On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:11:26 -0700 (PDT), RHF
wrote:
On Oct 10, 3:20*pm, Patriot Games wrote:
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 05:09:02 -0700 (PDT), RHF
wrote:
(OT) : 2008 Election News Flash :
- - McCain's AD Linking Barack Hussein Obama
- - to the Terrorist Bill Ayers
- - Have You Seen It ?
- Yes.
- - Do You Believe It ?
- Yes.

PG - See that was simple and easy.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
My (RHF) Answer would have been :
Have You Seen It ? - YES
Do You Believe It ? - Yes - The Fact that at one time
they were 'associated' in the Past.
Should-it-Matter : NO -provided-that- Obama was
Candid and Honest about it at the start; when he
was initially questioned about it.
- - - Like OK here is the Story about my 'association'
with Bill Ayers . . . {Case Closed}

Exactly correct.

=BUT= Obama tried to Dodge the Public Facts
appeared to Stone-Wall the Facts {Cover-Up}
So the 'question' becomes : What Is Obama Hiding ?
[ -creating-doubt-fear- Do We Really Know Him ? ]
And the 'issue' becomes : Obama's Honesty and Candor.
[ -creating-doubt-fear- Can We Trust Him ? ]

What Hussein bin Obama is hiding is a continuing working relationship
with Ayers on TWO Foundations, one was regarding education and another
regarding "community organizing." There is also the relationship with
Ayers as a supporter of his and ACORN.

But this is really an example of BAD Judgement. Obama's core base
would have no problem with his association with Ayers, they would have
no problem with his working to make local public education more
Euro-Socialist, and they would have no problem with doling out as much
free stuff to unemployed ghetto negros.

The problem is the Independents who will want to know WHY Obama
denounced Ayers' ACTIONS but never denounced the Ayers the MAN.

And the answer is Obama COULD NOT denounce the MAN because he DID have
a continuing relationship with him....

All of which left Hussein bin Obama in a position where LYING was his
ONLY recourse.