David Eduardo wrote:

"PocketRadio" wrote in message
...
�.

You're the HD Radio-shill that wants to destroy analog, with HD
Radio's adjacent-chennel interference.

The issue with HD is not that particular technical aspect... there is no
listening to adjacents in the primary signal contours of closer-by
stations. "Interference" is a relative term... there is really no
interference if no listening is being disturbed.

The analog carrier is an adjacent station that is often messed up by the
IBOC.

On May 15, 3:30�am, none ""root\"@(none)" wrote:
David Eduardo wrote:

"PocketRadio" wrote in message
....
.

You're the HD Radio-shill that wants to destroy analog, with HD
Radio's adjacent-chennel interference.

The issue with HD is not that particular technical aspect... there is no
listening to adjacents in the primary signal contours of closer-by
stations. "Interference" is a relative term... there is really no
interference if no listening is being disturbed.

The analog carrier is an adjacent station that is often messed up by the
IBOC.

Good point - self-interference.

In article
,
PocketRadio wrote:

On May 15, 3:30?am, none ""root\"@(none)" wrote:
David Eduardo wrote:

"PocketRadio" wrote in message
...
.

You're the HD Radio-shill that wants to destroy analog, with HD
Radio's adjacent-chennel interference.

The issue with HD is not that particular technical aspect... there is no
listening to adjacents in the primary signal contours of closer-by
stations. "Interference" is a relative term... there is really no
interference if no listening is being disturbed.

The analog carrier is an adjacent station that is often messed up by the
IBOC.

Good point - self-interference.

KFI is back to trashing their own signal at night and the audio high end
is compromised at all times.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

On May 15, 7:51�pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article
,





�PocketRadio wrote:
On May 15, 3:30?am, none ""root\"@(none)" wrote:
David Eduardo wrote:

"PocketRadio" wrote in message
...
.

You're the HD Radio-shill that wants to destroy analog, with HD
Radio's adjacent-chennel interference.

The issue with HD is not that particular technical aspect... there is no
listening to adjacents in the primary signal contours of closer-by
stations. "Interference" is a relative term... there is really no
interference if no listening is being disturbed.

The analog carrier is an adjacent station that is often messed up by the
IBOC.

Good point - self-interference.

KFI is back to trashing their own signal at night and the audio high end
is compromised at all times.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

What gives? Trying to destoy analog to force digital adoption?
Thinking that destroying adjacents will give them more ad revenues,
then force us Soviet Union style to have to listen to local stations
only?

On May 15, 7:51�pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article
,





�PocketRadio wrote:
On May 15, 3:30?am, none ""root\"@(none)" wrote:
David Eduardo wrote:

"PocketRadio" wrote in message
...
.

You're the HD Radio-shill that wants to destroy analog, with HD
Radio's adjacent-chennel interference.

The issue with HD is not that particular technical aspect... there is no
listening to adjacents in the primary signal contours of closer-by
stations. "Interference" is a relative term... there is really no
interference if no listening is being disturbed.

The analog carrier is an adjacent station that is often messed up by the
IBOC.

Good point - self-interference.

KFI is back to trashing their own signal at night and the audio high end
is compromised at all times.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

**** the Big Boys - I can't wait for all of them to go under!

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article


KFI is back to trashing their own signal at night and the audio high end
is compromised at all times.


And it remains a top 5 radio station...

In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article


KFI is back to trashing their own signal at night and the audio high end
is compromised at all times.


And it remains a top 5 radio station...

If they remain in the top 5 it will not be because of their wonderful
signal.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

"David Eduardo" wrote in message
news

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article


KFI is back to trashing their own signal at night and the audio high end
is compromised at all times.


And it remains a top 5 radio station...

Doesn't that disprove your statement about people not listening to stations
that are not perfectly clean and clear?

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article


KFI is back to trashing their own signal at night and the audio high
end
is compromised at all times.


And it remains a top 5 radio station...

If they remain in the top 5 it will not be because of their wonderful
signal.

Listening outside the LA market does not make any difference to them.

"Brenda Ann" wrote in message
...

"David Eduardo" wrote in message
news

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article


KFI is back to trashing their own signal at night and the audio high end
is compromised at all times.


And it remains a top 5 radio station...

Doesn't that disprove your statement about people not listening to
stations that are not perfectly clean and clear?


No, it does not. KFI sounds very clean and clear in its home market.

The NRSC research, headed by none other than Bob Orban, proved that a
bandwidth of up to around 6 kHz was ideal given today's receivers, and
anything more caused deterioration in the audio. The NRSC used a large
sample of average listeners using a variety of consumer radios.