you ever decide to venture outside the Bubble, I suggest you get your feet wet he http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timelines.jsp The truth shall set you free. |
(OT) US strike on al-Qaida kills children - AGAIN
dave wrote: dxAce wrote: As I stated earlier: You don't know Jack, Rickets. So you, and your drug addled brain ought to just wander off. Should you ever decide to venture outside the Bubble, I suggest you get your feet wet he http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timelines.jsp The truth shall set you free. Seems as though the "truth" has screwed you up beyond belief! |
(OT) US strike on al-Qaida kills children - AGAIN
dxAce wrote:
dave wrote: dxAce wrote: As I stated earlier: You don't know Jack, Rickets. So you, and your drug addled brain ought to just wander off. Should you ever decide to venture outside the Bubble, I suggest you get your feet wet he http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timelines.jsp The truth shall set you free. Seems as though the "truth" has screwed you up beyond belief! Yet you believe what you hear on WLS. |
(OT) US strike on al-Qaida kills children - AGAIN
dave wrote: dxAce wrote: dave wrote: dxAce wrote: As I stated earlier: You don't know Jack, Rickets. So you, and your drug addled brain ought to just wander off. Should you ever decide to venture outside the Bubble, I suggest you get your feet wet he http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timelines.jsp The truth shall set you free. Seems as though the "truth" has screwed you up beyond belief! Yet you believe what you hear on WLS. Of course! They just said that you're a drug addled 'tard boy, and that's the truth! |
(OT) US strike on al-Qaida kills children - AGAIN
dxAce wrote:
dave wrote: dxAce wrote: dave wrote: dxAce wrote: As I stated earlier: You don't know Jack, Rickets. So you, and your drug addled brain ought to just wander off. Should you ever decide to venture outside the Bubble, I suggest you get your feet wet he http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timelines.jsp The truth shall set you free. Seems as though the "truth" has screwed you up beyond belief! Yet you believe what you hear on WLS. Of course! They just said that you're a drug addled 'tard boy, and that's the truth! You're hallucinating again... |
(OT) US strike on al-Qaida kills children - AGAIN
dave wrote: dxAce wrote: dave wrote: dxAce wrote: dave wrote: dxAce wrote: As I stated earlier: You don't know Jack, Rickets. So you, and your drug addled brain ought to just wander off. Should you ever decide to venture outside the Bubble, I suggest you get your feet wet he http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timelines.jsp The truth shall set you free. Seems as though the "truth" has screwed you up beyond belief! Yet you believe what you hear on WLS. Of course! They just said that you're a drug addled 'tard boy, and that's the truth! You're hallucinating again... You'd be the one to know about hallucinations! |
US strike on al-Qaida kills children - AGAIN
On May 24, 9:53*am, dave wrote:
Cato wrote: * *What about all the agreements Iraq broke? * Among others.. they were kicking out international nuke inspectors.... *not allowing them to go places they wished to inspect...as if they had something big to hide.... *what a buch of stupid assholes to do that if they had nothing to hide... *The international community warned them and warned them to no avail... That is factually inaccurate propaganda. *Iraq complied with almost every ultimatum. *Mr. Bush was Hell-bent on war with Iraq; *even before he was appointed by the Supreme Court. *You don't know a coup d`etat when you see one. You deny that Saddam acted as if he had something to hide?? How many times did he hinder the inspectors?? Deny them access to areas they wanted to see?? The man acted suspicious... and every country knew it. He certainly did not help the inspectors and act as if everything was hunky dory. Anyone that acts with me the way he acted... I would supect something was being kept from me.. This idiot... who's sons used wood chippers to kill opponents, (if they liked you.. you went in head first..if they hated you... you went in feet first)... asked for it.. If he had done everything the international community demanded... things would have been very different. "Friday, June 11, 2004 UN inspectors: Saddam shipped out WMD before war and after The United Nations has determined that Saddam Hussein shipped weapons of mass destruction components as well as medium-range ballistic missiles before, during and after the U.S.-led war against Iraq in 2003. The UN Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission briefed the Security Council on new findings that could help trace the whereabouts of Saddam's missile and WMD program. The briefing contained satellite photographs that demonstrated the speed with which Saddam dismantled his missile and WMD sites before and during the war. Council members were shown photographs of a ballistic missile site outside Baghdad in May 2003, and then saw a satellite image of the same location in February 2004, in which facilities had disappeared. .....The Baghdad missile site contained a range of WMD and dual-use components, UN officials said. They included missile components, reactor vessel and fermenters – the latter required for the production of chemical and biological warheads. In April, International Atomic Energy Agency director-general Mohammed El Baradei said material from Iraqi nuclear facilities were being smuggled out of the country. |
US strike on al-Qaida kills children - AGAIN
www.devilfinder.com Lake Razzaza Iraq Atomic Test
I once read at www.softwar.net that Saddam Hussein did send some WMDs to Syria and Russia.I think the article said Syria and Russia. Saddam Hussein used to have a ''tricked out'' car.The car had at least one propane gas tank in the trunk of the car.The tank was connected to some pipes that were aimed sideways under the car.If Saddam's ''admirers'' got too close, somebody in the car would push a button and flip a valve/whatever and burn their legs off. cuhulin |
US strike on al-Qaida kills children - AGAIN
Cato wrote:
You deny that Saddam acted as if he had something to hide?? How many times did he hinder the inspectors?? Deny them access to areas they wanted to see?? .... Council members were shown photographs of a ballistic missile site outside Baghdad in May 2003, and then saw a satellite image of the same location in February 2004, in which facilities had disappeared... Saddam wanted his neighbors to think he could hurt them. May 2003 was after "Mission Accomplished". If anything was moved, it was done on our watch. |
US strike on al-Qaida kills children - AGAIN
I have this nice little bridge in Brooklyn that I can let you have for
a song.... AMericans ARE dumber than rocks, just look at the scum they are proposing to run their country... Saddam was a business partner of the Bush family, and was just top ho until he decided to take only Euros for his oil..... That war was planned even before Bush got into office, well documented, see Project For A New American Century Website, almost all dual citizen jews. Hell, why let the little jew boys die when the dumb ass Americans go to the slaughter for them. Americans ARE dumber than rocks.... On Sat, 24 May 2008 21:28:44 -0500, wrote: www.devilfinder.com Lake Razzaza Iraq Atomic Test I once read at www.softwar.net that Saddam Hussein did send some WMDs to Syria and Russia.I think the article said Syria and Russia. Saddam Hussein used to have a ''tricked out'' car.The car had at least one propane gas tank in the trunk of the car.The tank was connected to some pipes that were aimed sideways under the car.If Saddam's ''admirers'' got too close, somebody in the car would push a button and flip a valve/whatever and burn their legs off. cuhulin |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:47 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com