In article ,
John Barnard wrote:

dxAce wrote:

John Barnard wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
John Barnard wrote:

Billy Burpelson wrote:
"Billy Burpelson" wrote in message
...
MNMikeW wrote:

http://www.businessandmedia.org/arti...506084437.aspx
Well now, there's a reliable source: the "Business and Media
Institute"? What kind of *scientific* organization is that? What
scientific proof do they offer other than saying "it ain't so"?
MNMikeW wrote:

Shoot the messenger when you have nothing. Typical lib.
Nothing to do with "shoot the messenger". Or lib. Or conservative.

It is a scientific topic and therefore a perfectly legitimate question
to ask what their scientific qualifications are.

It is always a good idea to assess and examine credentials or to see who
are the sponsors of a study.
Oh yeah, your credentials as a dumb ass Usenet poster boy are very
impressive.

And your credentials of pretending to be hot **** when you are nothing
more than cold **** in a Dixie cup are even more impressive!

Gee, that sounds a lot like what CanaDuh does: pretend to be hot **** when
it is
nothing more than cold **** in a Dixie cup!


Cool! Someone let the other Polly out of its cage!

Uncool - you.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California