Dave wrote:

dxAce wrote:

Dave wrote:

dxAce wrote:
none wrote:

dxAce wrote:

Well, Mr. Butt-inski, maybe you can provide 2 examples of NPR slanting
news reporting to promote a political position.
Rickmers, one only has to do a bit of critical listening over a few days, weeks,
or months, to determine that NPR is THE mouthpiece of the
Liberal/Democrat/Marxists.

Surely YOU can provide 2 examples...
The examples are there, just do a bit of critical listening. I know that that may be
difficult for the knuckle dragging, I'm a victim, toting crowd, but hey, give it a
try.


That's what I thought. You hear facts and they make the people you like
look bad so therefore the facts are biased.

My Dad, a John Bircher Minuteman uber-right winger only listened to NPR
news, because of its objectivity.

Your Dad was confused. His genes were passed on to you. You are confused as well.

Like you, he probably woke up every morning retarded too.


At least he could stay on subject, and when challenged could produce
more than a personal attack.

Rickmers, you are not worthy of anything more than a personal attack.

RHF wrote:
On Dec 2, 5:30 am, none ""dave\"@(none)" wrote:
dxAce wrote:

Well, Mr. Butt-inski, maybe you can provide 2 examples of NPR slanting
news reporting to promote a political position.
Rickmers, one only has to do a bit of critical listening over a few days, weeks,
or months, to determine that NPR is THE mouthpiece of the
Liberal/Democrat/Marxists.
Surely YOU can provide 2 examples...

Dave,

The NPR Thundering Liberal Slant :
# 1 - Travis Smiley is as Uber-Liberal
and Slanted as TV Host's come. ~ RHF
http://www.pbs.org/kcet/tavissmiley/
.
The NPR Conservative Silence :
# 1 - Every seen Rush Limbaugh on a NPR Panel ?
never, Never. NEVER !
.
.
building the listing one-a-day for many days ~ RHF
.

Tavis Smiley is on PBS, not NPR. The same PBS that runs the McLaughlin
Group and Tony Brown's Journal, Tucker Carlson, Bill Bennet, etc.

Rush Limbaugh is a clown. He doesn't represent any valid political
viewpoint and would screw-up any program he was on.

Once again, NPR is radio. You do not see people on the radio.

The subject is bias in NPR's news coverage. Which you cannot give two
examples thereof.

dxAce wrote:

Dave wrote:

dxAce wrote:
Dave wrote:

dxAce wrote:
none wrote:

dxAce wrote:

Well, Mr. Butt-inski, maybe you can provide 2 examples of NPR slanting
news reporting to promote a political position.
Rickmers, one only has to do a bit of critical listening over a few days, weeks,
or months, to determine that NPR is THE mouthpiece of the
Liberal/Democrat/Marxists.

Surely YOU can provide 2 examples...
The examples are there, just do a bit of critical listening. I know that that may be
difficult for the knuckle dragging, I'm a victim, toting crowd, but hey, give it a
try.


That's what I thought. You hear facts and they make the people you like
look bad so therefore the facts are biased.

My Dad, a John Bircher Minuteman uber-right winger only listened to NPR
news, because of its objectivity.
Your Dad was confused. His genes were passed on to you. You are confused as well.

Like you, he probably woke up every morning retarded too.


At least he could stay on subject, and when challenged could produce
more than a personal attack.

Rickmers, you are not worthy of anything more than a personal attack.


Shut up.

On Dec 2, 7:37*pm, Bernard Peters wrote:
On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 09:04:35 -0500, dxAce wrote:
none wrote:
dxAce wrote:
Well, Mr. Butt-inski, maybe you can provide 2 examples of NPR
slanting news reporting to promote a political position.

Surely YOU can provide 2 examples...

The examples are there, just do a bit of critical listening. I know that
that may be difficult for the knuckle dragging, I'm a victim, toting
crowd, but hey, give it a try.

- From the prospective of a FOKKKs news viewer,
- all the media will be slanted. Perhaps you need a
- different perspective to make your judgments from?

Bernard Peters,

You K-lose for the use of made-up word "FoKKKs"
with the implication of Racism and Bigotry of the
Letters "KKK" added to the Argument.

This is the 'KKK' Insertion Rule and the first one to
invoke the "KKK" K-loses the K-arguement Kause
they haven't got a Klue as to the K-issues or the
K-facts but they sure do K-know how to mindlessly
K-name Kall someone else : K-which simply shows
their own inner bias and distorted sense of reality.

On Dec 2, 11:08*am, RHF wrote:
On Dec 2, 5:30*am, none ""dave\"@(none)" wrote:

dxAce wrote:

Well, Mr. Butt-inski, maybe you can provide 2 examples of NPR slanting
news reporting to promote a political position.

Rickmers, one only has to do a bit of critical listening over a few days, weeks,
or months, to determine that NPR is THE mouthpiece of the
Liberal/Democrat/Marxists.

Surely YOU can provide 2 examples...

Dave,

The NPR Thundering Liberal Slant :
# 1 - Travis Smiley Show -host- Travis Smiley
is as Uber-Liberal and Slanted as TV Host's come.
http://www.pbs.org/kcet/tavissmiley/
# 2 - "Democracy Now" -host- Amy Goodman
Amy is Hillary on Socialist Steroids and Liberal Speed
http://www.democracynow.org/about
*.
The NPR Conservative Silence :
# 1 - Every seen Rush Limbaugh on a NPR Panel ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rush_Limbaugh
never, Never. NEVER !
# 2 - Every seen Sean Hannity on a NPR Panel ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sean_Hannity
never, Never. NEVER !
*.
*.
building the listing one-a-day for many days ~ RHF
http://www.npr.org/programs/
*.

On Dec 3, 5:25*am, Dave wrote:
RHF wrote:
On Dec 2, 5:30 am, none ""dave\"@(none)" wrote:
dxAce wrote:

Well, Mr. Butt-inski, maybe you can provide 2 examples of NPR slanting
news reporting to promote a political position.
Rickmers, one only has to do a bit of critical listening over a few days, weeks,
or months, to determine that NPR is THE mouthpiece of the
Liberal/Democrat/Marxists.
Surely YOU can provide 2 examples...

Dave,

The NPR Thundering Liberal Slant :
# 1 - Travis Smiley is as Uber-Liberal
and Slanted as TV Host's come. ~ RHF
http://www.pbs.org/kcet/tavissmiley/
*.
The NPR Conservative Silence :
# 1 - Every seen Rush Limbaugh on a NPR Panel ?
never, Never. NEVER !
*.
*.
building the listing one-a-day for many days ~ RHF
*.

- Tavis Smiley is on PBS, not NPR. *

The NPR Radio program of The Tavis Smiley Show
concluded broadcasting on NPR December 16, 2004.
http://www.npr.org/templates/station...dule/?prgId=14

The same PBS that runs the McLaughlin Group and
Tony Brown's Journal, Tucker Carlson, Bill Bennet, etc.

D'Oh! - None of which is on the NPR Radio [.]

Once Again Proving My Point that NPR has a decided
Liberal Slant and Biased Against Conservatives.

dave - tyvm ~ RHF

On Dec 3, 10:17*am, Bernard Peters wrote:
On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 09:07:41 -0800, RHF wrote:
On Dec 2, 7:37*pm, Bernard Peters wrote:
On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 09:04:35 -0500, dxAce wrote:
none wrote:
dxAce wrote:
Well, Mr. Butt-inski, maybe you can provide 2 examples of NPR
slanting news reporting to promote a political position.

Surely YOU can provide 2 examples...

The examples are there, just do a bit of critical listening. I know
that that may be difficult for the knuckle dragging, I'm a victim,
toting crowd, but hey, give it a try.

- From the prospective of a FOKKKs news viewer, - all the media will be
slanted. Perhaps you need a - different perspective to make your
judgments from?


- - Bernard Peters,
- - You K-lose for the use of made-up word "FoKKKs"
- - with the implication of Racism and Bigotry of the
- - Letters "KKK" added to the Argument.

- But, like a typical republiCANT,
- you missed the f&*king message!

BP - More 'typical' make-up words : "republiCANT"
and talk about "you missed the f&*king message!"
* Can't Talk About The C-Issues
* Can't Deal With The C-Facts
Instead Make-Up Words and Resort to C-Name C-Calling.

You K-lose for the use of made-up word "FoKKKs"
with the implication of Racism and Bigotry of the
Letters "KKK" added to the Argument.

This is the 'KKK' Insertion Rule and the first one to
invoke the "KKK" K-loses the K-arguement Kause
they haven't got a Klue as to the K-issues or the
K-facts but they sure do K-know how to mindlessly
K-name Kall someone else : K-which simply shows
their own inner bias and distorted sense of reality.

WINB "The OvercComer Ministry" on 9265 kHz @ 22:45 UTC
featuring Brother R.G. Stair
OCM = http://www.overcomerministry.org/
BS = http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brother_Stair

WINB Shortwave Radio Station from Red Lion, PA -USA-
WINB = http://www.winb.com/

WINB Program Schedule by Time and Frequency
http://www.winb.com/schedule.htm
0630 - 0800 UTC on 9265 kHz
0800 - 1700 UTC on 13,570 kHz
1700 - 1800 UTC on 11,520 kHz
1800 - 2300 UTC on 9265 kHz

WINB Program Schedule by Title with Links
http://www.winb.com/bypgmsch.htm

Contact Shortwave Radio Station WINB
http://www.winb.com/contact.htm

FCC "B08" Winter 2008/2009 Shortwave Radio Broadcasting
Frequencies & Times for US Licensed Shortwave Radio Stations
http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/neg/hf_web/B08FCC01.TXT

(OT) : DX Acer @ gMail.Com = NNTP-Posting-Host : 12.154.10.254

It is not Unique to America, The Nazi party under Hitler
and the Japanese under hirohito declared they too were doing GOD'S bidding
and had GOD's Authority.
Jesus said we are pilgrims and strangers, yjat have no continueing City
but nobody ever claimed that republicans ever understood just what in
the heck Jesus was talking about,


Kurt_Lochner wrote:
David Hartung wrote:
Kurt_Lochner wrote:
David Hartung wrote:
Kurt_Lochner wrote:
David Hartung wrote:
Kurt_Lochner wrote:
David Hartung wrote:
Kurt_Lochner wrote:
David Hartung wrote:
wrote:
David Hartung deleted and then
bleated:
- - - - - - - - - - - -
The claim was that Robertson, Falwell and Dobson have
claimed that Republicans have the corner on Christianity.
You are again dishonestly trying to reframe what was said..
From earlier in the thread:
Soumay Nonay wrote:

"I've been told the Republican Party has exclusive franchise
on Christianity; it is easier for a camel to pass through
the eye of a needle than a non-Republican to enter the Kingdom
of God."
So you don't agree with the observation that Robertson, Falwell
and Dobson's alleged "churches" are predominantly involved in
politics, particularly the Republican party?

How quaint..
May I once again suggest that yo learn to read?
No.. May I again suggest that "yo" learn to proof-read?
Point taken.
Good.. You've made several typos which I could almost
qualify as Freudian Slips in the past 72 hours..

your understanding of the quote I provided is completely wrong.
Nope, the context which you're trying to misrepresent that quote
with is lacking a few details that I find amusing..

--And typical of a right-wing zealot..
From what I see, you are making excuses.

No, you're the one making excuses, David. You've again
deliberately tried to 'reframe' this discussion to suit your
opinion, rather than openly discussing how the churches led by
Dobson, Falwell and Robertson (eg "Moral Majority", "religious
right") have violated the separation of church and state..
How can a provate entity, which has zero legal authority,
violate the constitution?

It's not a "provate entity", David..

Focus on the Family is a multi-media empire now..

You're even blindly assuming that these 'religious' figures
haven't been trying to build themselves 'empires' that have
attempted to force the Republican party candidates to accept
some of Dobson, Robertson, et al's religious agenda..
In truth, I am absolutely convinced that Robertson and Falwell
would like to build a religious empire, with them in charge.

And so, you think that they haven't? How did you conclude that?

Perhaps I should have been more explicit.

I believe that these men, and others like them would like to return to
the days when the temporal government was subservient to the Church,
and they would like to be the one in charge of the Church.

In Dobson's case, I am a little more uncertain.

Henh! Heisenberg didn't come into play here, right?

If you're going to quibble those facts, then you're not only
being dishonest with me, you're being dishonest with yourself..
The original claim was not that these men are building empires,
but that the Republicans had the corner on Christianity,

Ask yourself this.. How many non-christians are involved
in the Republican party? Are they a majority, or a minority..

From what I have seen, non-Christians are a majority of both parties.