![]() |
|
Anti-Savage Nation
British authorities deem radio host Michael Savage the equivalent of
mass-murdering terrorists. http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArti...px?ARTID=34711 The Liberal Fascist thought police HEIL HITLER! |
Anti-Savage Nation
On May 6, 5:05*am, wrote:
British authorities deem radio host Michael Savage the equivalent of mass-murdering terrorists. http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArti...px?ARTID=34711 The Liberal Fascist thought police HEIL HITLER! The liberals always cry foul when the conversation turns to McCarthy and his black list of KNOWN Communist infiltrators. But notice how strangly quiet they turn when it's a harmless right wing blowhard that makes the gub'ment's black list. |
Anti-Savage Nation
Billary/2009 wrote:
On May 6, 5:05 am, wrote: British authorities deem radio host Michael Savage the equivalent of mass-murdering terrorists. http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArti...px?ARTID=34711 The Liberal Fascist thought police HEIL HITLER! The liberals always cry foul when the conversation turns to McCarthy and his black list of KNOWN Communist infiltrators. But notice how strangly quiet they turn when it's a harmless right wing blowhard that makes the gub'ment's black list. Savage spends a lot of time screaming about people he thinks shouldn't be in this country, but he won't give another country the same benefit. Go figure. |
Anti-Savage Nation
On May 6, 6:13*pm, "Mike C." wrote:
Billary/2009 wrote: On May 6, 5:05 am, wrote: British authorities deem radio host Michael Savage the equivalent of mass-murdering terrorists. http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArti...px?ARTID=34711 The Liberal Fascist thought police HEIL HITLER! The liberals always cry foul when the conversation turns to McCarthy and his black list of KNOWN Communist infiltrators. But notice how strangly quiet they turn when it's a harmless right wing blowhard that makes the gub'ment's black list. Savage spends a lot of time screaming about people he thinks shouldn't be in this country, but he won't give another country the same benefit. Go figure. Savage is as real as they come. Unlike that idiot Dobermann or that Dyke Maddowoman. |
Anti-Savage Nation
Billary/2009 wrote:
On May 6, 6:13 pm, "Mike C." wrote: Billary/2009 wrote: On May 6, 5:05 am, wrote: British authorities deem radio host Michael Savage the equivalent of mass-murdering terrorists. http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArti...px?ARTID=34711 The Liberal Fascist thought police HEIL HITLER! The liberals always cry foul when the conversation turns to McCarthy and his black list of KNOWN Communist infiltrators. But notice how strangly quiet they turn when it's a harmless right wing blowhard that makes the gub'ment's black list. Savage spends a lot of time screaming about people he thinks shouldn't be in this country, but he won't give another country the same benefit. Go figure. Savage is as real as they come. Unlike that idiot Dobermann or that Dyke Maddowoman. Whatever that means. Savage is just a loud-mouthed asshole. If that's "real" to you, enjoy. |
Anti-Savage Nation
On May 6, 7:18*pm, "Billary/2009"
wrote: On May 6, 5:05*am, wrote: British authorities deem radio host Michael Savage the equivalent of mass-murdering terrorists. http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArti...px?ARTID=34711 The Liberal Fascist thought police HEIL HITLER! The liberals always cry foul when the conversation turns to McCarthy and his black list of KNOWN Communist infiltrators. But notice how strangly quiet they turn when it's a harmless right wing blowhard that makes the gub'ment's black list. one who happens to have called for the deportation of muslims, members of the ACLU, and anchor babies. gee, i don't recall all the conservatives standing up for human rights at the time. |
Anti-Savage Nation
On May 6, 9:29*pm, "Billary/2009"
wrote: Savage is as real as they come. Unlike that idiot Dobermann or that Dyke Maddowoman so are dog turds! |
Anti-Savage Nation
On May 6, 7:07*pm, z wrote:
On May 6, 7:18*pm, "Billary/2009" wrote: On May 6, 5:05*am, wrote: British authorities deem radio host Michael Savage the equivalent of mass-murdering terrorists. http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArti...px?ARTID=34711 The Liberal Fascist thought police HEIL HITLER! The liberals always cry foul when the conversation turns to McCarthy and his black list of KNOWN Communist infiltrators. But notice how strangly quiet they turn when it's a harmless right wing blowhard that makes the gub'ment's black list. one who happens to have called for the deportation of muslims, members of the ACLU, and anchor babies. gee, i don't recall all the conservatives standing up for human rights at the time. Wrong again hockey puck. I recall GW pushing for "amnesty" for illegals. And protecting America after the gloves came off. I don't agree with Savage. But he is a non-violent person using his 1st amndment right to voice his discontent. McCarthy did the same thing to the Communist didn't he? |
Anti-Savage Nation
In article
, z wrote: On May 6, 9:29*pm, "Billary/2009" wrote: Savage is as real as they come. Unlike that idiot Dobermann or that Dyke Maddowoman so are dog turds! So what do you call this, liberal dog turd logic? I've heard before that the logic liberals employ was not worth a dog's turd but this is the first time I've heard one owe up to it. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Anti-Savage Nation
On Wed, 6 May 2009 16:18:08 -0700 (PDT), "Billary/2009"
wrote: The liberals always cry foul when the conversation turns to McCarthy and his black list of KNOWN Communist infiltrators. But notice how strangly quiet they turn when it's a harmless right wing blowhard that makes the gub'ment's black list. I think both are witch hunts. |
Anti-Savage Nation
On May 6, 5:05*am, wrote:
British authorities deem radio host Michael Savage the equivalent of mass-murdering terrorists. http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArti...px?ARTID=34711 The Liberal Fascist thought police HEIL HITLER! It's their friggin' country. They don't tell us what to do and we don't tell them. Any other rights of theirs that anybody would like to step on? Maybe we should just open our borders to anybody who wants to come in? England's leading by example: They get to decide who comes into their country. Not the US or anybody else. We've got all kinds of Al Qaieda types on the no-fly list. Just imagine if they all decided to sue Homeland Security. -c |
Anti-Savage Nation
In article
, C Gattman wrote: On May 6, 5:05*am, wrote: British authorities deem radio host Michael Savage the equivalent of mass-murdering terrorists. http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArti...px?ARTID=34711 The Liberal Fascist thought police HEIL HITLER! It's their friggin' country. They don't tell us what to do and we don't tell them. Any other rights of theirs that anybody would like to step on? Maybe we should just open our borders to anybody who wants to come in? SNIP What about Savages rights? Some Brit government hack decided they didn't like him and lumped him in with murders and criminals advocating violence so banned him from entering the country just because they don't like what he stands for. That is defamation of character. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Anti-Savage Nation
Billary/2009 wrote:
On May 6, 5:05 am, wrote: British authorities deem radio host Michael Savage the equivalent of mass-murdering terrorists. http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArti...px?ARTID=34711 The Liberal Fascist thought police HEIL HITLER! The liberals always cry foul when the conversation turns to McCarthy and his black list of KNOWN Communist infiltrators. But notice how strangly quiet they turn when it's a harmless right wing blowhard that makes the gub'ment's black list. All the so-called lefties on TV have held their noses and defended Mr. Weiner. Perhaps this is because they realize he is joking and that his audience is a bunch of gullible morons. |
Anti-Savage Nation
Telamon wrote:
In article , C Gattman wrote: On May 6, 5:05 am, wrote: British authorities deem radio host Michael Savage the equivalent of mass-murdering terrorists. http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArti...px?ARTID=34711 The Liberal Fascist thought police HEIL HITLER! It's their friggin' country. They don't tell us what to do and we don't tell them. Any other rights of theirs that anybody would like to step on? Maybe we should just open our borders to anybody who wants to come in? SNIP What about Savages rights? What rights? He's not a British citizen, and his US Constitutional rights to be a scathing ass don't extend past the US borders. Some Brit government hack decided they didn't like him and lumped him in with murders and criminals advocating violence so banned him from entering the country just because they don't like what he stands for. That is defamation of character. So a loudmouth asshole who, yaks on the radio all day attacking people, doesn't like it when he's attacked back. Boo hoo. |
Anti-Savage Nation
Telamon wrote:
In article , C Gattman wrote: On May 6, 5:05 am, wrote: British authorities deem radio host Michael Savage the equivalent of mass-murdering terrorists. http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArti...px?ARTID=34711 The Liberal Fascist thought police HEIL HITLER! It's their friggin' country. They don't tell us what to do and we don't tell them. Any other rights of theirs that anybody would like to step on? Maybe we should just open our borders to anybody who wants to come in? SNIP What about Savages rights? Some Brit government hack decided they didn't like him and lumped him in with murders and criminals advocating violence so banned him from entering the country just because they don't like what he stands for. That is defamation of character. Jacqui Smith is not held in very high regard by the Brits. Mr. Weiner should wear this as a badge of honor. |
Anti-Savage Nation
dave wrote:
Telamon wrote: In article , C Gattman wrote: On May 6, 5:05 am, wrote: British authorities deem radio host Michael Savage the equivalent of mass-murdering terrorists. http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArti...px?ARTID=34711 The Liberal Fascist thought police HEIL HITLER! It's their friggin' country. They don't tell us what to do and we don't tell them. Any other rights of theirs that anybody would like to step on? Maybe we should just open our borders to anybody who wants to come in? SNIP What about Savages rights? Some Brit government hack decided they didn't like him and lumped him in with murders and criminals advocating violence so banned him from entering the country just because they don't like what he stands for. That is defamation of character. Jacqui Smith is not held in very high regard by the Brits. Mr. Weiner should wear this as a badge of honor. I'm sure he's thrilled, this is more publicity than he's received in ages. My guess is that the Brits will end up apologizing all over the place for this, and the right will be able to claim a "victory over oppression and tyranny". |
(OT) : Banning Michael Savage Proves Freedom-of-Speech Is Dead In TheUK
On May 6, 5:05*am, wrote:
- British authorities deem radio host Michael Savage - the equivalent of mass-murdering terrorists. - - http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArti...px?ARTID=34711 - - The Liberal Fascist thought police HEIL HITLER! So the UK Says "No" to Michael Savage : http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/con...8/s2563493.htm Which just helps to Prove that "Freedom of Speech" is Dead in the UK. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...ryId=103819122 Oops . . . but then Michael Savage is Banned on NPR Too ! -?- Has Michael Savage ever been a 'guest' on any NPR Program : The Topic Yes -but- a 'quest' never : Now that is real Fair-and-Balanced. While the the UK Releases "Abu Izzadeen" a know Terrorist Supporter and Instigator of Public Unrest in the UK. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awr8_ODVJ08 http://www.indopia.in/India-usa-uk-n...ational/2/20/2 * Izzadeen convicted of raising Funds for Terrorists and Supporting Terrorism Overseas. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Izzadeen * Izzadeen was shown in a Video Clip provoking Muslims"To Kill Americans". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Ghurabaa * Izzadeenled a radical Islamic Group to storm into the moderate Mosque in central London. http://www.etaiwannews.com/etn/news_...&lang=eng_news So it would seam like Advocating 'Killing Americans" is 'good sport' in the UK -and- Breaking into Mosques is also just 'good sport' in the UK -and- Funding Terrorism in Other Countries is A-OK in the UK http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7paINhyXmk4 - - - but . . . Freedom of Speech THAT'S A NO NO IN THE UK ~ RHF |
(OT) : Banning Michael Savage Proves Freedom-of-Speech Is DeadIn The UK
~ RHF wrote:
- - The Liberal Fascist thought police HEIL HITLER! There is no such thing as a Liberal Fascist. Liberals and fascists are each others' enemies. If you hate liberals you like support fascism. |
Anti-Savage Nation
"Billary/2009" wrote in message ... On May 6, 5:05 am, wrote: British authorities deem radio host Michael Savage the equivalent of mass-murdering terrorists. http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArti...px?ARTID=34711 The Liberal Fascist thought police HEIL HITLER! The liberals always cry foul when the conversation turns to McCarthy and his black list of KNOWN Communist infiltrators. But notice how strangly quiet they turn when it's a harmless right wing blowhard that makes the gub'ment's black list. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Free speech is a one-way street to dopey libs. |
Anti-Savage Nation
England has a large and concentrated Muslim population to deal with that
easily dwarfs anything that exists in the USA or CDA. I would speculate that labeling Mr. Savage in this fashion only serves to contain and placate a smoldering and growing problem on their own soil and in neighboring Europe. I'm in Canada and listen to the Savage show on KFAB 1110 AM for no more than 20" at a time. A lot he has to say is off the wall and the man clearly has little or no respect for his audience. However there is a thread of truth to be found in some of his rants. The news media is more concerned about a H1M1 flu epidemic that hasn't really killed anymore people than an ordinary flu -- yet chooses to downplay or ignore the effect of criminals, weapons and drugs being smuggled north into the US from Mexico and the countless lives jeopardized by these activities. Governments around the world make nice with the Saudis and their Muslim friends to ensure an uninterrupted flow of oil, while numerous wealthy Saudi families continue to fund various terrorist interests without consequence. Mr. Savage is largely the architect of his own grief. Sadly, the really important stuff he occasionally brings to light gets quickly covered back up again by the garbage he spews on air. wrote in message ... British authorities deem radio host Michael Savage the equivalent of mass-murdering terrorists. http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArti...px?ARTID=34711 The Liberal Fascist thought police HEIL HITLER! |
Anti-Savage Nation
On Thu, 7 May 2009 12:22:57 -0700 (PDT), z
wrote: actually, i think it is pretty silly in savage's case. his visit isn't going to "stir up trouble" any more than his work from the US does, if any. where this kind of thing makes sense is with some of the neoNazis, etc. who, under the guise of "journalism" or "reporting on events" are in fact involved in planning and executing them. AFAIK, Savage isn't involved in anything like that; and if his diatribes are "incentives" to violence or some such, then they're just as incentivizing coming in via the intertubes from the US, so there's nothing to gain by slamming the door on him personally. Exactly he is not preaching hatred or trying to cause violence towards the Jews or any other minority group. If I am wrong please provide quotes. bottom line is, though, that the brits do have the right to run their country as they want to, without regard to how the US would do it. two things i particularly enjoy about the uproar, thought: 1) Savage's reference to this violating the Magna Carta. He must have studied a different copy than I did. Here, Mike: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magna_carta 1a) this being from the same guy who said "Don't tell me they're entitled to a rational defense, I'm so sick of this" in response to the decision in Boumediene v. Bush upholding the right of habeas corpus, no less. Here, Mike: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magna_c...in_force_today 2) His threat of having his listeners boycott Britain from their future travel plans. Yeah, the total number of passports among Savage's fan base wouldn't fill a supersized beverage container. He is the 3rd largest talk show host in America. But it still won't be much of an affect. |
Anti-Savage Nation
On Thu, 7 May 2009 09:15:44 -0500, "MNMikeW"
wrote: The liberals always cry foul when the conversation turns to McCarthy and his black list of KNOWN Communist infiltrators. But notice how strangly quiet they turn when it's a harmless right wing blowhard that makes the gub'ment's black list. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Free speech is a one-way street to dopey libs. I don't support Bush so I guess you would put me into this category. Trouble is I support the free speech of Michael Savage, Ann Colter, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh and all the other right wing hacks. |
Anti-Savage Nation
On Thu, 7 May 2009 13:02:18 -0700 (PDT), "Billary/2009"
wrote: On May 7, 8:52*am, "(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) Unemployed? No need to be: * * * GOOD for the BRITS!! * * * SMART PEOPLE!! * * * And -- NO RRR Cult for THEM!! No one hates like faggots hate. This faggot takes the prize. What a hypocrite. You go on about how the liberals hate and use hateful language like that. You make me sick. |
Anti-Savage Nation
In article
, z wrote: On May 7, 1:53*am, Telamon wrote: What about Savages rights? Some Brit government hack decided they didn't like him and lumped him in with murders and criminals advocating violence so banned him from entering the country just because they don't like what he stands for. That is defamation of character. not sure what part of the British Bill of Rights gives foreign radio hosts the right to enter Britain free of challenge. Maybe you could point me to it. The Brit hack/spokes-hole lumped Savage in with people that incite violence and murder. That is defamation. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Anti-Savage Nation
On May 7, 3:23*pm, "MNMikeW" wrote:
Are you saying there are no dopy libs in the UK? they still have a queen, for godsake. we couldn't even deal with a hereditary bush monarchy. |
Anti-Savage Nation
On May 7, 9:32*pm, Telamon
wrote: The Brit hack/spokes-hole lumped Savage in with people that incite violence and murder. That is defamation. -- Telamon Ventura, California you'd think he'd be complimented. at last somebody takes him seriously, ooooh, he's dangerous. stay away from him, girls. |
Anti-Savage Nation
"Seon Ferguson" wrote in message ... On Thu, 7 May 2009 09:15:44 -0500, "MNMikeW" wrote: The liberals always cry foul when the conversation turns to McCarthy and his black list of KNOWN Communist infiltrators. But notice how strangly quiet they turn when it's a harmless right wing blowhard that makes the gub'ment's black list. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Free speech is a one-way street to dopey libs. I don't support Bush so I guess you would put me into this category. Trouble is I support the free speech of Michael Savage, Ann Colter, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh and all the other right wing hacks. Absolutely. Our Constitution guarantees freedom of speech and freedom of expression equally to Rush Limbaugh, Dr. Laura, Reverend Wright, Lyndon LaRouche and everyone else. This of course includes the right of others to disagree and to state that they do disagree. |
Anti-Savage Nation
On Fri, 8 May 2009 12:12:54 +0900, "Brenda Ann"
wrote: Absolutely. Our Constitution guarantees freedom of speech and freedom of expression equally to Rush Limbaugh, Dr. Laura, Reverend Wright, Lyndon LaRouche and everyone else. This of course includes the right of others to disagree and to state that they do disagree. Or the rights of me to not listen tot hem. Its a pity the UK or Australia (where I live btw) can't guarantee those rights. Your countries founding fathers sure knew what they were talking about. |
Anti-Savage Nation
In article
, z wrote: On May 7, 9:32*pm, Telamon wrote: The Brit hack/spokes-hole lumped Savage in with people that incite violence and murder. That is defamation. you'd think he'd be complimented. at last somebody takes him seriously, ooooh, he's dangerous. stay away from him, girls. I can only hope you have the same luck then. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Anti-Savage Nation
On May 8, 1:07*am, Telamon
wrote: In article , *z wrote: On May 7, 9:32*pm, Telamon wrote: The Brit hack/spokes-hole lumped Savage in with people that incite violence and murder. That is defamation. you'd think he'd *be complimented. at last somebody takes him seriously, ooooh, he's dangerous. stay away from him, girls. I can only hope you have the same luck then. -- Telamon Ventura, California pretty sure that won't happen. that's why i'm here instead of doing something. |
Anti-Savage Nation
Brenda Ann wrote:
"Seon Ferguson" wrote in message ... On Thu, 7 May 2009 09:15:44 -0500, "MNMikeW" wrote: The liberals always cry foul when the conversation turns to McCarthy and his black list of KNOWN Communist infiltrators. But notice how strangly quiet they turn when it's a harmless right wing blowhard that makes the gub'ment's black list. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Free speech is a one-way street to dopey libs. I don't support Bush so I guess you would put me into this category. Trouble is I support the free speech of Michael Savage, Ann Colter, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh and all the other right wing hacks. Absolutely. Our Constitution guarantees freedom of speech and freedom of expression equally to Rush Limbaugh, Dr. Laura, Reverend Wright, Lyndon LaRouche and everyone else. This of course includes the right of others to disagree and to state that they do disagree. I even root for Liberals talk radio to survive. |
(OT) : Nations Banning the Entry of Criminals and Terrorists -was-Anti-Savage Nation
On May 7, 9:02*pm, wrote:
On Fri, 8 May 2009 12:12:54 +0900, "Brenda Ann" wrote: "Seon Ferguson" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 7 May 2009 09:15:44 -0500, "MNMikeW" wrote: The liberals always cry foul when the conversation turns to McCarthy and his black list of KNOWN Communist infiltrators. But notice how strangly quiet they turn when it's a harmless right wing blowhard that makes the gub'ment's black list. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Free speech is a one-way street to dopey libs. I don't support Bush so I guess you would put me into this category. Trouble is I support the free speech of Michael Savage, Ann Colter, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh and all the other right wing hacks. Absolutely. *Our Constitution guarantees freedom of speech and freedom of expression equally to Rush Limbaugh, Dr. Laura, Reverend Wright, Lyndon LaRouche and everyone else. This of course includes the right of others to disagree and to state that they do disagree. And yet we have a long list of people we will not give visas to for visits. It's not a freedom of speech issue. It's a border issue. Usually these 'people' are Convicted of a Felony Crime in their own Home Country or on a Known Terrorist Watch List. * Amy Winehouse [Drug Use UK] Banned from the USA * Martha Steward [Lying Under Oath USA] Banned from the UK * Real IRA [Terrorist Bombings UK] Banned from the USA * Tariq Ramadan [Muslim Brotherhood] Banned from the USA * Palestinian Islamic Jihad Members Banned from Canada So One Must Ask What Felony Crime Has Michael Savage Been Convicted Of . . . Oh That's Right "Freedom-of-Speech" as an American Radio Talk Show Host. Once Again Proving "Freedom-of-Speech" is Dead in the UK ~ RHF |
Anti-Savage Nation
Seon Ferguson wrote:
On Fri, 8 May 2009 12:12:54 +0900, "Brenda Ann" wrote: Absolutely. Our Constitution guarantees freedom of speech and freedom of expression equally to Rush Limbaugh, Dr. Laura, Reverend Wright, Lyndon LaRouche and everyone else. This of course includes the right of others to disagree and to state that they do disagree. Until Political Correctness was Born and we created "hate" speech. Now you don't have a right to say anything about those "special" people. Or the rights of me to not listen tot hem. Its a pity the UK or Australia (where I live btw) can't guarantee those rights. Your countries founding fathers sure knew what they were talking about. |
Anti-Savage Nation
On May 8, 8:40*am, "Who i$ John Galt" "Men of the Mind"@Talk-n-
Dog..com wrote: Brenda Ann wrote: "Seon Ferguson" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 7 May 2009 09:15:44 -0500, "MNMikeW" wrote: The liberals always cry foul when the conversation turns to McCarthy and his black list of KNOWN Communist infiltrators. But notice how strangly quiet they turn when it's a harmless right wing blowhard that makes the gub'ment's black list. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Free speech is a one-way street to dopey libs. I don't support Bush so I guess you would put me into this category. Trouble is I support the free speech of Michael Savage, Ann Colter, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh and all the other right wing hacks. Absolutely. *Our Constitution guarantees freedom of speech and freedom of expression equally to Rush Limbaugh, Dr. Laura, Reverend Wright, Lyndon LaRouche and everyone else. This of course includes the right of others to disagree and to state that they do disagree. - I even root for Liberals talk radio to survive. NPR "Liberal" Talk Radio has been Surviving for Decades with your Taxpayer Based Support. |
(OT) : UK Islamic Republic : The United Kingdoms of Saudi Arabia andEngland
On May 7, 4:22*pm, "homepc" wrote:
- England has a large and concentrated Muslim - population to deal with that easily dwarfs anything - that exists in the USA or CDA. The way things are going The UK/England will be the UK Islamic Republic by the End of this Century; with a twist the "UK" will stand for the United Kingdoms of Saudi Arabia and England. * A still Christian Scotland will be Free * A still Christan-Catholic Northern Ireland will be reunited with Catholic {South] Ireland. * The formerly Christian British Royal Family will Marry into the Saudi Royal Family and Convert to Islam; and the Saudis will become the Rulers of the new UK. God {Allah} Save The King - - - of the UK ! it's a new world order 'vision' thingee ~ RHF |
Anti-Savage Nation
wrote in message ... On Fri, 08 May 2009 11:48:03 -0400, "Who i$ John Galt" "Men of the wrote: Seon Ferguson wrote: On Fri, 8 May 2009 12:12:54 +0900, "Brenda Ann" wrote: Absolutely. Our Constitution guarantees freedom of speech and freedom of expression equally to Rush Limbaugh, Dr. Laura, Reverend Wright, Lyndon LaRouche and everyone else. This of course includes the right of others to disagree and to state that they do disagree. Until Political Correctness was Born and we created "hate" speech. Now you don't have a right to say anything about those "special" people. It's funny how the "conservatives' object so to manners and civil decorum and see them as coercive. I mean they're really screaming "I want to be an ass in public! People calling me on it is infringing my freedom". You can say anything you want. You just don't want to be called on it. Amen. It's amazing to me that so much of what is now called "political correctness" was taught to my, and previous, generations as "manners" and "respect for others". When did these become dirty words? |
Anti-Savage Nation
On May 8, 9:32*am, wrote:
On Fri, 08 May 2009 11:48:03 -0400, "Who i$ John Galt" "Men of the wrote: Seon Ferguson wrote: On Fri, 8 May 2009 12:12:54 +0900, "Brenda Ann" wrote: Absolutely. *Our Constitution guarantees freedom of speech and freedom of expression equally to Rush Limbaugh, Dr. Laura, Reverend Wright, Lyndon LaRouche and everyone else. This of course includes the right of others to disagree and to state that they do disagree. Until Political Correctness was Born and we created "hate" speech. Now you don't have a right to say anything about those "special" people. It's funny how the "conservatives' object so to manners and civil decorum and see them as coercive. - I mean they're really screaming - "I want to be an ass in public! - People calling me on it is infringing my freedom". So Freedom-of-Speech ! Is NOT Freedom-of-Speech ? - You can say anything you want. - You just don't want to be called on it. But "I" and 'others' have the Right to Rebut You or simply Walk Away and Disassociate Ourselves from You. Freedom-of-Speech =/= Freedom-Not-To-Have-To-Listen Freedom-of-the-Press =/= Freedom-Not-To-Have-To-Read-It Freedom-of-Association =/= Freedom-Not-To-Associate Freedom-of-Religion =/= Freedom-From-Religion Right-to-Bear-Arms =/= Freedom-Not-To-Own-A-Gun Right-to-Vote =/= Right-Not-To-Vote |
(OT) : Banning Michael Savage Proves Freedom-of-Speech Is Dead InThe UK
On May 7, 5:45Â*am, "~ RHF" wrote:
On May 6, 5:05Â*am, wrote: - British authorities deem radio host Michael Savage - the equivalent of mass-murdering terrorists. - -http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=34711 - - The Liberal Fascist thought police HEIL HITLER! So the UK Says "No" to Michael Savage :http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/con...8/s2563493.htm Which just helps to Prove that "Freedom of Speech" is Dead in the UK.http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...ryId=103819122 Oops . . . but then Michael Savage is Banned on NPR Too ! -?- Has Michael Savage ever been a 'guest' on any NPR Program : The Topic Yes -but- a 'quest' never : Now that is real Fair-and-Balanced. While the the UK Releases "Abu Izzadeen" a know Terrorist Supporter and Instigator of Public Unrest in the UK.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awr8_...192/Internatio... * Izzadeen convicted of raising Funds for Terrorists and Supporting Terrorism Overseas.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Izzadeen * Izzadeen was shown in a Video Clip provoking Muslims"To Kill Americans".http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Ghurabaa * Izzadeenled a radical Islamic Group to storm into the moderate Mosque in central London.http://www.etaiwannews.com/etn/news_...91〈=eng_news So it would seam like Advocating 'Killing Americans" is 'good sport' in the UK -and- Breaking into Mosques is also just 'good sport' in the UK -and- Funding Terrorism in Other Countries is A-OK in the UKhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7paINhyXmk4 - - - but . . . Freedom of Speech THAT'S A NO NO IN THE UK ~ RHF Â*. Â*. Mayor of London says the Home Secretary's decision to put Michael Savage on a Banned List makes the UK look infantile and pathetic http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2...michael-savage |
(OT) : Banning Michael Savage Proves Freedom-of-Speech Is Dead...
Why doesn't the UK BAN the Usurper? The Usurper is/was/still is a UK POS
when he was born in Kenya! cuhulin |
(OT) : Banning Michael Savage Proves Freedom-of-Speech Is Dead ...
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:42 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com