![]() |
|
KFI transmitter off the air
The 640 KFI transmitter just dropped out. Just before it dropped out
started sounding a little funny. It's only been on a few weeks now. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
KFI transmitter off the air
In article
, Telamon wrote: The 640 KFI transmitter just dropped out. Just before it dropped out started sounding a little funny. It's only been on a few weeks now. Carrier came up. No audio though. S meter is not where it was before the dropout. They still have problems to solve. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
KFI transmitter off the air
In article
, Telamon wrote: In article , Telamon wrote: The 640 KFI transmitter just dropped out. Just before it dropped out started sounding a little funny. It's only been on a few weeks now. Carrier came up. No audio though. S meter is not where it was before the dropout. They still have problems to solve. They are back on the air but signal strength is not what it was before this event. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
KFI transmitter off the air
On Oct 29, 11:29*pm, Telamon
wrote: The 640 KFI transmitter just dropped out. Just before it dropped out started sounding a little funny. It's only been on a few weeks now. -- Telamon Ventura, California My cousin is an bcst engineer out there on the West coast. KFI had a major transmitter failure and is running on a backup xmiter with half power. |
KFI transmitter off the air
In article
, Wingdingaling6 wrote: On Oct 29, 11:29*pm, Telamon wrote: The 640 KFI transmitter just dropped out. Just before it dropped out started sounding a little funny. It's only been on a few weeks now. My cousin is an bcst engineer out there on the West coast. KFI had a major transmitter failure and is running on a backup xmiter with half power. Tonight's event was kind of weird. All of a sudden the voice peaks sounded kind of fuzzy and then the carrier dropped out altogether. They went from 10 over S9 to S7. Got any idea when the new transmitter will be fixed? -- Telamon Ventura, California |
KFI transmitter off the air
Telamon wrote: In article , Wingdingaling6 wrote: On Oct 29, 11:29 pm, Telamon wrote: The 640 KFI transmitter just dropped out. Just before it dropped out started sounding a little funny. It's only been on a few weeks now. My cousin is an bcst engineer out there on the West coast. KFI had a major transmitter failure and is running on a backup xmiter with half power. Tonight's event was kind of weird. All of a sudden the voice peaks sounded kind of fuzzy and then the carrier dropped out altogether. They went from 10 over S9 to S7. Got any idea when the new transmitter will be fixed? Any idea when 'Eduardo' will stop transmitting? |
KFI transmitter off the air
Wingdingaling6 wrote:
On Oct 29, 11:29 pm, Telamon wrote: The 640 KFI transmitter just dropped out. Just before it dropped out started sounding a little funny. It's only been on a few weeks now. -- Telamon Ventura, California My cousin is an bcst engineer out there on the West coast. KFI had a major transmitter failure and is running on a backup xmiter with half power. 25 KW into an 8th wave antenna is more like 20% power. |
KFI transmitter off the air
David Eduardo wrote:
"Telamon" wrote in message ... The 640 KFI transmitter just dropped out. Just before it dropped out started sounding a little funny. It's only been on a few weeks now. They are using the old Harris DX series, I believe. The new transmitter had a catastrophic failure, and a new Nautel is apparently on rush order. I thought they had an old Continental 317 (best damn AM transmitter ever). |
KFI transmitter off the air
"Telamon" wrote in message ... Tonight's event was kind of weird. All of a sudden the voice peaks sounded kind of fuzzy and then the carrier dropped out altogether. They went from 10 over S9 to S7. Got any idea when the new transmitter will be fixed? Supposedly the "new" transmitter, which they used at Montecito Hts also, had "internal combustion" and is not coming back. KFI is awaiting a new Nautel instead. |
KFI transmitter off the air
"Dave" wrote in message ... Wingdingaling6 wrote: On Oct 29, 11:29 pm, Telamon wrote: The 640 KFI transmitter just dropped out. Just before it dropped out started sounding a little funny. It's only been on a few weeks now. -- Telamon Ventura, California My cousin is an bcst engineer out there on the West coast. KFI had a major transmitter failure and is running on a backup xmiter with half power. 25 KW into an 8th wave antenna is more like 20% power. They are using a backup trasnsmitter, not the aux tower. |
KFI transmitter off the air
"Dave" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... The 640 KFI transmitter just dropped out. Just before it dropped out started sounding a little funny. It's only been on a few weeks now. They are using the old Harris DX series, I believe. The new transmitter had a catastrophic failure, and a new Nautel is apparently on rush order. I thought they had an old Continental 317 (best damn AM transmitter ever). The Harris was the main, and the floor furnace the aux. I am told that the new BE selfdestructed, and will be replaced with a Nautel (all into the new tower) and the DX is the temporary main. |
KFI transmitter off the air
On Oct 30, 6:37*am, Dave wrote:
Wingdingaling6 wrote: On Oct 29, 11:29 pm, Telamon wrote: The 640 KFI transmitter just dropped out. Just before it dropped out started sounding a little funny. It's only been on a few weeks now. -- Telamon Ventura, California My cousin is an bcst engineer out there on the West coast. KFI had a major transmitter failure and is running on a backup xmiter with half power. 25 KW into an 8th wave antenna is more like 20% power. Dead Air here for KFI on 640 kHz; but most of the 'other' LA and SD AM-MW Radio Stations were coming in very well. ~ RHF Twain Harte, CA |
KFI transmitter off the air
Telamon wrote:
KFI is having a lot of bad luck with transmitters and antennas. So now that they have had two transmitters burn up anyone know why that happened? No excuse that I can think of. Broadcast engineering doesn't attract the best and brightest any more. Other specialties pay a lot better. People used to do it for love of the medium, but that's out the window as the medium generally sucks. |
KFI transmitter off the air
Telamon wrote:
In article , "Bob Campbell" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... KFI is having a lot of bad luck with transmitters and antennas. So now that they have had two transmitters burn up anyone know why that happened? Because they were broadcasting in HD? rimshot I suppose that is possible. I was thinking more along the lines of the cooling system failed or a HV component failed shorting out the final stage. There are protections for both of those. However I must point out that solid state transmitters have no B+. |
KFI transmitter off the air
"Dave" wrote in message ... Telamon wrote: KFI is having a lot of bad luck with transmitters and antennas. So now that they have had two transmitters burn up anyone know why that happened? No excuse that I can think of. Broadcast engineering doesn't attract the best and brightest any more. Other specialties pay a lot better. People used to do it for love of the medium, but that's out the window as the medium generally sucks. One transmitter burnt, and it has been commented that this is due to a design issue since 2 others (there are not that many 50 kw installs in the whole US) have gone the same way. The engineering at KFI is superb... but it's the same thing as giving a lemon car to an Indy 500 driver... it will still break down. |
KFI transmitter off the air
"Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , So what is the voltage out the finals on a solid state transmitter? There are no finals. Just a bunch of combined modules. The Nautel 50 has 8 RF and 4 modulator power modules. There is no final stage. |
KFI transmitter off the air
"David Eduardo" wrote in message ... "Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , So what is the voltage out the finals on a solid state transmitter? There are no finals. Just a bunch of combined modules. The Nautel 50 has 8 RF and 4 modulator power modules. There is no final stage. Ain't power MOSfet's a wunnerful thing? |
KFI transmitter off the air
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , So what is the voltage out the finals on a solid state transmitter? There are no finals. Just a bunch of combined modules. The Nautel 50 has 8 RF and 4 modulator power modules. There is no final stage. Ok, Don't call the modules "finals" then but what is the output voltage to the antenna? I would like to know what the RF current is as the output is supposed to be 50KW. You know the skin effect will concentrate all the current into the conductor skin. I wanted to calculate the current density. I wonder what the power loss is in the hardline from transmitter to antenna? I expect the parallel solid state design will have much lower voltage and higher current than older tube designs. It would then follow that transmitter destruction is more likely to result from connector problems in a solid state transmitter where the higher voltage tube designs would result from insulator breakdown or flashover. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
KFI transmitter off the air
"Telamon" wrote in message ... Ok, Don't call the modules "finals" then but what is the output voltage to the antenna? I would like to know what the RF current is as the output is supposed to be 50KW. Almost all phasors or lines are50 or 52 ohms today. You know the skin effect will concentrate all the current into the conductor skin. I wanted to calculate the current density. I wonder what the power loss is in the hardline from transmitter to antenna? The line manufacturers all have specs on loss as a function of frequency. I expect the parallel solid state design will have much lower voltage and higher current than older tube designs. It would then follow that transmitter destruction is more likely to result from connector problems in a solid state transmitter where the higher voltage tube designs would result from insulator breakdown or flashover. It all ends with a match to 50 ohm line at the output fitting on top of the box. |
KFI transmitter off the air
David Eduardo wrote:
"Dave" wrote in message ... Telamon wrote: KFI is having a lot of bad luck with transmitters and antennas. So now that they have had two transmitters burn up anyone know why that happened? No excuse that I can think of. Broadcast engineering doesn't attract the best and brightest any more. Other specialties pay a lot better. People used to do it for love of the medium, but that's out the window as the medium generally sucks. One transmitter burnt, and it has been commented that this is due to a design issue since 2 others (there are not that many 50 kw installs in the whole US) have gone the same way. The engineering at KFI is superb... but it's the same thing as giving a lemon car to an Indy 500 driver... it will still break down. There's obviously a dumbass factor at work somewhere is this chain of events. Somebody designed a HPA stage prone to catastrophic failure, didn't they? |
KFI transmitter off the air
Telamon wrote:
In article , Dave wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , "Bob Campbell" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message . .. KFI is having a lot of bad luck with transmitters and antennas. So now that they have had two transmitters burn up anyone know why that happened? Because they were broadcasting in HD? rimshot I suppose that is possible. I was thinking more along the lines of the cooling system failed or a HV component failed shorting out the final stage. There are protections for both of those. However I must point out that solid state transmitters have no B+. So what is the voltage out the finals on a solid state transmitter? After the output matching network a little under 1,600 Volts. |
KFI transmitter off the air
Telamon wrote:
In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , So what is the voltage out the finals on a solid state transmitter? There are no finals. Just a bunch of combined modules. The Nautel 50 has 8 RF and 4 modulator power modules. There is no final stage. Ok, Don't call the modules "finals" then but what is the output voltage to the antenna? I would like to know what the RF current is as the output is supposed to be 50KW. 31 Amperes |
KFI transmitter off the air
Billy Burpelson wrote:
Telamon wrote: So what is the voltage out the finals on a solid state transmitter? Do you mean the DC voltage on the collectors of the output transistors or the RF voltage into the feed line? Telamon wrote: Ok, Don't call the modules "finals" then but what is the output voltage to the antenna? I would like to know what the RF current is as the output is supposed to be 50KW. I'm surprised a smart person like you isn't familiar with Ohm's law... To find the RF voltage for a 50 kW transmitter, assuming a 50 ohm transmission line: Simple Ohm's Law: V= the square root of (RxW) (V=volts, W=watts, R=feed line impedance in ohms...assume 50 ohms) To find the current: I= the square root of (W/R) Sometimes you're just to, too, two clueless. :-) This is even simpler: http://www.sengpielaudio.com/calculator-ohm.htm |
KFI transmitter off the air
Telamon wrote:
In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... I'll assume that there are 10 modules so each would put out about 3 amps. The outputs could be protected by limiting that source current and there would also have to be a another protection against VSWR. Maybe a temperature sensor on the output FET but that might be too slow. So how do the separate modules work together? Do they all put out the same voltage and current in phase through some kind of card backplane? The principle manufacturers of solid state transmitters are Harris, BE, and Nautel in the US/NA. Each as a website, and I believe there are both functional diagrams and some white papers about design. I have never worked inside a big ss transmitter so am of limited use in describing how they work. Thanks for answering my questions Eduardo. I'll check those sites out. Can you tell me who makes the hardline between transmitter and antenna? I'm just the curious sort. I have never really worked with RF power and I just haven't though of the obvious answers to some of the questions I have asked in the thread. In my work experience the RF power is 0 dBm and less coming out of equipment like network analyzers and synthesizers. I can tell you that there is a lot more to actually fabricating electronics than the schematics can explain. www.eriinc.com/pubs/Catalog07_168-171.pdf Scroll down for specs at 0.64 MHz |
KFI transmitter off the air
Telamon wrote:
In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... . :-) You are such a retard. I was wondering what the line loss would be and I am not familiar with the FCC rules. The 50Kw could be the max the transmitter puts out or the input to the antenna or it could be based on antenna field strength measurements. There are several isssues here. 1. It's usually the licensed power into the antenna for non-directional stations. So most new solid state transmitters deliver 10% to 20% more, so that if the line loss is a couple of percent, the line is fed with the licensed power plus line loss. 2. Directional systems feed the licensed power plus phasor loss to the common point (input) of the directional phasor. So if phasor loss for a 50 kw station is 5 kw, then they feed the common point with 55 kw. 3. Some classes of AM service have a maximum field strength at a determined distance. If the radiator is too efficient (a 5/8 wave or a Franklin) the station may actually feed less than licensed power to the tower to compensate for the radiation efficiency. SNIP The 5/8 wavelength antenna is a good one to use for local mobile communications. I think that is because it has a good low to the horizon lobe creating a better ground wave than a 1/4 wavelength antenna would generate. That sound right to you or is there another reason? That is correct. Most flamethrowers are electrically near 1/2 5/8 wave. Half wave antennas are harder to feed. |
KFI transmitter off the air
In article ,
Dave wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message . .. I'll assume that there are 10 modules so each would put out about 3 amps. The outputs could be protected by limiting that source current and there would also have to be a another protection against VSWR. Maybe a temperature sensor on the output FET but that might be too slow. So how do the separate modules work together? Do they all put out the same voltage and current in phase through some kind of card backplane? The principle manufacturers of solid state transmitters are Harris, BE, and Nautel in the US/NA. Each as a website, and I believe there are both functional diagrams and some white papers about design. I have never worked inside a big ss transmitter so am of limited use in describing how they work. Thanks for answering my questions Eduardo. I'll check those sites out. Can you tell me who makes the hardline between transmitter and antenna? I'm just the curious sort. I have never really worked with RF power and I just haven't though of the obvious answers to some of the questions I have asked in the thread. In my work experience the RF power is 0 dBm and less coming out of equipment like network analyzers and synthesizers. I can tell you that there is a lot more to actually fabricating electronics than the schematics can explain. www.eriinc.com/pubs/Catalog07_168-171.pdf Scroll down for specs at 0.64 MHz 6 1/8 inch is what most radio stations use? -- Telamon Ventura, California |
KFI transmitter off the air
"Telamon" wrote in message ... 6 1/8 inch is what most radio stations use? Pretty common for FM and TV stations.. not so much for AM. IIRC, 1520 in Portland used 3" Heliax for 50KW. |
KFI transmitter off the air
In article ,
"Brenda Ann" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... 6 1/8 inch is what most radio stations use? Pretty common for FM and TV stations.. not so much for AM. IIRC, 1520 in Portland used 3" Heliax for 50KW. Someone wrote that 50 ohm was standard. Why am I seeing 75 ohm components then? And while I'm back on the impedance subject I expect that tower impedance can be much lower than 50 ohms so that why a matching network is needed at the antenna? -- Telamon Ventura, California |
KFI transmitter off the air
Telamon wrote:
In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... SNIP Some time I need to find a time where our engineers can take you to Mt Wilson. One of our sites is shared with multiple users, including several TVs. You would have a lot of questions for the follks at that manned site. SNIP Now that would be an interesting field trip. As long as you don't plan on having children... |
KFI transmitter off the air
In article ,
Dave wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message . .. SNIP Some time I need to find a time where our engineers can take you to Mt Wilson. One of our sites is shared with multiple users, including several TVs. You would have a lot of questions for the follks at that manned site. SNIP Now that would be an interesting field trip. As long as you don't plan on having children... I could wear lead lined depends. It's just an hour or two of RF not as bad as holding a cell phone to your head. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
KFI transmitter off the air
In article , Billy Burpelson wrote: Telamon wrote: So what is the voltage out the finals on a solid state transmitter? Do you mean the DC voltage on the collectors of the output transistors or the RF voltage into the feed line? Telamon wrote: Ok, Don't call the modules "finals" then but what is the output voltage to the antenna? I would like to know what the RF current is as the output is supposed to be 50KW. I'm surprised a smart person like you isn't familiar with Ohm's law... To find the RF voltage for a 50 kW transmitter, assuming a 50 ohm transmission line: Simple Ohm's Law: V= the square root of (RxW) (V=volts, W=watts, R=feed line impedance in ohms...assume 50 ohms) To find the current: I= the square root of (W/R) Sometimes you're just to, too, two clueless. :-) Telamon wrote: You are such a retard. I was wondering what the line loss would be Try again. You were NOT asking about the "line loss". and I am not familiar with the FCC rules. Well, then could we say YOU are clueless? The 50Kw could be the max the transmitter puts out or the input to the antenna or it could be based on antenna field strength measurements. Again, could we say YOU are clueless? And also the 50 ohms impedance would be another assumption on my part but since a clueless wonder such as yourself generally proceeds on unfounded assumptions you will not understand this. You admit *YOU* know *NOTHING* about the power or impedance and yet you accuse others of being "clueless". Can you see the irony here? Or are you to, too, two clueless to get it? |
KFI transmitter off the air
Telamon wrote: In article , "Brenda Ann" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... 6 1/8 inch is what most radio stations use? Pretty common for FM and TV stations.. not so much for AM. IIRC, 1520 in Portland used 3" Heliax for 50KW. Someone wrote that 50 ohm was standard. Why am I seeing 75 ohm components then? Dave wrote: 75 Ohm has lower loss for long runs, but requires extra matching sections, usually at both ends. Sorry to rain on your parade...but to follow your own (lack of) logic: The "extra matching sections" you talk about (at each end) would add *more* loss than you would gain by using your -supposedly- lower loss 75 ohm cable. Also, 75 ohm cable does not inherently have less (or more) loss than 50 ohm cable. *Loss* is dependent on the dielectric used, the materials used and the construction (size) of the cable, no matter what the impedance. Finally, AFAIK, 50 ohms has been traditionally used for AM/FM/SW transmitters while 75 ohms is used for CATV distribution. |
KFI transmitter off the air
In article ,
Billy Burpelson wrote: In article , Billy Burpelson wrote: Telamon wrote: So what is the voltage out the finals on a solid state transmitter? Do you mean the DC voltage on the collectors of the output transistors or the RF voltage into the feed line? Telamon wrote: Ok, Don't call the modules "finals" then but what is the output voltage to the antenna? I would like to know what the RF current is as the output is supposed to be 50KW. I'm surprised a smart person like you isn't familiar with Ohm's law... To find the RF voltage for a 50 kW transmitter, assuming a 50 ohm transmission line: Simple Ohm's Law: V= the square root of (RxW) (V=volts, W=watts, R=feed line impedance in ohms...assume 50 ohms) To find the current: I= the square root of (W/R) Sometimes you're just to, too, two clueless. :-) Telamon wrote: You are such a retard. I was wondering what the line loss would be Try again. You were NOT asking about the "line loss". SNIP Excuse me 'tard boy. I just happen to know what I was after here. Your cluelessness is not my problem. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
KFI transmitter off the air
In article ,
Billy Burpelson wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , "Brenda Ann" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... 6 1/8 inch is what most radio stations use? Pretty common for FM and TV stations.. not so much for AM. IIRC, 1520 in Portland used 3" Heliax for 50KW. Someone wrote that 50 ohm was standard. Why am I seeing 75 ohm components then? Dave wrote: 75 Ohm has lower loss for long runs, but requires extra matching sections, usually at both ends. Sorry to rain on your parade...but to follow your own (lack of) logic: The "extra matching sections" you talk about (at each end) would add *more* loss than you would gain by using your -supposedly- lower loss 75 ohm cable. Also, 75 ohm cable does not inherently have less (or more) loss than 50 ohm cable. *Loss* is dependent on the dielectric used, the materials used and the construction (size) of the cable, no matter what the impedance. Finally, AFAIK, 50 ohms has been traditionally used for AM/FM/SW transmitters while 75 ohms is used for CATV distribution. I'm inclined to agree with you on this but seeing how you are clueless 99.999% of the time I'll have to think and research this a little more. Maybe you could supply a little logic behind this view? -- Telamon Ventura, California |
KFI transmitter off the air
On Nov 2, 4:12*pm, Dave wrote:
Telamon wrote: I would think that this argument would be about which would be easier to make, use, or construct for a low loss transmission line 50 or 75 ohms. - Argument? -*If you want to argue about cables ad infinitum - I suggest rec.radio.amateur.antenna Dave D'Oh! so Political Off-Topic is OK but something remotely related to Shortwave Radio like technology should be taken elsewhere. ok i get it 'not' ~ RHF |
KFI transmitter off the air
Telamon wrote:
In article , Dave wrote: Telamon wrote: I would think that this argument would be about which would be easier to make, use, or construct for a low loss transmission line 50 or 75 ohms. Argument? The argument would be between you and Ian. If you want to argue about cables ad infinitum I suggest rec.radio.amateur.antenna No thanks that news group blows. As if this group doesn't? Hardly any of the valued contributors from years past bother to post here anymore. They moved on to groups with moderators that don't allow the kind of BS that goes on here. |
KFI transmitter off the air
RHF wrote:
On Nov 2, 4:12 pm, Dave wrote: Telamon wrote: I would think that this argument would be about which would be easier to make, use, or construct for a low loss transmission line 50 or 75 ohms. - Argument? - If you want to argue about cables ad infinitum - I suggest rec.radio.amateur.antenna Dave D'Oh! so Political Off-Topic is OK but something remotely related to Shortwave Radio like technology should be taken elsewhere. ok i get it 'not' ~ RHF . If you want to center feed a dipole, go for the 75 Ohm. |
KFI transmitter off the air
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 16:10:01 -0500, Billy Burpelson wrote:
.. However, the thread seems clearly titled " KFI transmitter off the air" and I doubt your statement above ( center feeding a dipole) is implying that KFI is using a dipole. Please 'splain. It depends on your meaning of dipole. Read the thread all the way back, and you'll see what I mean by bull****. |
KFI transmitter off the air
In article ,
factcheck wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , Dave wrote: Telamon wrote: I would think that this argument would be about which would be easier to make, use, or construct for a low loss transmission line 50 or 75 ohms. Argument? The argument would be between you and Ian. If you want to argue about cables ad infinitum I suggest rec.radio.amateur.antenna No thanks that news group blows. As if this group doesn't? Hardly any of the valued contributors from years past bother to post here anymore. They moved on to groups with moderators that don't allow the kind of BS that goes on here. That news group is way worse than this one. The regulars in that news group are all like Billy Boy. I'm thankful we just have one of those here. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
KFI transmitter off the air
In article ,
Billy Burpelson wrote: Dave wrote: If you want to center feed a dipole, go for the 75 Ohm. As far as it goes, you are correct in that the nominal impedance of a half-wave, center fed dipole is around 72 Ohms only at its resonant frequency. So yes, you would have a good match between the feed line and the antenna, BUT...(and there is usually a but)... ...all you are doing is moving the mismatch of the 75 ohm feed line to the back of the transceiver, as all rigs made in the last 20 years or so have a fixed, nominal 50 Ohm input/output. So, would you like your mismatch at the back of your transceiver or at the antenna? In -either- case (50 or 75 ohm line), you will still have a nominal 1.44: 1 SWR at the resonant frequency. If you are at any other frequency than resonance, all bets are off, no matter what impedance coax you use. He could use a broadband UNUN at the back of the receiver Mr. Clueless. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:01 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com