Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 12, 10:12*pm, RHF wrote:
On Dec 12, 7:01*pm, SC Dxing wrote: It is still used but it's no longer a requirement to get a HAM license. If you flip inbetween the broadcast bands, you're find some. Having SSB on your radio will make the morse a lot more copyable. The one advantage morse code still has over voice is that you can understand morse on a weak signal when voice or data won't come in well. Morse also takes up less bandwidth than voice and less power to transmit over an equal distance. - A lot of the morse you will hear now is computer generated, - not so much hand keyers anymore, although I'm sure there - are some out there. Computer {Keyboard} Generated and Computer and most likely Generated {On-the-Screen} Decoded too. *. I remember when I learned morse code back in 83, the hand senders would have their own accents from countries just like the language. I haven't heard a hand sender yet with my revival in shortwave. Just bots or computerized generated morse. I sure am rusty with morse though..... I seem to have to think about characters before typing them which really slows me down. I'll have to get some software to help me get efficient again. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
, SC Dxing writes On Dec 12, 10:12*pm, RHF wrote: On Dec 12, 7:01*pm, SC Dxing wrote: It is still used but it's no longer a requirement to get a HAM license. If you flip inbetween the broadcast bands, you're find some. Having SSB on your radio will make the morse a lot more copyable. The one advantage morse code still has over voice is that you can understand morse on a weak signal when voice or data won't come in well. Morse also takes up less bandwidth than voice and less power to transmit over an equal distance. - A lot of the morse you will hear now is computer generated, - not so much hand keyers anymore, although I'm sure there - are some out there. Computer {Keyboard} Generated and Computer and most likely Generated {On-the-Screen} Decoded too. *. I remember when I learned morse code back in 83, the hand senders would have their own accents from countries just like the language. I haven't heard a hand sender yet with my revival in shortwave. Just bots or computerized generated morse. I sure am rusty with morse though..... I seem to have to think about characters before typing them which really slows me down. I'll have to get some software to help me get efficient again. I've held my radio amateur licence since 1960, but have never been very good at morse. However, now I've got a bit more time on my hands, I am trying to brush up my skill and, in my spare moments, have been doing some 'SWLing' on the morse parts of the amateur bands. I recently-bought Eton E5 receiver is handy for use in places like the toilet, where listening to morse makes a change from reading a book or the daily paper. I can confirm that, although many countries no longer require morse in order to get the licence, there certainly is a heck of a lot of morse still used by radio amateurs. It's certainly NOT a dying art. For beginners, the main problem is finding transmissions which are slow enough to be understood. Fortunately, there are dozens of excellent freeware computer programs which generate morse for you to practise with, and allow you work up your speed. There are also a lot of morse decoder programs which take your receiver audio output and display it as text. Even if you are getting quite good at morse, and are pretty good at decoding it 'in your head', the display of the text 'subtitles' provides an instant indication of how you are doing. Some programs indicate the speed of the received morse, and I was surprised that I now seem to be able to copy quite a lot at up to 20wpm. -- Ian |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ian Jackson wrote:
There are also a lot of morse decoder programs which take your receiver audio output and display it as text. Even if you are getting quite good at morse, and are pretty good at decoding it 'in your head', the display of the text 'subtitles' provides an instant indication of how you are doing. Some programs indicate the speed of the received morse, and I was surprised that I now seem to be able to copy quite a lot at up to 20wpm. I don't think there's a radio made that doesn't call it "CW". The VBR binary system invented by S. F. B. Morse for electric clicker DC wire communications might resemble CW at first glance, but modern CW is quite different. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 21:44:00 -0800 (PST), SC Dxing
wrote: On Dec 12, 10:12*pm, RHF wrote: On Dec 12, 7:01*pm, SC Dxing wrote: It is still used but it's no longer a requirement to get a HAM license. If you flip inbetween the broadcast bands, you're find some. Having SSB on your radio will make the morse a lot more copyable. The one advantage morse code still has over voice is that you can understand morse on a weak signal when voice or data won't come in well. Morse also takes up less bandwidth than voice and less power to transmit over an equal distance. - A lot of the morse you will hear now is computer generated, - not so much hand keyers anymore, although I'm sure there - are some out there. Computer {Keyboard} Generated and Computer and most likely Generated {On-the-Screen} Decoded too. *. I remember when I learned morse code back in 83, the hand senders would have their own accents from countries just like the language. I haven't heard a hand sender yet with my revival in shortwave. Just bots or computerized generated morse. I sure am rusty with morse though..... I seem to have to think about characters before typing them which really slows me down. I'll have to get some software to help me get efficient again. Try CPWin http://www.xertech.net/Projects/CPwin.html |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
W1AW sends codes practice lessons on week days..
Several times a day and many bands.. also code bulletins.. check www.arrl.org for the frequencies and times .. or check QST -- Thanks & 73 Hank WD5JFR wrote in message ... On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 21:44:00 -0800 (PST), SC Dxing wrote: On Dec 12, 10:12 pm, RHF wrote: On Dec 12, 7:01 pm, SC Dxing wrote: It is still used but it's no longer a requirement to get a HAM license. If you flip inbetween the broadcast bands, you're find some. Having SSB on your radio will make the morse a lot more copyable. The one advantage morse code still has over voice is that you can understand morse on a weak signal when voice or data won't come in well. Morse also takes up less bandwidth than voice and less power to transmit over an equal distance. - A lot of the morse you will hear now is computer generated, - not so much hand keyers anymore, although I'm sure there - are some out there. Computer {Keyboard} Generated and Computer and most likely Generated {On-the-Screen} Decoded too. . I remember when I learned morse code back in 83, the hand senders would have their own accents from countries just like the language. I haven't heard a hand sender yet with my revival in shortwave. Just bots or computerized generated morse. I sure am rusty with morse though..... I seem to have to think about characters before typing them which really slows me down. I'll have to get some software to help me get efficient again. Try CPWin http://www.xertech.net/Projects/CPwin.html |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 13, 5:47 am, "Henry Kolesnik"
wrote: - - W1AW sends codes practice lessons on week days.. - Several times a day and many bands.. - also code bulletins.. - check www.arrl.org - for the frequencies and times .. - or check QST - - -- - Thanks & 73 - Hank WD5JFR - HK, "W1AW" is a very good Tip and Link for those who want to Listen To and Learn Morse Code. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|