Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Eduardo wrote:
No, an attempt to jump into the digital world that was just not timely enough. AM is pretty much dead, with little advertiser interest in most of the remaining listeners. The "digital world" is where machines live, not people. Until you can make a $5 digital radio that runs for a week on a single AA battery you have an inferior product. As I said earlier, AM DX can't be preserved if there is a way of making AMs more viable. As it is, the night listening levels to AM are about 25% of daytime levels, and there is no measured listening outside each station's local groundwave coverage area. The need for night service died when evening programming moved to TV, and then the FCC licensed about 10,000 more local stations, obviating any need to listen to scratchy, fading, staticy AM signals from afar. What about stations from "afar" that sound better than the locals? Los Angeles has nothing that comes close to the quality of KGO, both in production values and technical air sound. Hell, KKOH in Reno has a more together air sound than anything in L. A. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave" wrote in message m... What about stations from "afar" that sound better than the locals? Los Angeles has nothing that comes close to the quality of KGO, both in production values and technical air sound. Hell, KKOH in Reno has a more together air sound than anything in L. A. KGO is old fashioned in production and execution vs. KFI. And KFI does hugely better in 25-54 in its market than KGO does in theirs. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Radio Pioneers & Core Technologies -source- FCC | Shortwave | |||
What men do when they can't get laid... | General | |||
Yet Another Lennie Rant and Brain Drain Laid To Rest | Policy | |||
Two percent and 14 percent | Antenna |