Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Billy Burpelson wrote:
What more could they possibly add? That we may be experiencing the beginning of another "Maunder Minimum"? Possibly. All indicators are down not just the sunspots. Time will tell. The drop in solar wind is kind of scary. Hopefully, this will just last another couple of years at most otherwise we will be spending the rest of our lives going through another "Maunder Minimum". dave wrote: If the solar winds get much weaker we won't be around to worry about some stupid glaciers. From Wikipedia: "Earth itself is largely *protected* [emphasis added] from the solar wind by its magnetic field, which deflects most of the charged particles..." If the solar wind is something we need to be protected from, why would a -weaker- solar wind put us in danger, as you seem to be implying? (If the solar wind got -stronger-, more than our magnetosphere could cope with, yes, then there would be danger). Please 'splain. "Although a weakening of the solar wind may not sound very important, the effects of this reduction will have serious implications, diminishing the natural defences of the heliopause (our Solar System’s invisible barrier) which protects us from high energy cosmic rays blasting through intergalactic space…" http://www.universetoday.com/2008/09...at-record-low/ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
SolderSmoke #30: Solar pwr, IRF 510 amp, QST 50, BITX20, rockbound rigs, solar min? | Boatanchors | |||
SolderSmoke #30: Solar pwr, IRF 510 amp, QST 50, BITX20, rockbound rigs, solar min? | Homebrew | |||
DX on 10 meters? Solar min looking like solar max? | Dx | |||
Solar Minimum in 2006? | Shortwave | |||
FA: Swan 350 $15 minimum bid! | Boatanchors |