| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
(OT) Glen Beck joins Fox News.
|
(OT) Glen Beck joins Fox News.
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:04:50 -0500, cuhulin wrote:
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=242205 cuhulin Trash should be placed in the trash can foKKKs news! |
(OT) Glen Beck joins Fox News.
On Oct 16, 6:04*pm, wrote:
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=242205 cuhulin Between Beck and O'Reilly Fox will blow everyone out of the sky with viewership ratings - they're an AWESOME pair! |
(OT) Glen Beck joins Fox News.
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:04:50 -0500, cuhulin wrote: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=242205 cuhulin Bernard Peters wrote: Trash should be placed in the trash can foKKKs news! It's really "Faux News" |
(OT) Glen Beck joins Fox News.
I almost never click on those 24/7 talking heads so-called tv news
shows.Right now I am watching Overhauling on The Learning Channel.Next up, American Chopper.I would be watching Animal Planet if Meerkat Manor was on there right now.Meerkats are much smarter than any politicians. cuhulin |
(OT) Glen Beck joins Fox News.
Ever notice how all the wingnut media screamers are brain fried ex-
druggies and college dropouts who were dysfunctional societal misfits in their early lives. They couldn't run their own lives but now know all the answers to every world problem. He's a college dropout sot his dud will fit right in with the lame brains at Fixed News. Gotta love how most of these big mouth know-it- alls couldn't cut the mustard in college where just having a big mouth and an opinion won't make the grade. "Glenn Beck grew up in Mount Vernon, Washington, a small town about a hundred miles from Seattle. He started on radio by winning an hour of air time in a contest on one of the town's two radio stations. While still in high school, he worked as a late-night and weekend disc jockey at a different station about forty miles from Seattle, until he was fired for missing scheduled shifts. Beck became an alcoholic and daily drug user. His first marriage ended in divorce, and then he kicked his addictions with help from Alcoholics Anonymous. Now clean and sober, Beck says he still suffers back pain from an injury incurred when, intoxicated or high, he tumbled through a window. Beck suffers from Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), so his radio show is always fast-paced. Fans describe him as a good Christian but his is really a Mormon. He says he begins and end each day on his knees, praying for the troops and the president. Beck is big on conservative politics and traditional family values but he has been divorced. In the build-up to America's 2003 war on Iraq, Beck countered anti-war protests by using his radio show to organize dozens of pro-war rallies across the nation, and he has promised he will never question the cause, “no matter how unpopular this war gets." He has described Jimmy Carter who has devoted the past twenty years to fighting disease and poverty in the world's poorest countries as "a waste of skin", Cindy Sheehan who lost her son in Iraq as "a pretty big prostitute". He's a real piece of ****, has much in common (e.g. being loud mouthed drug addled hypocrites) with Rush the Gasbag Limbaugh. I wonder if they have Oxycotin parties together? |
(OT) : Another Liberal Invoking the KKK Post -was- Glen Beck joinsFox News.
On Oct 16, 4:27*pm, Bernard Peters wrote:
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:04:50 -0500, cuhulin wrote: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...=242205cuhulin Trash should be placed in the trash can foKKKs news! Another Liberal Invoking the KKK Post |
(OT) Glen Beck joins Fox News.
In article 4dd164eb-5199-4a84-85ed-3f7d673207b5
@r66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com, says... On Oct 16, 6:04*pm, wrote: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=242205 cuhulin Between Beck and O'Reilly Fox will blow everyone out of the sky with viewership ratings - they're an AWESOME pair! Pair of what? -- BDK BDK Klan leader? kOOk Magnet! NJJ CLUB #1 Shillmaster |
(OT) Glen Beck joins Fox News.
|
(OT) Glen Beck joins Fox News.
Billy Burpelson wrote:
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:04:50 -0500, cuhulin wrote: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=242205 cuhulin Bernard Peters wrote: Trash should be placed in the trash can foKKKs news! It's really "Faux News" Fokkks News |
Another Liberal Invoking the KKK Post -was- Glen Beck joins Fox News.
On Oct 17, 5:25*am, Dave wrote:
Billy Burpelson wrote: On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:04:50 -0500, cuhulin wrote: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...=242205cuhulin Bernard Peters wrote: Trash should be placed in the trash can foKKKs news! It's really "Faux News" - Fokkks News Another Liberal Invoking the KKK Post -was- Glen Beck joins Fox News. |
Glen Beck joins Fox News
Generous retired government worker located in California seeking
younger males for fun. Discretion a must. Interests include shortwave radio, right wing politics, Rush Limbaugh and role playing. Click on my profile for more information.. I am currently out of town visiting new friends I've met online. Will email my home address. Have open door policy at my house so drop ins most welcome. Serious inquiries only. Roy P.S. Justin and Dylan yes that is my home address. You are welcome to stay with me, come over when you get into town, I am a night owl so don't worry about the hour. Looking forward to seeing you! |
(OT) Glen Beck joins Fox News.
wrote in message ... On Oct 16, 6:04 pm, wrote: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=242205 cuhulin Between Beck and O'Reilly Fox will blow everyone out of the sky with viewership ratings - they're an AWESOME pair! Until the Dopeocrats fix it with the fairness doctrine. |
(OT) Glen Beck joins Fox News.
I don't have anything to do with Glen Beck.Or Paul Gallo either.
www.supertalkms.com One time a few years ago I phoned Paul Gallo on his politics radio talk show.He told me to Go to Hell! then he slammed his phone down and hung up, crazy little bandy legged Italian rooster! More Gay Sex Allegations Involving Obama. www.rense.com cuhulin |
(OT) Glen Beck joins Fox News.
B HO is getting his/her gay ass busted while he is in Hawaii.
cuhulin |
(OT) Glen Beck joins Fox News.
"MNMikeW" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Oct 16, 6:04 pm, wrote: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=242205 cuhulin Between Beck and O'Reilly Fox will blow everyone out of the sky with viewership ratings - they're an AWESOME pair! Until the Dopeocrats fix it with the fairness doctrine. Fairness doctrine would not take anyone off the air, only require equal time for the other side. Fox News should not have a problem with that if they were to actually be true to their slogan "Fair and Balanced". Aside from that, the doctrine only applies during election season. Conservative talk radio (really almost all of it has been so from the beginning many decades ago) existed coincident with the original doctrine, with almost no legal issues. A station or network had to pretty much specifically be 'in the tank' for a given candidate to elicit any legal action by the Commission. |
(OT) Glen Beck joins Fox News.
On Oct 16, 5:36*pm, wrote:
On Oct 16, 6:04*pm, wrote: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=242205 cuhulin Between Beck and O'Reilly Fox will blow everyone out of the sky with viewership ratings - they're an AWESOME pair! You're right - I never laugh harder than when I'm watching those guys. Bruce |
(OT) Glen Beck joins Fox News.
MNMikeW wrote:
wrote in message ... On Oct 16, 6:04 pm, wrote: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=242205 cuhulin Between Beck and O'Reilly Fox will blow everyone out of the sky with viewership ratings - they're an AWESOME pair! Until the Dopeocrats fix it with the fairness doctrine. They will have the paranoid demo totally sewn up. What a great combo, a dirty old man and a closeted speed freak. Lovely. |
(OT) Glen Beck joins Fox News.
Brenda Ann wrote:
"MNMikeW" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Oct 16, 6:04 pm, wrote: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=242205 cuhulin Between Beck and O'Reilly Fox will blow everyone out of the sky with viewership ratings - they're an AWESOME pair! Until the Dopeocrats fix it with the fairness doctrine. Fairness doctrine would not take anyone off the air, only require equal time for the other side. Fox News should not have a problem with that if they were to actually be true to their slogan "Fair and Balanced". Aside from that, the doctrine only applies during election season. Conservative talk radio (really almost all of it has been so from the beginning many decades ago) existed coincident with the original doctrine, with almost no legal issues. A station or network had to pretty much specifically be 'in the tank' for a given candidate to elicit any legal action by the Commission. As I recall, all it took to be compliant was an open offer for opposing view points. |
(OT) Glen Beck joins Fox News.
"Dave" wrote in message ... Brenda Ann wrote: "MNMikeW" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Oct 16, 6:04 pm, wrote: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=242205 cuhulin Between Beck and O'Reilly Fox will blow everyone out of the sky with viewership ratings - they're an AWESOME pair! Until the Dopeocrats fix it with the fairness doctrine. Fairness doctrine would not take anyone off the air, only require equal time for the other side. Fox News should not have a problem with that if they were to actually be true to their slogan "Fair and Balanced". Aside from that, the doctrine only applies during election season. Conservative talk radio (really almost all of it has been so from the beginning many decades ago) existed coincident with the original doctrine, with almost no legal issues. A station or network had to pretty much specifically be 'in the tank' for a given candidate to elicit any legal action by the Commission. As I recall, all it took to be compliant was an open offer for opposing view points. I believe that was precisely the situation, yes. |
(OT) Glen Beck joins Fox News.
Brenda Ann wrote: "Dave" wrote in message ... Brenda Ann wrote: "MNMikeW" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Oct 16, 6:04 pm, wrote: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=242205 cuhulin Between Beck and O'Reilly Fox will blow everyone out of the sky with viewership ratings - they're an AWESOME pair! Until the Dopeocrats fix it with the fairness doctrine. Fairness doctrine would not take anyone off the air, only require equal time for the other side. Fox News should not have a problem with that if they were to actually be true to their slogan "Fair and Balanced". Aside from that, the doctrine only applies during election season. Conservative talk radio (really almost all of it has been so from the beginning many decades ago) existed coincident with the original doctrine, with almost no legal issues. A station or network had to pretty much specifically be 'in the tank' for a given candidate to elicit any legal action by the Commission. As I recall, all it took to be compliant was an open offer for opposing view points. I believe that was precisely the situation, yes. But the thing is, it's just a hassle for the stations... And, the Liberal/Democrat/Marxists are big into hassling, bribery and extortion... just ask Jesse Jackson! |
(OT) Glen Beck joins Fox News.
dxAce wrote:
But the thing is, it's just a hassle for the stations... The stations are granted a license to use the public airwaves and must serve the public in return. I'd support a return to the days when every station did news and every station had meaningful public service programming. |
(OT) Glen Beck joins Fox News.
"Dave" wrote in message ... Brenda Ann wrote: "MNMikeW" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Oct 16, 6:04 pm, wrote: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=242205 cuhulin Between Beck and O'Reilly Fox will blow everyone out of the sky with viewership ratings - they're an AWESOME pair! Until the Dopeocrats fix it with the fairness doctrine. Fairness doctrine would not take anyone off the air, only require equal time for the other side. Fox News should not have a problem with that if they were to actually be true to their slogan "Fair and Balanced". Aside from that, the doctrine only applies during election season. Conservative talk radio (really almost all of it has been so from the beginning many decades ago) existed coincident with the original doctrine, with almost no legal issues. A station or network had to pretty much specifically be 'in the tank' for a given candidate to elicit any legal action by the Commission. As I recall, all it took to be compliant was an open offer for opposing view points. Equal time. Have an hour conservative show, have a hour liberal show. We saw how the liberals did with the AirAmerica disaster. |
(OT) Glen Beck joins Fox News.
How much do those Transfemme.com tablets cost? I want to jug my natural
B Cup size boobies wayyyyyyy onnnnn up there? Of course that means I would have to buy a bigger bra at the Goodwill store. cuhulin |
(OT) Glen Beck joins Fox News.
In article ,
dxAce wrote: Brenda Ann wrote: "Dave" wrote in message ... Brenda Ann wrote: "MNMikeW" wrote in message ... wrote in message .. . On Oct 16, 6:04 pm, wrote: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=242205 cuhulin Between Beck and O'Reilly Fox will blow everyone out of the sky with viewership ratings - they're an AWESOME pair! Until the Dopeocrats fix it with the fairness doctrine. Fairness doctrine would not take anyone off the air, only require equal time for the other side. Fox News should not have a problem with that if they were to actually be true to their slogan "Fair and Balanced". Aside from that, the doctrine only applies during election season. Conservative talk radio (really almost all of it has been so from the beginning many decades ago) existed coincident with the original doctrine, with almost no legal issues. A station or network had to pretty much specifically be 'in the tank' for a given candidate to elicit any legal action by the Commission. As I recall, all it took to be compliant was an open offer for opposing view points. I believe that was precisely the situation, yes. But the thing is, it's just a hassle for the stations... And, the Liberal/Democrat/Marxists are big into hassling, bribery and extortion... just ask Jesse Jackson! Talk radio on AM and FM once upon a time was all Liberal all the time. Not only did I not care for that point of view many of these left leaning hosts were disgusting, despicable people. Two of these I recall was Tom Leykis and another was Bernie Ward. Bernie finally got a jail sentence for child porn. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...9/BAG212JO5B.D TL Leykis is still free but one day I expect to read about him being behind bars for getting caught doing some disgusting thing. http://www.blowmeuptom.com/ -- Telamon Ventura, California |
(OT) Glen Beck joins Fox News.
In article ,
"MNMikeW" wrote: "Dave" wrote in message ... Brenda Ann wrote: "MNMikeW" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Oct 16, 6:04 pm, wrote: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=242205 cuhulin Between Beck and O'Reilly Fox will blow everyone out of the sky with viewership ratings - they're an AWESOME pair! Until the Dopeocrats fix it with the fairness doctrine. Fairness doctrine would not take anyone off the air, only require equal time for the other side. Fox News should not have a problem with that if they were to actually be true to their slogan "Fair and Balanced". Aside from that, the doctrine only applies during election season. Conservative talk radio (really almost all of it has been so from the beginning many decades ago) existed coincident with the original doctrine, with almost no legal issues. A station or network had to pretty much specifically be 'in the tank' for a given candidate to elicit any legal action by the Commission. As I recall, all it took to be compliant was an open offer for opposing view points. Equal time. Have an hour conservative show, have a hour liberal show. We saw how the liberals did with the AirAmerica disaster. That would be an hour of no revenue for the station. You work 40 hours a week. How about you give me 1 hour worth of that. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
(OT) Glen Beck joins Fox News.
MNMikeW wrote:
"Dave" wrote in message ... Brenda Ann wrote: "MNMikeW" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Oct 16, 6:04 pm, wrote: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=242205 cuhulin Between Beck and O'Reilly Fox will blow everyone out of the sky with viewership ratings - they're an AWESOME pair! Until the Dopeocrats fix it with the fairness doctrine. Fairness doctrine would not take anyone off the air, only require equal time for the other side. Fox News should not have a problem with that if they were to actually be true to their slogan "Fair and Balanced". Aside from that, the doctrine only applies during election season. Conservative talk radio (really almost all of it has been so from the beginning many decades ago) existed coincident with the original doctrine, with almost no legal issues. A station or network had to pretty much specifically be 'in the tank' for a given candidate to elicit any legal action by the Commission. As I recall, all it took to be compliant was an open offer for opposing view points. Equal time. Have an hour conservative show, have a hour liberal show. We saw how the liberals did with the AirAmerica disaster. I don't think that's how it would work. In Los Angeles Clear Channel owns 3 talkers: KFI, which caters to the knuckle dragging mouth breathers; KLAC, Sports; and KTLK, which is Progressive Talk (your Air America provides some programs, as does Jones Radio and Nova M). In Los Angeles Clear Channel is pretty well-balanced ideologically. On the other hand, there are many markets that are brimming with right-wing hate radio, and nothing to counter. They really need to balance things out, lest the people get a warped view of the world. Hopefully, just the threat of a "Fairness Doctrine" law would be enough to get these guys to loosen up. BTW, there never was Fairness Doctrine legislation. It was always an executive order. |
(OT) Glen Beck joins Fox News.
"Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , "MNMikeW" wrote: "Dave" wrote in message ... Brenda Ann wrote: "MNMikeW" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Oct 16, 6:04 pm, wrote: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=242205 cuhulin Between Beck and O'Reilly Fox will blow everyone out of the sky with viewership ratings - they're an AWESOME pair! Until the Dopeocrats fix it with the fairness doctrine. Fairness doctrine would not take anyone off the air, only require equal time for the other side. Fox News should not have a problem with that if they were to actually be true to their slogan "Fair and Balanced". Aside from that, the doctrine only applies during election season. Conservative talk radio (really almost all of it has been so from the beginning many decades ago) existed coincident with the original doctrine, with almost no legal issues. A station or network had to pretty much specifically be 'in the tank' for a given candidate to elicit any legal action by the Commission. As I recall, all it took to be compliant was an open offer for opposing view points. Equal time. Have an hour conservative show, have a hour liberal show. We saw how the liberals did with the AirAmerica disaster. That would be an hour of no revenue for the station. You work 40 hours a week. How about you give me 1 hour worth of that. Of course there would be no revenue. Who would advertise on a time slot where nobody listens? |
(OT) Glen Beck joins Fox News.
"Dave" wrote in message ... MNMikeW wrote: "Dave" wrote in message ... Brenda Ann wrote: "MNMikeW" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Oct 16, 6:04 pm, wrote: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=242205 cuhulin Between Beck and O'Reilly Fox will blow everyone out of the sky with viewership ratings - they're an AWESOME pair! Until the Dopeocrats fix it with the fairness doctrine. Fairness doctrine would not take anyone off the air, only require equal time for the other side. Fox News should not have a problem with that if they were to actually be true to their slogan "Fair and Balanced". Aside from that, the doctrine only applies during election season. Conservative talk radio (really almost all of it has been so from the beginning many decades ago) existed coincident with the original doctrine, with almost no legal issues. A station or network had to pretty much specifically be 'in the tank' for a given candidate to elicit any legal action by the Commission. As I recall, all it took to be compliant was an open offer for opposing view points. Equal time. Have an hour conservative show, have a hour liberal show. We saw how the liberals did with the AirAmerica disaster. I don't think that's how it would work. In Los Angeles Clear Channel owns 3 talkers: KFI, which caters to the knuckle dragging mouth breathers; KLAC, Sports; and KTLK, which is Progressive Talk (your Air America provides some programs, as does Jones Radio and Nova M). In Los Angeles Clear Channel is pretty well-balanced ideologically. On the other hand, there are many markets that are brimming with right-wing hate radio, and nothing to counter. They really need to balance things out, lest the people get a warped view of the world. Hopefully, just the threat of a "Fairness Doctrine" law would be enough to get these guys to loosen up. BTW, there never was Fairness Doctrine legislation. It was always an executive order. There is legislation to ban it for good. Of course Pelosi and her goons wont let it get a vote. |
(OT) Glen Beck joins Fox News.
On Oct 22, 6:52*pm, Telamon
wrote: In article , *dxAce wrote: Brenda Ann wrote: "Dave" wrote in message ... Brenda Ann wrote: "MNMikeW" wrote in message ... wrote in message .. . On Oct 16, 6:04 pm, wrote: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=242205 cuhulin Between Beck and O'Reilly Fox will blow everyone out of the sky with viewership ratings - they're an AWESOME pair! Until the Dopeocrats fix it with the fairness doctrine. Fairness doctrine would not take anyone off the air, only require equal time for the other side. Fox News should not have a problem with that if they were to actually be true to their slogan "Fair and Balanced". Aside from that, the doctrine only applies during election season. Conservative talk radio (really almost all of it has been so from the beginning many decades ago) existed coincident with the original doctrine, with almost no legal issues. A station or network had to pretty much specifically be 'in the tank' for a given candidate to elicit any legal action by the Commission. As I recall, all it took to be compliant was an open offer for opposing view points. I believe that was precisely the situation, yes. But the thing is, it's just a hassle for the stations... And, the Liberal/Democrat/Marxists are big into hassling, bribery and extortion... just ask Jesse Jackson! Talk radio on AM and FM once upon a time was all Liberal all the time. Not only did I not care for that point of view many of these left leaning hosts were disgusting, despicable people. Two of these I recall was Tom Leykis and another was Bernie Ward. Bernie finally got a jail sentence for child porn. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl.../BAG212JO5B..D TL Leykis is still free but one day I expect to read about him being behind bars for getting caught doing some disgusting thing. http://www.blowmeuptom.com/ -- Telamon Ventura, California- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So, Leykis is despicable because - Why? He talks about things that make you blush? You just want an excuse to bad-mouth him because he's middle-liberal, and to you and other ideologues that's a dirty word. Bruce |
(OT) Glen Beck joins Fox News.
Maybe I might plug in my phone and ask somebody at G.V.''Sonny''
Montgomery V.A.Center if I can get those tablets for free.Of course, there would be a co-pay attatched to that. cuhulin |
(OT) Glen Beck joins Fox News.
In article
, bpnjensen wrote: On Oct 22, 6:52*pm, Telamon wrote: In article , *dxAce wrote: Brenda Ann wrote: "Dave" wrote in message ... Brenda Ann wrote: "MNMikeW" wrote in message ... wrote in message m.. . On Oct 16, 6:04 pm, wrote: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=242205 cuhulin Between Beck and O'Reilly Fox will blow everyone out of the sky with viewership ratings - they're an AWESOME pair! Until the Dopeocrats fix it with the fairness doctrine. Fairness doctrine would not take anyone off the air, only require equal time for the other side. Fox News should not have a problem with that if they were to actually be true to their slogan "Fair and Balanced". Aside from that, the doctrine only applies during election season. Conservative talk radio (really almost all of it has been so from the beginning many decades ago) existed coincident with the original doctrine, with almost no legal issues. A station or network had to pretty much specifically be 'in the tank' for a given candidate to elicit any legal action by the Commission. As I recall, all it took to be compliant was an open offer for opposing view points. I believe that was precisely the situation, yes. But the thing is, it's just a hassle for the stations... And, the Liberal/Democrat/Marxists are big into hassling, bribery and extortion... just ask Jesse Jackson! Talk radio on AM and FM once upon a time was all Liberal all the time. Not only did I not care for that point of view many of these left leaning hosts were disgusting, despicable people. Two of these I recall was Tom Leykis and another was Bernie Ward. Bernie finally got a jail sentence for child porn. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl.../08/29/BAG212J O5B.D TL Leykis is still free but one day I expect to read about him being behind bars for getting caught doing some disgusting thing. http://www.blowmeuptom.com/ So, Leykis is despicable because - Why? He talks about things that make you blush? You just want an excuse to bad-mouth him because he's middle-liberal, and to you and other ideologues that's a dirty word. No I bad mouth him for the reason I stated. The speaks about and advocates immoral behavior. He clearly abuses his position as a public speaker. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
(OT) Glen Beck joins Fox News.
In article , Dave
wrote: MNMikeW wrote: "Dave" wrote in message ... Brenda Ann wrote: "MNMikeW" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Oct 16, 6:04 pm, wrote: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=242205 cuhulin Between Beck and O'Reilly Fox will blow everyone out of the sky with viewership ratings - they're an AWESOME pair! Until the Dopeocrats fix it with the fairness doctrine. Fairness doctrine would not take anyone off the air, only require equal time for the other side. Fox News should not have a problem with that if they were to actually be true to their slogan "Fair and Balanced". Aside from that, the doctrine only applies during election season. Conservative talk radio (really almost all of it has been so from the beginning many decades ago) existed coincident with the original doctrine, with almost no legal issues. A station or network had to pretty much specifically be 'in the tank' for a given candidate to elicit any legal action by the Commission. As I recall, all it took to be compliant was an open offer for opposing view points. Equal time. Have an hour conservative show, have a hour liberal show. We saw how the liberals did with the AirAmerica disaster. I don't think that's how it would work. In Los Angeles Clear Channel owns 3 talkers: KFI, which caters to the knuckle dragging mouth breathers; KLAC, Sports; and KTLK, which is Progressive Talk (your Air America provides some programs, as does Jones Radio and Nova M). In Los Angeles Clear Channel is pretty well-balanced ideologically. On the other hand, there are many markets that are brimming with right-wing hate radio, and nothing to counter. They really need to balance things out, lest the people get a warped view of the world. Hopefully, just the threat of a "Fairness Doctrine" law would be enough to get these guys to loosen up. BTW, there never was Fairness Doctrine legislation. It was always an executive order. You talk about "they". "They" otherwise known as the public don't need you to dictate what "we" all need. Air America has failed so start your own liberal talk syndication show if you think you can make a go of it. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
(OT) : Is "Liberal" a Dirty Word ?
On Oct 23, 7:38*am, bpnjensen wrote:
On Oct 22, 6:52*pm, Telamon wrote: In article , *dxAce wrote: Brenda Ann wrote: "Dave" wrote in message ... Brenda Ann wrote: "MNMikeW" wrote in message ... wrote in message .. . On Oct 16, 6:04 pm, wrote: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=242205 cuhulin Between Beck and O'Reilly Fox will blow everyone out of the sky with viewership ratings - they're an AWESOME pair! Until the Dopeocrats fix it with the fairness doctrine. Fairness doctrine would not take anyone off the air, only require equal time for the other side. Fox News should not have a problem with that if they were to actually be true to their slogan "Fair and Balanced". Aside from that, the doctrine only applies during election season. |
(OT) Glen Beck joins Fox News.
Telamon wrote:
You talk about "they". "They" otherwise known as the public don't need you to dictate what "we" all need. Air America has failed so start your own liberal talk syndication show if you think you can make a go of it. Democracy needs an informed electorate to work. If the public square only allows speakers from a certain viewpoint to have their say, the public doesn't get the smörgåsbord of ideas it needs. This idea is enshrined in the First Amendment. |
(OT) : Is "Liberal" a Dirty Word ?
RHF wrote:
BpnJ - Acutally "libEral" is really two dirty words "Libe" and "Eral" sharing a common vowel "E" ;-} ~ RHF . The USA was founded by radical liberals, er, liberal radicals, er freaks. |
(OT) Glen Beck joins Fox News.
On Oct 23, 5:50*pm, Telamon
wrote: No I bad mouth him for the reason I stated. The speaks about and advocates immoral behavior. He clearly abuses his position as a public speaker. -- Telamon Ventura, California- Hide quoted text - I feel the same way about Rush Limbaugh ;-) I think we need to recognize that your statement is an opinion and not a fact. In any case, factually, what he advocates is not illegal. Like most people on the radio, his goal is to fill a nitch and entertain, which of course leads to earning a living. Like Limbaugh. Bruce |
(OT) Glen Beck joins Fox News.
"Dave" wrote in message ... Telamon wrote: You talk about "they". "They" otherwise known as the public don't need you to dictate what "we" all need. Air America has failed so start your own liberal talk syndication show if you think you can make a go of it. Democracy needs an informed electorate to work. If the public square only allows speakers from a certain viewpoint to have their say, the public doesn't get the smörgåsbord of ideas it needs. This idea is enshrined in the First Amendment. And the leftys are trying to do away with a certian side of the debate. Since they cannot compete in the free market, they need to legislate it. They make it sound like there are no liberal viewpoints out there. |
(OT) Glen Beck joins Fox News.
On Oct 24, 8:08*am, "MNMikeW" wrote:
"Dave" wrote in message ... Telamon wrote: You talk about "they". "They" otherwise known as the public don't need you to dictate what "we" all need. Air America has failed so start your own liberal talk syndication show if you think you can make a go of it.. Democracy needs an informed electorate to work. *If the public square only allows speakers from a certain viewpoint to have their say, the public doesn't get the smörgåsbord of ideas it needs. This idea is enshrined in the First Amendment. And the leftys are trying to do away with a certian side of the debate. Since they cannot compete in the free market, they need to legislate it. They make it sound like there are no liberal viewpoints out there. Do you realize that each of these sentences is a broad and unsupported generalization that is practically impossible to substantiate? |
(OT) Glen Beck joins Fox News.
"bpnjensen" wrote in message ... On Oct 24, 8:08 am, "MNMikeW" wrote: "Dave" wrote in message ... Telamon wrote: You talk about "they". "They" otherwise known as the public don't need you to dictate what "we" all need. Air America has failed so start your own liberal talk syndication show if you think you can make a go of it. Democracy needs an informed electorate to work. If the public square only allows speakers from a certain viewpoint to have their say, the public doesn't get the smörgåsbord of ideas it needs. This idea is enshrined in the First Amendment. And the leftys are trying to do away with a certian side of the debate. Since they cannot compete in the free market, they need to legislate it. They make it sound like there are no liberal viewpoints out there. Do you realize that each of these sentences is a broad and unsupported generalization that is practically impossible to substantiate? The only reason they are bringing this up again is talk radio. Guess which viewpoint is dominate on talk radio, take your time. Liberals tried talk radio, how did that work out? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:09 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com