Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 13th 08, 01:36 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave,alt.religion.christian,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.republicans,alt.news-media
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2008
Posts: 123
Default CrAcK Head ObaMao Supports FARC - Marxist Drug Cartel in Columbia

CrAcK Head ObaMao Supports FARC - Marxist Drug Cartel in Columbia

October 15, 2008 - The Third McCain-Obama Presidential Debate
[...]
MCCAIN: Well, you know, I admire so much Senator Obama's eloquence.
And you really have to pay attention to words.
[...]
Now, on the subject of free trade agreements. I am a free trader.
[...]
But let me give you another example of a free trade agreement that
Senator Obama opposes. Right now, because of previous agreements, some
made by President Clinton, the goods and products that we send to
[democratic] Colombia, which is OUR LARGEST AGRICULTURAL IMPORTER OF
OUR PRODUCTS, is -- there's a billion dollars that we -- our
businesses have paid so far in order to get our goods in there.

Because of previous agreements, their goods and products come into our
country for free [Tax free - Americans save money]. So Senator Obama,
who has never traveled south of our border, opposes the Colombia Free
Trade Agreement. The same country that's helping us try to stop the
flow of drugs into our country that's killing young Americans.

And also the country that just freed three Americans that will help us
create jobs in America because they will be a market for our goods and
products without having to pay -- without us having to pay the
billions of dollars -- the billion dollars and more that we've already
paid.

Free trade with [democratic] Colombia is something that's a no-
brainer. But maybe you ought to travel down there and visit them and
maybe you could understand it a lot better.

OBAMA: Let me respond. Actually, I UNDERSTAND IT PRETTY WELL. The
history in Colombia right now is that [MARXIST] LABOR LEADERS have
been targeted for assassination on a fairly consistent basis [see
below] and there have not been prosecutions.

And what I have said, because the free trade -- the trade agreement
itself DOES HAVE labor and environmental protections, but we have to
stand for human rights [for marxists] and we have to make sure that
violence isn't being perpetrated against [marxist] workers [What about
marxist perpetrators?] who are just trying to organize for their
[marxist] rights, which is why, for example, I supported the Peruvian
Free Trade Agreement which was a well-structured agreement. [NOTE: The
Peruvian FTA was based on the Andean Trade Preference Act. In 1991,
under the George H. W. Bush administration, the United States enacted
the Andean Trade Preference Act. The program was renewed in 2002 by
the George W. Bush administration as the Andean Trade Promotion and
Drug Eradication Act. OBAMA did nothing! He is an obfuscator!]
[...]

MCCAIN: Well, let me just [say] that... Senator Obama doesn't want a
free trade agreement with our best ally in the region but wants to sit
down across the table without precondition with [communist dictator]
Hugo Chavez [a murderer], the guy who has been helping [marxist] FARC
[drug cartell], the terrorist organization.

Free trade between ourselves and [democratic] Colombia, I just recited
to you the benefits of concluding that agreement, a billion dollars of
American dollars that could have gone to creating jobs and businesses
in the United States, opening up those markets.

....I don't think there's any doubt that Senator OBAMA WANTS TO
RESTRICT TRADE AND HE WANTS TO RAISE TAXES. And the last president of
the United States that tried that was Herbert Hoover, and we went from
a deep recession into a depression.

We're not going to follow that path when I'm president of the United
States.
[...]
http://www.debates.org/pages/trans2008d.html
__________________________________________________ _____

In 2003 Colombian President Alvaro Uribe accused Colombian NGOs of
“politicking at the service of terrorism.” “Every time a security
policy is carried out in Colombia to defeat terrorism, when terrorists
start feeling weak, they immediately send their spokesmen to talk
about human rights.”

In 2002 over 40 Democrat members of Congress signed a letter to
Secretary of State Colin Powell alleging "human rights violations" by
the Government of Colombia in its war against the drug-running,
marxist guerrilla terrorist Colombian Revolutionary Armed Forces,
FARC, established as the military wing of the Colombian Communist
Party. This letter, published worldwide and used as pro-FARC anti-
Government of Colombia propaganda, made no mention of marxist FARC's
thousands of murders, atrocities and support from Cuban Marxist
dictator Fidel Castro and from Venezuela's Marxist caudillo Hugo
Chavez. The letter urged Secretary Powell "to take our concerns into
account when determining whether to approve additional military aid
for Colombia this year."
http://www.ciponline.org/colombia/02072301.htm

The daring rescue this past summer of French-Colombian politician
Ingrid Betancourt and 14 other hostages (including three Americans) by
Colombian commandos is cause for rejoicing. As Colombian President
Alvaro Uribe put it, the rescue mission was "an unbelievable military
achievement." It marked yet another huge victory for Colombia in its
war on terrorism and another embarrassing defeat for the country's
main leftist guerrilla group--known by its Spanish acronym, FARC--
which had been holding Betancourt since 2002.

During the six years of her captivity, Colombia was transformed.
Murders, kidnappings, and terrorist attacks have all plunged
dramatically. The FARC has been devastated by combat deaths and
desertions; its remaining forces inhabit remote camps deep in the
Colombian jungle, far away from the urban areas. As a result, foreign
investment is pouring into the biggest cities. The World Bank has
lauded Colombia for its economic reforms, which helped GDP grow by 6.8
percent in 2006 and by more than 7 percent in 2007.

When we consider the progress made under President Uribe (who was
first elected in 2002), it is appalling that the U.S. Congress has
refused to approve a free trade agreement (FTA) with Colombia,
ostensibly due to concerns over violence. By any serious measure,
Colombia is a far less violent place today than at any time in recent
years. Democratic House leaders argue that Colombia has not done
enough to stop attacks on trade unionists. That depends on the meaning
of the word "enough": According to official Colombian statistics,
murders of trade unionists declined from 196 in 2002 to 26 in 2007.
Uribe established a special government-funded program to protect union
members from violence, and there is no question that their safety has
increased enormously.

Unfortunately, American labor unions--a bulwark of the Democratic
party--are strongly opposed to the free trade pact. (Never mind that
the Free Trade Agreement would mostly benefit U.S. farmers and
exporters.) If the deal has any chance of winning congressional
approval, it will happen after the 2008 election.

Like most Democrats, Barack Obama has come out against the Colombia
Free Trade Agreement and has chastised the Uribe administration for
not doing more to reduce violence. Though Obama speaks often of his
desire to improve U.S. credibility abroad, the Democrats' treatment of
Colombia is having precisely the opposite effect. Uribe is our closest
ally in Latin America. If Congress is willing to humiliate him, what
message does that send to other countries in the region?

If Obama saw the results on the ground in Colombia, he would be less
inclined to denounce Uribe over human rights. John McCain was in
Colombia last summer (the same week Betancourt was rescued).

Since 2000, the United States has spent billions of dollars on "Plan
Colombia," an aid package designed to help Colombia stamp out
narcotics trafficking. Though it was expanded by President Bush, Plan
Colombia began as a Clinton administration initiative that enjoyed
strong bipartisan backing in Congress. In other words, close
cooperation with Bogotá is not a "Bush policy."

Colombia is located in a region where Communist Venezuelan leader Hugo
Chávez is trying to spread radical populism. Americans should affirm
their support for a robust U.S.-Colombia partnership--even if it
angers some prominent socialist Democrats, Liberal Fascist Neo-
Communists and the marxist AFL-CIO crowd.

In other words, ObaMao does not give a damn about working Americans.
NO! The only thing he cares about are his marxist comrades in the
Communist Party International:

Recovered Emails Detail the FARC's International Support

Email messages linking the Colombian Marxist guerilla insurgency
(known by its Spanish acronym, FARC) to POLITICIANS, UNION ACTIVISTS
AND LEFT-WING POLITICAL PARTIES IN NORTH AMERICA have revealed a
network of supporters spanning several continents, and have kept
tensions high between Colombia and some of its neighbors.

http://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/article.aspx?id=2742

ObaMao doesn't want to save no stinkin' white ass blue collar union
workers. HELL NO! He wants to save the MARXIST MURDERERS who run the
Communist Unions and who have ties with the drug cartel, the Columbian
Marxist FARC, who are running cocaine into the noses of your sons and
daughters.

In his own words ObaMao admits to being a CrAcKhEaD!
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Marxist-Leninists Come Out for Obama [email protected] Shortwave 6 September 4th 08 09:59 PM
British Columbia & NW Washington Scanner Page Serial # 19781010 Scanner 0 March 5th 04 12:19 AM
CC-AWA Winter Swap Meet in Columbia SC Ron Lawrence Boatanchors 0 January 11th 04 09:20 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017