Billy Burpelson wrote:
Berkeley Bolshevik wrote:

It will be hard to vote her and her crew out of office if Obammy
achieves his goal to put 95% of Americans on welfare.

First, what would be the point of having 95% of the people on welfare?
What would that "goal" accomplish?


A secure voting block that will always vote for Liberal-Socialists who
promise to keep the streams of government money flowing to people voting
for Liberals-Socialist.


Finally, even if this were so, how could the 5% that are working support
the 95% that aren't?


That is what we are finding out right now... Obama thinks they can. I
say that once you fleece the rich and have run out of other people's
money, then the Socialist nirvana will collapse, but Obama thinks he can
just print money and keep the deception alive.

You have just asked the Questions that Obama is afraid of..... This is
why the Democrats tried to destroy Joe the Plumber when he asked that
question. Joe was questioning how Socialism was going to afford all this
spreading the wealth around that Obama wants.

It's real nice to want everyone to get what they need, the problem is
the idea is like that of a perpetual motion machine.... they run up
against reality and a perpetual Socialist economy is as out of reach as
is the perpetual motion machine.

In article ,
says...
BDK wrote:
In article telamon_spamshield-31392C.21030521032009
@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com,
lid says...
In article 49c575a3.1387703@chupacabra,
Bob Dobbs wrote:

Brenda Ann wrote:
Perhaps you can explain how anyone being on welfare (and there's no way 95
(or even 50) percent of the population could ever be on welfare) would
affect voting? Even the homeless have voting rights..
There's no rational explanation to the absurd rantings of the Republican
losers, that's why they lost, too many inconsistencies in their dogma.
I would not put myself up as a paragon of rationality when you don't
even believe in God.




BWHAHAHAHA! I knew you would say something like that.

"God" has no place in politics. That's in backwards Middle East
countries, not the proudly secular U S of A.



Telemundohh feels differently, as his his right.

We have the right to snicker at him.
--
BDK

BDK Klan leader?
Former #1 kOOk Magnet (Title passed to Larnrod!)
NJJ CLUB #1
Shillmaster

In article ,
dave wrote:

BDK wrote:
In article telamon_spamshield-31392C.21030521032009
@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com,
lid says...
In article 49c575a3.1387703@chupacabra,
Bob Dobbs wrote:

Brenda Ann wrote:
Perhaps you can explain how anyone being on welfare (and there's no way
95
(or even 50) percent of the population could ever be on welfare) would
affect voting? Even the homeless have voting rights..
There's no rational explanation to the absurd rantings of the Republican
losers, that's why they lost, too many inconsistencies in their dogma.
I would not put myself up as a paragon of rationality when you don't
even believe in God.




BWHAHAHAHA! I knew you would say something like that.

"God" has no place in politics. That's in backwards Middle East
countries, not the proudly secular U S of A.

Our founding fathers thought differently. I'll side with them.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

In article ,
BDK wrote:

In article ,
says...
BDK wrote:
In article telamon_spamshield-31392C.21030521032009
@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com,
lid says...
In article 49c575a3.1387703@chupacabra,
Bob Dobbs wrote:

Brenda Ann wrote:
Perhaps you can explain how anyone being on welfare (and there's no
way 95
(or even 50) percent of the population could ever be on welfare) would
affect voting? Even the homeless have voting rights..
There's no rational explanation to the absurd rantings of the
Republican
losers, that's why they lost, too many inconsistencies in their dogma.
I would not put myself up as a paragon of rationality when you don't
even believe in God.




BWHAHAHAHA! I knew you would say something like that.

"God" has no place in politics. That's in backwards Middle East
countries, not the proudly secular U S of A.



Telemundohh feels differently, as his his right.

We have the right to snicker at him.

And you the right to laugh at anything, at any time, which of course you
exercise all the time.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

On Mar 22, 3:53*pm, who are you? wrote:
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 15:26:35 -0700, ~ RHF wrote:
On Mar 22, 6:22*am, dave wrote:
BDK wrote:
In article telamon_spamshield-31392C.21030521032009
@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com,
says...
In article 49c575a3.1387703@chupacabra,
*Bob Dobbs wrote:

Brenda Ann wrote:
Perhaps you can explain how anyone being on welfare (and there's
no way 95 (or even 50) percent of the population could ever be on
welfare) would affect voting? Even the homeless have voting
rights..
There's no rational explanation to the absurd rantings of the
Republican losers, that's why they lost, too many inconsistencies
in their dogma.
I would not put myself up as a paragon of rationality when you don't
even believe in God.

BWHAHAHAHA! I knew you would say something like that.

- "God" has no place in politics.

Dave -proclaims- "God" Has No Place In Politics.

He's right! Unless you wish to re-write the Constitution.

But, *if we re-write the Constitution, I want to see the 2nd amendment
removed because it will save ink. It's quite obsolete now that the
government has laser guns, toxic gas and

-can beam thoughts into you unshielded brain.

WAY - You are clealy "living proof" of that.

hulu, Hulu. HULU ! - http://www.hulu.com/

Guns are no defense against that!

Comrade Billy Burpelson wrote:

Berkeley Bolshevik wrote:

It will be hard to vote her and her crew out of office if Obammy
achieves his goal to put 95% of Americans on welfare.

First, what would be the point of having 95% of the people on welfare?
What would that "goal" accomplish?

The economy is a mess and it is ripe for politician to express
government is the answer to all our troubles. With his expansion of
government and new entitlements, he will increase the dependent class.
It's given, government entitlements are hard for politicians to let
go.

Finally, even if this were so, how could the 5% that are working support
the 95% that aren't?

We are on a progressive road of having the ratio of tax receivers
coming close to taxpayers. By the time the baby boom generation
retires, there will be less people paying into the system. We also
have the second highest corporate tax amongst industrialized nations.

The top 1 percent of income earners, by household, paid 39 percent of
all federal income taxes in 2005, whereas the bottom 50 percent paid a
little over 3 percent. Further, 32 percent of all tax returns filed in
2005 were from people who paid no federal income tax at all.

During Fiscal Year (FY) 2006, the IRS collected more than $2.2
trillion in tax net of refunds, about 44 percent of which was
attributable to the individual income tax. This is partially due to
the nature of the individual income tax category; containing taxes
collected from working class, small business, self employed, and
capital gains. Of the Individual Income Tax, the top 5% of income
earners pay 60% of this amount.


It stands to reason that 60% represents less people than those who pay
little or no tax at all.
-

Obama did not break his promise to review bills that
reach his desk line by line to eliminate earmarks. He now
says when he said it, it was a Teleprompter malfunction.

Comrade "Brenda Ann" wrote:


"Berkeley Bolshevik" wrote in message
.. .
Comrade " wrote:

On Mar 19, 6:35 pm, wrote:
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi Says Immigration Enforcement is "Un-
American"

http://www.numbersusa.com/content/

Wait till some blonde hairred blue eyed girl gets killed near the
border. I wonder if she will
change her tune then? But theb again, she and the others work for
that other country not the USA!
Elections coming up soon?

It will be hard to vote her and her crew out of office if Obammy
achieves his goal to put 95% of Americans on welfare.


Perhaps you can explain how anyone being on welfare (and there's no way 95
(or even 50) percent of the population could ever be on welfare) would
affect voting? Even the homeless have voting rights..

Obammy wants to make most Americans dependent on government. He did
campaign on tax increases on the top income earners and increase tax
breaks for those who do currently pay taxes.

http://www.barackobama.com/taxes/

Obama’s Comprehensive Tax Policy Plan for America will:

-Cut taxes for 95 percent of workers and their families with a tax cut
of $500 for workers or $1,000 for working couples.
-Provide generous tax cuts for low- and middle-income seniors,
homeowners, the uninsured, and families sending a child to college or
looking to save and accumulate wealth.

Obammy is attracting the lower classes by promising economic justice.
Karl Marx preached the same thing and the way he felt to achieve it
was through wealth distribution. That's why Joe "the Plumber" became
well known because he got Obammy to 'fess up on that goal.
-

Obama did not break his promise to review bills that
reach his desk line by line to eliminate earmarks. He now
says when he said it, it was a Teleprompter malfunction.

Obama Should Note Growing Anger in America. www.rense.com
cuhulin

In article telamon_spamshield-6FDB27.14093622032009
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net,
lid says...
In article ,
BDK wrote:

In article ,
says...
BDK wrote:
In article telamon_spamshield-31392C.21030521032009
@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com,
lid says...
In article 49c575a3.1387703@chupacabra,
Bob Dobbs wrote:

Brenda Ann wrote:
Perhaps you can explain how anyone being on welfare (and there's no
way 95
(or even 50) percent of the population could ever be on welfare) would
affect voting? Even the homeless have voting rights..
There's no rational explanation to the absurd rantings of the
Republican
losers, that's why they lost, too many inconsistencies in their dogma.
I would not put myself up as a paragon of rationality when you don't
even believe in God.




BWHAHAHAHA! I knew you would say something like that.

"God" has no place in politics. That's in backwards Middle East
countries, not the proudly secular U S of A.



Telemundohh feels differently, as his his right.

We have the right to snicker at him.

And you the right to laugh at anything, at any time, which of course you
exercise all the time.



Lying again, Telemundoh?

Typical.

--
BDK

BDK Klan leader?
Former #1 kOOk Magnet (Title passed to Larnrod!)
NJJ CLUB #1
Shillmaster

Telamon wrote:


Our founding fathers thought differently. I'll side with them.


They were quite meticulous about it, actually. More enlightened times
back then. We are younger than that now.