|
A Promise Kept
W said he was a uniter. However, because of his war and many other
issues, the country was greatly divided. It didn't seem like he would be able to keep his promise to unite the country. However, he finally did keep his promise. * He united the country to put Obama in office in a *landslide*. * He united the country to give the Republican Party its biggest spanking in history. Truly and sincerely, Heck of a job, Georgie! |
A Promise Kept
"Billy Burpelson" wrote in message
... * He united the country to put Obama in office in a *landslide*. I wouldn't call it a "landslide". A solid majority yes, but not a landslide. A true landslide was Reagan's 1984 win. 49 states. The only state to go Democratic was Mondale's home state of Minnesota, which he barely won. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._pr...election,_1984 Or Nixon's in 1972. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...election,_1972 These are true landslides. Carrying 29 states and winning by a 5% margin is not my idea of a landslide. |
A Promise Kept
On Nov 6, 6:42*pm, "Bob Campbell" wrote:
"Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... * He united the country to put Obama in office in a *landslide*. I wouldn't call it a "landslide". * A solid majority yes, but not a landslide. * A true landslide was Reagan's 1984 win. *49 states. * The only state to go Democratic was Mondale's home state of Minnesota, which he barely won. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._pr...election,_1984 Or Nixon's in 1972. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...election,_1972 These are true landslides. Carrying 29 states and winning by a 5% margin is not my idea of a landslide. ACORN FRAUD! |
A Promise Kept
On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 19:25:40 -0500, Billy Burpelson
wrote: W said he was a uniter. However, because of his war and many other issues, the country was greatly divided. It didn't seem like he would be able to keep his promise to unite the country. However, he finally did keep his promise. * He united the country to put Obama in office in a *landslide*. * He united the country to give the Republican Party its biggest spanking in history. Truly and sincerely, Heck of a job, Georgie! Your calling 6% more votes a landslide? Perhaps you need to refer to the definition of the term "landslide". 27 states do not a "landslide" make. Obama got a million more votes than Bush did in 04. And you all said then that Bush had nowhere near enough popular vote to have a mandate. So you're saying that the left lied then? BTW, THESE were "Landslides": (results in electoral votes) Theodore Roosevelt over Alton Parker in 1904, 336-140. -Woodrow Wilson over Roosevelt and William Taft in 1912, 435-96. -Warren Harding over James Cox in 1920, 404-127. -Herbert Hoover over Alfred Smith in 1928, 444-87. -Franklin Roosevelt in all four of his elections, with electoral votes of 472, 523, 449 and 432. -Lyndon Johnson over Barry Goldwater in 1964, 486-52. -Richard Nixon over George McGovern in 1972, 520-17. -Ronald Reagan over Walter Mondale in 1984, 525-13. Regards §tarkiller© "Many of you are well enough off that ... the tax cuts may have helped you," Sen. Clinton said. "We're saying that for America to get back on track, we're probably going to cut that short and not give it to you. We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." |
A Promise Kept
"§tarkiller©" wrote in message ... BTW, THESE were "Landslides": (results in electoral votes) Theodore Roosevelt over Alton Parker in 1904, 336-140. The current electoral count stands at Obama 349, McCain 147. I have no data on how many members of the House of Representatives have been added since the T. Roosevelt administration. -Woodrow Wilson over Roosevelt and William Taft in 1912, 435-96. -Warren Harding over James Cox in 1920, 404-127. -Herbert Hoover over Alfred Smith in 1928, 444-87. -Franklin Roosevelt in all four of his elections, with electoral votes of 472, 523, 449 and 432. -Lyndon Johnson over Barry Goldwater in 1964, 486-52. -Richard Nixon over George McGovern in 1972, 520-17. -Ronald Reagan over Walter Mondale in 1984, 525-13. |
A Promise Kept
On Fri, 7 Nov 2008 10:34:34 +0900, "Brenda Ann"
wrote: "§tarkiller©" wrote in message .. . BTW, THESE were "Landslides": (results in electoral votes) Theodore Roosevelt over Alton Parker in 1904, 336-140. The current electoral count stands at Obama 349, McCain 147. I have no data on how many members of the House of Representatives have been added since the T. Roosevelt administration. That particular electoral total is a bit misleading on the surface. Roosevelt got a lot wider margin in the popular vote percentage wise and he got all but 12 states. -Woodrow Wilson over Roosevelt and William Taft in 1912, 435-96. -Warren Harding over James Cox in 1920, 404-127. -Herbert Hoover over Alfred Smith in 1928, 444-87. -Franklin Roosevelt in all four of his elections, with electoral votes of 472, 523, 449 and 432. -Lyndon Johnson over Barry Goldwater in 1964, 486-52. -Richard Nixon over George McGovern in 1972, 520-17. -Ronald Reagan over Walter Mondale in 1984, 525-13. Regards §tarkiller© "Many of you are well enough off that ... the tax cuts may have helped you," Sen. Clinton said. "We're saying that for America to get back on track, we're probably going to cut that short and not give it to you. We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." |
A Promise Kept
Bob Campbell wrote:
"Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... * He united the country to put Obama in office in a *landslide*. I wouldn't call it a "landslide". A solid majority yes, but not a landslide. A true landslide was Reagan's 1984 win. 49 states. The only state to go Democratic was Mondale's home state of Minnesota, which he barely won. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._pr...election,_1984 Or Nixon's in 1972. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...election,_1972 These are true landslides. Carrying 29 states and winning by a 5% margin is not my idea of a landslide. I was referring to the electoral votes, which as you know, is how presidents are elected. Obama (364) to McCain (162)*. Some would call this a landslide. Your mileage may vary. *Approximate figures as of 11/06/08 from: http://news.yahoo.com/election/2008/dashboard |
A Promise Kept
§tarkiller© wrote:
On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 19:25:40 -0500, Billy Burpelson wrote: W said he was a uniter. However, because of his war and many other issues, the country was greatly divided. It didn't seem like he would be able to keep his promise to unite the country. However, he finally did keep his promise. * He united the country to put Obama in office in a *landslide*. * He united the country to give the Republican Party its biggest spanking in history. Truly and sincerely, Heck of a job, Georgie! Your calling 6% more votes a landslide? I was referring to the electoral votes, which as you know, is how presidents are actually elected. Obama (364) to McCain (162)*. Some would call this a landslide. Your mileage may vary. *Approximate figures as of 11/06/08 from: http://news.yahoo.com/election/2008/dashboard |
A Promise Kept
"Billy Burpelson" wrote in message
... Bob Campbell wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... * He united the country to put Obama in office in a *landslide*. I wouldn't call it a "landslide". A solid majority yes, but not a landslide. A true landslide was Reagan's 1984 win. 49 states. The only state to go Democratic was Mondale's home state of Minnesota, which he barely won. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._pr...election,_1984 Or Nixon's in 1972. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...election,_1972 These are true landslides. Carrying 29 states and winning by a 5% margin is not my idea of a landslide. I was referring to the electoral votes, which as you know, is how presidents are elected. An electoral landslide is 525 to 13 (Reagan over Mondale). Obama (364) to McCain (162)*. Some would call this a landslide. Your mileage may vary. Some would call Obama a "Marxist". Your mileage may vary. See how easy that is? You can say a rock is a tree. Calling a rock a tree does not make it a tree. This election was not a landslide, unless we are redefining "landslide" to mean "win". |
A Promise Kept
"Billy Burpelson" wrote in message
... Your calling 6% more votes a landslide? I was referring to the electoral votes, which as you know, is how presidents are actually elected. Obama (364) to McCain (162)*. Some would call this a landslide. Your mileage may vary. Your repeating this does not make it true. |
A Promise Kept
In article ,
Billy Burpelson wrote: Bob Campbell wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... * He united the country to put Obama in office in a *landslide*. I wouldn't call it a "landslide". A solid majority yes, but not a landslide. A true landslide was Reagan's 1984 win. 49 states. The only state to go Democratic was Mondale's home state of Minnesota, which he barely won. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._pr...election,_1984 Or Nixon's in 1972. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...election,_1972 These are true landslides. Carrying 29 states and winning by a 5% margin is not my idea of a landslide. I was referring to the electoral votes, which as you know, is how presidents are elected. Obama (364) to McCain (162)*. Some would call this a landslide. Your mileage may vary. *Approximate figures as of 11/06/08 from: http://news.yahoo.com/election/2008/dashboard It's not right to look at electoral votes this way using words like landslide. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
A Promise Kept
Comrade Barak Obama is not America's next president.
www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd411.htm B HO! cuhulin |
A Promise Kept
"Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... Bob Campbell wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... * He united the country to put Obama in office in a *landslide*. I wouldn't call it a "landslide". A solid majority yes, but not a landslide. A true landslide was Reagan's 1984 win. 49 states. The only state to go Democratic was Mondale's home state of Minnesota, which he barely won. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._pr...election,_1984 Or Nixon's in 1972. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...election,_1972 These are true landslides. Carrying 29 states and winning by a 5% margin is not my idea of a landslide. I was referring to the electoral votes, which as you know, is how presidents are elected. Bob Campbell wrote: An electoral landslide is 525 to 13 (Reagan over Mondale). Obama (364) to McCain (162)*. Some would call this a landslide. Your mileage may vary. Some would call Obama a "Marxist". But then, they would probably be called kooktards. This election was not a landslide, unless we are redefining "landslide" to mean "win". No, you are playing a game of semantics. Just because Reagan/Mondale was a bigger landslide doesn't mean this election -wasn't- also a landslide. Most people would define getting more than double the votes of the runner-up as a landslide, albeit not as dramatic as your Ronnie example, but a landslide none the less. In any event, you miss the -main- point of the original post. It wasn't to play semantics, it -was- to point out the irony of how W united the country -- just not in the way that he planned. |
A Promise Kept
In article , Billy Burpelson wrote: Bob Campbell wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... * He united the country to put Obama in office in a *landslide*. I wouldn't call it a "landslide". A solid majority yes, but not a landslide. A true landslide was Reagan's 1984 win. 49 states. The only state to go Democratic was Mondale's home state of Minnesota, which he barely won. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._pr...election,_1984 Or Nixon's in 1972. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...election,_1972 These are true landslides. Carrying 29 states and winning by a 5% margin is not my idea of a landslide. I was referring to the electoral votes, which as you know, is how presidents are elected. Obama (364) to McCain (162)*. Some would call this a landslide. Your mileage may vary. *Approximate figures as of 11/06/08 from: http://news.yahoo.com/election/2008/dashboard Telamon wrote: It's not right to look at electoral votes this way using words like landslide. And why not, pray tell? Electoral votes are -exactly- what is used to determine the winner. And if the winner gets -more than double- the votes of the runner-up, most *intelligent* people would consider that a landslide. However, it's certainly your prerogative to call it whatever you wish. In any event, you miss the -main- point of the original post. It wasn't to play semantics, it -was- to point out the irony of how W united the country -- just not in the way that he planned. But then, I shouldn't be surprised. Your specialty is spinning, dodging and doing everything -but- addressing the original topics. |
A Promise Kept
"Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... Your calling 6% more votes a landslide? I was referring to the electoral votes, which as you know, is how presidents are actually elected. Obama (364) to McCain (162)*. Some would call this a landslide. Your mileage may vary. Bob Campbell wrote: Your repeating this does not make it true. Your playing semantics does not make it false. |
A Promise Kept
In article ,
Billy Burpelson wrote: In article , Billy Burpelson wrote: Bob Campbell wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... * He united the country to put Obama in office in a *landslide*. I wouldn't call it a "landslide". A solid majority yes, but not a landslide. A true landslide was Reagan's 1984 win. 49 states. The only state to go Democratic was Mondale's home state of Minnesota, which he barely won. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._pr...election,_1984 Or Nixon's in 1972. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...election,_1972 These are true landslides. Carrying 29 states and winning by a 5% margin is not my idea of a landslide. I was referring to the electoral votes, which as you know, is how presidents are elected. Obama (364) to McCain (162)*. Some would call this a landslide. Your mileage may vary. *Approximate figures as of 11/06/08 from: http://news.yahoo.com/election/2008/dashboard Telamon wrote: It's not right to look at electoral votes this way using words like landslide. And why not, pray tell? Electoral votes are -exactly- what is used to determine the winner. SNIP OK, it is yet another concept beyond your ken then. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
A Promise Kept
In article ,
Billy Burpelson wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... Bob Campbell wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... * He united the country to put Obama in office in a *landslide*. I wouldn't call it a "landslide". A solid majority yes, but not a landslide. A true landslide was Reagan's 1984 win. 49 states. The only state to go Democratic was Mondale's home state of Minnesota, which he barely won. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._pr...election,_1984 Or Nixon's in 1972. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...election,_1972 These are true landslides. Carrying 29 states and winning by a 5% margin is not my idea of a landslide. I was referring to the electoral votes, which as you know, is how presidents are elected. Bob Campbell wrote: An electoral landslide is 525 to 13 (Reagan over Mondale). Obama (364) to McCain (162)*. Some would call this a landslide. Your mileage may vary. Some would call Obama a "Marxist". But then, they would probably be called kooktards. SNIP He is a marxist you twit. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
A Promise Kept
In article ,
Billy Burpelson wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... Your calling 6% more votes a landslide? I was referring to the electoral votes, which as you know, is how presidents are actually elected. Obama (364) to McCain (162)*. Some would call this a landslide. Your mileage may vary. Bob Campbell wrote: Your repeating this does not make it true. Your playing semantics does not make it false. Your cluelessness does not make it true. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
A Promise Kept
In article telamon_spamshield-64EA0B.00232807112008
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net, lid says... In article , Billy Burpelson wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... Your calling 6% more votes a landslide? I was referring to the electoral votes, which as you know, is how presidents are actually elected. Obama (364) to McCain (162)*. Some would call this a landslide. Your mileage may vary. Bob Campbell wrote: Your repeating this does not make it true. Your playing semantics does not make it false. Your cluelessness does not make it true. Your kooktardery DOES make you funny. -- BDK BDK Klan leader? kOOk Magnet! NJJ CLUB #1 Shillmaster |
(OT) : Barack Hussein Obama 2008 US Presidential Election : AResounding Win
On Nov 7, 1:27*am, RHF wrote:
Dear Lord God {Allah} may Barack Hussein Obama take his Oath-of-Office and Serve All the American People with Honor and Distinction; and may the USA Prosper under his Stewardship and Leadership - Amen ~ RHF * .- Hide quoted text - I just have to say this RHF, you keep stating "Dear Lord God {Allah}." I don't want to get into a ****ing match with you and I am sure you'll provide many a links but I have never (until you) ever heard or read in the history of my life "Lord God {Allah}." It seems you have somewhat fallen into the trap so too speak, no where in my Bible or from any pulpit have I ever heard Lord God called "Allah". From what I know Allah wasn't crucified and rose from the dead three days later.....just thought I'd mention that. I know a group of people though that love to read that. Allah? Lord please help us. |
A Promise Kept
On Nov 7, 4:06*am, BDK wrote:
In article telamon_spamshield-DC6C89.00224607112008 @newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net, says... In article , *Billy Burpelson wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... Bob Campbell wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message .. . * He united the country to put Obama in office in a *landslide*. I wouldn't call it a "landslide". * A solid majority yes, but not a landslide. * A true landslide was Reagan's 1984 win. *49 states. * The only state to go Democratic was Mondale's home state of Minnesota, which he barely won. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._pr...election,_1984 Or Nixon's in 1972. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...election,_1972 These are true landslides. Carrying 29 states and winning by a 5% margin is not my idea of a landslide. I was referring to the electoral votes, which as you know, is how presidents are elected. Bob Campbell wrote: An electoral landslide is 525 to 13 (Reagan over Mondale). Obama (364) to McCain (162)*. Some would call this a landslide. Your mileage may vary. Some would call Obama a "Marxist". But then, they would probably be called *kooktards. SNIP He is a marxist you twit. No, he isn't, but you are a kooktard. -- BDK BDK Klan leader? kOOk Magnet! NJJ CLUB #1 Shillmaster- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - But yet you proudly state that you are a Klan Leader/Kook/ Shill.....lol.rolling my eyes |
more off topic garbage from rhf aka retired halfassed fool
Shortwave radio enthusiasts have a right to enjoy a newsgroup
which was established for them and is supposed to be dedicated to shortwave radio information. And they have a right to do so without wading through all the off topic garbage you post and it isn't incumbent upon them to filter obnoxious morons like you out, also many don't have the capability to do so. Start behaving like a responsible adult and filter yourself by posting your nonsense in the appropriate newsgroups. |
A Promise Kept
In article ,
BDK wrote: In article telamon_spamshield-DC6C89.00224607112008 @newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net, lid says... In article , Billy Burpelson wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... Bob Campbell wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... * He united the country to put Obama in office in a *landslide*. I wouldn't call it a "landslide". A solid majority yes, but not a landslide. A true landslide was Reagan's 1984 win. 49 states. The only state to go Democratic was Mondale's home state of Minnesota, which he barely won. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._pr...election,_1984 Or Nixon's in 1972. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...election,_1972 These are true landslides. Carrying 29 states and winning by a 5% margin is not my idea of a landslide. I was referring to the electoral votes, which as you know, is how presidents are elected. Bob Campbell wrote: An electoral landslide is 525 to 13 (Reagan over Mondale). Obama (364) to McCain (162)*. Some would call this a landslide. Your mileage may vary. Some would call Obama a "Marxist". But then, they would probably be called kooktards. SNIP He is a marxist you twit. No, he isn't, but you are a kooktard. You are the kook 'tard. You post like one and it's in your sig. Yeah, and you are a shillmaster. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
A Promise Kept
In article ,
BDK wrote: In article 943fcfd3-2c14-4ca5-95cf-f1b7fdc5eb83 @e38g2000prn.googlegroups.com, says... On Nov 7, 4:06*am, BDK wrote: In article telamon_spamshield-DC6C89.00224607112008 @newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net, says... In article , *Billy Burpelson wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... Bob Campbell wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message .. . * He united the country to put Obama in office in a *landslide*. I wouldn't call it a "landslide". * A solid majority yes, but not a landslide. * A true landslide was Reagan's 1984 win. *49 states. * The only state to go Democratic was Mondale's home state of Minnesota, which he barely won. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._pr...election,_1984 Or Nixon's in 1972. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...al_election,_1 972 These are true landslides. Carrying 29 states and winning by a 5% margin is not my idea of a landslide. I was referring to the electoral votes, which as you know, is how presidents are elected. Bob Campbell wrote: An electoral landslide is 525 to 13 (Reagan over Mondale). Obama (364) to McCain (162)*. Some would call this a landslide. Your mileage may vary. Some would call Obama a "Marxist". But then, they would probably be called *kooktards. SNIP He is a marxist you twit. No, he isn't, but you are a kooktard. -- BDK BDK Klan leader? kOOk Magnet! NJJ CLUB #1 Shillmaster- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - But yet you proudly state that you are a Klan Leader/Kook/ Shill.....lol.rolling my eyes It's a joke. The joke is on you apparently. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
A Promise Kept
In article ,
BDK wrote: In article telamon_spamshield-64EA0B.00232807112008 @newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net, lid says... In article , Billy Burpelson wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... Your calling 6% more votes a landslide? I was referring to the electoral votes, which as you know, is how presidents are actually elected. Obama (364) to McCain (162)*. Some would call this a landslide. Your mileage may vary. Bob Campbell wrote: Your repeating this does not make it true. Your playing semantics does not make it false. Your cluelessness does not make it true. Your kooktardery DOES make you funny. Your mediocrity isn't kooktard. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
A Promise Kept
In article telamon_spamshield-B30024.21125007112008
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net, lid says... In article , BDK wrote: In article telamon_spamshield-DC6C89.00224607112008 @newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net, lid says... In article , Billy Burpelson wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... Bob Campbell wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... * He united the country to put Obama in office in a *landslide*. I wouldn't call it a "landslide". A solid majority yes, but not a landslide. A true landslide was Reagan's 1984 win. 49 states. The only state to go Democratic was Mondale's home state of Minnesota, which he barely won. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._pr...election,_1984 Or Nixon's in 1972. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...election,_1972 These are true landslides. Carrying 29 states and winning by a 5% margin is not my idea of a landslide. I was referring to the electoral votes, which as you know, is how presidents are elected. Bob Campbell wrote: An electoral landslide is 525 to 13 (Reagan over Mondale). Obama (364) to McCain (162)*. Some would call this a landslide. Your mileage may vary. Some would call Obama a "Marxist". But then, they would probably be called kooktards. SNIP He is a marxist you twit. No, he isn't, but you are a kooktard. You are the kook 'tard. You post like one and it's in your sig. Apparently, you can't read. It says "kOOk Magnet". That means I attract kooks. Like...you.. Yeah, and you are a shillmaster. Is that right? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! You better hope it isn't true, or you're screwed. -- BDK BDK Klan leader? kOOk Magnet! NJJ CLUB #1 Shillmaster |
A Promise Kept
In article telamon_spamshield-406159.21151407112008
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net, lid says... In article , BDK wrote: In article telamon_spamshield-64EA0B.00232807112008 @newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net, lid says... In article , Billy Burpelson wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... Your calling 6% more votes a landslide? I was referring to the electoral votes, which as you know, is how presidents are actually elected. Obama (364) to McCain (162)*. Some would call this a landslide. Your mileage may vary. Bob Campbell wrote: Your repeating this does not make it true. Your playing semantics does not make it false. Your cluelessness does not make it true. Your kooktardery DOES make you funny. Your mediocrity isn't kooktard. I am to sane folks. I know that doesn't apply to you, but hey, you are a worthwhile person..After all, someone has to be the deluded clown. -- BDK BDK Klan leader? kOOk Magnet! NJJ CLUB #1 Shillmaster |
(OT) : RHF -why-i-say- God {Allah} Bless America and AllAmericans - Amen
On Nov 7, 11:48*am, RHF wrote:
On Nov 7, 5:14*am, BCBlazysusan wrote: On Nov 7, 1:27*am, RHF wrote: Dear Lord God {Allah} may Barack Hussein Obama take his Oath-of-Office and Serve All the American People with Honor and Distinction; and may the USA Prosper under his Stewardship and Leadership - Amen ~ RHF * .- Hide quoted text - I just have to say this RHF, you keep stating "Dear Lord God {Allah}." I don't want to get into a ****ing match with you and I am sure you'll provide many a links but I have never (until you) ever heard or read in the history of my life "Lord God {Allah}." It seems you have somewhat fallen into the trap so too speak, no where in my Bible or from any pulpit have I ever heard Lord God called "Allah". From what I know Allah wasn't crucified and rose from the dead three days later.....just thought I'd mention that. I know a group of people though that love to read that. Allah? Lord please help us. BCB LazySusan, The Islam-O-Fascists 'claim' to be Attacking the USA and Americans : In-the-Name-of-Allah. God {Allah} is am In-Your-Face Statement "God Bless America and All Americans" -translation- 'Allah Bless America and All Americans' Meaning : God {Allah} Is Good -while- The Islam-O-Fascist Are Bad The Word "Lord" [God] is a Self-Recognition that We 'choose' {surrender/submission} to Put "God" Above Us. The Word "Dear" [God -or- Lord God] is the Self-Admission that We 'hold' {internalize} "God" and Our-Relationship with Our+God as 'Something Special' {Fulfilling+Adoration} To Us and Our Inner-Being. So often a Pray starts with "Dear Lord God" . . . Call Your Deity "God" "Jesus" "Allah" "Buddha" 'whatever' : I Call On All Deities to Bless the USA and Protect All Americans.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deity I DO NOT CONCEDE THAT IT IS THE WILL OF 'ALLAH' TO ATTACK THE USA AND KILL AMERICANS [.] Hence the Name of {Allah} after the Name "God". Once Again I will Close with the Statement : God {Allah} Bless America and All Americans - Amen ~ RHF *.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - OK, I guess I know what you mean but just seeing the Lord God with Allah next to it kind of gives me the creeps. Sooner rather than later the entire world shall see whos God is the greatest. I bet I know the winner. ;-) |
A Promise Kept
On Nov 7, 12:10*pm, BDK wrote:
In article 943fcfd3-2c14-4ca5-95cf-f1b7fdc5eb83 @e38g2000prn.googlegroups.com, says... On Nov 7, 4:06*am, BDK wrote: In article telamon_spamshield-DC6C89.00224607112008 @newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net, says... In article , *Billy Burpelson wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... Bob Campbell wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message .. . * He united the country to put Obama in office in a *landslide*. I wouldn't call it a "landslide". * A solid majority yes, but not a landslide. * A true landslide was Reagan's 1984 win. *49 states. * The only state to go Democratic was Mondale's home state of Minnesota, which he barely won. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._pr...election,_1984 Or Nixon's in 1972. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...election,_1972 These are true landslides. Carrying 29 states and winning by a 5% margin is not my idea of a landslide. I was referring to the electoral votes, which as you know, is how presidents are elected. Bob Campbell wrote: An electoral landslide is 525 to 13 (Reagan over Mondale). Obama (364) to McCain (162)*. Some would call this a landslide.. Your mileage may vary. Some would call Obama a "Marxist". But then, they would probably be called *kooktards. SNIP He is a marxist you twit. No, he isn't, but you are a kooktard. -- BDK BDK Klan leader? kOOk Magnet! NJJ CLUB #1 Shillmaster- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - But yet you proudly state that you are a Klan Leader/Kook/ Shill.....lol.rolling my eyes It's a joke. Some people don't get it. If you were in alt.conspiracy, you probably would. Maybe not. Whatever. -- BDK BDK Klan leader? kOOk Magnet! NJJ CLUB #1 Shillmaster- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Oh but I thought I was a conspiracy nut according to you and others? Heaven forbid I state the facts about Barack Husseins lolol Obama's ties....according to you and everyone else who loves the messiah Hussein we are fools and conspiracy nuts. He is good for this country. shaking my head |
(OT) : RHF -why-i-say- God {Allah} Bless America and AllAmericans - Amen
On Nov 7, 1:19*pm, Bob Dobbs wrote:
RHF wrote: Once Again I will Close with the Statement : God {Allah} Bless America and All Americans - Amen ~ RHF ...and an empty statement it is, despite your syncretic efforts, since there isn't any god, allah, jehovah, yahweh, elohim, or any other of the sundry names the cretins ascribe to the expedient answer to their lack of inspired contemplation. -- Operator Bob Echo Charlie 42 **sigh** Anyone who makes sure their posts are taken away from the archives has no credibility. Just my opinion Bob. |
A Promise Kept
On Nov 8, 12:12*am, Telamon
wrote: In article , *BDK wrote: In article telamon_spamshield-DC6C89.00224607112008 @newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net, says... In article , *Billy Burpelson wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... Bob Campbell wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message .. . * He united the country to put Obama in office in a *landslide*. I wouldn't call it a "landslide". * A solid majority yes, but not a landslide. * A true landslide was Reagan's 1984 win. *49 states. * The only state to go Democratic was Mondale's home state of Minnesota, which he barely won. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._pr...election,_1984 Or Nixon's in 1972. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...election,_1972 These are true landslides. Carrying 29 states and winning by a 5% margin is not my idea of a landslide. I was referring to the electoral votes, which as you know, is how presidents are elected. Bob Campbell wrote: An electoral landslide is 525 to 13 (Reagan over Mondale). Obama (364) to McCain (162)*. Some would call this a landslide. Your mileage may vary. Some would call Obama a "Marxist". But then, they would probably be called *kooktards. SNIP He is a marxist you twit. No, he isn't, but you are a kooktard. You are the kook 'tard. You post like one and it's in your sig. Yeah, and you are a shillmaster. -- Telamon Ventura, California- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Heck yes Telamon, he got paid 50cents a post from Barack Hussein Obama. You know......"Spreadin' the Wealth." ;-) |
A Promise Kept
In article 101ee35f-da93-4a28-81e6-bc1c65d58245
@r36g2000prf.googlegroups.com, says... On Nov 7, 12:10*pm, BDK wrote: In article 943fcfd3-2c14-4ca5-95cf-f1b7fdc5eb83 @e38g2000prn.googlegroups.com, says... On Nov 7, 4:06*am, BDK wrote: In article telamon_spamshield-DC6C89.00224607112008 @newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net, says... In article , *Billy Burpelson wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... Bob Campbell wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message .. . * He united the country to put Obama in office in a *landslide*. I wouldn't call it a "landslide". * A solid majority yes, but not a landslide. * A true landslide was Reagan's 1984 win. *49 states. * The only state to go Democratic was Mondale's home state of Minnesota, which he barely won. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._pr...election,_1984 Or Nixon's in 1972. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...election,_1972 These are true landslides. Carrying 29 states and winning by a 5% margin is not my idea of a landslide. I was referring to the electoral votes, which as you know, is how presidents are elected. Bob Campbell wrote: An electoral landslide is 525 to 13 (Reagan over Mondale). Obama (364) to McCain (162)*. Some would call this a landslide. Your mileage may vary. Some would call Obama a "Marxist". But then, they would probably be called *kooktards. SNIP He is a marxist you twit. No, he isn't, but you are a kooktard. -- BDK BDK Klan leader? kOOk Magnet! NJJ CLUB #1 Shillmaster- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - But yet you proudly state that you are a Klan Leader/Kook/ Shill.....lol.rolling my eyes It's a joke. Some people don't get it. If you were in alt.conspiracy, you probably would. Maybe not. Whatever. -- BDK BDK Klan leader? kOOk Magnet! NJJ CLUB #1 Shillmaster- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Oh but I thought I was a conspiracy nut according to you and others? Heaven forbid I state the facts about Barack Husseins lolol Obama's ties....according to you and everyone else who loves the messiah Hussein we are fools and conspiracy nuts. He is good for this country. shaking my head I'm not saying Obama is" The Messiah", "special" or anything else. That seems to be some sort of delusion that some folks have, like some folks have some delusion he's the devil or whatever. I'm talking about the birth certificate nonsense, and the "chicken little, the sky is falling" reaction to his getting elected. It's going to be awfully hard for him to outdo Bush in the bad president contest. -- BDK BDK Klan leader? kOOk Magnet! NJJ CLUB #1 Shillmaster |
A Promise Kept
In article cd9b8ae1-3112-4f85-bbcc-e2bcdf8a43a4
@c22g2000prc.googlegroups.com, says... On Nov 8, 12:12*am, Telamon wrote: In article , *BDK wrote: In article telamon_spamshield-DC6C89.00224607112008 @newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net, says... In article , *Billy Burpelson wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... Bob Campbell wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message .. . * He united the country to put Obama in office in a *landslide*. I wouldn't call it a "landslide". * A solid majority yes, but not a landslide. * A true landslide was Reagan's 1984 win. *49 states. * The only state to go Democratic was Mondale's home state of Minnesota, which he barely won. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._pr...election,_1984 Or Nixon's in 1972. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...election,_1972 These are true landslides. Carrying 29 states and winning by a 5% margin is not my idea of a landslide. I was referring to the electoral votes, which as you know, is how presidents are elected. Bob Campbell wrote: An electoral landslide is 525 to 13 (Reagan over Mondale). Obama (364) to McCain (162)*. Some would call this a landslide.. Your mileage may vary. Some would call Obama a "Marxist". But then, they would probably be called *kooktards. SNIP He is a marxist you twit. No, he isn't, but you are a kooktard. You are the kook 'tard. You post like one and it's in your sig. Yeah, and you are a shillmaster. -- Telamon Ventura, California- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Heck yes Telamon, he got paid 50cents a post from Barack Hussein Obama. You know......"Spreadin' the Wealth." ;-) No no, I get paid a dollar a pop by Dick Cheney to **** with 911 kooktards, the other stuff is just for kicks... ROTFL -- BDK BDK Klan leader? kOOk Magnet! NJJ CLUB #1 Shillmaster |
A Promise Kept
In article ,
BDK wrote: In article telamon_spamshield-B30024.21125007112008 @newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net, lid says... In article , BDK wrote: In article telamon_spamshield-DC6C89.00224607112008 @newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net, lid says... In article , Billy Burpelson wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... Bob Campbell wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... * He united the country to put Obama in office in a *landslide*. I wouldn't call it a "landslide". A solid majority yes, but not a landslide. A true landslide was Reagan's 1984 win. 49 states. The only state to go Democratic was Mondale's home state of Minnesota, which he barely won. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._pr...election,_1984 Or Nixon's in 1972. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...ial_election,_ 1972 These are true landslides. Carrying 29 states and winning by a 5% margin is not my idea of a landslide. I was referring to the electoral votes, which as you know, is how presidents are elected. Bob Campbell wrote: An electoral landslide is 525 to 13 (Reagan over Mondale). Obama (364) to McCain (162)*. Some would call this a landslide. Your mileage may vary. Some would call Obama a "Marxist". But then, they would probably be called kooktards. SNIP He is a marxist you twit. No, he isn't, but you are a kooktard. You are the kook 'tard. You post like one and it's in your sig. Apparently, you can't read. It says "kOOk Magnet". That means I attract kooks. Like...you.. Sure thing KOOK. Yeah, and you are a shillmaster. Is that right? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! You better hope it isn't true, or you're screwed. Take your meds and settle down or you will have to be restrained again. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
A Promise Kept
In article ,
BDK wrote: In article telamon_spamshield-406159.21151407112008 @newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net, lid says... In article , BDK wrote: In article telamon_spamshield-64EA0B.00232807112008 @newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net, lid says... In article , Billy Burpelson wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... Your calling 6% more votes a landslide? I was referring to the electoral votes, which as you know, is how presidents are actually elected. Obama (364) to McCain (162)*. Some would call this a landslide. Your mileage may vary. Bob Campbell wrote: Your repeating this does not make it true. Your playing semantics does not make it false. Your cluelessness does not make it true. Your kooktardery DOES make you funny. Your mediocrity isn't kooktard. I am to sane folks. I know that doesn't apply to you, but hey, you are a worthwhile person..After all, someone has to be the deluded clown. The other KOOKS don't count in sanity assessments. Why the default clown act? -- Telamon Ventura, California |
A Promise Kept
In article
, BCBlazysusan wrote: On Nov 8, 12:12*am, Telamon wrote: In article , *BDK wrote: In article telamon_spamshield-DC6C89.00224607112008 @newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net, says... In article , *Billy Burpelson wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... Bob Campbell wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message .. . * He united the country to put Obama in office in a *landslide*. I wouldn't call it a "landslide". * A solid majority yes, but not a landslide. * A true landslide was Reagan's 1984 win. *49 states. * The only state to go Democratic was Mondale's home state of Minnesota, which he barely won. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._pr...election,_1984 Or Nixon's in 1972. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...al_election,_1 972 These are true landslides. Carrying 29 states and winning by a 5% margin is not my idea of a landslide. I was referring to the electoral votes, which as you know, is how presidents are elected. Bob Campbell wrote: An electoral landslide is 525 to 13 (Reagan over Mondale). Obama (364) to McCain (162)*. Some would call this a landslide. Your mileage may vary. Some would call Obama a "Marxist". But then, they would probably be called *kooktards. SNIP He is a marxist you twit. No, he isn't, but you are a kooktard. You are the kook 'tard. You post like one and it's in your sig. Yeah, and you are a shillmaster. Heck yes Telamon, he got paid 50cents a post from Barack Hussein Obama. You know......"Spreadin' the Wealth." ;-) Economic opportunities for the rubber room bound are far and few. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
A Promise Kept
In article ,
BDK wrote: In article cd9b8ae1-3112-4f85-bbcc-e2bcdf8a43a4 @c22g2000prc.googlegroups.com, says... On Nov 8, 12:12*am, Telamon wrote: In article , *BDK wrote: In article telamon_spamshield-DC6C89.00224607112008 @newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net, says... In article , *Billy Burpelson wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... Bob Campbell wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message .. . * He united the country to put Obama in office in a *landslide*. I wouldn't call it a "landslide". * A solid majority yes, but not a landslide. * A true landslide was Reagan's 1984 win. *49 states. * The only state to go Democratic was Mondale's home state of Minnesota, which he barely won. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._pr...election,_1984 Or Nixon's in 1972. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...ntial_election, _1972 These are true landslides. Carrying 29 states and winning by a 5% margin is not my idea of a landslide. I was referring to the electoral votes, which as you know, is how presidents are elected. Bob Campbell wrote: An electoral landslide is 525 to 13 (Reagan over Mondale). Obama (364) to McCain (162)*. Some would call this a landslide. Your mileage may vary. Some would call Obama a "Marxist". But then, they would probably be called *kooktards. SNIP He is a marxist you twit. No, he isn't, but you are a kooktard. You are the kook 'tard. You post like one and it's in your sig. Yeah, and you are a shillmaster. -- Telamon Ventura, California- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Heck yes Telamon, he got paid 50cents a post from Barack Hussein Obama. You know......"Spreadin' the Wealth." ;-) No no, I get paid a dollar a pop by Dick Cheney to **** with 911 kooktards, the other stuff is just for kicks... ROTFL You get paid by the report a smear fascists. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
(OT) : RHF -why-i-say- God {Allah} Bless America and AllAmericans - Amen
On Nov 8, 2:56*am, BCBlazysusan wrote:
On Nov 7, 1:19*pm, Bob Dobbs wrote: RHF wrote: Once Again I will Close with the Statement : God {Allah} Bless America and All Americans - Amen ~ RHF ...and an empty statement it is, despite your syncretic efforts, since there isn't any god, allah, jehovah, yahweh, elohim, or any other of the sundry names the cretins ascribe to the expedient answer to their lack of inspired contemplation. -- Operator Bob Echo Charlie 42 **sigh** Anyone who makes sure their posts are taken away from the archives has no credibility. Just my opinion Bob. BCB LzS, =IF= You Post to His Post and the Text of His Post are then 'embedded' in Your Post with His Posting ID : The prior Post is "In-the-Archives" forever. :o) ~ RHF |
(OT) : Barack Hussein Obama 2008 US Presidential Election : AResounding Win
On Nov 7, 8:14*am, BCBlazysusan wrote:
On Nov 7, 1:27*am, RHF wrote: Dear Lord God {Allah} may Barack Hussein Obama take his Oath-of-Office and Serve All the American People with Honor and Distinction; and may the USA Prosper under his Stewardship and Leadership - Amen ~ RHF I just have to say this RHF, you keep stating "Dear Lord God {Allah}." I don't want to get into a ****ing match with you and I am sure you'll provide many a links but I have never (until you) ever heard or read in the history of my life "Lord God {Allah}." It seems you have somewhat fallen into the trap so too speak, no where in my Bible or from any pulpit have I ever heard Lord God called "Allah". From what I know Allah wasn't crucified and rose from the dead three days later.....just thought I'd mention that. I know a group of people though that love to read that. Allah? Lord please help us. This group cracks me up. Shortwave Radio? Huh? All I see is this "religious secret language" in here ie; {Allah} Bibel etc. etc. etc. what a joke of a group IMO. I thought I would visit here to read some great posts and opinions about the Grundig 750. Nada - nothing. Enough said. Have fun all you "cool kids" shaking my head and rolling my eyes Usenet- gotta love it. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:39 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com