|
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 InternationalScientistsDissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
John Barnard wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , Billy Burpelson wrote: MNMikeW wrote: There has been no warming for last 10 years yet CO levels continue to rise. Billy Burpelson wrote: Well, OK, no warming. If you say so...but then what would explain all those glaciers and polar ice that is melting? Somebody used Photoshop (tm) to doctor the hundreds of satellite and terrestrial pictures that have been published over the last several years showing the melting? ALL those pictures are fraudulent? Also, I think you meant C02 (carbon dioxide), not CO (carbon monoxide). Telamon wrote: They melt every year in the summer time Billy. It's nothing new or different. Can you guess what happens in the winter time? I'll bet you can. Yes indeed, there are seasonal changes. Congratulations on your intuitive grasp of...the obvious. I grew up on the east coast so I know about the seasons. Unfortunately, if you had done even the tiniest bit of homework, you would realize that there has been a huge loss of ice, glaciers pulled back for -miles-, waaay more than can be accounted for by seasonal changes. I have spent hours reading about this and you are buying the global warming Kool-aid but hey I'm not surprised. Selective reading, no doubt. You should not take so much pride in your selection bias. But, hey, that's OK. We here realize that you've never been one to let facts get in your way. Facts are data. Data by itself is useless. You have to understand what you are looking at to draw conclusions. In other words, you went on a data mining trip. GWB did that with Iraq and he recanted later on. When can we expect your mea culpa? You have not done this. Instead you have allowed other people to draw conclusions for you because of some personal reason. That reason could be that you are just plain lazy or it could be you are to dull. Whatever the reason I suggest you apply a little more personal effort on the topic instead of making the usual ignorant post. How goes your Obama BC conspiracy? How goes your CanaDuh really means anything at all conspiracy? CanaDuh is nothing. Get over it. dxAce Michigan USA |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
In article ,
John Barnard wrote: Billy Burpelson wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... MNMikeW wrote: http://www.businessandmedia.org/arti...506084437.aspx Well now, there's a reliable source: the "Business and Media Institute"? What kind of *scientific* organization is that? What scientific proof do they offer other than saying "it ain't so"? MNMikeW wrote: Shoot the messenger when you have nothing. Typical lib. Nothing to do with "shoot the messenger". Or lib. Or conservative. It is a scientific topic and therefore a perfectly legitimate question to ask what their scientific qualifications are. It is always a good idea to assess and examine credentials or to see who are the sponsors of a study. Oh yeah, your credentials as a dumb ass Usenet poster boy are very impressive. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
In article ,
John Barnard wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , Billy Burpelson wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... MNMikeW wrote: http://www.businessandmedia.org/arti...506084437.aspx Well now, there's a reliable source: the "Business and Media Institute"? What kind of *scientific* organization is that? What scientific proof do they offer other than saying "it ain't so"? MNMikeW wrote: Shoot the messenger when you have nothing. Typical lib. Nothing to do with "shoot the messenger". Or lib. Or conservative. It is a scientific topic and therefore a perfectly legitimate question to ask what their scientific qualifications are. How about shoot the idiot? Let's make holes in Billy boy. RHF Jr. - you really need to stop shooting your foot while it is in your mouth! Hey Kookabura junior don't talk with both your feet in your mouth. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
In article ,
John Barnard wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , Billy Burpelson wrote: MNMikeW wrote: There has been no warming for last 10 years yet CO levels continue to rise. Billy Burpelson wrote: Well, OK, no warming. If you say so...but then what would explain all those glaciers and polar ice that is melting? Somebody used Photoshop (tm) to doctor the hundreds of satellite and terrestrial pictures that have been published over the last several years showing the melting? ALL those pictures are fraudulent? Also, I think you meant C02 (carbon dioxide), not CO (carbon monoxide). Telamon wrote: They melt every year in the summer time Billy. It's nothing new or different. Can you guess what happens in the winter time? I'll bet you can. Yes indeed, there are seasonal changes. Congratulations on your intuitive grasp of...the obvious. I grew up on the east coast so I know about the seasons. Unfortunately, if you had done even the tiniest bit of homework, you would realize that there has been a huge loss of ice, glaciers pulled back for -miles-, waaay more than can be accounted for by seasonal changes. I have spent hours reading about this and you are buying the global warming Kool-aid but hey I'm not surprised. Selective reading, no doubt. You should not take so much pride in your selection bias. I would say that was selective thinking on your part but it's obvious you don't have a thought. But, hey, that's OK. We here realize that you've never been one to let facts get in your way. Facts are data. Data by itself is useless. You have to understand what you are looking at to draw conclusions. In other words, you went on a data mining trip. GWB did that with Iraq and he recanted later on. When can we expect your mea culpa? He relied on faulty intelligence gathering and you have, as in only, faulty intelligence. There is a difference. You have not done this. Instead you have allowed other people to draw conclusions for you because of some personal reason. That reason could be that you are just plain lazy or it could be you are to dull. Whatever the reason I suggest you apply a little more personal effort on the topic instead of making the usual ignorant post. How goes your Obama BC conspiracy? Seems to be moving right along on schedule as I predicted. How are the voices in your head treating you today? -- Telamon Ventura, California |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
|
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
In article telamon_spamshield-6B18AD.23350714032009
@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com, lid says... In article , BDK wrote: In article telamon_spamshield-434D33.18490114032009 @newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net, lid says... In article , John Barnard wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , Billy Burpelson wrote: MNMikeW wrote: There has been no warming for last 10 years yet CO levels continue to rise. Billy Burpelson wrote: Well, OK, no warming. If you say so...but then what would explain all those glaciers and polar ice that is melting? Somebody used Photoshop (tm) to doctor the hundreds of satellite and terrestrial pictures that have been published over the last several years showing the melting? ALL those pictures are fraudulent? Also, I think you meant C02 (carbon dioxide), not CO (carbon monoxide). Telamon wrote: They melt every year in the summer time Billy. It's nothing new or different. Can you guess what happens in the winter time? I'll bet you can. Yes indeed, there are seasonal changes. Congratulations on your intuitive grasp of...the obvious. I grew up on the east coast so I know about the seasons. Unfortunately, if you had done even the tiniest bit of homework, you would realize that there has been a huge loss of ice, glaciers pulled back for -miles-, waaay more than can be accounted for by seasonal changes. I have spent hours reading about this and you are buying the global warming Kool-aid but hey I'm not surprised. Selective reading, no doubt. You should not take so much pride in your selection bias. I would say that was selective thinking on your part but it's obvious you don't have a thought. But, hey, that's OK. We here realize that you've never been one to let facts get in your way. Facts are data. Data by itself is useless. You have to understand what you are looking at to draw conclusions. In other words, you went on a data mining trip. GWB did that with Iraq and he recanted later on. When can we expect your mea culpa? He relied on faulty intelligence gathering and you have, as in only, faulty intelligence. There is a difference. You have not done this. Instead you have allowed other people to draw conclusions for you because of some personal reason. That reason could be that you are just plain lazy or it could be you are to dull. Whatever the reason I suggest you apply a little more personal effort on the topic instead of making the usual ignorant post. How goes your Obama BC conspiracy? Seems to be moving right along on schedule as I predicted. How are the voices in your head treating you today? LOL. The Obama BC kooktardery calls to you, doesn't it? You are the one with the Kookaburra call. It's funny, but it must be hell for your family. They can't do a thing for you, until you want to get help yourself. They pretty much agree with me on most things. I'm not you. I don't have problems with family members or have the psychological problems you exhibit. Keep saying it, again and again, Telemundo. I'm sure you'll convince yourself of something or another, maybe that Obama was born in Kenya, or some other crazy ****. -- BDK BDK Klan leader? Former #1 kOOk Magnet (Title passed to Larnrod!) NJJ CLUB #1 Shillmaster |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
In article ,
BDK wrote: In article telamon_spamshield-6B18AD.23350714032009 @newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com, lid says... In article , BDK wrote: In article telamon_spamshield-434D33.18490114032009 @newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net, lid says... In article , John Barnard wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , Billy Burpelson wrote: MNMikeW wrote: There has been no warming for last 10 years yet CO levels continue to rise. Billy Burpelson wrote: Well, OK, no warming. If you say so...but then what would explain all those glaciers and polar ice that is melting? Somebody used Photoshop (tm) to doctor the hundreds of satellite and terrestrial pictures that have been published over the last several years showing the melting? ALL those pictures are fraudulent? Also, I think you meant C02 (carbon dioxide), not CO (carbon monoxide). Telamon wrote: They melt every year in the summer time Billy. It's nothing new or different. Can you guess what happens in the winter time? I'll bet you can. Yes indeed, there are seasonal changes. Congratulations on your intuitive grasp of...the obvious. I grew up on the east coast so I know about the seasons. Unfortunately, if you had done even the tiniest bit of homework, you would realize that there has been a huge loss of ice, glaciers pulled back for -miles-, waaay more than can be accounted for by seasonal changes. I have spent hours reading about this and you are buying the global warming Kool-aid but hey I'm not surprised. Selective reading, no doubt. You should not take so much pride in your selection bias. I would say that was selective thinking on your part but it's obvious you don't have a thought. But, hey, that's OK. We here realize that you've never been one to let facts get in your way. Facts are data. Data by itself is useless. You have to understand what you are looking at to draw conclusions. In other words, you went on a data mining trip. GWB did that with Iraq and he recanted later on. When can we expect your mea culpa? He relied on faulty intelligence gathering and you have, as in only, faulty intelligence. There is a difference. You have not done this. Instead you have allowed other people to draw conclusions for you because of some personal reason. That reason could be that you are just plain lazy or it could be you are to dull. Whatever the reason I suggest you apply a little more personal effort on the topic instead of making the usual ignorant post. How goes your Obama BC conspiracy? Seems to be moving right along on schedule as I predicted. How are the voices in your head treating you today? LOL. The Obama BC kooktardery calls to you, doesn't it? You are the one with the Kookaburra call. It's funny, but it must be hell for your family. They can't do a thing for you, until you want to get help yourself. They pretty much agree with me on most things. I'm not you. I don't have problems with family members or have the psychological problems you exhibit. Keep saying it, again and again, Telemundo. I'm sure you'll convince yourself of something or another, maybe that Obama was born in Kenya, or some other crazy ****. Repetition does not work on me but it does work on you. You keep saying stupid stuff and trying to attribute it to me. Well, that has not worked and if you keep it up it still won't work but it will accomplish one thing and that's your credentials as a Kookaburra. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International ScientistsDissentOver Man-Made Global Warming Claims
dxAce wrote:
John Barnard wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , Billy Burpelson wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... MNMikeW wrote: http://www.businessandmedia.org/arti...506084437.aspx Well now, there's a reliable source: the "Business and Media Institute"? What kind of *scientific* organization is that? What scientific proof do they offer other than saying "it ain't so"? MNMikeW wrote: Shoot the messenger when you have nothing. Typical lib. Nothing to do with "shoot the messenger". Or lib. Or conservative. It is a scientific topic and therefore a perfectly legitimate question to ask what their scientific qualifications are. How about shoot the idiot? Let's make holes in Billy boy. RHF Jr. - you really need to stop shooting your foot while it is in your mouth! CanaDuh has it's foot in it's mouth... it is definitely a third world country, sucking off the teat of the USA. I say, cast the *******s off! For a guy who claims to have a business degree you sure didn't get a good grasp of the basics. Better get your $$$ back from the Matchbook Business Institute! JB |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International ScientistsDissentOver Man-Made Global Warming Claims
dxAce wrote:
John Barnard wrote: Billy Burpelson wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... MNMikeW wrote: http://www.businessandmedia.org/arti...506084437.aspx Well now, there's a reliable source: the "Business and Media Institute"? What kind of *scientific* organization is that? What scientific proof do they offer other than saying "it ain't so"? MNMikeW wrote: Shoot the messenger when you have nothing. Typical lib. Nothing to do with "shoot the messenger". Or lib. Or conservative. It is a scientific topic and therefore a perfectly legitimate question to ask what their scientific qualifications are. It is always a good idea to assess and examine credentials or to see who are the sponsors of a study. Ignore studies by dumbass Canucks! The Bible Belt whack you one too many times up the side of your head? JB |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International ScientistsDissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
Telamon wrote:
In article , John Barnard wrote: Billy Burpelson wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... MNMikeW wrote: http://www.businessandmedia.org/arti...506084437.aspx Well now, there's a reliable source: the "Business and Media Institute"? What kind of *scientific* organization is that? What scientific proof do they offer other than saying "it ain't so"? MNMikeW wrote: Shoot the messenger when you have nothing. Typical lib. Nothing to do with "shoot the messenger". Or lib. Or conservative. It is a scientific topic and therefore a perfectly legitimate question to ask what their scientific qualifications are. It is always a good idea to assess and examine credentials or to see who are the sponsors of a study. Oh yeah, your credentials as a dumb ass Usenet poster boy are very impressive. And your credentials of pretending to be hot **** when you are nothing more than cold **** in a Dixie cup are even more impressive! JB |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International ScientistsDissentOver Man-Made Global Warming Claims
dxAce wrote:
John Barnard wrote: MNMikeW wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... MNMikeW wrote: http://www.businessandmedia.org/arti...506084437.aspx Well now, there's a reliable source: the "Business and Media Institute"? What kind of *scientific* organization is that? What scientific proof do they offer other than saying "it ain't so"? Shoot the messenger when you have nothing. Typical lib. The National Academy of Sciences agrees with Mann and not with the "Business and Media Institute". Are you guys in Mn ever going to get your other Senator? Maybe as soon as you f00kin dumbass Canucks who thought you could tax your way to prosperity can get your excrement together in one sack! I have no doubt that my standard of living is better than what you have! After all, I don't need alcohol to blind me to reality! JB |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International ScientistsDissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
MNMikeW wrote:
"John Barnard" wrote in message ... MNMikeW wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... MNMikeW wrote: http://www.businessandmedia.org/arti...506084437.aspx Well now, there's a reliable source: the "Business and Media Institute"? What kind of *scientific* organization is that? What scientific proof do they offer other than saying "it ain't so"? Shoot the messenger when you have nothing. Typical lib. The National Academy of Sciences agrees with Mann and not with the "Business and Media Institute". Are you guys in Mn ever going to get your other Senator? JB Next year perhaps. Leave it to lawyers to mess things up. JB |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International ScientistsDissentOver Man-Made Global Warming Claims
dxAce wrote:
John Barnard wrote: MNMikeW wrote: "dave" wrote in message ... MNMikeW wrote: Sensor drift, google it. Give it up. You are a tool of entrenched carbon industries. Whereas you are just a tool. Speaking of tools, I hope that you didn't donate to the Coleman campaign using a credit card. Sorry SOB didn't let anyone know that their data had been compromised. RIP - Coleman! Never listen to dumbass Canucks, no matter what dey say! Da dxAce never done steer no one wrong! You go around in circles all the time! And that's the worst kind of steering that exists! JB |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International ScientistsDissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
Telamon wrote:
In article , John Barnard wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , Billy Burpelson wrote: MNMikeW wrote: There has been no warming for last 10 years yet CO levels continue to rise. Billy Burpelson wrote: Well, OK, no warming. If you say so...but then what would explain all those glaciers and polar ice that is melting? Somebody used Photoshop (tm) to doctor the hundreds of satellite and terrestrial pictures that have been published over the last several years showing the melting? ALL those pictures are fraudulent? Also, I think you meant C02 (carbon dioxide), not CO (carbon monoxide). Telamon wrote: They melt every year in the summer time Billy. It's nothing new or different. Can you guess what happens in the winter time? I'll bet you can. Yes indeed, there are seasonal changes. Congratulations on your intuitive grasp of...the obvious. I grew up on the east coast so I know about the seasons. Unfortunately, if you had done even the tiniest bit of homework, you would realize that there has been a huge loss of ice, glaciers pulled back for -miles-, waaay more than can be accounted for by seasonal changes. I have spent hours reading about this and you are buying the global warming Kool-aid but hey I'm not surprised. Selective reading, no doubt. You should not take so much pride in your selection bias. I would say that was selective thinking on your part but it's obvious you don't have a thought. But, hey, that's OK. We here realize that you've never been one to let facts get in your way. Facts are data. Data by itself is useless. You have to understand what you are looking at to draw conclusions. In other words, you went on a data mining trip. GWB did that with Iraq and he recanted later on. When can we expect your mea culpa? He relied on faulty intelligence gathering and you have, as in only, faulty intelligence. There is a difference. You have not done this. Instead you have allowed other people to draw conclusions for you because of some personal reason. That reason could be that you are just plain lazy or it could be you are to dull. Whatever the reason I suggest you apply a little more personal effort on the topic instead of making the usual ignorant post. How goes your Obama BC conspiracy? Seems to be moving right along on schedule as I predicted. How are the voices in your head treating you today? Right on schedule!?! There has to be some sort of 12-Step program near you! JB |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
In article ,
John Barnard wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , John Barnard wrote: Billy Burpelson wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... MNMikeW wrote: http://www.businessandmedia.org/arti...506084437.aspx Well now, there's a reliable source: the "Business and Media Institute"? What kind of *scientific* organization is that? What scientific proof do they offer other than saying "it ain't so"? MNMikeW wrote: Shoot the messenger when you have nothing. Typical lib. Nothing to do with "shoot the messenger". Or lib. Or conservative. It is a scientific topic and therefore a perfectly legitimate question to ask what their scientific qualifications are. It is always a good idea to assess and examine credentials or to see who are the sponsors of a study. Oh yeah, your credentials as a dumb ass Usenet poster boy are very impressive. And your credentials of pretending to be hot **** when you are nothing more than cold **** in a Dixie cup are even more impressive! On the other hand your credentials as an idiot are very impressive. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 InternationalScientistsDissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
John Barnard wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , John Barnard wrote: Billy Burpelson wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... MNMikeW wrote: http://www.businessandmedia.org/arti...506084437.aspx Well now, there's a reliable source: the "Business and Media Institute"? What kind of *scientific* organization is that? What scientific proof do they offer other than saying "it ain't so"? MNMikeW wrote: Shoot the messenger when you have nothing. Typical lib. Nothing to do with "shoot the messenger". Or lib. Or conservative. It is a scientific topic and therefore a perfectly legitimate question to ask what their scientific qualifications are. It is always a good idea to assess and examine credentials or to see who are the sponsors of a study. Oh yeah, your credentials as a dumb ass Usenet poster boy are very impressive. And your credentials of pretending to be hot **** when you are nothing more than cold **** in a Dixie cup are even more impressive! Gee, that sounds a lot like what CanaDuh does: pretend to be hot **** when it is nothing more than cold **** in a Dixie cup! |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
In article ,
John Barnard wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , John Barnard wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , Billy Burpelson wrote: MNMikeW wrote: There has been no warming for last 10 years yet CO levels continue to rise. Billy Burpelson wrote: Well, OK, no warming. If you say so...but then what would explain all those glaciers and polar ice that is melting? Somebody used Photoshop (tm) to doctor the hundreds of satellite and terrestrial pictures that have been published over the last several years showing the melting? ALL those pictures are fraudulent? Also, I think you meant C02 (carbon dioxide), not CO (carbon monoxide). Telamon wrote: They melt every year in the summer time Billy. It's nothing new or different. Can you guess what happens in the winter time? I'll bet you can. Yes indeed, there are seasonal changes. Congratulations on your intuitive grasp of...the obvious. I grew up on the east coast so I know about the seasons. Unfortunately, if you had done even the tiniest bit of homework, you would realize that there has been a huge loss of ice, glaciers pulled back for -miles-, waaay more than can be accounted for by seasonal changes. I have spent hours reading about this and you are buying the global warming Kool-aid but hey I'm not surprised. Selective reading, no doubt. You should not take so much pride in your selection bias. I would say that was selective thinking on your part but it's obvious you don't have a thought. But, hey, that's OK. We here realize that you've never been one to let facts get in your way. Facts are data. Data by itself is useless. You have to understand what you are looking at to draw conclusions. In other words, you went on a data mining trip. GWB did that with Iraq and he recanted later on. When can we expect your mea culpa? He relied on faulty intelligence gathering and you have, as in only, faulty intelligence. There is a difference. You have not done this. Instead you have allowed other people to draw conclusions for you because of some personal reason. That reason could be that you are just plain lazy or it could be you are to dull. Whatever the reason I suggest you apply a little more personal effort on the topic instead of making the usual ignorant post. How goes your Obama BC conspiracy? Seems to be moving right along on schedule as I predicted. How are the voices in your head treating you today? Right on schedule!?! There has to be some sort of 12-Step program near you! I defer to your expertise on 12 step programs since you have been on many for alcohol, crack, and PCP usage among others, which begs the question of how you are doing on them. From here it doesn't look good. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International ScientistsDissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
In article ,
John Barnard wrote: dxAce wrote: John Barnard wrote: MNMikeW wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... MNMikeW wrote: http://www.businessandmedia.org/arti...506084437.aspx Well now, there's a reliable source: the "Business and Media Institute"? What kind of *scientific* organization is that? What scientific proof do they offer other than saying "it ain't so"? Shoot the messenger when you have nothing. Typical lib. The National Academy of Sciences agrees with Mann and not with the "Business and Media Institute". Are you guys in Mn ever going to get your other Senator? Maybe as soon as you f00kin dumbass Canucks who thought you could tax your way to prosperity can get your excrement together in one sack! I have no doubt that my standard of living is better than what you have! After all, I don't need alcohol to blind me to reality! The 12 step program work for the alcohol then. What about the other drug abuse? Looks like that is still happening. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International ScientistsDissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
In article ,
John Barnard wrote: dxAce wrote: John Barnard wrote: MNMikeW wrote: "dave" wrote in message ... MNMikeW wrote: Sensor drift, google it. Give it up. You are a tool of entrenched carbon industries. Whereas you are just a tool. Speaking of tools, I hope that you didn't donate to the Coleman campaign using a credit card. Sorry SOB didn't let anyone know that their data had been compromised. RIP - Coleman! Never listen to dumbass Canucks, no matter what dey say! Da dxAce never done steer no one wrong! You go around in circles all the time! And that's the worst kind of steering that exists! This from a guy with one ore in the water? You must be dizzy from the circles you make. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International ScientistsDissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
In article ,
John Barnard wrote: dxAce wrote: John Barnard wrote: Billy Burpelson wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... MNMikeW wrote: http://www.businessandmedia.org/arti...506084437.aspx Well now, there's a reliable source: the "Business and Media Institute"? What kind of *scientific* organization is that? What scientific proof do they offer other than saying "it ain't so"? MNMikeW wrote: Shoot the messenger when you have nothing. Typical lib. Nothing to do with "shoot the messenger". Or lib. Or conservative. It is a scientific topic and therefore a perfectly legitimate question to ask what their scientific qualifications are. It is always a good idea to assess and examine credentials or to see who are the sponsors of a study. Ignore studies by dumbass Canucks! The Bible Belt whack you one too many times up the side of your head? Did you fall down and hit your head again? You must have more bumps on your noggin than a toad has on it body. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International ScientistsDissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
In article ,
dxAce wrote: John Barnard wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , John Barnard wrote: Billy Burpelson wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... MNMikeW wrote: http://www.businessandmedia.org/arti...506084437.aspx Well now, there's a reliable source: the "Business and Media Institute"? What kind of *scientific* organization is that? What scientific proof do they offer other than saying "it ain't so"? MNMikeW wrote: Shoot the messenger when you have nothing. Typical lib. Nothing to do with "shoot the messenger". Or lib. Or conservative. It is a scientific topic and therefore a perfectly legitimate question to ask what their scientific qualifications are. It is always a good idea to assess and examine credentials or to see who are the sponsors of a study. Oh yeah, your credentials as a dumb ass Usenet poster boy are very impressive. And your credentials of pretending to be hot **** when you are nothing more than cold **** in a Dixie cup are even more impressive! Gee, that sounds a lot like what CanaDuh does: pretend to be hot **** when it is nothing more than cold **** in a Dixie cup! Barnard is nothing but a hoser. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International ScientistsDissentOver Man-Made Global Warming Claims
Telamon wrote:
In article , John Barnard wrote: dxAce wrote: John Barnard wrote: Billy Burpelson wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... MNMikeW wrote: http://www.businessandmedia.org/arti...506084437.aspx Well now, there's a reliable source: the "Business and Media Institute"? What kind of *scientific* organization is that? What scientific proof do they offer other than saying "it ain't so"? MNMikeW wrote: Shoot the messenger when you have nothing. Typical lib. Nothing to do with "shoot the messenger". Or lib. Or conservative. It is a scientific topic and therefore a perfectly legitimate question to ask what their scientific qualifications are. It is always a good idea to assess and examine credentials or to see who are the sponsors of a study. Ignore studies by dumbass Canucks! The Bible Belt whack you one too many times up the side of your head? Did you fall down and hit your head again? You must have more bumps on your noggin than a toad has on it body. Hey, Polly! Here's one for you to repeat: "Obama has a legit BC. Obama has a legit BC". JB |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International ScientistsDissentOver Man-Made Global Warming Claims
dxAce wrote:
John Barnard wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , John Barnard wrote: Billy Burpelson wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... MNMikeW wrote: http://www.businessandmedia.org/arti...506084437.aspx Well now, there's a reliable source: the "Business and Media Institute"? What kind of *scientific* organization is that? What scientific proof do they offer other than saying "it ain't so"? MNMikeW wrote: Shoot the messenger when you have nothing. Typical lib. Nothing to do with "shoot the messenger". Or lib. Or conservative. It is a scientific topic and therefore a perfectly legitimate question to ask what their scientific qualifications are. It is always a good idea to assess and examine credentials or to see who are the sponsors of a study. Oh yeah, your credentials as a dumb ass Usenet poster boy are very impressive. And your credentials of pretending to be hot **** when you are nothing more than cold **** in a Dixie cup are even more impressive! Gee, that sounds a lot like what CanaDuh does: pretend to be hot **** when it is nothing more than cold **** in a Dixie cup! Cool! Someone let the other Polly out of its cage! JB |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International ScientistsDissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
Telamon wrote:
In article , John Barnard wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , John Barnard wrote: Billy Burpelson wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... MNMikeW wrote: http://www.businessandmedia.org/arti...506084437.aspx Well now, there's a reliable source: the "Business and Media Institute"? What kind of *scientific* organization is that? What scientific proof do they offer other than saying "it ain't so"? MNMikeW wrote: Shoot the messenger when you have nothing. Typical lib. Nothing to do with "shoot the messenger". Or lib. Or conservative. It is a scientific topic and therefore a perfectly legitimate question to ask what their scientific qualifications are. It is always a good idea to assess and examine credentials or to see who are the sponsors of a study. Oh yeah, your credentials as a dumb ass Usenet poster boy are very impressive. And your credentials of pretending to be hot **** when you are nothing more than cold **** in a Dixie cup are even more impressive! On the other hand your credentials as an idiot are very impressive. What do the voices in your head tell you about the next enthralling saga of Obama's BC? JB |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International ScientistsDissentOver Man-Made Global Warming Claims
Telamon wrote:
In article , John Barnard wrote: dxAce wrote: John Barnard wrote: MNMikeW wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... MNMikeW wrote: http://www.businessandmedia.org/arti...506084437.aspx Well now, there's a reliable source: the "Business and Media Institute"? What kind of *scientific* organization is that? What scientific proof do they offer other than saying "it ain't so"? Shoot the messenger when you have nothing. Typical lib. The National Academy of Sciences agrees with Mann and not with the "Business and Media Institute". Are you guys in Mn ever going to get your other Senator? Maybe as soon as you f00kin dumbass Canucks who thought you could tax your way to prosperity can get your excrement together in one sack! I have no doubt that my standard of living is better than what you have! After all, I don't need alcohol to blind me to reality! The 12 step program work for the alcohol then. What about the other drug abuse? Looks like that is still happening. We save that for kooktard conspiracists such as yourself. Even your RHF daddy can do better than that Jr. JB |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International ScientistsDissentOver Man-Made Global Warming Claims
Telamon wrote:
In article , John Barnard wrote: dxAce wrote: John Barnard wrote: MNMikeW wrote: "dave" wrote in message ... MNMikeW wrote: Sensor drift, google it. Give it up. You are a tool of entrenched carbon industries. Whereas you are just a tool. Speaking of tools, I hope that you didn't donate to the Coleman campaign using a credit card. Sorry SOB didn't let anyone know that their data had been compromised. RIP - Coleman! Never listen to dumbass Canucks, no matter what dey say! Da dxAce never done steer no one wrong! You go around in circles all the time! And that's the worst kind of steering that exists! This from a guy with one ore in the water? You must be dizzy from the circles you make. Funny thing about oars and paddles - if you know how to use them properly by paddling from side-to-side you can go in a straight line. But you wouldn't know anything about that now, would you? JB |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International ScientistsDissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
Telamon wrote:
In article , John Barnard wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , John Barnard wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , Billy Burpelson wrote: MNMikeW wrote: There has been no warming for last 10 years yet CO levels continue to rise. Billy Burpelson wrote: Well, OK, no warming. If you say so...but then what would explain all those glaciers and polar ice that is melting? Somebody used Photoshop (tm) to doctor the hundreds of satellite and terrestrial pictures that have been published over the last several years showing the melting? ALL those pictures are fraudulent? Also, I think you meant C02 (carbon dioxide), not CO (carbon monoxide). Telamon wrote: They melt every year in the summer time Billy. It's nothing new or different. Can you guess what happens in the winter time? I'll bet you can. Yes indeed, there are seasonal changes. Congratulations on your intuitive grasp of...the obvious. I grew up on the east coast so I know about the seasons. Unfortunately, if you had done even the tiniest bit of homework, you would realize that there has been a huge loss of ice, glaciers pulled back for -miles-, waaay more than can be accounted for by seasonal changes. I have spent hours reading about this and you are buying the global warming Kool-aid but hey I'm not surprised. Selective reading, no doubt. You should not take so much pride in your selection bias. I would say that was selective thinking on your part but it's obvious you don't have a thought. But, hey, that's OK. We here realize that you've never been one to let facts get in your way. Facts are data. Data by itself is useless. You have to understand what you are looking at to draw conclusions. In other words, you went on a data mining trip. GWB did that with Iraq and he recanted later on. When can we expect your mea culpa? He relied on faulty intelligence gathering and you have, as in only, faulty intelligence. There is a difference. You have not done this. Instead you have allowed other people to draw conclusions for you because of some personal reason. That reason could be that you are just plain lazy or it could be you are to dull. Whatever the reason I suggest you apply a little more personal effort on the topic instead of making the usual ignorant post. How goes your Obama BC conspiracy? Seems to be moving right along on schedule as I predicted. How are the voices in your head treating you today? Right on schedule!?! There has to be some sort of 12-Step program near you! I defer to your expertise on 12 step programs since you have been on many for alcohol, crack, and PCP usage among others, which begs the question of how you are doing on them. From here it doesn't look good. People who wear blinders very rarely have good vision. Remove your blinders and your outlook may improve. JB |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International ScientistsDissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
In article ,
John Barnard wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , John Barnard wrote: dxAce wrote: John Barnard wrote: Billy Burpelson wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... MNMikeW wrote: http://www.businessandmedia.org/arti...506084437.aspx Well now, there's a reliable source: the "Business and Media Institute"? What kind of *scientific* organization is that? What scientific proof do they offer other than saying "it ain't so"? MNMikeW wrote: Shoot the messenger when you have nothing. Typical lib. Nothing to do with "shoot the messenger". Or lib. Or conservative. It is a scientific topic and therefore a perfectly legitimate question to ask what their scientific qualifications are. It is always a good idea to assess and examine credentials or to see who are the sponsors of a study. Ignore studies by dumbass Canucks! The Bible Belt whack you one too many times up the side of your head? Did you fall down and hit your head again? You must have more bumps on your noggin than a toad has on it body. Hey, Polly! Here's one for you to repeat: "Obama has a legit BC. Obama has a legit BC". Here is one for you. John Barnard is an ignorant ass! John Barnard is an ignorant ass! -- Telamon Ventura, California |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International ScientistsDissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
In article ,
John Barnard wrote: dxAce wrote: John Barnard wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , John Barnard wrote: Billy Burpelson wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... MNMikeW wrote: http://www.businessandmedia.org/arti...506084437.aspx Well now, there's a reliable source: the "Business and Media Institute"? What kind of *scientific* organization is that? What scientific proof do they offer other than saying "it ain't so"? MNMikeW wrote: Shoot the messenger when you have nothing. Typical lib. Nothing to do with "shoot the messenger". Or lib. Or conservative. It is a scientific topic and therefore a perfectly legitimate question to ask what their scientific qualifications are. It is always a good idea to assess and examine credentials or to see who are the sponsors of a study. Oh yeah, your credentials as a dumb ass Usenet poster boy are very impressive. And your credentials of pretending to be hot **** when you are nothing more than cold **** in a Dixie cup are even more impressive! Gee, that sounds a lot like what CanaDuh does: pretend to be hot **** when it is nothing more than cold **** in a Dixie cup! Cool! Someone let the other Polly out of its cage! Uncool - you. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
In article ,
John Barnard wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , John Barnard wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , John Barnard wrote: Billy Burpelson wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... MNMikeW wrote: http://www.businessandmedia.org/arti...506084437.aspx Well now, there's a reliable source: the "Business and Media Institute"? What kind of *scientific* organization is that? What scientific proof do they offer other than saying "it ain't so"? MNMikeW wrote: Shoot the messenger when you have nothing. Typical lib. Nothing to do with "shoot the messenger". Or lib. Or conservative. It is a scientific topic and therefore a perfectly legitimate question to ask what their scientific qualifications are. It is always a good idea to assess and examine credentials or to see who are the sponsors of a study. Oh yeah, your credentials as a dumb ass Usenet poster boy are very impressive. And your credentials of pretending to be hot **** when you are nothing more than cold **** in a Dixie cup are even more impressive! On the other hand your credentials as an idiot are very impressive. What do the voices in your head tell you about the next enthralling saga of Obama's BC? No voices have programed me like they have you. You don't know what in blazes you are talking about that won't stop you. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International ScientistsDissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
In article ,
John Barnard wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , John Barnard wrote: dxAce wrote: John Barnard wrote: MNMikeW wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... MNMikeW wrote: http://www.businessandmedia.org/arti...506084437.aspx Well now, there's a reliable source: the "Business and Media Institute"? What kind of *scientific* organization is that? What scientific proof do they offer other than saying "it ain't so"? Shoot the messenger when you have nothing. Typical lib. The National Academy of Sciences agrees with Mann and not with the "Business and Media Institute". Are you guys in Mn ever going to get your other Senator? Maybe as soon as you f00kin dumbass Canucks who thought you could tax your way to prosperity can get your excrement together in one sack! I have no doubt that my standard of living is better than what you have! After all, I don't need alcohol to blind me to reality! The 12 step program work for the alcohol then. What about the other drug abuse? Looks like that is still happening. We save that for kooktard conspiracists such as yourself. Even your RHF daddy can do better than that Jr. You are not in command of the facts, you don't know what you are talking about, you miss construe what I post. The asshole act is coming up short hoser. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International ScientistsDissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
In article ,
John Barnard wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , John Barnard wrote: dxAce wrote: John Barnard wrote: MNMikeW wrote: "dave" wrote in message ... MNMikeW wrote: Sensor drift, google it. Give it up. You are a tool of entrenched carbon industries. Whereas you are just a tool. Speaking of tools, I hope that you didn't donate to the Coleman campaign using a credit card. Sorry SOB didn't let anyone know that their data had been compromised. RIP - Coleman! Never listen to dumbass Canucks, no matter what dey say! Da dxAce never done steer no one wrong! You go around in circles all the time! And that's the worst kind of steering that exists! This from a guy with one ore in the water? You must be dizzy from the circles you make. Funny thing about oars and paddles - if you know how to use them properly by paddling from side-to-side you can go in a straight line. You don't know and you only have one ore. But you wouldn't know anything about that now, would you? Of course I know about that, that's why I made the one ore in the water comment. You must be very dizzy. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
In article ,
John Barnard wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , John Barnard wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , John Barnard wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , Billy Burpelson wrote: MNMikeW wrote: There has been no warming for last 10 years yet CO levels continue to rise. Billy Burpelson wrote: Well, OK, no warming. If you say so...but then what would explain all those glaciers and polar ice that is melting? Somebody used Photoshop (tm) to doctor the hundreds of satellite and terrestrial pictures that have been published over the last several years showing the melting? ALL those pictures are fraudulent? Also, I think you meant C02 (carbon dioxide), not CO (carbon monoxide). Telamon wrote: They melt every year in the summer time Billy. It's nothing new or different. Can you guess what happens in the winter time? I'll bet you can. Yes indeed, there are seasonal changes. Congratulations on your intuitive grasp of...the obvious. I grew up on the east coast so I know about the seasons. Unfortunately, if you had done even the tiniest bit of homework, you would realize that there has been a huge loss of ice, glaciers pulled back for -miles-, waaay more than can be accounted for by seasonal changes. I have spent hours reading about this and you are buying the global warming Kool-aid but hey I'm not surprised. Selective reading, no doubt. You should not take so much pride in your selection bias. I would say that was selective thinking on your part but it's obvious you don't have a thought. But, hey, that's OK. We here realize that you've never been one to let facts get in your way. Facts are data. Data by itself is useless. You have to understand what you are looking at to draw conclusions. In other words, you went on a data mining trip. GWB did that with Iraq and he recanted later on. When can we expect your mea culpa? He relied on faulty intelligence gathering and you have, as in only, faulty intelligence. There is a difference. You have not done this. Instead you have allowed other people to draw conclusions for you because of some personal reason. That reason could be that you are just plain lazy or it could be you are to dull. Whatever the reason I suggest you apply a little more personal effort on the topic instead of making the usual ignorant post. How goes your Obama BC conspiracy? Seems to be moving right along on schedule as I predicted. How are the voices in your head treating you today? Right on schedule!?! There has to be some sort of 12-Step program near you! I defer to your expertise on 12 step programs since you have been on many for alcohol, crack, and PCP usage among others, which begs the question of how you are doing on them. From here it doesn't look good. People who wear blinders very rarely have good vision. Remove your blinders and your outlook may improve. I don't have blinders on. You just have a problem with what I post. You have no good reason to disagree with me of course and that's why you just keep on posting BS. BS is all you got. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International ScientistsDissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
|
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International ScientistsDissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
In article telamon_spamshield-52BD51.17534518032009
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net, lid says... In article , John Barnard wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , John Barnard wrote: dxAce wrote: John Barnard wrote: Billy Burpelson wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... MNMikeW wrote: http://www.businessandmedia.org/arti...506084437.aspx Well now, there's a reliable source: the "Business and Media Institute"? What kind of *scientific* organization is that? What scientific proof do they offer other than saying "it ain't so"? MNMikeW wrote: Shoot the messenger when you have nothing. Typical lib. Nothing to do with "shoot the messenger". Or lib. Or conservative. It is a scientific topic and therefore a perfectly legitimate question to ask what their scientific qualifications are. It is always a good idea to assess and examine credentials or to see who are the sponsors of a study. Ignore studies by dumbass Canucks! The Bible Belt whack you one too many times up the side of your head? Did you fall down and hit your head again? You must have more bumps on your noggin than a toad has on it body. Hey, Polly! Here's one for you to repeat: "Obama has a legit BC. Obama has a legit BC". Here is one for you. John Barnard is an ignorant ass! John Barnard is an ignorant ass! But he's not a Obama BC kooktard! But he's not a Obama BC kooktard! But he's not a Obama BC kooktard! But he's not a Obama BC kooktard! That's almost untoppable, Telemundo. -- BDK BDK Klan leader? Former #1 kOOk Magnet (Title passed to Larnrod!) NJJ CLUB #1 Shillmaster |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 InternationalScie...
Why is the Planet Mars heating up too? Couldn't be anything to do with
the Sun, or other natural thingys, now could it? cuhulin |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International ScientistsDissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
In article ,
BDK wrote: In article telamon_spamshield-52BD51.17534518032009 @newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net, lid says... In article , John Barnard wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , John Barnard wrote: dxAce wrote: John Barnard wrote: Billy Burpelson wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... MNMikeW wrote: http://www.businessandmedia.org/arti...506084437.aspx Well now, there's a reliable source: the "Business and Media Institute"? What kind of *scientific* organization is that? What scientific proof do they offer other than saying "it ain't so"? MNMikeW wrote: Shoot the messenger when you have nothing. Typical lib. Nothing to do with "shoot the messenger". Or lib. Or conservative. It is a scientific topic and therefore a perfectly legitimate question to ask what their scientific qualifications are. It is always a good idea to assess and examine credentials or to see who are the sponsors of a study. Ignore studies by dumbass Canucks! The Bible Belt whack you one too many times up the side of your head? Did you fall down and hit your head again? You must have more bumps on your noggin than a toad has on it body. Hey, Polly! Here's one for you to repeat: "Obama has a legit BC. Obama has a legit BC". Here is one for you. John Barnard is an ignorant ass! John Barnard is an ignorant ass! But he's not a Obama BC kooktard! But he's not a Obama BC kooktard! But he's not a Obama BC kooktard! But he's not a Obama BC kooktard! That's almost untoppable, Telemundo. Yet you are managing to do just that whack job. You topped me there. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International ScientistsDissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
In article ,
BDK wrote: In article telamon_spamshield-F0DC49.18021918032009 @newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net, lid says... In article , John Barnard wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , John Barnard wrote: dxAce wrote: John Barnard wrote: MNMikeW wrote: "dave" wrote in message ... MNMikeW wrote: Sensor drift, google it. Give it up. You are a tool of entrenched carbon industries. Whereas you are just a tool. Speaking of tools, I hope that you didn't donate to the Coleman campaign using a credit card. Sorry SOB didn't let anyone know that their data had been compromised. RIP - Coleman! Never listen to dumbass Canucks, no matter what dey say! Da dxAce never done steer no one wrong! You go around in circles all the time! And that's the worst kind of steering that exists! This from a guy with one ore in the water? You must be dizzy from the circles you make. Funny thing about oars and paddles - if you know how to use them properly by paddling from side-to-side you can go in a straight line. You don't know and you only have one ore. But you wouldn't know anything about that now, would you? Of course I know about that, that's why I made the one ore in the water comment. You must be very dizzy. An Obama BC kooktard calling someone else dizzy is just too ironic. A Kookaburra calling someone else a Kook? Now that's funny. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International ScientistsDissentOver Man-Made Global Warming Claims
BDK wrote:
In article telamon_spamshield-52BD51.17534518032009 @newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net, lid says... In article , John Barnard wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , John Barnard wrote: dxAce wrote: John Barnard wrote: Billy Burpelson wrote: "Billy Burpelson" wrote in message ... MNMikeW wrote: http://www.businessandmedia.org/arti...506084437.aspx Well now, there's a reliable source: the "Business and Media Institute"? What kind of *scientific* organization is that? What scientific proof do they offer other than saying "it ain't so"? MNMikeW wrote: Shoot the messenger when you have nothing. Typical lib. Nothing to do with "shoot the messenger". Or lib. Or conservative. It is a scientific topic and therefore a perfectly legitimate question to ask what their scientific qualifications are. It is always a good idea to assess and examine credentials or to see who are the sponsors of a study. Ignore studies by dumbass Canucks! The Bible Belt whack you one too many times up the side of your head? Did you fall down and hit your head again? You must have more bumps on your noggin than a toad has on it body. Hey, Polly! Here's one for you to repeat: "Obama has a legit BC. Obama has a legit BC". Here is one for you. John Barnard is an ignorant ass! John Barnard is an ignorant ass! But he's not a Obama BC kooktard! But he's not a Obama BC kooktard! But he's not a Obama BC kooktard! But he's not a Obama BC kooktard! That's almost untoppable, Telemundo. It's usually pretty tough to top the truth. Ahh, that Telemundoh! and his crazy conspiracies. JB |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:53 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com