We think it is and that it has long been planned and, for that matter,
rather openly proclaimed since way back during the presidential
campaign. Michelle Malkin has been concerned for some time and here
[link below] is her latest (with some good links) on what may be an
impending disaster for talk radio. - Milt Rosenberg, WGN Radio

Fairness Doctrine Watch: The FCC’s “Diversity Panel”

http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/04...versity-panel/

On Sat, 09 May 2009 12:35:17 -0700, obamao.sux.donki.dixsss wrote:

We think it is and that it has long been planned and, for that matter,
rather openly proclaimed since way back during the presidential
campaign. Michelle Malkin has been concerned for some time and here
[link below] is her latest (with some good links) on what may be an
impending disaster for talk radio. - Milt Rosenberg, WGN Radio



would be pretty funny to take the only tool the republican't party has
over it's lemmings, childish name calling.

Ru$h LimpBalls would be out-a a job!

Without FUD for the republican't party to use to control it's
lemmings, they will be forced to come up with real ideas

In article ,
who are you? wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2009 12:35:17 -0700, obamao.sux.donki.dixsss wrote:

We think it is and that it has long been planned and, for that matter,
rather openly proclaimed since way back during the presidential
campaign. Michelle Malkin has been concerned for some time and here
[link below] is her latest (with some good links) on what may be an
impending disaster for talk radio. - Milt Rosenberg, WGN Radio



would be pretty funny to take the only tool the republican't party has
over it's lemmings, childish name calling.

Yeah, Americans losing their free speech rights would be hilarious.

I think we should start with you.

Ru$h LimpBalls would be out-a a job!

You would have nothing whine about.

Without FUD for the republican't party to use to control it's
lemmings, they will be forced to come up with real ideas

This from a KooK-aid drinking lefty.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

On Sat, 09 May 2009 16:00:37 -0700, Telamon wrote:

In article ,
who are you? wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2009 12:35:17 -0700, obamao.sux.donki.dixsss wrote:


would be pretty funny to take the only tool the republican't party has
over it's lemmings, childish name calling.

Yeah, Americans losing their free speech rights would be hilarious.

I think we should start with you.

Anybody was able to say anything they wanted before and after the
Fairness Doctrine was repealed. The reason for the reinstatement is that
with all the rich republican'ts owning all the media outlets, fat dumb
sausage suckers (like Ru$h and Beck) spewing an acid bath of hate that is
being presented as the only fact.

Without the Fairness Doctrine, your only hearing one side of the issue...
Theirs! And, if your only hearing their side, it's probably NOT in your
favor.

Republican't attitude...
**** you! I'm right and you don't need to know more


Without FUD for the republican't party to use to control it's lemmings,
they will be forced to come up with real ideas

In article ,
who are you? wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2009 16:00:37 -0700, Telamon wrote:

In article ,
who are you? wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2009 12:35:17 -0700, obamao.sux.donki.dixsss wrote:


would be pretty funny to take the only tool the republican't party has
over it's lemmings, childish name calling.

Yeah, Americans losing their free speech rights would be hilarious.

I think we should start with you.

Anybody was able to say anything they wanted before and after the
Fairness Doctrine was repealed.

SNIP

Baloney, people reading this news group were not born yesterday. I
remember the way things were before and after the "unfairness doctrine"
was enforced. For some reason you got the left point of view and that
was it. I could not stand listening to talk radio with the liberals in
control as a right wringer calling in would get shouted down by the
host. Basically people that called in got the same treatment from the
hosts as the liberal assholes that spew their crap on Usenet do here
today. The same old liberal lying crap said over and over like that will
make it true. Well keep dreaming that the "unfairness doctrine" will
make a comeback as it is the only chance you got to fool people into
believing the liberal lie.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

On Sat, 09 May 2009 22:31:24 -0700, Telamon wrote:

In article ,
who are you? wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2009 16:00:37 -0700, Telamon wrote:

In article ,
who are you? wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2009 12:35:17 -0700, obamao.sux.donki.dixsss wrote:


would be pretty funny to take the only tool the republican't party
has over it's lemmings, childish name calling.

Yeah, Americans losing their free speech rights would be hilarious.

I think we should start with you.

Anybody was able to say anything they wanted before and after the
Fairness Doctrine was repealed.

SNIP

Baloney, people reading this news group were not born yesterday. I
remember the way things were before and after the "unfairness doctrine"
was enforced.
snip unrelated biased opinion

O yea?!

early in mass coommmunications, Talkshows and call-ins were rare but
viewpoint programs were not. In radio and TV, there were people with
timers to make sure different viewpoints were equally represented, at
least by equality in time. Perhaps there were mistakes by not having a
fully qualified guest making the response for one side or another but
never-the-less, there WAS a response and the audience was not left with
the impression that the host of the "show" was "the authority".

What we have today are groups of people who follow what they like to hear
and believe as fact, most anything said by the program moderator. There
is little if no confirmation of facts and the program host will let the
audience conjecture bogus attitudes on a subject or person when the basis
of the subject is truly unfounded.

With a fairness doctrine, no individual will loose any civil rights.
If you feel differently, please explain.

The only people I feel will loose (financially but not civilly) are the
corporations who own all the media outlets. Their gain (by keeping the
public in the dark) is simply your lose to make educated opinion or
judgment.

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
who are you? wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2009 16:00:37 -0700, Telamon wrote:

In article ,
who are you? wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2009 12:35:17 -0700, obamao.sux.donki.dixsss wrote:

would be pretty funny to take the only tool the republican't party has
over it's lemmings, childish name calling.
Yeah, Americans losing their free speech rights would be hilarious.

I think we should start with you.
Anybody was able to say anything they wanted before and after the
Fairness Doctrine was repealed.

SNIP

Baloney, people reading this news group were not born yesterday. I
remember the way things were before and after the "unfairness doctrine"
was enforced. For some reason you got the left point of view and that
was it. I could not stand listening to talk radio with the liberals in
control as a right wringer calling in would get shouted down by the
host. Basically people that called in got the same treatment from the
hosts as the liberal assholes that spew their crap on Usenet do here
today. The same old liberal lying crap said over and over like that will
make it true. Well keep dreaming that the "unfairness doctrine" will
make a comeback as it is the only chance you got to fool people into
believing the liberal lie.


What ARE you talking about? Give a concrete example. Hell, Limbaugh
started during the era of the Fairness Doctrine. What about Joe Pyne?
Morton Downey Junior? Wally George? etc?

On May 9, 3:27*pm, who are you? wrote

would be pretty funny to take the only tool the republican't party has
over it's lemmings, childish name calling.

Ru$h LimpBalls would be out-a a job!

* *Without FUD for the republican't party to use to control it's
lemmings, they will be forced to come up with real ideas

HEIL 0baMa0 HITLER!!!!

On May 9, 1:27*pm, who are you? wrote:
On Sat, 09 May 2009 12:35:17 -0700, obamao.sux.donki.dixsss wrote:
We think it is and that it has long been planned and, for that matter,
rather openly proclaimed since way back during the presidential
campaign. Michelle Malkin has been concerned for some time and here
[link below] is her latest (with some good links) on what may be an
impending disaster for talk radio. - Milt Rosenberg, WGN Radio

would be pretty funny to take the only tool the republican't party has
over it's lemmings, childish name calling.

Ru$h LimpBalls would be out-a a job!

* *Without FUD for the republican't party to use to control it's
lemmings, they will be forced to come up with real ideas

WAY - Speaking of 'childish name calling'
* 'lemmings'
* 'Ru$h LimpBalls'

- - - = = = RHF's Canned Reply 'Rant' = = = - - -
[: To Liberal-Fascist Name Calling :]
ROTFL - You Know When You Are Winning An Argument :
When a Super-Smart 'Enlightened" Liberal Starts Name Calling*.
* They Lose Their Ability To Think And Get Emotional - rotfl ~ RHF
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...8979fbe8546cfa

On Sat, 09 May 2009 23:03:56 -0700, ~ RHF wrote:

On May 9, 1:27Â*pm, who are you? wrote:
On Sat, 09 May 2009 12:35:17 -0700, obamao.sux.donki.dixsss wrote:
We think it is and that it has long been planned and, for that
matter, rather openly proclaimed since way back during the
presidential campaign. Michelle Malkin has been concerned for some
time and here [link below] is her latest (with some good links) on
what may be an impending disaster for talk radio. - Milt Rosenberg,
WGN Radio

would be pretty funny to take the only tool the republican't party has
over it's lemmings, childish name calling.

Ru$h LimpBalls would be out-a a job!

Â* Â*Without FUD for the republican't party to use to control it's
lemmings, they will be forced to come up with real ideas

WAY - Speaking of 'childish name calling' * 'lemmings'
* 'Ru$h LimpBalls'


sigh I was doing my part to communicate with your type :-)