On 21 Nov 2008 17:51:06 -0500, wrote:

David Hartung writes:
David SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim wrote:
now this is funny, bush has completely destroyed the constitution,
greed is rampant, bush singlehandedly destroyed the u.s. economy,
and you're scared of the demcorats?
you should be scared of the dumbass nazi neocon republican scum
save america, kill a neocon today

He has come very close to destroying Iraq.
By complete incompetence.

§tarkiller© wrote:

Yeah yeah sure sure, guess that's why so many less people are dying in
Iraq today than did under your hero Saddam yes?

Um, if you read carefully, he said "destroying Iraq" (the COUNTRY), not
specifically that less people are dying. "Destroying Iraq" in that there
is limited electricity, limited fresh water, limited sewage treatment,
lack of medical care/equipment/pharmaceuticals, lack of fuel, lack of
jobs and just generally having TRASHED the entire country.

Guess that's also why the Iraq oil business is booming raking in
billions to Iraq.

So if they are "raking in billions", how would you explain why WE have
to keep sinking billions in Iraq.

Guess that's also why we see so few reports of fighting and deaths
these days compares to just a couple of years ago as well yes?

There are STILL all kinds of bombings...yes, less than "before", but
still a SIGNIFICANT amount, still no picnic.

He has destroyed our prestige in the world.

No, people like Soros, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton and few choice
others traveling all over the world badmouthing the US to foreign
nations did a lot of that, along with liberals like yoursel that
started screaming how horrible the US was even before Bush took office

What planet have YOU been on? Yes he HAS destroyed our prestige in the
world, both in the Islamic world and in Europe. Most of the world
realizes the "war" was fraudulent and bogus and therefore have a poor
opinion of us.

He is really one of the worst presidents of
all time.

Another youngster not old enough to have experienced the Carter
administration no doubt.

If W is so much better than Jimmah, does that mean we will be seeing W
get his Nobel prize anytime soon?

Billy Burpelson wrote:

Um, if you read carefully, he said "destroying Iraq" (the COUNTRY), not
specifically that less people are dying. "Destroying Iraq" in that there
is limited electricity, limited fresh water, limited sewage treatment,
lack of medical care/equipment/pharmaceuticals, lack of fuel, lack of
jobs and just generally having TRASHED the entire country.

How recent is your information?

Guess that's also why the Iraq oil business is booming raking in
billions to Iraq.

So if they are "raking in billions", how would you explain why WE have
to keep sinking billions in Iraq.

How are the two statements related?

What planet have YOU been on? Yes he HAS destroyed our prestige in the
world, both in the Islamic world and in Europe. Most of the world
realizes the "war" was fraudulent and bogus and therefore have a poor
opinion of us.

You are aware that there is more to the "?world" than western Europe and
Islam?

Exactly what parts of the world constitute "most" and why should we care
what they think?

wrote:
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 21:34:23 -0600, David Hartung
wrote:

Exactly what parts of the world constitute "most" and why should we care
what they think?

Because, Hartung

THEY are on the rise, becoming more and more adept at
capitalism, need more and more resources, are in global
competition, and closer to the strategic petroleum
reserves in the world.

China---1.2 billion

China is a communist nation. They wish to become the dominant power in
the world, and they have never "liked" us. Why should we care what they
think.

Asia--- 3-5 billions spread around.

Asia is a large place. You can demonstrate that they are uniform in
their "dislike" of the USA?

David Hartung wrote:
wrote:
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 21:34:23 -0600, David Hartung
wrote:

Exactly what parts of the world constitute "most" and why should we
care what they think?

Because, Hartung
THEY are on the rise, becoming more and more adept at
capitalism, need more and more resources, are in global
competition, and closer to the strategic petroleum
reserves in the world.

China---1.2 billion

China is a communist nation. They wish to become the dominant power in
the world, and they have never "liked" us. Why should we care what they
think.

China is as far as you can get from Communism. They are a fascist
dictatorship.

David Hartung writes:

David wrote:
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 21:34:23 -0600, David Hartung
wrote:

Exactly what parts of the world constitute "most" and why should we
care what they think?
Because, Hartung THEY are on the rise, becoming more and more adept
at
capitalism, need more and more resources, are in global
competition, and closer to the strategic petroleum
reserves in the world.
China---1.2 billion

David China is a communist nation.

China is not communist, and has not been for over twenty
years.

You should really try to keep up with current affairs.


--
Andrew Hall
(Now reading Usenet in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh...)

wrote:
David Hartung writes:

David wrote:
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 21:34:23 -0600, David Hartung
wrote:

Exactly what parts of the world constitute "most" and why should we
care what they think?
Because, Hartung THEY are on the rise, becoming more and more adept
at
capitalism, need more and more resources, are in global
competition, and closer to the strategic petroleum
reserves in the world.
China---1.2 billion

David China is a communist nation.

China is not communist, and has not been for over twenty
years.

You should really try to keep up with current affairs.

I see, what are they?