On Thu, 7 May 2009 12:22:57 -0700 (PDT), z
wrote:

actually, i think it is pretty silly in savage's case. his visit isn't
going to "stir up trouble" any more than his work from the US does, if
any.

where this kind of thing makes sense is with some of the neoNazis,
etc. who, under the guise of "journalism" or "reporting on events" are
in fact involved in planning and executing them. AFAIK, Savage isn't
involved in anything like that; and if his diatribes are "incentives"
to violence or some such, then they're just as incentivizing coming in
via the intertubes from the US, so there's nothing to gain by slamming
the door on him personally.

Exactly he is not preaching hatred or trying to cause violence towards
the Jews or any other minority group. If I am wrong please provide
quotes.

bottom line is, though, that the brits do have the right to run their
country as they want to, without regard to how the US would do it.

two things i particularly enjoy about the uproar, thought:
1) Savage's reference to this violating the Magna Carta. He must have
studied a different copy than I did. Here, Mike: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magna_carta
1a) this being from the same guy who said "Don't tell me they're
entitled to a rational defense, I'm so sick of this" in response to
the decision in Boumediene v. Bush upholding the right of habeas
corpus, no less. Here, Mike: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magna_c...in_force_today
2) His threat of having his listeners boycott Britain from their
future travel plans. Yeah, the total number of passports among
Savage's fan base wouldn't fill a supersized beverage container.

He is the 3rd largest talk show host in America. But it still won't be
much of an affect.

On Thu, 7 May 2009 09:15:44 -0500, "MNMikeW"
wrote:


The liberals always cry foul when the conversation turns to McCarthy
and his black list of KNOWN Communist infiltrators. But notice how
strangly quiet they turn when it's a harmless right wing blowhard that
makes the gub'ment's black list.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Free speech is a one-way street to dopey libs.

I don't support Bush so I guess you would put me into this category.
Trouble is I support the free speech of Michael Savage, Ann Colter,
Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh and all the other right wing hacks.

On Thu, 7 May 2009 13:02:18 -0700 (PDT), "Billary/2009"
wrote:

On May 7, 8:52*am, "(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) Unemployed? No need to
be:
* * * GOOD for the BRITS!!

* * * SMART PEOPLE!!

* * * And -- NO RRR Cult for THEM!!

No one hates like faggots hate. This faggot takes the prize.

What a hypocrite. You go on about how the liberals hate and use
hateful language like that. You make me sick.

In article
,
z wrote:

On May 7, 1:53*am, Telamon
wrote:

What about Savages rights? Some Brit government hack decided they didn't
like him and lumped him in with murders and criminals advocating
violence so banned him from entering the country just because they don't
like what he stands for. That is defamation of character.


not sure what part of the British Bill of Rights gives foreign radio
hosts the right to enter Britain free of challenge. Maybe you could
point me to it.

The Brit hack/spokes-hole lumped Savage in with people that incite
violence and murder. That is defamation.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

On May 7, 3:23*pm, "MNMikeW" wrote:


Are you saying there are no dopy libs in the UK?

they still have a queen, for godsake. we couldn't even deal with a
hereditary bush monarchy.

On May 7, 9:32*pm, Telamon
wrote:

The Brit hack/spokes-hole lumped Savage in with people that incite
violence and murder. That is defamation.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

you'd think he'd be complimented. at last somebody takes him
seriously, ooooh, he's dangerous. stay away from him, girls.

"Seon Ferguson" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 7 May 2009 09:15:44 -0500, "MNMikeW"
wrote:


The liberals always cry foul when the conversation turns to McCarthy
and his black list of KNOWN Communist infiltrators. But notice how
strangly quiet they turn when it's a harmless right wing blowhard that
makes the gub'ment's black list.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Free speech is a one-way street to dopey libs.

I don't support Bush so I guess you would put me into this category.
Trouble is I support the free speech of Michael Savage, Ann Colter,
Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh and all the other right wing hacks.

Absolutely. Our Constitution guarantees freedom of speech and freedom of
expression equally to Rush Limbaugh, Dr. Laura, Reverend Wright, Lyndon
LaRouche and everyone else. This of course includes the right of others to
disagree and to state that they do disagree.

On Fri, 8 May 2009 12:12:54 +0900, "Brenda Ann"
wrote:


Absolutely. Our Constitution guarantees freedom of speech and freedom of
expression equally to Rush Limbaugh, Dr. Laura, Reverend Wright, Lyndon
LaRouche and everyone else. This of course includes the right of others to
disagree and to state that they do disagree.

Or the rights of me to not listen tot hem. Its a pity the UK or
Australia (where I live btw) can't guarantee those rights. Your
countries founding fathers sure knew what they were talking about.

In article
,
z wrote:

On May 7, 9:32*pm, Telamon
wrote:

The Brit hack/spokes-hole lumped Savage in with people that incite
violence and murder. That is defamation.


you'd think he'd be complimented. at last somebody takes him
seriously, ooooh, he's dangerous. stay away from him, girls.

I can only hope you have the same luck then.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

On May 8, 1:07*am, Telamon
wrote:
In article
,

*z wrote:
On May 7, 9:32*pm, Telamon
wrote:

The Brit hack/spokes-hole lumped Savage in with people that incite
violence and murder. That is defamation.

you'd think he'd *be complimented. at last somebody takes him
seriously, ooooh, he's dangerous. stay away from him, girls.

I can only hope you have the same luck then.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

pretty sure that won't happen. that's why i'm here instead of doing
something.