Telamon wrote:


It may be an incredible collaboration to you but pretty simple thing
to most people.

Possibly you are interpreting his statement the wrong way. I -don't-
think he means an "incredible collaboration" would have been required at
the time of birth.

Rather, he may be referring to the "incredible collaboration" that would
be required to keep it covered up *TODAY*.

In article ,
Billy Burpelson wrote:

Telamon wrote:


It may be an incredible collaboration to you but pretty simple thing
to most people.

Possibly you are interpreting his statement the wrong way. I -don't-
think he means an "incredible collaboration" would have been required at
the time of birth.

Rather, he may be referring to the "incredible collaboration" that would
be required to keep it covered up *TODAY*.

That's the neat thing about "intentionally" introducing an error or
falsity into the database or history of an event as it does not need any
more support to propagate its existence. Conversely it takes effort to
find the error and correct it so you got it backward. Think about it.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

In article telamon_spamshield-374F2E.18535003012009
@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com,
lid says...
In article ,
Billy Burpelson wrote:

Telamon wrote:


It may be an incredible collaboration to you but pretty simple thing
to most people.

Possibly you are interpreting his statement the wrong way. I -don't-
think he means an "incredible collaboration" would have been required at
the time of birth.

Rather, he may be referring to the "incredible collaboration" that would
be required to keep it covered up *TODAY*.

That's the neat thing about "intentionally" introducing an error or
falsity into the database or history of an event as it does not need any
more support to propagate its existence. Conversely it takes effort to
find the error and correct it so you got it backward. Think about it.



BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Holy ****! Don't you get tired from all the tap
dancing you're doing to keep this nonsense going?

--
BDK

BDK Klan leader?
kOOk Magnet!
NJJ CLUB #1
Shillmaster

In article ,
BDK wrote:

In article telamon_spamshield-374F2E.18535003012009
@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com,
lid says...
In article ,
Billy Burpelson wrote:

Telamon wrote:


It may be an incredible collaboration to you but pretty simple thing
to most people.

Possibly you are interpreting his statement the wrong way. I -don't-
think he means an "incredible collaboration" would have been required at
the time of birth.

Rather, he may be referring to the "incredible collaboration" that would
be required to keep it covered up *TODAY*.

That's the neat thing about "intentionally" introducing an error or
falsity into the database or history of an event as it does not need any
more support to propagate its existence. Conversely it takes effort to
find the error and correct it so you got it backward. Think about it.



BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Holy ****! Don't you get tired from all the tap
dancing you're doing to keep this nonsense going?

Try and pay attention.

You will notice I'm not the one keeping it going. I'm responding to
other posts on the topic, OK Kookaburra?

Thanks for the laugh.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California