|
Bogus ibiquity and the infinite spin master Struble
Whatever happened to low power hd radios that were just on the horizon
according to ibiquity? Every year we hear the same thing and as usual nothing materializes. How long will this nonsense continue? At least when FM came on the scene there were plenty of FM radios to choose from - so that old and tired comparison from ibquity is meaningless. What’s up with that Mr. "Radio Pioneer" Struble? Eduardo - Any comment? |
Bogus ibiquity and the infinite spin master Struble
On Feb 16, 10:05*am, wrote:
Whatever happened to low power hd radios that were just on the horizon according to ibiquity? *Every year we hear the same thing and as usual nothing materializes. *How long will this nonsense continue? At least when FM came on the scene there were plenty of FM radios to choose from - so that old and tired comparison from ibquity is meaningless. What’s up with that Mr. "Radio Pioneer" Struble? Eduardo - Any comment? I'm still waiting for the $19.99 HD portable radio. My $9.99 clock radio still works and sounds great.. LMAO.. |
Bogus ibiquity and the infinite spin master Struble
On Feb 16, 12:25 pm, elaich wrote:
wrote in news:bce3bccb-de13-419e-9cd6- : Whatever happened to low power hd radios that were just on the horizon according to ibiquity? Every year we hear the same thing and as usual nothing materializes. How long will this nonsense continue? Why do you keep posting this crap in this newsgroup that is completely off topic, and that most people are sick and tired of seeing? Another Google Grouper hits the killfile. Well elaich, I like to hear from guys like you. |
Bogus ibiquity and the infinite spin master Struble
On Feb 16, 12:55 pm, Bob Dobbs wrote:
elaich wrote: Another Google Grouper hits the killfile. http://improve-usenet.org/ -- Operator Bob Echo Charlie 42 Google Groups are FREE $$$ |
Bogus ibiquity and the infinite spin master Struble
On Feb 16, 10:05*am, wrote:
Whatever happened to low power hd radios that were just on the horizon according to ibiquity? *Every year we hear the same thing and as usual nothing materializes. *How long will this nonsense continue? At least when FM came on the scene there were plenty of FM radios to choose from - so that old and tired comparison from ibquity is meaningless. What’s up with that Mr. "Radio Pioneer" Struble? Eduardo - Any comment? Jim - haven't heard from you in a while, hope everything is ok? |
Bogus ibiquity and the infinite spin master Struble
On Feb 16, 12:25�pm, elaich wrote:
wrote in news:bce3bccb-de13-419e-9cd6- : Whatever happened to low power hd radios that were just on the horizon according to ibiquity? �Every year we hear the same thing and as usual nothing materializes. �How long will this nonsense continue? Why do you keep posting this crap in this newsgroup that is completely off topic, and that most people are sick and tired of seeing? Another Google Grouper hits the killfile. **** you... |
Bogus ibiquity and the infinite spin master Struble
wrote in message ... At least when FM came on the scene there were plenty of FM radios to choose from - so that old and tired comparison from ibquity is meaningless. FM began prior to W.W. II, and then changed from 47 MHz to the current band after the War. There were no radios available. By 1950, there were over 1000 FM stations licensed (source, Broadcasting Yearbook 1950) yet by 1960 there were only around 650 (idem, '60 edition). There were hardly any radios available, and the ones that were out there cost many times that of a common AM radio. That was 20 years after FM stations began to broadcast. In 1977, FM surpassed AM in audience. Today, in many markets, AM has less than 10% of all listening. Whether HD will work during a recession is anybody's guess. And whether AM is even worth trying is on many owner's minds. But expecting a change in a couple of years is absurd. Satellite is in Year 9 now, and still loses nearly $1 billion a year and may not survive. |
Bogus ibiquity and the infinite spin master Struble
On Feb 17, 1:39*am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message ... At least when FM came on the scene there were plenty of FM radios to choose from - so that old and tired comparison from ibquity is meaningless. FM began prior to W.W. II, and then changed from 47 MHz to the current band after the War. There were no radios available. By 1950, there were over 1000 FM stations licensed (source, Broadcasting Yearbook 1950) yet by 1960 there were only around 650 (idem, '60 edition).. There were hardly any radios available, and the ones that were out there cost many times that of a common AM radio. That was 20 years after FM stations began to broadcast. In 1977, FM surpassed AM in audience. Today, in many markets, AM has less than 10% of all listening. Whether HD will work during a recession is anybody's guess. And whether AM is even worth trying is on many owner's minds. But expecting a change in a couple of years is absurd. Satellite is in Year 9 now, and still loses nearly $1 billion a year and may not survive. What advantage do broadcasters have over webcasters? Towers. Nationwide wireless web access is on our horizon, with consumers receiving content via paid or free access supported by advertisers. Every radio will be web enabled. So get ready for URADIO created in many forms and colors. One form will be commercial broadcasters, competing head on with a guy or gal creating basement content. Google that! |
Bogus ibiquity and the infinite spin master Struble
On Feb 17, 1:39 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message ... At least when FM came on the scene there were plenty of FM radios to choose from - so that old and tired comparison from ibquity is meaningless. FM began prior to W.W. II, and then changed from 47 MHz to the current band after the War. There were no radios available. By 1950, there were over 1000 FM stations licensed (source, Broadcasting Yearbook 1950) yet by 1960 there were only around 650 (idem, '60 edition). There were hardly any radios available, and the ones that were out there cost many times that of a common AM radio. That was 20 years after FM stations began to broadcast. In 1977, FM surpassed AM in audience. Today, in many markets, AM has less than 10% of all listening. Whether HD will work during a recession is anybody's guess. And whether AM is even worth trying is on many owner's minds. But expecting a change in a couple of years is absurd. Satellite is in Year 9 now, and still loses nearly $1 billion a year and may not survive. Eduardo - You're a bit mistaken, at least as far as ibiquity is concerned. If I recall (and I do), Struble boldly stated several years back that his hd radio would become the "norm" in a few short years. Go back through recent radio history and check it for yourself. In case you haven't noticed - a few short years have come and gone - good buddy. He also stated that when you purchase a radio you would automatically assume you purchased an hd "digital" radio. Didn't happen - not even close. Once again you look at the world in your typical distorted way but it's always fun talking to you anyway. You do need to get another profession thought. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:55 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com