|
Are hams terrorists?
Take a look at the excuses the U.S. feds gave.
I don't know if all of these people really were terrorists or not as the feds claim, however looking at the reasons the feds gave, I don't see any way of any legittimate ham radio operator getting out of being accused and arrested and ruled definitely a terrorist even if you are a legitimate law-abiding ham. You won't be able to prove you're innocent. http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:...lnk&cd=4&gl=us The same might eventually be said for cbers also. Along with frs.gmrs users, eventually. |
Are hams terrorists?
radioguy wrote:
Take a look at the excuses the U.S. feds gave. I don't know if all of these people really were terrorists or not as the feds claim, however looking at the reasons the feds gave, I don't see any way of any legittimate ham radio operator getting out of being accused and arrested and ruled definitely a terrorist even if you are a legitimate law-abiding ham. You won't be able to prove you're innocent. http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:...lnk&cd=4&gl=us The same might eventually be said for cbers also. Along with frs.gmrs users, eventually. That doesn't help. |
Are hams terrorists?
radioguy wrote in
: Take a look at the excuses the U.S. feds gave. I don't know if all of these people really were terrorists or not as the feds claim, however looking at the reasons the feds gave, I don't see any way of any legittimate ham radio operator getting out of being accused and arrested and ruled definitely a terrorist even if you are a legitimate law-abiding ham. You won't be able to prove you're innocent. http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:...ps.derkeiler.c om/pdf/Archive/Rec/rec.radio.amateur.misc/2008-04/msg00001.pdf+%22arres ted+for+using+a+ham+radio%22&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=4&gl =us The same might eventually be said for cbers also. Along with frs.gmrs users, eventually. I bought a ham the other day and found it quite tasty. I wasn't a bit terrorized. -- "The better educated a person is, the less likely it is that person will be a conservative." |
Are hams terrorists?
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 03:40:08 -0800 (PST), radioguy
wrote: Take a look at the excuses the U.S. feds gave. I don't know if all of these people really were terrorists or not as the feds claim, however looking at the reasons the feds gave, I don't see any way of any legittimate ham radio operator getting out of being accused and arrested and ruled definitely a terrorist even if you are a legitimate law-abiding ham. You won't be able to prove you're innocent. http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:...lnk&cd=4&gl=us The same might eventually be said for cbers also. Along with frs.gmrs users, eventually. Are you that gullible that you believe that article? |
Are hams terrorists?
I'm sure it won't be long before Israel declares hams to be terrorists. |
Are hams terrorists?
On Jan 15, 6:40�am, radioguy wrote:
Take a look at the excuses the U.S. feds gave. I don't know if all of these people really were terrorists or not as the feds claim, however looking at the reasons the feds gave, I don't see any way of any legittimate ham radio operator getting out of being accused and arrested and ruled definitely �a terrorist even if you are a legitimate law-abiding ham. You won't be able to prove you're innocent. http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:...oups.derkeiler.... The same might eventually be said for cbers also. Along with frs.gmrs users, eventually. You are a troll and so is the story.. you guys took this crap hook line and sinker.. This story is bogus, look at the names in the story..."Lucifer Barrientos" Who, but in hell is going to name their kid "Lucifer" or even Ramakrishna Lakshminaramayanan. Google William Roberts and terroist, not one hit, nothing, nada. The only place you can find this bogus story is on Usenet. DL |
Are hams terrorists?
On Jan 15, 5:12*pm, wrote:
On Jan 15, 6:40 am, radioguy wrote: Take a look at the excuses the U.S. feds gave. I don't know if all of these people really were terrorists or not as the feds claim, however looking at the reasons the feds gave, I don't see any way of any legittimate ham radio operator getting out of being accused and arrested and ruled definitely a terrorist even if you are a legitimate law-abiding ham. You won't be able to prove you're innocent. http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:...oups.derkeiler.... The same might eventually be said for cbers also. Along with frs.gmrs users, eventually. You are a troll and so is the story.. you guys took this crap hook line and sinker.. This story is bogus, look at the names in the story..."Lucifer Barrientos" Who, but in hell is going to name their kid "Lucifer" or even Ramakrishna Lakshminaramayanan. *Google William Roberts and terroist, not one hit, nothing, nada. The only place you can find this bogus story is on Usenet. DL Actually, there are some Doctor Who books written by a guy whose last name really is Lucifer. Lofficer is French for Lucifer. Yes the story is bogus. I did not notice the date on it until afterwards. However it was very plausible since in the past,I have actually experienced similar catch-22 situations by certain self-appointed cops who turned out to be hams. What is it with ham radio that seems to attract all of the self- appointed radio cops??? CB doesn't seem to attract them. This isn't anything against all hams It's just a certain few that seem to give all hams a bad name. Come to think of it, it's not jst hams. GMRS seems to attract them also. It seems like radio services requiring a radio license attracts all of the self-appointed radio cops. |
Are hams terrorists?
wrote in message
... Who, but in hell is going to name their kid "Lucifer" or even Ramakrishna Lakshminaramayanan. Someone named their kid Adolf Hitler and it was all over the news. The only place you can find this bogus story is on Usenet. Oh, not just usenet. What's funny is so many people have responded to the false story, including yourself and now sad to say, myself. We both just rewarded the poster by responding to it. |
Are hams terrorists?
"radioguy" wrote in message
... On Jan 15, 5:12 pm, wrote: This isn't anything against all hams It's just a certain few that seem to give all hams a bad name. Correct. Most hams probably are good people but if you just read usenet, you would think hams are basket cases. |
Are hams terrorists?
|
Are hams terrorists?
On Jan 15, 5:50�pm, "SC Dxing" wrote:
wrote in message ... Who, but in hell is going to name their kid "Lucifer" or even Ramakrishna Lakshminaramayanan. Someone named their kid Adolf Hitler and it was all over the news. The only place you can find this bogus story is on Usenet. Oh, not just usenet. What's funny is so many people have responded to the false story, including yourself and now sad to say, myself. We both just rewarded the poster by responding to it. Not necessary, I did not respond to the story, I responded to Radioguy's post, reporting a blatant troll story. 73 DL |
Are hams terrorists?
On Jan 15, 5:37�pm, radioguy wrote:
On Jan 15, 5:12�pm, wrote: On Jan 15, 6:40 am, radioguy wrote: Take a look at the excuses the U.S. feds gave. I don't know if all of these people really were terrorists or not as the feds claim, however looking at the reasons the feds gave, I don't see any way of any legittimate ham radio operator getting out of being accused and arrested and ruled definitely a terrorist even if you are a legitimate law-abiding ham. You won't be able to prove you're innocent. http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:...oups.derkeiler... The same might eventually be said for cbers also. Along with frs.gmrs users, eventually. You are a troll and so is the story.. you guys took this crap hook line and sinker.. This story is bogus, look at the names in the story..."Lucifer Barrientos" Who, but in hell is going to name their kid "Lucifer" or even Ramakrishna Lakshminaramayanan. �Google William Roberts and terroist, not one hit, nothing, nada. The only place you can find this bogus story is on Usenet. DL Actually, there are some Doctor Who books written by a guy whose �last name really is Lucifer. Lofficer is French for Lucifer. Yes the story is bogus. I did not notice the date on it until afterwards. However it was very plausible since in the past,I have actually experienced similar catch-22 �situations by certain self-appointed cops who turned out to be hams. What is it with ham radio that seems to attract all of the self- appointed radio cops??? Not sure, never ran into these folks, but I have heard of them. Mostly OO's hanging out on 75 waiting to pounce. CB doesn't seem to attract them. CB doesn't seem to attract anything around here but three types, drive time users, truckers, and professional CB'er's with their big amps, echo mics, roger beeps, noise toys, etc etc etc, so they can ride around in their vehicles yelling, "NO NAME NO NAME NO NAME", or "SQUISH SQUISH SQUSIH", or "CB FAGGOT CB FAGGOT CB FAGGOT" or "DAVE MADE DAVE MADE DAVE MADE", or varibles of such. Quite amusing for about 10 seconds listening tor grown men acting like a bunch of morons. Which is why we call it, at least around my parts, the Children's Band Radio. This isn't anything against all hams This isn't anything aganst all CB users It's just a certain few that seem to give all hams a bad name. Ditto Come to think of it, it's not jst hams. GMRS seems to attract them also. It seems like radio services requiring a radio license attracts all of the self-appointed radio cops.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - 73, DL |
Are hams terrorists?
On Jan 15, 7:19*am, Dave wrote:
radioguy wrote: Take a look at the excuses the U.S. feds gave. I don't know if all of these people really were terrorists or not as the feds claim, however looking at the reasons the feds gave, I don't see any way of any legittimate ham radio operator getting out of being accused and arrested and ruled definitely *a terrorist even if you are a legitimate law-abiding ham. You won't be able to prove you're innocent. http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:...oups.derkeiler.... The same might eventually be said for cbers also. Along with frs.gmrs users, eventually. That doesn't help.- Hide quoted text - At least your "free", Dr.DaviD - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s4YbZ7iXFDA |
Are hams terrorists?
On Jan 15, 2:12*pm, wrote:
On Jan 15, 6:40 am, radioguy wrote: Take a look at the excuses the U.S. feds gave. I don't know if all of these people really were terrorists or not as the feds claim, however looking at the reasons the feds gave, I don't see any way of any legittimate ham radio operator getting out of being accused and arrested and ruled definitely a terrorist even if you are a legitimate law-abiding ham. You won't be able to prove you're innocent. http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:...oups.derkeiler.... The same might eventually be said for cbers also. Along with frs.gmrs users, eventually. You are a troll and so is the story.. you guys took this crap hook line and sinker.. This story is bogus, look at the names in the story..."Lucifer Barrientos" Who, but in hell is going to name their kid "Lucifer" or even Ramakrishna Lakshminaramayanan. *Google William Roberts and terroist, not one hit, nothing, nada. The only place you can find this bogus story is on Usenet. DL Yeah TSA and William Roberts does show very few results; but there are no results that show the article to be a fraud either. ~ RHF |
Are hams terrorists?
On Jan 15, 4:00*pm, wrote:
On Jan 15, 5:37 pm, radioguy wrote: On Jan 15, 5:12 pm, wrote: On Jan 15, 6:40 am, radioguy wrote: Take a look at the excuses the U.S. feds gave. I don't know if all of these people really were terrorists or not as the feds claim, however looking at the reasons the feds gave, I don't see any way of any legittimate ham radio operator getting out of being accused and arrested and ruled definitely a terrorist even if you are a legitimate law-abiding ham. You won't be able to prove you're innocent. http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:...oups.derkeiler... The same might eventually be said for cbers also. Along with frs.gmrs users, eventually. You are a troll and so is the story.. you guys took this crap hook line and sinker.. This story is bogus, look at the names in the story..."Lucifer Barrientos" Who, but in hell is going to name their kid "Lucifer" or even Ramakrishna Lakshminaramayanan. Google William Roberts and terroist, not one hit, nothing, nada. The only place you can find this bogus story is on Usenet. DL Actually, there are some Doctor Who books written by a guy whose last name really is Lucifer. Lofficer is French for Lucifer. Yes the story is bogus. I did not notice the date on it until afterwards. However it was very plausible since in the past,I have actually experienced similar catch-22 situations by certain self-appointed cops who turned out to be hams. What is it with ham radio that seems to attract all of the self- appointed radio cops??? Not sure, never ran into these folks, but I have heard of them. Mostly OO's hanging out on 75 waiting to pounce. CB doesn't seem to attract them. CB doesn't seem to attract anything around here but three types, drive time users, truckers, and professional CB'er's with their big amps, echo mics, roger beeps, noise toys, etc etc etc, so they can ride around in their vehicles yelling, "NO NAME NO NAME NO NAME", or "SQUISH SQUISH SQUSIH", or "CB FAGGOT CB FAGGOT CB FAGGOT" or "DAVE MADE DAVE MADE DAVE MADE", or varibles of such. *Quite amusing for about 10 seconds listening tor grown men acting like a bunch of morons. Which is why we call it, at least around my parts, the Children's Band Radio. This isn't anything against all hams This isn't anything aganst all CB users It's just a certain few that seem to give all hams a bad name. Ditto Come to think of it, it's not jst hams. GMRS seems to attract them also. It seems like radio services requiring a radio license attracts all of the self-appointed radio cops.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - 73, DL Roger Beep That ! ;-} ~ RHF |
Are hams terrorists?
On Jan 15, 3:51*pm, wrote:
On Jan 15, 5:50 pm, "SC Dxing" wrote: wrote in message .... Who, but in hell is going to name their kid "Lucifer" or even Ramakrishna Lakshminaramayanan. Someone named their kid Adolf Hitler and it was all over the news. The only place you can find this bogus story is on Usenet. Oh, not just usenet. What's funny is so many people have responded to the false story, including yourself and now sad to say, myself. We both just rewarded the poster by responding to it. - Not necessary, I did not respond to the story, - I responded to Radioguy's post, - reporting a blatant troll story. - - 73 DL "Troll Story" - war and peace on the internet ~ RHF |
Are hams terrorists?
On Jan 16, 10:27*am, RHF wrote:
On Jan 15, 3:51*pm, wrote: On Jan 15, 5:50 pm, "SC Dxing" wrote: wrote in message .... Who, but in hell is going to name their kid "Lucifer" or even Ramakrishna Lakshminaramayanan. Someone named their kid Adolf Hitler and it was all over the news. The only place you can find this bogus story is on Usenet. Oh, not just usenet. What's funny is so many people have responded to the false story, including yourself and now sad to say, myself. We both just rewarded the poster by responding to it. - Not necessary, I did not respond to the story, - I responded to Radioguy's post, - reporting a blatant troll story. - - 73 DL "Troll Story" - war and peace on the internet ~ RHF *. Gee, the date on that story was April 1, 2008. Could that be a clue? |
Are hams terrorists?
radioguy wrote:
Actually, there are some Doctor Who books written by a guy whose last name really is Lucifer. Lofficer is French for Lucifer. http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/lucere |
Are hams terrorists?
In message
, VR2HF K7DAN writes On Jan 16, 10:27*am, RHF wrote: On Jan 15, 3:51*pm, wrote: On Jan 15, 5:50 pm, "SC Dxing" wrote: wrote in message ... Who, but in hell is going to name their kid "Lucifer" or even Ramakrishna Lakshminaramayanan. Someone named their kid Adolf Hitler and it was all over the news. The only place you can find this bogus story is on Usenet. Oh, not just usenet. What's funny is so many people have responded to the false story, including yourself and now sad to say, myself. We both just rewarded the poster by responding to it. - Not necessary, I did not respond to the story, - I responded to Radioguy's post, - reporting a blatant troll story. - - 73 DL "Troll Story" - war and peace on the internet ~ RHF *. Gee, the date on that story was April 1, 2008. Could that be a clue? I'm sure that everyone DID realise what the date was, and were simply going along with the joke to see how many more of the gullible could be drawn in before the myth imploded. However, these days, you can never REALLY be sure that these things aren't in fact true. -- Ian |
Are hams terrorists?
Ian Jackson wrote:
In message , . Gee, the date on that story was April 1, 2008. Could that be a clue? I'm sure that everyone DID realise what the date was, and were simply going along with the joke to see how many more of the gullible could be drawn in before the myth imploded. However, these days, you can never REALLY be sure that these things aren't in fact true. For humor to work, it must be based on some level of truth. |
Are hams terrorists?
On Jan 16, 11:31*pm, wrote:
On Jan 15, 3:40*am, radioguy wrote: Take a look at the excuses the U.S. feds gave. I don't know if all of these people really were terrorists or not as the feds claim, You know. They're not. We liberals warned you conservatives about this massive overreach of the government in the "war on terrorism." It was Muslims first. Then ham radio operators. You'll be next. Yeah - Beware of Ham-Us who point their . . . Beam Antennas East Five Times a Day ;;-}} ~ RHF |
Are hams terrorists?
On Jan 18, 1:22*pm, RHF wrote:
There are a Billion Muslims in the World and -if- Only 1% were Terrorist : That would mean there should be about 10 Million Names on the List : So it would appear that we only have 10% of the 'potential' Islam-O-Fascist Terrorist on the List and need to do better. Good to do the math. I assume that the list is weighted towards Americans of all stripes and does not draw from the full billion Muslims. How many active terrorists are there in the world? I couldn't begin to guess. I tried to Google it but with no luck? But, I can't imagine it is anywhere near 10,000,000. If you count battery-owning ham radio terrorists, the number goes up, obviously. |
Are hams terrorists?
|
Are hams terrorists?
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:25 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com