(OT) : The UAW Is Killing / Has Killed The Big-3
 

On Dec 11, 5:31*am, Billy Burpelson wrote:
It almost seems that Senator Shelby is still sore about losing the Civil
War and trying to get revenge on the North. * :-)

Hypocrite alert!

Senator Shelby seems quite proud of the fact and brags that he voted
against the Chrysler loan in '79.

Why is he so proud?

* The country MADE MONEY on the deal (interest received). Why is he
against that?

* The loan allowed Chrysler to keep going for almost 30 years -- thirty
years of people being employed and paying taxes (HIS salary). Why is he
against that?

Answer:

H-Y-P-O-C-R-I-T-E !!!! *(or just a turd?)

Without Sustainable Wages; Worker Benefits and Retiree
Benefits the Big-3 Are Doomed [.]

The was to bring the Big-3 inline with the 'other' US Domestic
Auto Manufactures and Help the Big-3 to be Competitive Today
and In-the-Future for Long Term Business and Employment.

The UAW Union Turned That Offer Down [.]
(OT) : The UAW Is Killing / Has Killed The Big-3

At this Point-in-Time the Only Answer is Bankruptcy and
Re-Structuring of the Big-3 into a Sustainable Industry that
can be Competitive Today and In-the-Future like the other
US US Domestic Auto Manufactures.

~ RHF

(OT) : Saving The BIG-3 [UAW] Has To Be Equitable and Fair To The USTaxpayers
 

On Dec 14, 8:08*am, Billy Burpelson wrote:
On Dec 11, 5:31 am, Billy Burpelson wrote:
It almost seems that Senator Shelby is still sore about losing the Civil
War and trying to get revenge on the North. * :-)

Hypocrite alert!

Senator Shelby seems quite proud of the fact and brags that he voted
against the Chrysler loan in '79.

Why is he so proud?

* The country MADE MONEY on the deal (interest received). Why is he
against that?

* The loan allowed Chrysler to keep going for almost 30 years -- thirty
years of people being employed and paying taxes (HIS salary). Why is he
against that?

Answer:

H-Y-P-O-C-R-I-T-E !!!! *(or just a turd?)

- Roy,
- I'm beginning to think the 'F' in RHF stands for FOOL.

BP - ? Shelby -- a turd? ?

BP - ? the 'F' in RHF stands for FOOL ?

- - - = = = RHF's Canned Reply = = = - - -
[: To Liberal Name Calling :]
ROTFL - You Know When You Are Winning An Argument :
When a Super-Smart 'Enlightened" Liberal Starts Name Calling*.
* They Lose Their Ability To Think And Get Emotional {ROTFL}
* -Or- * They Are Simply Showing Their True Bias, Bigotry,
Ignorance and Intolerance {Sadly-All-Too-Often-It's-True}

(OT) : BP - KEEP-ON PROMOTING THE BIG LIE IT'S A LOAN : It's aTaxpayer Bail-Out {Grant} to the BIG-3 and the UAW.
 

On Dec 14, 12:32*pm, Billy Burpelson wrote:
RHF wrote:
BP -you misspoke yourself- Chrysler, 1979 was 'not' a Bail-Out :
IT WAS A LOAN and It got Paid Back in Full with Interest.

Absolutely correct -- and unless the millions of words spoken on the
topic by ALL the media were wrong, the Big 3 -are- looking for LOANS, a
'bridge' loan. Get it? 'Bailout' was *Shelby's* term that I was using.
(BTW, the previous point just illustrates more of Shelby's hypocrisy).

=IF= As you claim the 'difference' between the BIG-3
the 'Other' US Domestic Auto Makes is the Retirement
Costs of the UAW Retirees : Then Transfer Them All To
Social Secuirty and as a Tax Payer I will Gladly Paid to
See that They Get What Everyone Else Gets : BUT !
I Say HELL NO To Paying Them More Than [DOUBLE
and TRIPLE] What Their Fellow Citizens Receiving Social
Security Are Getting : That's Fair and That's Equitable.

Huh? Roy, what in the -hell- are you talking about? Pensions are
pensions and Social Security is Social Security. They were promised
their pension contractually. They earned their pension fair and square.
It is totally different than Social Security. Pensions are 'over and
above and in addition to' what people get from SS. "Double or triple"
has NOTHING to do with the issue. It is what they were contractually
promised and what they earned. You are mixing apples and oranges. They
are TWO DIFFERENT THINGS.

BP,

Tell that to all the 'other' US Pensioners who have been
Shafted by the US Federal Government Laws that allowed
United Airlines and countless other American Retirees
to lose most; if not all their Private Company Pensions.
Many/Most now get social Security as their only Pension
now; or as a Supplement to a Greatly Reduced Pension.

Once again in the name of Equality and Fairness the
UAW Retirees deserve No Better and Deserve No Worse
then Other Private Pension Plan Retirees who's Company's
have Gone Bankrupt and been force to Divest themselve
of burdensome Retiree Cost and Re-Structure to become
Viable as a Business Again.

Plus once again the US Taxpayers many of whom are
Social Security Retirees should not have to pay for
exorbitant Bankrupt Retirement Plans for UAW Retirees
when they themselves only receive a half or a third of
the amount themselves. ?Why" in the interest of Equality
and Fairness for All Retirees Who the US Government
{Taxpayers} are Picking-Up the Tab.

BP - Everyone Knows That The BIG-3 and The UAW
Wants To Dump The Retirement Cost On the US Tax
Payers : AND I SAY HELL NO TO THAT [.] ~ RHF