In article
,
z wrote:

On May 7, 1:53*am, Telamon
wrote:

What about Savages rights? Some Brit government hack decided they didn't
like him and lumped him in with murders and criminals advocating
violence so banned him from entering the country just because they don't
like what he stands for. That is defamation of character.


not sure what part of the British Bill of Rights gives foreign radio
hosts the right to enter Britain free of challenge. Maybe you could
point me to it.

The Brit hack/spokes-hole lumped Savage in with people that incite
violence and murder. That is defamation.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

On May 7, 9:32*pm, Telamon
wrote:

The Brit hack/spokes-hole lumped Savage in with people that incite
violence and murder. That is defamation.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

you'd think he'd be complimented. at last somebody takes him
seriously, ooooh, he's dangerous. stay away from him, girls.

In article
,
z wrote:

On May 7, 9:32*pm, Telamon
wrote:

The Brit hack/spokes-hole lumped Savage in with people that incite
violence and murder. That is defamation.


you'd think he'd be complimented. at last somebody takes him
seriously, ooooh, he's dangerous. stay away from him, girls.

I can only hope you have the same luck then.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

On May 8, 1:07*am, Telamon
wrote:
In article
,

*z wrote:
On May 7, 9:32*pm, Telamon
wrote:

The Brit hack/spokes-hole lumped Savage in with people that incite
violence and murder. That is defamation.

you'd think he'd *be complimented. at last somebody takes him
seriously, ooooh, he's dangerous. stay away from him, girls.

I can only hope you have the same luck then.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

pretty sure that won't happen. that's why i'm here instead of doing
something.