Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

Tex wrote:

Why let a "god damn piece of paper" like the U.S. Constitution...

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references please.

The reason I ask is, if true, it seems an astoundingly impolitic
statement to be made by a sitting president.

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

m II wrote:

Billy Burpelson wrote:

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references please.

The reason I ask is, if true, it seems an astoundingly impolitic
statement to be made by a sitting president.

==========================================
"Stop throwing the Constitution in my face," Bush screamed back. "It's
just a goddamned piece of paper!"

http://www.gnn.tv/threads/10799/Bush...e ce_of_paper
==========================================

Lots mo

http://tinyurl.com/5pqwtt

Perhaps what he was trying to indicate was that we cannot allow our enemies (such as dumbass
Canucks) to use OUR Constitution to destroy OUR country via internal means.

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

Billy Burpelson wrote:
Tex wrote:

Why let a "god damn piece of paper" like the U.S. Constitution...

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references please.


This has been debunked.


The reason I ask is, if true, it seems an astoundingly impolitic
statement to be made by a sitting president.


No more so than the taking of the Lord's name in vain by a devout
Christian.

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

dxAce wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/5pqwtt

Perhaps what he was trying to indicate was that we cannot allow our enemies (such as dumbass
Canucks) to use OUR Constitution to destroy OUR country via internal means.


=======================================

Actually Bush did say this. I used to use it as my signature whenever I
wrote something. I believe even Keith Olberman did a story on his show
at the time it came out.
Bush is not quite the perfect little church goer that he's suckered half
the country into believing he is. Here's another Bush person quote:
Attorney General Alberto Gonzales said "The Constitution is an outdated
document, and needs a rewriting."
Here's the Olberman Piece:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wmc60JmaLbE


http://tinyurl.com/5se6r2
==============================================


mike





--
Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage, this filter
blocks all postings from Gmail, Google Mail and Google Groups.

http://improve-usenet.org/

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

m II wrote:

dxAce wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/5pqwtt

Perhaps what he was trying to indicate was that we cannot allow our enemies (such as dumbass
Canucks) to use OUR Constitution to destroy OUR country via internal means.

=======================================

Actually Bush did say this. I used to use it as my signature whenever I
wrote something.

Well good for you. But, since you're nothing more than a dumbass Canuck, I can't take to much
stock in what you say or do.

You are worthless.

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

dxAce wrote:

m II wrote:

Billy Burpelson wrote:

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references please.

The reason I ask is, if true, it seems an astoundingly impolitic
statement to be made by a sitting president.
==========================================
"Stop throwing the Constitution in my face," Bush screamed back. "It's
just a goddamned piece of paper!"

http://www.gnn.tv/threads/10799/Bush...e ce_of_paper
==========================================

Lots mo

http://tinyurl.com/5pqwtt

Perhaps what he was trying to indicate was that we cannot allow our enemies (such as dumbass
Canucks) to use OUR Constitution to destroy OUR country via internal means.


That makes no sense. There is nothing to protect if we lose the
Constitution. Bin Laden wants Bush to destroy the country for him.
Bush has done everything Bin Laden wants.

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

D Peter Maus wrote:
Billy Burpelson wrote:
Tex wrote:

Why let a "god damn piece of paper" like the U.S. Constitution...

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references please.


This has been debunked.

It has not been debunked. It comes from a credible reporter with solid
inside connections. He works at a reputable organization who would
withdraw it if it had been "debunked".

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

Dave wrote:

dxAce wrote:

m II wrote:

Billy Burpelson wrote:

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references please.

The reason I ask is, if true, it seems an astoundingly impolitic
statement to be made by a sitting president.
==========================================
"Stop throwing the Constitution in my face," Bush screamed back. "It's
just a goddamned piece of paper!"

http://www.gnn.tv/threads/10799/Bush...e ce_of_paper
==========================================

Lots mo

http://tinyurl.com/5pqwtt

Perhaps what he was trying to indicate was that we cannot allow our enemies (such as dumbass
Canucks) to use OUR Constitution to destroy OUR country via internal means.


That makes no sense. There is nothing to protect if we lose the
Constitution. Bin Laden wants Bush to destroy the country for him.
Bush has done everything Bin Laden wants.

Really? Has he chopped off your worthless head yet?

I know, I know, you've already lost your mind, so why worry about the head, right?

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:
Billy Burpelson wrote:
Tex wrote:

Why let a "god damn piece of paper" like the U.S. Constitution...

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references please.


This has been debunked.

It has not been debunked. It comes from a credible reporter with solid
inside connections. He works at a reputable organization who would
withdraw it if it had been "debunked".

Then where is the specific reference? There is none.

Name the reporter. Name the organization. I've been hearing this
statement for a number of years, now, but never where it actually came
from. I've not found any specific cite, reference, attribution, or even
quotation.

The only thing I've found is an article by Doug Thompson, in which he
claims that he's spoken with people who were in the room when this was
supposed to have been said.

Trouble is, that the number of persons he spoke to that day has
become variable: Two, then three, then two, then possibly four....

But no one else has reported it, except a few articles referring to
Thompson. And there are no direct attributions. What he's not done is
quoted anyone. This becomes, then, hearsay. And by its own content,
questionable.

Snopes.com had debunked this, and had an article posted on the site I
remember reading as late as two months ago. Looking for it this
morning, I found no reference to it at all. No surprise there.
Politically speaking, Snopes has been inconsistent in its objectivity at
best.

As it stands, it's a gratuitous assertion. A gratuitous assertion
that's been debunked. Also by those with solid inside connections.

As for retractions....well, I'll counter that with the name of Dan
Rather, who, when faced with hard evidence that his anti-Bush documents
were fakes, apologized, but insisted that the content of the faked
documents was true.

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters AgainFollowup....
 

D Peter Maus wrote:
Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:
Billy Burpelson wrote:
Tex wrote:

Why let a "god damn piece of paper" like the U.S. Constitution...

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references please.


This has been debunked.

It has not been debunked. It comes from a credible reporter with
solid inside connections. He works at a reputable organization who
would withdraw it if it had been "debunked".

Then where is the specific reference? There is none.

Name the reporter. Name the organization. I've been hearing this
statement for a number of years, now, but never where it actually came
from. I've not found any specific cite, reference, attribution, or even
quotation.

The only thing I've found is an article by Doug Thompson, in which he
claims that he's spoken with people who were in the room when this was
supposed to have been said.

Trouble is, that the number of persons he spoke to that day has become
variable: Two, then three, then two, then possibly four....

But no one else has reported it, except a few articles referring to
Thompson. And there are no direct attributions. What he's not done is
quoted anyone. This becomes, then, hearsay. And by its own content,
questionable.

Snopes.com had debunked this, and had an article posted on the site I
remember reading as late as two months ago. Looking for it this
morning, I found no reference to it at all. No surprise there.
Politically speaking, Snopes has been inconsistent in its objectivity at
best.

As it stands, it's a gratuitous assertion. A gratuitous assertion
that's been debunked. Also by those with solid inside connections.

As for retractions....well, I'll counter that with the name of Dan
Rather, who, when faced with hard evidence that his anti-Bush documents
were fakes, apologized, but insisted that the content of the faked
documents was true.




Capitol Hill Blue is the website for which Doug Thompson writes. A
reasonably credible news site at one time, until the owner of the site
admitted that his most used and most credible source Terrence J.
Wilkinson was a fake.

Google CapitolHillBlue+ Terrence J. Wilkinson to see for yourself.


The story has been debunked.

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

Tex wrote:

Why let a "god damn piece of paper" like the U.S. Constitution...

Billy Burpelson wrote:

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references
please. The reason I ask is, if true, it seems an astoundingly
impolitic statement to be made by a sitting president.

D Peter Maus wrote:

No more so than the taking of the Lord's name in vain by a devout
Christian.

First, over the last 7 1/2 years of his administration, numerous news
sources have had numerous news articles about W's profanity laced
tirades and outbursts. Are you contending all of those news stories are
fake?

Finally, it's interesting that you think a "devout Christian" would not
use vulgarity while apparently it does not bother or concern you that
this "devout Christian" lied us into a bogus war* that has taken
thousands of innocent lives.

* Please review the blue-ribbon, BI-PARTISAN Congressional panel that
has stated the same.

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters AgainFollowup....
 

D Peter Maus wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:
Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:
Billy Burpelson wrote:
Tex wrote:

Why let a "god damn piece of paper" like the U.S. Constitution...

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references
please.


This has been debunked.

It has not been debunked. It comes from a credible reporter with
solid inside connections. He works at a reputable organization who
would withdraw it if it had been "debunked".

Then where is the specific reference? There is none.

Name the reporter. Name the organization. I've been hearing this
statement for a number of years, now, but never where it actually came
from. I've not found any specific cite, reference, attribution, or
even quotation.

The only thing I've found is an article by Doug Thompson, in which
he claims that he's spoken with people who were in the room when this
was supposed to have been said.

Trouble is, that the number of persons he spoke to that day has
become variable: Two, then three, then two, then possibly four....

But no one else has reported it, except a few articles referring to
Thompson. And there are no direct attributions. What he's not done is
quoted anyone. This becomes, then, hearsay. And by its own content,
questionable.

Snopes.com had debunked this, and had an article posted on the site
I remember reading as late as two months ago. Looking for it this
morning, I found no reference to it at all. No surprise there.
Politically speaking, Snopes has been inconsistent in its objectivity
at best.

As it stands, it's a gratuitous assertion. A gratuitous assertion
that's been debunked. Also by those with solid inside connections.

As for retractions....well, I'll counter that with the name of Dan
Rather, who, when faced with hard evidence that his anti-Bush
documents were fakes, apologized, but insisted that the content of the
faked documents was true.




Capitol Hill Blue is the website for which Doug Thompson writes. A
reasonably credible news site at one time, until the owner of the site
admitted that his most used and most credible source Terrence J.
Wilkinson was a fake.

Google CapitolHillBlue+ Terrence J. Wilkinson to see for yourself.


The story has been debunked.



Neither bunked nor debunked. Why no official denial?

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters AgainFollowup....
 

Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:
Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:
Billy Burpelson wrote:
Tex wrote:

Why let a "god damn piece of paper" like the U.S. Constitution...

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references
please.


This has been debunked.

It has not been debunked. It comes from a credible reporter with
solid inside connections. He works at a reputable organization who
would withdraw it if it had been "debunked".

Then where is the specific reference? There is none.

Name the reporter. Name the organization. I've been hearing this
statement for a number of years, now, but never where it actually
came from. I've not found any specific cite, reference, attribution,
or even quotation.

The only thing I've found is an article by Doug Thompson, in which
he claims that he's spoken with people who were in the room when this
was supposed to have been said.

Trouble is, that the number of persons he spoke to that day has
become variable: Two, then three, then two, then possibly four....

But no one else has reported it, except a few articles referring to
Thompson. And there are no direct attributions. What he's not done is
quoted anyone. This becomes, then, hearsay. And by its own content,
questionable.

Snopes.com had debunked this, and had an article posted on the site
I remember reading as late as two months ago. Looking for it this
morning, I found no reference to it at all. No surprise there.
Politically speaking, Snopes has been inconsistent in its objectivity
at best.

As it stands, it's a gratuitous assertion. A gratuitous assertion
that's been debunked. Also by those with solid inside connections.

As for retractions....well, I'll counter that with the name of Dan
Rather, who, when faced with hard evidence that his anti-Bush
documents were fakes, apologized, but insisted that the content of
the faked documents was true.




Capitol Hill Blue is the website for which Doug Thompson writes. A
reasonably credible news site at one time, until the owner of the site
admitted that his most used and most credible source Terrence J.
Wilkinson was a fake.

Google CapitolHillBlue+ Terrence J. Wilkinson to see for yourself.


The story has been debunked.



Neither bunked nor debunked.



Good point. The primary source is fictional. Therefore the story may
be true.


Why no official denial?


For the same reasons there's never an official denial.

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

Billy Burpelson wrote:


Tex wrote:

Why let a "god damn piece of paper" like the U.S. Constitution...

Billy Burpelson wrote:

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references
please. The reason I ask is, if true, it seems an astoundingly
impolitic statement to be made by a sitting president.

D Peter Maus wrote:

No more so than the taking of the Lord's name in vain by a devout
Christian.

First, over the last 7 1/2 years of his administration, numerous news
sources have had numerous news articles about W's profanity laced
tirades and outbursts. Are you contending all of those news stories are
fake?

Finally, it's interesting that you think a "devout Christian" would not
use vulgarity while apparently it does not bother or concern you that
this "devout Christian" lied us into a bogus war* that has taken
thousands of innocent lives.

* Please review the blue-ribbon, BI-PARTISAN Congressional panel that
has stated the same.


LOL!

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again Followup....
 

In article ,
Dave wrote:

D Peter Maus wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:
Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:
Billy Burpelson wrote:
Tex wrote:

Why let a "god damn piece of paper" like the U.S. Constitution...

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references
please.


This has been debunked.

It has not been debunked. It comes from a credible reporter with
solid inside connections. He works at a reputable organization who
would withdraw it if it had been "debunked".

Then where is the specific reference? There is none.

Name the reporter. Name the organization. I've been hearing this
statement for a number of years, now, but never where it actually came
from. I've not found any specific cite, reference, attribution, or
even quotation.

The only thing I've found is an article by Doug Thompson, in which
he claims that he's spoken with people who were in the room when this
was supposed to have been said.

Trouble is, that the number of persons he spoke to that day has
become variable: Two, then three, then two, then possibly four....

But no one else has reported it, except a few articles referring to
Thompson. And there are no direct attributions. What he's not done is
quoted anyone. This becomes, then, hearsay. And by its own content,
questionable.

Snopes.com had debunked this, and had an article posted on the site
I remember reading as late as two months ago. Looking for it this
morning, I found no reference to it at all. No surprise there.
Politically speaking, Snopes has been inconsistent in its objectivity
at best.

As it stands, it's a gratuitous assertion. A gratuitous assertion
that's been debunked. Also by those with solid inside connections.

As for retractions....well, I'll counter that with the name of Dan
Rather, who, when faced with hard evidence that his anti-Bush
documents were fakes, apologized, but insisted that the content of the
faked documents was true.




Capitol Hill Blue is the website for which Doug Thompson writes. A
reasonably credible news site at one time, until the owner of the site
admitted that his most used and most credible source Terrence J.
Wilkinson was a fake.

Google CapitolHillBlue+ Terrence J. Wilkinson to see for yourself.


The story has been debunked.



Neither bunked nor debunked. Why no official denial?

Apparently to keep drug addled people like you in a tizzy.

You are a stupid off topic idiot.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

In article ,
Billy Burpelson wrote:



Tex wrote:

Why let a "god damn piece of paper" like the U.S. Constitution...

Billy Burpelson wrote:

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references
please. The reason I ask is, if true, it seems an astoundingly
impolitic statement to be made by a sitting president.

D Peter Maus wrote:

No more so than the taking of the Lord's name in vain by a devout
Christian.

First, over the last 7 1/2 years of his administration, numerous news
sources have had numerous news articles about W's profanity laced
tirades and outbursts. Are you contending all of those news stories are
fake?

SNIP

Where do you get this stuff? In the tabloids?

I have never heard of this on domestic radio, SW, or numerous news
sources on the Internet.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

Billy Burpelson wrote:
Tex wrote:

Why let a "god damn piece of paper" like the U.S. Constitution...

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references please.

The reason I ask is, if true, it seems an astoundingly impolitic
statement to be made by a sitting president.

Here are some more impolitic quotes from the shrubbery:

"Goodbye from the world's biggest polluter" G8 summit in Tokyo, Japan

"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never
stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and
neither do we." Washington, D.C.; August 5, 2004

"Do you have blacks, too?" To Brazilian President, Henrique Cardoso;
Washington, D.C.; November 8, 2001

"See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over
and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the
propaganda." Greece, New York; May 24, 2005

"I was going to say he's a piece of work, but that might not translate
too well. Is that all right, if I call you a 'piece of work'?" To
Jean-Claude Juncker, Prime Minister of Luxembourg; Washington, D.C.;
June 20, 2005

"As you can possibly see, I have an injury myself - not even here at the
hospital, but in combat with a cedar. I eventually won. The cedar gave
me a little scratch." After visiting with wounded veterans from the
Amputee Care Center of Brooke Army Medical Center; San Antonio, Texas;
January 1, 2006

JB

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again Followup....
 

In article ,
Dave wrote:

Telamon wrote:

Neither bunked nor debunked. Why no official denial?

Apparently to keep drug addled people like you in a tizzy.

You are a stupid off topic idiot.


I didn't start it, so we both have equal culpability.

You start plenty and you keep it going. Put a sock in it as you just
continue to look more retarded with every post.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

In article ,
Dave wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
Billy Burpelson wrote:


Tex wrote:

Why let a "god damn piece of paper" like the U.S. Constitution...
Billy Burpelson wrote:

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references
please. The reason I ask is, if true, it seems an astoundingly
impolitic statement to be made by a sitting president.
D Peter Maus wrote:

No more so than the taking of the Lord's name in vain by a devout
Christian.
First, over the last 7 1/2 years of his administration, numerous news
sources have had numerous news articles about W's profanity laced
tirades and outbursts. Are you contending all of those news stories are
fake?

SNIP

Where do you get this stuff? In the tabloids?

I have never heard of this on domestic radio, SW, or numerous news
sources on the Internet.


http://www.snopes.com/politics/bush/bushcuss.asp

So what Mr. Drug addled.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again Followup....
 

In article ,
Billy Burpelson wrote:

Dave wrote:

Why no official denial?

D Peter Maus wrote:

For the same reasons there's never an official denial.

And that reason would be??? Please, do tell the rest of the story.

We're still waiting to hear the official government explanation of why
Guckert/Gannon (the male prostitute) had free reign at the White House.

As usual Billy you are clueless.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

"Billy Burpelson" wrote in message
...

Billy Burpelson wrote:
Tex wrote:

Why let a "god damn piece of paper" like the U.S. Constitution...

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references please.

The reason I ask is, if true, it seems an astoundingly impolitic
statement to be made by a sitting president.

John Barnard wrote:

Here are some more impolitic quotes from the shrubbery:

"Goodbye from the world's biggest polluter" G8 summit in Tokyo, Japan

"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never
stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and
neither do we." Washington, D.C.; August 5, 2004

"Do you have blacks, too?" To Brazilian President, Henrique Cardoso;
Washington, D.C.; November 8, 2001

"See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over
and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the
propaganda." Greece, New York; May 24, 2005

"I was going to say he's a piece of work, but that might not translate
too well. Is that all right, if I call you a 'piece of work'?" To
Jean-Claude Juncker, Prime Minister of Luxembourg; Washington, D.C.; June
20, 2005

"As you can possibly see, I have an injury myself - not even here at the
hospital, but in combat with a cedar. I eventually won. The cedar gave me
a little scratch." After visiting with wounded veterans from the Amputee
Care Center of Brooke Army Medical Center; San Antonio, Texas; January 1,
2006

JB

Please John, cut the man some slack. After all that alcohol and cocaine
abuse, it's a wonder he's as coherent as he is.

Why do you think that DxDouche and him have the same mindset. After all,
they do think very much the same

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

Billy Burpelson wrote:

Billy Burpelson wrote:
Tex wrote:

Why let a "god damn piece of paper" like the U.S. Constitution...

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references please.

The reason I ask is, if true, it seems an astoundingly impolitic
statement to be made by a sitting president.

John Barnard wrote:

Here are some more impolitic quotes from the shrubbery:

"Goodbye from the world's biggest polluter" G8 summit in Tokyo, Japan

"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never
stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and
neither do we." Washington, D.C.; August 5, 2004

"Do you have blacks, too?" To Brazilian President, Henrique Cardoso;
Washington, D.C.; November 8, 2001

"See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and
over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the
propaganda." Greece, New York; May 24, 2005

"I was going to say he's a piece of work, but that might not translate
too well. Is that all right, if I call you a 'piece of work'?" To
Jean-Claude Juncker, Prime Minister of Luxembourg; Washington, D.C.;
June 20, 2005

"As you can possibly see, I have an injury myself - not even here at
the hospital, but in combat with a cedar. I eventually won. The cedar
gave me a little scratch." After visiting with wounded veterans from
the Amputee Care Center of Brooke Army Medical Center; San Antonio,
Texas; January 1, 2006

JB

Please John, cut the man some slack. After all that alcohol and cocaine
abuse, it's a wonder he's as coherent as he is.

LOL! If I try and cut him some slack, Bob Dobbs would get upset ;). I
can't knock the entertainment value of many of GWB's quotes but that
last quote supersedes the bounds of anything that approaches tasteful.

JB

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

Billy Burpelson wrote:

Billy Burpelson wrote:


Tex wrote:

Why let a "god damn piece of paper" like the U.S. Constitution...

Billy Burpelson wrote:

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references
please. The reason I ask is, if true, it seems an astoundingly
impolitic statement to be made by a sitting president.

D Peter Maus wrote:

No more so than the taking of the Lord's name in vain by a devout
Christian.

First, over the last 7 1/2 years of his administration, numerous news
sources have had numerous news articles about W's profanity laced
tirades and outbursts. Are you contending all of those news stories are
fake?

Finally, it's interesting that you think a "devout Christian" would not
use vulgarity while apparently it does not bother or concern you that
this "devout Christian" lied us into a bogus war* that has taken
thousands of innocent lives.

* Please review the blue-ribbon, BI-PARTISAN Congressional panel that
has stated the same.

D Peter Maus wrote:

LOL!

Yup, DP, "LOL". Yer a real riot, a laugh a minute...

I'm sure the parents of the 4100 dead American kids and the relatives of
the tens of thousands innocent dead Iraqis share in your laughter at the
unprovoked, bogus 'war'.

Billy, Saddam started the war. We along with others are merely finishing what he
started.

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

dxAce wrote:

I'm sure the parents of the 4100 dead American kids and the relatives of
the tens of thousands innocent dead Iraqis share in your laughter at the
unprovoked, bogus 'war'.

Billy, Saddam started the war. We along with others are merely finishing what he
started.


That's a new one. Please provide a shred of evidence supporting this
crazy notion.

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

Dave wrote:

dxAce wrote:

I'm sure the parents of the 4100 dead American kids and the relatives of
the tens of thousands innocent dead Iraqis share in your laughter at the
unprovoked, bogus 'war'.

Billy, Saddam started the war. We along with others are merely finishing what he
started.


That's a new one.

New? Guess you weren't around when Saddam invaded Kuwait or for Gulf War I...

Were you locked up, out of touch, or just so damn stoned that you can't remember, oh
addled one?

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

Billy Burpelson wrote:

Billy Burpelson wrote:

Tex wrote:

Why let a "god damn piece of paper" like the U.S. Constitution...
Billy Burpelson wrote:

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references
please. The reason I ask is, if true, it seems an astoundingly
impolitic statement to be made by a sitting president.
D Peter Maus wrote:

No more so than the taking of the Lord's name in vain by a devout
Christian.
First, over the last 7 1/2 years of his administration, numerous news
sources have had numerous news articles about W's profanity laced
tirades and outbursts. Are you contending all of those news stories are
fake?

Finally, it's interesting that you think a "devout Christian" would not
use vulgarity while apparently it does not bother or concern you that
this "devout Christian" lied us into a bogus war* that has taken
thousands of innocent lives.

* Please review the blue-ribbon, BI-PARTISAN Congressional panel that
has stated the same.
D Peter Maus wrote:

LOL!
Yup, DP, "LOL". Yer a real riot, a laugh a minute...

I'm sure the parents of the 4100 dead American kids and the relatives of
the tens of thousands innocent dead Iraqis share in your laughter at the
unprovoked, bogus 'war'.

dxAce wrote:

Billy, Saddam started the war. We along with others are merely finishing what he
started.


I really do hate to say it, but...

Huh???

"Saddam started the war" [Gulf war II]?

Even Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney specifically stated that was -not- the case.

Please contact Washington immediately with this new information you have.

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters AgainFollowup....
 

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
Billy Burpelson wrote:

Dave wrote:

Why no official denial?
D Peter Maus wrote:

For the same reasons there's never an official denial.
And that reason would be??? Please, do tell the rest of the story.

We're still waiting to hear the official government explanation of why
Guckert/Gannon (the male prostitute) had free reign at the White House.

As usual Billy you are clueless.

Maybe yes, maybe no...but as usual, *you* are -again- dodging, dancing,
spinning and refusing to answer a simple, direct, point-blank question
about -your- statement.

Why do you refuse to defend/explain it?

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
Dave wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
Billy Burpelson wrote:

Tex wrote:

Why let a "god damn piece of paper" like the U.S. Constitution...
Billy Burpelson wrote:

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references
please. The reason I ask is, if true, it seems an astoundingly
impolitic statement to be made by a sitting president.
D Peter Maus wrote:

No more so than the taking of the Lord's name in vain by a devout
Christian.
First, over the last 7 1/2 years of his administration, numerous news
sources have had numerous news articles about W's profanity laced
tirades and outbursts. Are you contending all of those news stories are
fake?
SNIP

Where do you get this stuff? In the tabloids?

I have never heard of this on domestic radio, SW, or numerous news
sources on the Internet.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/bush/bushcuss.asp

So what Mr. Drug addled.

"So what"?

*You* asked a specific question and he responded with a specific answer
(and a reference), that's "so what". What didn't you understand? It
seems straightforward enough.

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

Billy Burpelson wrote:


Billy Burpelson wrote:

Billy Burpelson wrote:

Tex wrote:

Why let a "god damn piece of paper" like the U.S. Constitution...
Billy Burpelson wrote:

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references
please. The reason I ask is, if true, it seems an astoundingly
impolitic statement to be made by a sitting president.
D Peter Maus wrote:

No more so than the taking of the Lord's name in vain by a devout
Christian.
First, over the last 7 1/2 years of his administration, numerous news
sources have had numerous news articles about W's profanity laced
tirades and outbursts. Are you contending all of those news stories are
fake?

Finally, it's interesting that you think a "devout Christian" would not
use vulgarity while apparently it does not bother or concern you that
this "devout Christian" lied us into a bogus war* that has taken
thousands of innocent lives.

* Please review the blue-ribbon, BI-PARTISAN Congressional panel that
has stated the same.
D Peter Maus wrote:

LOL!
Yup, DP, "LOL". Yer a real riot, a laugh a minute...

I'm sure the parents of the 4100 dead American kids and the relatives of
the tens of thousands innocent dead Iraqis share in your laughter at the
unprovoked, bogus 'war'.

dxAce wrote:

Billy, Saddam started the war. We along with others are merely finishing what he
started.

I really do hate to say it, but...

Huh???

"Saddam started the war" [Gulf war II]?

Even Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney specifically stated that was -not- the case.

Please contact Washington immediately with this new information you have.

Billy, I suggest you contact those who are trying to help you with your mental health
problems, immediately.

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again Followup....
 

On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 17:42:44 GMT, D Peter Maus
wrote:

D Peter Maus wrote:
Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:
Billy Burpelson wrote:
Tex wrote:

Why let a "god damn piece of paper" like the U.S. Constitution...

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references please.


This has been debunked.

It has not been debunked. It comes from a credible reporter with
solid inside connections. He works at a reputable organization who
would withdraw it if it had been "debunked".

Then where is the specific reference? There is none.

Name the reporter. Name the organization. I've been hearing this
statement for a number of years, now, but never where it actually came
from. I've not found any specific cite, reference, attribution, or even
quotation.

The only thing I've found is an article by Doug Thompson, in which he
claims that he's spoken with people who were in the room when this was
supposed to have been said.

Trouble is, that the number of persons he spoke to that day has become
variable: Two, then three, then two, then possibly four....

But no one else has reported it, except a few articles referring to
Thompson. And there are no direct attributions. What he's not done is
quoted anyone. This becomes, then, hearsay. And by its own content,
questionable.

Snopes.com had debunked this, and had an article posted on the site I
remember reading as late as two months ago. Looking for it this
morning, I found no reference to it at all. No surprise there.
Politically speaking, Snopes has been inconsistent in its objectivity at
best.

As it stands, it's a gratuitous assertion. A gratuitous assertion
that's been debunked. Also by those with solid inside connections.

As for retractions....well, I'll counter that with the name of Dan
Rather, who, when faced with hard evidence that his anti-Bush documents
were fakes, apologized, but insisted that the content of the faked
documents was true.




Capitol Hill Blue is the website for which Doug Thompson writes. A
reasonably credible news site at one time, until the owner of the site
admitted that his most used and most credible source Terrence J.
Wilkinson was a fake.

Google CapitolHillBlue+ Terrence J. Wilkinson to see for yourself.


The story has been debunked.



Well, regardless of what Cheny said or did not say, the Bush
administration's actions are often at odds with the U.S. constitution,
the Geneva agreements against torture, and international law in
general.

Seven months and counting...

bob
k5qwg

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters AgainFollowup....
 

Bob Miller wrote:

On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 17:42:44 GMT, D Peter Maus
wrote:

D Peter Maus wrote:
Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:
Billy Burpelson wrote:
Tex wrote:

Why let a "god damn piece of paper" like the U.S. Constitution...

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references please.


This has been debunked.

It has not been debunked. It comes from a credible reporter with
solid inside connections. He works at a reputable organization who
would withdraw it if it had been "debunked".

Then where is the specific reference? There is none.

Name the reporter. Name the organization. I've been hearing this
statement for a number of years, now, but never where it actually came
from. I've not found any specific cite, reference, attribution, or even
quotation.

The only thing I've found is an article by Doug Thompson, in which he
claims that he's spoken with people who were in the room when this was
supposed to have been said.

Trouble is, that the number of persons he spoke to that day has become
variable: Two, then three, then two, then possibly four....

But no one else has reported it, except a few articles referring to
Thompson. And there are no direct attributions. What he's not done is
quoted anyone. This becomes, then, hearsay. And by its own content,
questionable.

Snopes.com had debunked this, and had an article posted on the site I
remember reading as late as two months ago. Looking for it this
morning, I found no reference to it at all. No surprise there.
Politically speaking, Snopes has been inconsistent in its objectivity at
best.

As it stands, it's a gratuitous assertion. A gratuitous assertion
that's been debunked. Also by those with solid inside connections.

As for retractions....well, I'll counter that with the name of Dan
Rather, who, when faced with hard evidence that his anti-Bush documents
were fakes, apologized, but insisted that the content of the faked
documents was true.




Capitol Hill Blue is the website for which Doug Thompson writes. A
reasonably credible news site at one time, until the owner of the site
admitted that his most used and most credible source Terrence J.
Wilkinson was a fake.

Google CapitolHillBlue+ Terrence J. Wilkinson to see for yourself.


The story has been debunked.



Well, regardless of what Cheny said or did not say, the Bush
administration's actions are often at odds with the U.S. constitution,
the Geneva agreements against torture, and international law in
general.

Bob, you really need to go and read the 'Geneva Agreements' before you shoot your
mouth off!

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters AgainFollowup....
 

dxAce wrote:

Bob Miller wrote:

On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 17:42:44 GMT, D Peter Maus
wrote:

D Peter Maus wrote:
Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:
Billy Burpelson wrote:
Tex wrote:

Why let a "god damn piece of paper" like the U.S. Constitution...

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references please.


This has been debunked.

It has not been debunked. It comes from a credible reporter with
solid inside connections. He works at a reputable organization who
would withdraw it if it had been "debunked".

Then where is the specific reference? There is none.

Name the reporter. Name the organization. I've been hearing this
statement for a number of years, now, but never where it actually came
from. I've not found any specific cite, reference, attribution, or even
quotation.

The only thing I've found is an article by Doug Thompson, in which he
claims that he's spoken with people who were in the room when this was
supposed to have been said.

Trouble is, that the number of persons he spoke to that day has become
variable: Two, then three, then two, then possibly four....

But no one else has reported it, except a few articles referring to
Thompson. And there are no direct attributions. What he's not done is
quoted anyone. This becomes, then, hearsay. And by its own content,
questionable.

Snopes.com had debunked this, and had an article posted on the site I
remember reading as late as two months ago. Looking for it this
morning, I found no reference to it at all. No surprise there.
Politically speaking, Snopes has been inconsistent in its objectivity at
best.

As it stands, it's a gratuitous assertion. A gratuitous assertion
that's been debunked. Also by those with solid inside connections.

As for retractions....well, I'll counter that with the name of Dan
Rather, who, when faced with hard evidence that his anti-Bush documents
were fakes, apologized, but insisted that the content of the faked
documents was true.




Capitol Hill Blue is the website for which Doug Thompson writes. A
reasonably credible news site at one time, until the owner of the site
admitted that his most used and most credible source Terrence J.
Wilkinson was a fake.

Google CapitolHillBlue+ Terrence J. Wilkinson to see for yourself.


The story has been debunked.



Well, regardless of what Cheny said or did not say, the Bush
administration's actions are often at odds with the U.S. constitution,
the Geneva agreements against torture, and international law in
general.

Bob, you really need to go and read the 'Geneva Agreements' before you shoot your
mouth off!

And Bob, I don't think you have a clue as to what the US Constitution is all about!

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

In article ,
Billy Burpelson wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
Dave wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
Billy Burpelson wrote:

Tex wrote:

Why let a "god damn piece of paper" like the U.S. Constitution...
Billy Burpelson wrote:

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references
please. The reason I ask is, if true, it seems an astoundingly
impolitic statement to be made by a sitting president.
D Peter Maus wrote:

No more so than the taking of the Lord's name in vain by a devout
Christian.
First, over the last 7 1/2 years of his administration, numerous news
sources have had numerous news articles about W's profanity laced
tirades and outbursts. Are you contending all of those news stories are
fake?
SNIP

Where do you get this stuff? In the tabloids?

I have never heard of this on domestic radio, SW, or numerous news
sources on the Internet.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/bush/bushcuss.asp

So what Mr. Drug addled.

"So what"?

*You* asked a specific question and he responded with a specific answer
(and a reference), that's "so what". What didn't you understand? It
seems straightforward enough.

What do you not understand?

He starts with Bush shredding the constitution and provides a link to
where Bush is quoted calling a reporter an asshole.

I know you don't have the mental capacity to follow a non sequitur but
give it a shot Billy boy.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

In article ,
Dave wrote:

dxAce wrote:

I'm sure the parents of the 4100 dead American kids and the relatives of
the tens of thousands innocent dead Iraqis share in your laughter at the
unprovoked, bogus 'war'.

Billy, Saddam started the war. We along with others are merely finishing
what he
started.


That's a new one. Please provide a shred of evidence supporting this
crazy notion.

That very funny coming from you.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again Followup....
 

On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 10:56:02 -0400, dxAce
wrote:



Bob Miller wrote:

On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 17:42:44 GMT, D Peter Maus
wrote:

D Peter Maus wrote:
Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:
Billy Burpelson wrote:
Tex wrote:

Why let a "god damn piece of paper" like the U.S. Constitution...

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references please.


This has been debunked.

It has not been debunked. It comes from a credible reporter with
solid inside connections. He works at a reputable organization who
would withdraw it if it had been "debunked".

Then where is the specific reference? There is none.

Name the reporter. Name the organization. I've been hearing this
statement for a number of years, now, but never where it actually came
from. I've not found any specific cite, reference, attribution, or even
quotation.

The only thing I've found is an article by Doug Thompson, in which he
claims that he's spoken with people who were in the room when this was
supposed to have been said.

Trouble is, that the number of persons he spoke to that day has become
variable: Two, then three, then two, then possibly four....

But no one else has reported it, except a few articles referring to
Thompson. And there are no direct attributions. What he's not done is
quoted anyone. This becomes, then, hearsay. And by its own content,
questionable.

Snopes.com had debunked this, and had an article posted on the site I
remember reading as late as two months ago. Looking for it this
morning, I found no reference to it at all. No surprise there.
Politically speaking, Snopes has been inconsistent in its objectivity at
best.

As it stands, it's a gratuitous assertion. A gratuitous assertion
that's been debunked. Also by those with solid inside connections.

As for retractions....well, I'll counter that with the name of Dan
Rather, who, when faced with hard evidence that his anti-Bush documents
were fakes, apologized, but insisted that the content of the faked
documents was true.




Capitol Hill Blue is the website for which Doug Thompson writes. A
reasonably credible news site at one time, until the owner of the site
admitted that his most used and most credible source Terrence J.
Wilkinson was a fake.

Google CapitolHillBlue+ Terrence J. Wilkinson to see for yourself.


The story has been debunked.



Well, regardless of what Cheny said or did not say, the Bush
administration's actions are often at odds with the U.S. constitution,
the Geneva agreements against torture, and international law in
general.

Bob, you really need to go and read the 'Geneva Agreements' before you shoot your
mouth off!


I have. I guess you'd prefer Alberto Gonzales' "improvements" to
GCIII? On on the U.S. Constitution, you'd take your interpretation
from folks like John Yoo & David Addington?

Have a good one...

bob

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters AgainFollowup....
 

Bob Miller wrote:

On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 10:56:02 -0400, dxAce
wrote:



Bob Miller wrote:

On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 17:42:44 GMT, D Peter Maus
wrote:

D Peter Maus wrote:
Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:
Billy Burpelson wrote:
Tex wrote:

Why let a "god damn piece of paper" like the U.S. Constitution...

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references please.


This has been debunked.

It has not been debunked. It comes from a credible reporter with
solid inside connections. He works at a reputable organization who
would withdraw it if it had been "debunked".

Then where is the specific reference? There is none.

Name the reporter. Name the organization. I've been hearing this
statement for a number of years, now, but never where it actually came
from. I've not found any specific cite, reference, attribution, or even
quotation.

The only thing I've found is an article by Doug Thompson, in which he
claims that he's spoken with people who were in the room when this was
supposed to have been said.

Trouble is, that the number of persons he spoke to that day has become
variable: Two, then three, then two, then possibly four....

But no one else has reported it, except a few articles referring to
Thompson. And there are no direct attributions. What he's not done is
quoted anyone. This becomes, then, hearsay. And by its own content,
questionable.

Snopes.com had debunked this, and had an article posted on the site I
remember reading as late as two months ago. Looking for it this
morning, I found no reference to it at all. No surprise there.
Politically speaking, Snopes has been inconsistent in its objectivity at
best.

As it stands, it's a gratuitous assertion. A gratuitous assertion
that's been debunked. Also by those with solid inside connections.

As for retractions....well, I'll counter that with the name of Dan
Rather, who, when faced with hard evidence that his anti-Bush documents
were fakes, apologized, but insisted that the content of the faked
documents was true.




Capitol Hill Blue is the website for which Doug Thompson writes. A
reasonably credible news site at one time, until the owner of the site
admitted that his most used and most credible source Terrence J.
Wilkinson was a fake.

Google CapitolHillBlue+ Terrence J. Wilkinson to see for yourself.


The story has been debunked.



Well, regardless of what Cheny said or did not say, the Bush
administration's actions are often at odds with the U.S. constitution,
the Geneva agreements against torture, and international law in
general.

Bob, you really need to go and read the 'Geneva Agreements' before you shoot your
mouth off!


I have. I guess you'd prefer Alberto Gonzales' "improvements" to
GCIII? On on the U.S. Constitution, you'd take your interpretation
from folks like John Yoo & David Addington?

Have a good one...


Bob, I'm always having a good one, laughing at idiots such as yourself.

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters AgainFollowup....
 

On Jul 13, 1:09*pm, Bob Miller wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 10:56:02 -0400, dxAce
wrote:







Bob Miller wrote:

On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 17:42:44 GMT, D Peter Maus
wrote:

D Peter Maus wrote:
Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:
Billy Burpelson wrote:
Tex wrote:

Why let a "god damn piece of paper" like the U.S. Constitution....

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references please.

* This has been debunked.

It has not been debunked. *It comes from a credible reporter with
solid inside connections. *He works at a reputable organization who
would withdraw it if it had been "debunked".

* Then where is the specific reference? There is none.

* Name the reporter. Name the organization. I've been hearing this
statement for a number of years, now, but never where it actually came
from. I've not found any specific cite, reference, attribution, or even
quotation.

* The only thing I've found is an article by Doug Thompson, in which he
claims that he's spoken with people who were in the room when this was
supposed to have been said.

* Trouble is, that the number of persons he spoke to that day has become
variable: Two, then three, then two, then possibly four....

* But no one else has reported it, except a few articles referring to
Thompson. And there are no direct attributions. What he's not done is
quoted anyone. This becomes, then, hearsay. And by its own content,
questionable.

* Snopes.com had debunked this, and had an article posted on the site I
*remember reading as late as two months ago. Looking for it this
morning, I found no reference to it at all. No surprise there.
Politically speaking, Snopes has been inconsistent in its objectivity at
best.

* As it stands, it's a gratuitous assertion. A gratuitous assertion
that's been debunked. Also by those with solid inside connections.

* As for retractions....well, I'll counter that with the name of Dan
Rather, who, when faced with hard evidence that his anti-Bush documents
were fakes, apologized, but insisted that the content of the faked
documents was true.

* Capitol Hill Blue is the website for which Doug Thompson writes. A
reasonably credible news site at one time, until the owner of the site
admitted that his most used and most credible source Terrence J.
Wilkinson was a fake.

* Google CapitolHillBlue+ Terrence J. Wilkinson to see for yourself.

* The story has been debunked.

Well, regardless of what Cheny said or did not say, the Bush
administration's actions are often at odds with the U.S. constitution,
the Geneva agreements against torture, and international law in
general.

Bob, you really need to go and read the 'Geneva Agreements' before you shoot your
mouth off!

- I have. I guess you'd prefer Alberto Gonzales' "improvements"
- to GCIII?
- On on the U.S. Constitution, you'd take your interpretation
- from folks like John Yoo & David Addington?
-
- Have a good one...
-
- bob

Alberto Gonzales was an 'improvement' over JaNut Reno [.]

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

dxAce wrote:

Dave wrote:

dxAce wrote:

I'm sure the parents of the 4100 dead American kids and the relatives of
the tens of thousands innocent dead Iraqis share in your laughter at the
unprovoked, bogus 'war'.
Billy, Saddam started the war. We along with others are merely finishing what he
started.

That's a new one.

New? Guess you weren't around when Saddam invaded Kuwait or for Gulf War I...

Were you locked up, out of touch, or just so damn stoned that you can't remember, oh
addled one?


If you'd have said he was threatening to lower the price of oil I would
have agreed. You are so far out of the loop it ain't even funny (well,
yes it is). Look up 2 names: April Glaspie and Operation Ajax. Then
tell me again; who started it?

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

In article ,
Dave wrote:

Telamon wrote:


He starts with Bush shredding the constitution and provides a link to
where Bush is quoted calling a reporter an asshole.

I know you don't have the mental capacity to follow a non sequitur but
give it a shot Billy boy.


This looks pretty linear to me:

First, over the last 7 1/2 years of his administration, numerous news
sources have had numerous news articles about W's profanity laced
tirades and outbursts. Are you contending all of those news
stories are
fake?
SNIP

Where do you get this stuff? In the tabloids?

I have never heard of this on domestic radio, SW, or numerous news
sources on the Internet.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/bush/bushcuss.asp

Only after you smoked a bowl does it look OK to you. What about the rest
of us that have to wade through your crap? You make no sense whack job.

Now try reading the first sentence above again very slowly.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

Dave wrote:

dxAce wrote:

Dave wrote:

dxAce wrote:

I'm sure the parents of the 4100 dead American kids and the relatives of
the tens of thousands innocent dead Iraqis share in your laughter at the
unprovoked, bogus 'war'.
Billy, Saddam started the war. We along with others are merely finishing what he
started.

That's a new one.

New? Guess you weren't around when Saddam invaded Kuwait or for Gulf War I...

Were you locked up, out of touch, or just so damn stoned that you can't remember, oh
addled one?


If you'd have said he was threatening to lower the price of oil I would
have agreed. You are so far out of the loop it ain't even funny (well,
yes it is). Look up 2 names: April Glaspie and Operation Ajax. Then
tell me again; who started it?

Saddam.