Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 20, 12:20*pm, "MNMikeW" wrote:
"Drafterman" wrote in message ... First of all, the bill originally containedl anguage to limit the amount of money that could be given as bonuses abut this was removed at the last minute. Details are still sketchy about who and why this happened but it means that the bill was not constructed with the intention of use as a diversionary tactic. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------*--------------- The who and why are NOT sketchy. Chris Dodd did it. As for why? I would imagine that $103,000 in campaign dough he got from AIG had something to do with it. But now of course, he claims he's giving it back, lol! Unless you can provide why your imaginings should be accepted as fact then I'll retain my use of the word "sketchy". |