wrote:
0baMa0 will purposefully legislate the radio industry into bankruptcy.
Why bother?
As with the banks, insurance companies and automobile companies, they
will then takeover every radio station in the U.S. Then they will set
their sites on the internet. Kiss your Free Speech goodbye! It will
be Liberal Fascist Propaganda 24 hours a day 7 days a week on every
media outlet everywhere.

FREEDOM ISN'T FREE - FIGHT BACK http://www.unfairair.org
The advertisers are withdrawing commercials, which is cutting the
incomes of newspapers, TV, and radio. Sure they can put ads on the web,
but who bothers looking at them? If you wanna buy something, and
actually have some money, you comparison shop.

Free speech has long been drowned out by paid for corporate speech. It
will be nice to see what citizens, like yourself, have to say for a change.

Genaro wrote:
On May 9, 6:47 pm, dave wrote:

The airwaves belong to everyone and cannot be used to create a poisonous
political atmosphere. Licensees have an obligation to serve the public
interest.

-------
Then let the public decide what is in their best interest.

That is precisely why broadcast media needs to be more down the middle.
People cannot make informed decisions if all they hear is propaganda.

When I was a kid, EVERY radio station did regular newscasts, (at least
one an hour).

(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) Unemployed? No need to be:
www.LayoffRemedy.com wrote:
On Sat, 09 May 2009 15:57:53 -0700, Telamon
wrote:


I expect we are going to get the "fairness doctrine" shoved
down out throats in the near future but it will be called something
else.

CLUE, Mindless Loser -- FAIRNESS *cannot** be FORCED
upon anyone any more than any FREEDOM can

For public airwaves to be ABUSED to give ONE-sided and
BIGOTED views -- as FAUX News has been doing. is UNfair.

Fox News is a cable channel. The big scary fairness doctrine only
applies to wireless broadcast, e.g. radio and TV stations..

"dave" wrote in message
m...
(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) Unemployed? No need to be: www.LayoffRemedy.com
wrote:
On Sat, 09 May 2009 15:57:53 -0700, Telamon
wrote:


I expect we are going to get the "fairness doctrine" shoved down out
throats in the near future but it will be called something else.

CLUE, Mindless Loser -- FAIRNESS *cannot** be FORCED
upon anyone any more than any FREEDOM can

For public airwaves to be ABUSED to give ONE-sided and BIGOTED
views -- as FAUX News has been doing. is UNfair.

Fox News is a cable channel. The big scary fairness doctrine only applies
to wireless broadcast, e.g. radio and TV stations..

Hardly matters -- that's Rush's backyard and you know how the dittoheads
circle to protect their queen pig...

Jim

On May 9, 5:47*pm, dave wrote:
wrote:

ery

media outlet everywhere.

The airwaves belong to everyone and cannot be used to create a poisonous
political atmosphere. *Licensees have an obligation to serve the public
interest.

"Poisonous" as defined by whom? Little Liberal Fascist Diktators in
your local Hitlery "It Takes A Village"?
There is no better way to determine satisfaction of a licensees
obligation of serving the public than the Public actually listening.
Through which the radio station gains its Market Share Rating and
allows the station to make enough advertizing revenue to continue
opperating. If Free Market Capitalism (you and me consuming radio
product) is not allowed to operate than WHO/WHAT will decide which
stations continue to operate? A Politician? An 0baMa0 appointed
Liberal Fascist/Neo-Communist? Kiss your freedom goodbye. And
Dr.DaviD, you can kiss my ass!

Newspapers can print whatever they like, because anybody can start a
newspaper. *Spectrum is a finite commodity. *They cannot be coralled and
used to further political objectives of the capital class to the
detriment of everyone else.

Ah yes! A typical Liberal Fascist explaination. The "Capital Class".
As if that excludes everyone except rich as defined by 0baMaoists -
bwaHAHAHAHAHA!
Yes, Dr.DaviD - Heil 0baMao Hitler - our great leader will decide what
is good for every single individual Serf. **** OFF YOU LIL'NEO-COMMIE
IMBECILE!

On May 9, 7:58*pm, dave wrote:
Genaro wrote:
On May 9, 6:47 pm, dave wrote:
The airwaves belong to everyone and cannot be used to create a poisonous
political atmosphere. *Licensees have an obligation to serve the public
interest.

-------
Then let the public decide what is in their best interest.

That is precisely why broadcast media needs to be more down the middle.

Ja, let Heil 0baMa0 Hitler decide what is "down the middle" instead of
Free Market Consumers - (me and you)

* People cannot make informed decisions if all they hear is propaganda.

or go to public schools and be taught Liberal fascist Neo-Communist
PROPAGANDA LIES from K to PhD! Right IMBECILE Dr.DaviD,PhD?

When I was a kid, EVERY radio station did regular newscasts, (at least
one an hour).

Ooooh - Dr.DaviD can taste the Liberal Fascist power - HEIL HITLER!!!!

On May 9, 3:27*pm, who are you? wrote

would be pretty funny to take the only tool the republican't party has
over it's lemmings, childish name calling.

Ru$h LimpBalls would be out-a a job!

* *Without FUD for the republican't party to use to control it's
lemmings, they will be forced to come up with real ideas

HEIL 0baMa0 HITLER!!!!

On Sat, 09 May 2009 16:00:37 -0700, Telamon wrote:

In article ,
who are you? wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2009 12:35:17 -0700, obamao.sux.donki.dixsss wrote:


would be pretty funny to take the only tool the republican't party has
over it's lemmings, childish name calling.

Yeah, Americans losing their free speech rights would be hilarious.

I think we should start with you.

Anybody was able to say anything they wanted before and after the
Fairness Doctrine was repealed. The reason for the reinstatement is that
with all the rich republican'ts owning all the media outlets, fat dumb
sausage suckers (like Ru$h and Beck) spewing an acid bath of hate that is
being presented as the only fact.

Without the Fairness Doctrine, your only hearing one side of the issue...
Theirs! And, if your only hearing their side, it's probably NOT in your
favor.

Republican't attitude...
**** you! I'm right and you don't need to know more


Without FUD for the republican't party to use to control it's lemmings,
they will be forced to come up with real ideas

In article ,
who are you? wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2009 16:00:37 -0700, Telamon wrote:

In article ,
who are you? wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2009 12:35:17 -0700, obamao.sux.donki.dixsss wrote:


would be pretty funny to take the only tool the republican't party has
over it's lemmings, childish name calling.

Yeah, Americans losing their free speech rights would be hilarious.

I think we should start with you.

Anybody was able to say anything they wanted before and after the
Fairness Doctrine was repealed.

SNIP

Baloney, people reading this news group were not born yesterday. I
remember the way things were before and after the "unfairness doctrine"
was enforced. For some reason you got the left point of view and that
was it. I could not stand listening to talk radio with the liberals in
control as a right wringer calling in would get shouted down by the
host. Basically people that called in got the same treatment from the
hosts as the liberal assholes that spew their crap on Usenet do here
today. The same old liberal lying crap said over and over like that will
make it true. Well keep dreaming that the "unfairness doctrine" will
make a comeback as it is the only chance you got to fool people into
believing the liberal lie.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

On May 9, 1:27*pm, who are you? wrote:
On Sat, 09 May 2009 12:35:17 -0700, obamao.sux.donki.dixsss wrote:
We think it is and that it has long been planned and, for that matter,
rather openly proclaimed since way back during the presidential
campaign. Michelle Malkin has been concerned for some time and here
[link below] is her latest (with some good links) on what may be an
impending disaster for talk radio. - Milt Rosenberg, WGN Radio

would be pretty funny to take the only tool the republican't party has
over it's lemmings, childish name calling.

Ru$h LimpBalls would be out-a a job!

* *Without FUD for the republican't party to use to control it's
lemmings, they will be forced to come up with real ideas

WAY - Speaking of 'childish name calling'
* 'lemmings'
* 'Ru$h LimpBalls'

- - - = = = RHF's Canned Reply 'Rant' = = = - - -
[: To Liberal-Fascist Name Calling :]
ROTFL - You Know When You Are Winning An Argument :
When a Super-Smart 'Enlightened" Liberal Starts Name Calling*.
* They Lose Their Ability To Think And Get Emotional - rotfl ~ RHF
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...8979fbe8546cfa