Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
(OT) : The UAW Is Killing / Has Killed The Big-3
On Dec 11, 5:31*am, Billy Burpelson wrote:
It almost seems that Senator Shelby is still sore about losing the Civil War and trying to get revenge on the North. * :-) Hypocrite alert! Senator Shelby seems quite proud of the fact and brags that he voted against the Chrysler loan in '79. Why is he so proud? * The country MADE MONEY on the deal (interest received). Why is he against that? * The loan allowed Chrysler to keep going for almost 30 years -- thirty years of people being employed and paying taxes (HIS salary). Why is he against that? Answer: H-Y-P-O-C-R-I-T-E !!!! *(or just a turd?) Without Sustainable Wages; Worker Benefits and Retiree Benefits the Big-3 Are Doomed [.] The was to bring the Big-3 inline with the 'other' US Domestic Auto Manufactures and Help the Big-3 to be Competitive Today and In-the-Future for Long Term Business and Employment. The UAW Union Turned That Offer Down [.] (OT) : The UAW Is Killing / Has Killed The Big-3 At this Point-in-Time the Only Answer is Bankruptcy and Re-Structuring of the Big-3 into a Sustainable Industry that can be Competitive Today and In-the-Future like the other US US Domestic Auto Manufactures. ~ RHF |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
(OT) : Saving The BIG-3 [UAW] Has To Be Equitable and Fair To The USTaxpayers
On Dec 14, 8:08*am, Billy Burpelson wrote:
On Dec 11, 5:31 am, Billy Burpelson wrote: It almost seems that Senator Shelby is still sore about losing the Civil War and trying to get revenge on the North. * :-) Hypocrite alert! Senator Shelby seems quite proud of the fact and brags that he voted against the Chrysler loan in '79. Why is he so proud? * The country MADE MONEY on the deal (interest received). Why is he against that? * The loan allowed Chrysler to keep going for almost 30 years -- thirty years of people being employed and paying taxes (HIS salary). Why is he against that? Answer: H-Y-P-O-C-R-I-T-E !!!! *(or just a turd?) - Roy, - I'm beginning to think the 'F' in RHF stands for FOOL. BP - ? Shelby -- a turd? ? BP - ? the 'F' in RHF stands for FOOL ? - - - = = = RHF's Canned Reply = = = - - - [: To Liberal Name Calling :] ROTFL - You Know When You Are Winning An Argument : When a Super-Smart 'Enlightened" Liberal Starts Name Calling*. * They Lose Their Ability To Think And Get Emotional {ROTFL} * -Or- * They Are Simply Showing Their True Bias, Bigotry, Ignorance and Intolerance {Sadly-All-Too-Often-It's-True} |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
(OT) : BP - KEEP-ON PROMOTING THE BIG LIE IT'S A LOAN : It's aTaxpayer Bail-Out {Grant} to the BIG-3 and the UAW.
On Dec 14, 12:32*pm, Billy Burpelson wrote:
RHF wrote: BP -you misspoke yourself- Chrysler, 1979 was 'not' a Bail-Out : IT WAS A LOAN and It got Paid Back in Full with Interest. Absolutely correct -- and unless the millions of words spoken on the topic by ALL the media were wrong, the Big 3 -are- looking for LOANS, a 'bridge' loan. Get it? 'Bailout' was *Shelby's* term that I was using. (BTW, the previous point just illustrates more of Shelby's hypocrisy). =IF= As you claim the 'difference' between the BIG-3 the 'Other' US Domestic Auto Makes is the Retirement Costs of the UAW Retirees : Then Transfer Them All To Social Secuirty and as a Tax Payer I will Gladly Paid to See that They Get What Everyone Else Gets : BUT ! I Say HELL NO To Paying Them More Than [DOUBLE and TRIPLE] What Their Fellow Citizens Receiving Social Security Are Getting : That's Fair and That's Equitable. Huh? Roy, what in the -hell- are you talking about? Pensions are pensions and Social Security is Social Security. They were promised their pension contractually. They earned their pension fair and square. It is totally different than Social Security. Pensions are 'over and above and in addition to' what people get from SS. "Double or triple" has NOTHING to do with the issue. It is what they were contractually promised and what they earned. You are mixing apples and oranges. They are TWO DIFFERENT THINGS. BP, Tell that to all the 'other' US Pensioners who have been Shafted by the US Federal Government Laws that allowed United Airlines and countless other American Retirees to lose most; if not all their Private Company Pensions. Many/Most now get social Security as their only Pension now; or as a Supplement to a Greatly Reduced Pension. Once again in the name of Equality and Fairness the UAW Retirees deserve No Better and Deserve No Worse then Other Private Pension Plan Retirees who's Company's have Gone Bankrupt and been force to Divest themselve of burdensome Retiree Cost and Re-Structure to become Viable as a Business Again. Plus once again the US Taxpayers many of whom are Social Security Retirees should not have to pay for exorbitant Bankrupt Retirement Plans for UAW Retirees when they themselves only receive a half or a third of the amount themselves. ?Why" in the interest of Equality and Fairness for All Retirees Who the US Government {Taxpayers} are Picking-Up the Tab. BP - Everyone Knows That The BIG-3 and The UAW Wants To Dump The Retirement Cost On the US Tax Payers : AND I SAY HELL NO TO THAT [.] ~ RHF |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|